Decision-making for extremely preterm infants with severe hemorrhages on head ultrasound: Science, values, and communication skills.

Severe intracranial hemorrhages are not rare in extremely preterm infants. They occur early, generally when babies require life-sustaining interventions. This may lead to ethical discussions and decision-making about levels of care. Prognosis is variable and depends on the extent, location, and laterality of the lesions, and, importantly also on the subsequent occurrence of other clinical complications or progressive ventricular dilatation. Decision-making should depend on prognosis and parental values. This article will review prognosis and the uncertainty of outcomes for different lesions and provide an outline of ways to conduct an ethically appropriate discussion on the decision of whether to continue life sustaining therapy. It is possible to communicate in a compassionate and honest way with parents and engage in decision-making, focussing on personalized information and decisions, and on function, as opposed to diagnosis.

A tiny baby intubation team improves endotracheal intubation success rate but decreases residents' training opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the educational and clinical impact of a tiny baby intubation team (TBIT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing endotracheal intubation (ETI) performed: pre-implementation of a TBIT (T1), 6 months post-implementation (T2), and 4 years post-implementation (T3). RESULTS: Post-implementation (T2), first-attempt success rate in tiny babies increased (44% T1; 59% T2, p = 0.04; 56% T3, p = NS) and the proportion of ETIs performed by residents decreased (53% T1; 37% T2, p = 0.001; 45% T3, p = NS). After an educational quality improvement intervention (prioritizing non-tiny baby ETIs to residents, systematic simulation training and ETI using videolaryngoscopy), in T3 residents' overall (67% T1; 60% T2, p = NS; 79% T3, p = 0.02) and non-tiny baby ETI success rate improved (72% T1; 60% T2, p = NS; 82% T3, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A TBIT improves success rate of ETIs in ELBW infants but decreases educational exposure of residents. Educational strategies may help maintain resident procedural competency without impacting on quality of care.

Neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia: Observations in a large Canadian population and determinants of death and/or brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Birth asphyxia in term neonates remains a serious condition that causes significant mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae despite hypothermia treatment. The objective of this study was to review therapeutic hypothermia practices in a large population of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) across Canada and to identify determinants of adverse outcome. METHODS: Our retrospective observational cohort study examined neonates≥36 weeks, admitted to the Canadian Neonatal Network NICUs between 2010 and 2014, diagnosed with HIE, and treated with hypothermia. Adverse outcome was defined as death and/or brain injury. Maternal, birth, and postnatal characteristics were compared between neonates with adverse outcome and those without. The association between the variables which were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two groups and adverse outcome were further tested, while adjusting for gestational age, birth weight, gender, and initial severity of encephalopathy. RESULTS: A total of 2187 neonates were admitted for HIE; 52% were treated with hypothermia and 40% developed adverse outcome. Initial severity of encephalopathy (moderate, p = 0.006; severe, p < 0.0001), hypotension treated with inotropes (p = 0.001), and renal failure (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with an increased risk of death and/or brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: In asphyxiated neonates treated with hypothermia, not only their initial severity of encephalopathy on admission, but also their cardiac and renal complications during the first days after birth were significantly associated with risk of death and/or brain injury. Careful monitoring and cautious management of these complications is warranted.

Norepinephrine infusion improves haemodynamics in the preterm infants during septic shock.

AIM: This study evaluated the clinical and haemodynamic effects of norepinephrine infusion in preterm infants. METHODS: The effects of norepinephrine therapy for refractory hypotension were evaluated in preterm infants between April 2009 and April 2011 at the neonatal intensive care unit of Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec. Changes in haemodynamics and clinical parameters were analysed eight hours before and eight hours after the start of norepinephrine infusion, and eight hours after its cessation. RESULTS: During the study, 30 preterm infants at a mean gestational age of 26.5 ± 2.6 weeks (median: 25.7, 23.4-34) and birthweight of 903 ± 437 g (median 827, 450-2550) received norepinephrine infusion for neonatal septic shock. After eight hours of treatment, mean blood pressure, urine output and FiO2 significantly improved. Eight hours after cessation of norepinephrine infusion, the number of patients treated with other inotropes decreased significantly, 24 patients (80%) had normal mean blood pressure and 27 patients (90%) had normal urine output. CONCLUSION: Norepinephrine therapy could be considered to improve blood pressure and urine output during neonatal septic shock in preterm infants. Further studies are needed to prove the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine infusion in neonates.

The Lacuna Trial: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial of lactoferrin supplementation in the very preterm infant.

OBJECTIVE: To determine tolerability of bovine lactoferrin (bLF) in very preterm infants, and whether the intervention can be adequately masked. STUDY DESIGN: In a single-center masked pilot trial infants under 31 weeks gestation were randomized before 48 h of age to receive milk with 100 mg per day of bLF or control. The primary outcome was feeding tolerance, defined as time to achieve full feeds (140 ml kg(-1) per day). Parents answered a short questionnaire regarding acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-nine infants were enrolled and analyzed according to intention to treat. There was no effect of bLF on the primary outcome. In addition, mortality, late onset sepsis and other complications of prematurity were no different. Equal numbers of parents in both groups believed their infant received bLF. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that bLF is well tolerated, easy to administer and its presence in prepared milk is not evident. Trial registration number ISRCTN66482337.

Preventing postnatal growth restriction in infants with birthweight less than 1300 g.

AIM: To examine nutritional and growth outcomes in very preterm infants with a birthweight (BW) of ≤1300 g before and after the introduction of enhanced enteral and parenteral nutrition protocols. METHODS: A comparison of two historical cohorts. RESULTS: There were 153 infants in cohort 1 and 118 in cohort 2. A total of 19% were growth restricted at birth in both cohorts. Feeds advanced more quickly in cohort 2, with decreased duration of central lines and TPN; breastmilk fortification occurred sooner. Calorie and protein intakes were increased during all of the first 14 days of life. Adverse clinical outcomes were unchanged, including NEC. The proportion of infants discharged <10th percentile of expected weight, decreased from 23% to 9%. In cohort 2, the z-score for body weight decreased by 0.39, compared to an average 1.03 in cohort 1 (p < 0.001). Head circumference and body weight were also significantly improved at discharge (p < 0.01), but length was improved to a lesser degree. CONCLUSION: Early and enhanced postnatal intravenous and enteral feeding can provide good postnatal growth among very immature infants without adverse effects. Calorie and particularly protein intake in early life could probably be further optimised.

Management of hypotension in preterm infants (The HIP Trial): a randomised controlled trial of hypotension management in extremely low gestational age newborns.

BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm babies (delivered at <28 completed weeks of gestation) are frequently diagnosed with hypotension and treated with inotropic and pressor drugs in the immediate postnatal period. Dopamine is the most commonly used first-line drug. Babies who are treated for hypotension more frequently sustain brain injury, have long-term disability or die compared to those who are not. Despite the widespread use of drugs to treat hypotension in such infants, evidence for efficacy is lacking, and the effect of these agents on long-term outcomes is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: In extremely preterm babies, restricting the use of dopamine when mean blood pressure (BP) values fall below a nominal threshold and using clinical criteria to determine escalation of support ('restricted' approach) will result in improved neonatal and longer-term developmental outcomes. RESEARCH PLAN: In an international multi-centre randomised trial, 830 infants born at <28 weeks of gestation, and within 72 h of birth, will be allocated to 1 of 2 alternative treatment options (dopamine vs. restricted approach) to determine the better strategy for the management of BP, using a conventional threshold to commence treatment. The first co-primary outcome of survival without brain injury will be determined at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and the second co-primary outcome (survival without neurodevelopmental disability) will be assessed at 2 years of age, corrected for prematurity. DISCUSSION: It is essential that appropriately designed trials be performed to define the most appropriate management strategies for managing low BP in extremely preterm babies.

Intestinal absorption of lipid emulsion in premature infants: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate nutritional intake is essential in the very-low-birth-weight infant, but difficult to achieve in the first few postnatal days. Can lipids be given enterally in the first few days of life in sick preterm infants? OBJECTIVE: To determine tolerance and absorption of lipid emulsion when fed enterally to very-low-birth-weight infants. DESIGN/METHODS: Infants had a birth weight <1,500 g, an appropriate weight for gestational age, and were receiving parenteral nutrition. We performed a progressive series of studies, enrolling 5 infants in each group. Group 1 infants were fed enteral lipid emulsion at 1 g/kg/day for 4 days, starting when 60 ml/kg/day of breast milk was tolerated enterally. Simultaneously, a matched control group which received no oral lipid emulsion was enrolled. We then enrolled group 2 infants who were fed 3 g/kg/day with the same protocol as group 1. Group 3 infants were fed enteral lipid emulsion starting in the first 72 h of life. The infants were fed 1, 2 and 3 g/kg/day subsequently for 48 h each. Fat absorption was measured. RESULTS: Gestational age was 24.6-30.8 weeks and birth weight was 620-1,400 g. One infant (group 1) developed necrotizing enterocolitis 1 week after the study. There were no other adverse clinical findings. On average, enteral lipid emulsion was started on day 8 of life in groups 1 and 2, and on day 2 in group 3. The intestinal lipid absorption was 93.6% (min. = 76%). There was no difference in fat absorption between the 4 groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lipid emulsions are an isotonic high-calorie source which can be given safely enterally instead of intravenously in the immediate neonatal period of very-low-birth-weight infants without clinical adverse effects and with almost complete absorption. There are potential advantages to oral administration of a lipid emulsion starting in early life which require further investigation.

Permissive hypotension in the extremely low birthweight infant with signs of good perfusion.

INTRODUCTION: Many practitioners routinely treat infants whose mean arterial blood pressure in mm Hg is less than their gestational age in weeks (GA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of utilising a combined approach of clinical signs, metabolic acidosis and absolute blood pressure (BP) values when deciding to treat hypotension in the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infant. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all live born ELBW infants admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit over a 4-year period. Patients were grouped as either normotensive (BP never less than GA), hypotensive and not treated (BP

Evaluation and treatment of hypotension in the preterm infant.

A large proportion of very preterm infants receive treatment for hypotension. The definition of hypotension is unclear, and, currently, there is no evidence that treating it improves outcomes or, indeed, which treatment to choose among the available alternatives. Assessment of circulatory adequacy of the preterm infant requires a careful clinical assessment and may also require ancillary investigations. The most commonly used interventions, fluid boluses and dopamine, are problematic: fluid boluses are statistically associated with worse clinical outcomes and may not even increase blood pressure, whereas dopamine increases blood pressure mostly by causing vasoconstriction and may decrease perfusion. For neither intervention is there any reliable data showing clinical benefit. Prospective trials of intervention for hypotension and circulatory compromise are urgently required.

Nobody likes premies: the relative value of patients' lives.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether patient selection or triage requires placing a relative value on human lives and whether the values placed on these lives are consistent with current ethical theories. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous questionnaire was administered to groups of physicians and students in Montreal. It presented eight currently incompetent patients with potential neurological sequelae requiring emergency care. Predicted outcomes were explicitly described. Four patients had a predicted 50% survival and a 50% chance of impairment; they were a preterm and a term neonate, a 2-month-old and a 50-year-old. Two already disabled patients, a 7-year-old and an 80-year-old, had 50% predicted survival. A 14-year-old and a 35-year-old had 5% survival, but differing impairment. Respondents were asked if they would resuscitate and in what order they would resuscitate if all needed intervention simultaneously. RESULT: Eighty-five percent response rate, n=524. The proportion stating they would always resuscitate was smallest for the 80-year-old (18% P<0.001 compared to other patients), then the preterm (35%, P<0.001), then the term and the 50-year-old (53 and 58%, P<0.01). The 2-month-old and the 7-year-old would be resuscitated most frequently (74 and 77%, P<0.01), followed by the patients with 5% survival (64 and 68%, P<0.001). The median order of triage was first the 2-month-old, followed by the 7-year-old, the 14-year-old, the term newborn, the 50-year-old, the 35-year-old, the premature newborn and the 80-year-old. CONCLUSION: Order of resuscitation was not closely related to the predicted survival, impairment or potential life years gained. Age appeared to have a strong influence, with children's lives being valued more than the adults'. This tendency was reversed for the newborn infants who were undervalued compared with older children, and most particularly for the premature. The value placed on the life of newborns, in particular the premature, is less than that expected by any objective medical data and was not consistent with any ethical theory that we tested.

Management of respiratory failure in the preterm infant.

Respiratory failure is common in the preterm infant. Support of the infant with oxygen, positive pressure, and assisted ventilation are among the commonest interventions required in neonatal care. This article is an overview of many features of respiratory care of the preterm infant, including the goals of therapy, continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP), non-invasive ventilation, various modes of ''conventional'' ventilation, high frequency ventilation and inhaled nitric oxide use. The proven benefits and limitations of various interventions are discussed, and areas requiring further investigation are highlighted. Although it is clear that respiratory support is life-saving, there is a lack of good evidence to choose one mode of support over another. Many prospective trials have been performed which, in general, have failed to demonstrate a significant additional benefit of any newer mode of ventilation over conventional time-cycled pressure limited ventilation. Many of the currently available modes of respiratory support have never been subjected to adequate study. Newer modes of respiratory support including such innovations as volume targeted ventilation, pressure support ventilation, and inhaled nitric oxide use in the preterm, require further investigation prior to their adoption for routine clinical use.

Caregivers attitudes for very premature infants: what if they knew?

BACKGROUND: Decisions about resuscitation of extremely premature babies are controversial. Such decisions may reflect poor understanding of outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare caregivers' attitudes towards the resuscitation of a premature infant if they are only told the infant's gestational age or if they are only given prognostic information for infants at that gestational age. DESIGN/METHODS: Residents and nurses involved in perinatal care were asked whether they would resuscitate a depressed AGA 24-week gestation infant at birth. In another question they were asked whether they would resuscitate a depressed preterm infant with a 50% chance of survival, knowing that of those who survived, 50% would have a development 'within normal limits', 20-25% a serious handicap and 40% with behavioural and/or learning disability. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine caregivers responded (91% response rate). In the scenario that only presented gestational age, 21% of respondents would resuscitate. In the scenario that only presented prognostic statistics, 51% of respondents would resuscitate (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Providers of perinatal health care respond to vignettes differently depending upon the format in which information is provided. The relative unwillingness to resuscitate a baby of 24-week gestation is surprising since outcomes for such babies are the same or better than those we described in the scenario that provided only outcome data without specifying gestational age. Two explanations are possible: (1) respondents have irrational negative associations with low gestational ages or (2) respondents are unaware of actual outcomes.

Treating hypotension in the preterm infant: when and with what: a critical and systematic review.

UNLABELLED: A very large proportion of extremely preterm infants receive treatments for hypotension. There are, however, marked variations in indications for treatment, and in the interventions used, between neonatal intensive care units and between neonatologists. METHODS: We performed systematic reviews of the literature in order to determine which preterm infants may benefit from treatment with interventions to elevate blood pressure (BP), and which interventions improve clinically important outcomes. RESULTS: Our review was not able to define a threshold BP that was significantly predictive of a poor outcome, nor whether any interventions for hypotensive infants improved outcomes, nor which interventions were more likely to be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: There is a distinct lack of prospective research of this issue, which prevents good clinical care. It is possible that a simple BP threshold that indicates the need for therapy does not exist, and other factors, such as the clinical status or systemic blood flow measurements, may be much more informative. Such a paradigm shift will also require careful prospective study.

Inhaled nitric oxide for respiratory failure in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been proven to be effective in term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. The pathophysiology of respiratory failure, and the potential risks, differ substantially in preterm infants. Therefore, analysis of the efficacy and toxicities of iNO in infants born before 35 weeks is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of treatment with iNO on the rates of death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), or neurodevelopmental disability in preterm newborn infants (< 35 weeks gestation) with respiratory disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) were searched, using the following keywords: nitric oxide, clinical trial, and newborn covering the years from 1985 to 2006. In addition, the abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised studies in preterm infants with respiratory disease that compared the effects of administration of iNO gas compared to control, with or without placebo are included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including death, BPD (defined as oxygen dependence at 36 weeks postmenstrual age), IVH, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), long term neurodevelopmental outcome and short term effects on oxygenation were excerpted from the trial reports by the investigators. Standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. Two investigators extracted, assessed and coded separately all data for each study. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven randomised controlled trials of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in preterm infants were found. The trials have been grouped post hoc into three categories depending on the entry criteria; entry in the first three days of life based on oxygenation criteria (Kinsella 1999; Hascoet 2004; INNOVO 2005; Van Meurs 2004; Mercier 1999; Dani 2006), routine use in intubated preterm babies (Schreiber 2003; Kinsella 2006) and later enrolment based on an increased risk of BPD (Subhedar 1997; Ballard 2006). The usefulness of the overall analyses was considered limited by the differing characteristics of the studies, and only subgroup analyses were performed. Trials of early rescue treatment of infants based on oxygenation criteria demonstrated no significant effect of iNO on mortality or BPD. The subgroup of studies with routine use of iNO in intubated preterm infants demonstrated a marginally significant reduction in the combined outcome of death or BPD [typical RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.84, 0.99); typical RD -0.06 (95% CI -0.12, -0.01)]. Later treatment with iNO based on the risk of BPD demonstrated no significant benefit for this outcome in our analysis. Studies of early rescue treatment with iNO demonstrated a trend toward increased risk of severe IVH, whereas the subgroup of studies with routine use in intubated preterm infants seems to show a reduction in the risk of having either a severe IVH or PVL [typical RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.53, 0.91); typical RD -0.07 (95% CI -0.12, -0.02)]. Later iNO treatment of infants at risk of BPD is given after the major risk period for IVH, and does not appear to lead to progression of old lesions. Two studies (Schreiber 2003; INNOVO 2005) presented data on long term neurodevelopmental outcome. The early routine treatment study (Schreiber 2003) showed an improved outcome at two years corrected age, while the rescue treatment study (INNOVO 2005) showed no effect of iNO. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: iNO as rescue therapy for the very ill ventilated preterm infant does not appear to be effective and may increase the risk of severe IVH. Later use of iNO to prevent BPD also does not appear to be effective. Early routine use of iNO in mildly sick preterm infants may decrease serious brain injury and may improve survival without BPD. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, to define groups most likely to benefit, and to describe long term outcomes.

Moral distress in the neonatal intensive care unit: caregiver's experience.

BACKGROUND: The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) can be ethically charged, which can create challenges for health-care workers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency with which nurses and residents have experienced ethical confrontations and what factors are associated with increased frequency. DESIGN/METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to nurses in a university center, a high-risk obstetric service, a maternity hospital NICU with 85% in-born patients and an outborn NICU, most of whose preterm admissions are those with surgical complications. Obstetric and pediatric residents in the four universities of the province also received the questionnaire, which included demographics, opinions regarding the gestational age threshold at which resuscitation of a premature infant with bradycardia was appropriate, knowledge of cerebral palsy (CP) outcomes (as an indicator of knowledge about long-term sequelae of prematurity) and questions about ethical confrontation in the NICU. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine caregivers participated (115 full time nurses and 164 residents). All the distributed questionnaires were completed. Frequent ethical confrontation was reported by 35% of the nurses and 19% of the residents. Among the nurses, moral distress differed significantly between work environments. Nurses working in an out-born NICU and obstetric nurses were more likely to overestimate CP prevalence (P<0.05). Nurses who overestimated CP rates had higher thresholds for resuscitation and were more likely to experience ethical confrontations. Of the residents, 60% were pediatric and 40% obstetric. All groups of residents frequently overestimated the prevalence of CP, and knowledge differed significantly by residency program (P<0.05). The residents who overestimated CP rates had higher thresholds for resuscitation, had more incorrect answers regarding prematurity outcomes and were less likely to have ethical confrontations. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of nurses and residents report frequent ethical confrontations. Many residents and nurses have limited knowledge of outcomes and high threshold for resuscitation. Ethical confrontation is more common among nurses with poor knowledge about outcomes, and less common in residents with poor knowledge about outcomes.

Nitric oxide for respiratory failure in infants born at or near term.

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide is a major endogenous regulator of vascular tone. Inhaled nitric oxide gas has been investigated as a treatment for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment of hypoxaemic term and near-term newborn infants with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) improves oxygenation and reduces the rates of death, the requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or affects long term neurodevelopmental outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic and hand searching of pediatric/neonatal literature and personal data files. In addition we contacted the principal investigators of articles which have been published as abstracts to ascertain the necessary information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized studies of inhaled nitric oxide in term and near term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. Clinically relevant outcomes, including death, requirement for ECMO, and oxygenation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial reports were analysed for methodologic quality using the criteria of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Results of mortality, oxygenation, short term clinical outcomes (particularly need for ECMO), and long term developmental outcomes were tabulated. STATISTICS: For categorical outcomes, typical estimates for relative risk and risk difference were calculated. For continuous variables, typical estimates for weighted mean difference were calculated. 95% confidence intervals were used. A fixed effect model was assumed for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen eligible randomized controlled studies were found in term and near term infants with hypoxia. Seven of the trials compared iNO to control (placebo or standard care without iNO) in infants with moderate or severe severity of illness scores. Four of the trials compared iNO to control, but allowed back up treatment with iNO if the infants continued to satisfy the same criteria for severity of illness after a defined period of time. Two trials enrolled infants with moderate severity of illness score (OI or AaDO2) and randomized to immediate iNO treatment or iNO treatment only if they deteriorated to more severe criteria. One trial studied only infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Ninos 1997), and one trial enrolled both preterm and term infants (Mercier 1998), but reported the majority of the results separately for the two groups. Inhaled nitric oxide appears to improve outcome in hypoxaemic term and near term infants by reducing the incidence of the combined endpoint of death or need for ECMO. The reduction seems to be entirely a reduction in need for ECMO; mortality is not reduced. Oxygenation improves in approximately 50% of infants receiving nitric oxide. The Oxygenation Index decreases by a (weighted) mean of 15.1 within 30 to 60 minutes after commencing therapy and PaO2 increases by a mean of 53 mmHg. Whether infants have clear echocardiographic evidence of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) or not does not appear to affect outcome. The outcome of infants with diaphragmatic hernia was not improved; indeed there is a suggestion that outcome was slightly worsened. The incidence of disability, incidence of deafness and infant development scores are all similar between tested survivors who received nitric oxide or not. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: On the evidence presently available, it appears reasonable to use inhaled nitric oxide in an initial concentration of 20 ppm for term and near term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure who do not have a diaphragmatic hernia.

Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic interventions for the hypotensive very low birth weight infant.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis and management of hypotension in the very low birth weight (VLBW) is a controversial area. OBJECTIVE: To establish if there is any consensus in the diagnostic criteria and therapeutic interventions in the hypotensive VLBW among neonatologists in Canada. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to neonatologists in all level II and III neonatal intensive care units throughout Canada. RESULTS: In total, 120 questionnaires were sent. Ninety-five completed questionnaires were returned. Seventy-six percent of respondents work in units where at least 50 VLBWs and 43% where at least 100 VLBWs are cared for annually. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents have at least 10 years experience as practicing neonatologists. 25.8% rely on blood pressure values alone when intervening, the most common being a blood pressure less than gestational age in weeks. Ninety-seven percent of respondents commence therapy with a fluid bolus. Normal saline is the predominant volume administered (95%). Dopamine remains the pressor of choice. Great variation exists in starting doses and total amount administered. Similar variation exists with epinephrine, with tenfold differences in starting doses (0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min) and tenfold differences in maximum dose (0.4-4 mc/kg/min) administered. Steroid doses used ranged from 0.1 mg/kg/dose of hydrocortisone to 5 mg/kg/dose. Bicarbonate is rarely used. Three predominant therapeutic regimes exist. These include (i) volume followed by dopamine then a steroid (32%), (ii) volume, dopamine, dobutamine (29%), (iii) volume, dopamine, epinephrine (22%). CONCLUSION: This is the first large study of practices among neonatologists addressing hypotension in the VLBW infant. There is wide variation in practice, which is a reflection of the lack of good evidence currently available for this very common problem.

Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation in the neonate is painful and is associated with adverse physiological effects. Some premedication regimens have been shown to reduce these effects, but the optimal regimen is not yet determined. METHOD: Data on semi-elective intubations were prospectively collected in the neonatal intensive care unit over a six month period. Patients received 20 microg/kg atropine, 200 microg/kg mivacurium (a non-depolarising muscle relaxant) followed by 5 microg/kg fentanyl. RESULTS: Thirty three patients were electively intubated during this time period. The primary reason for intubation was surfactant administration (53%). Median (range) birth weight, gestational age, and age at intubation were 1360 g (675-4200), 29 weeks (25-38), and 33 hours (1-624) respectively. Twenty two of the infants were intubated on the first attempt. Median duration from initial insertion of the laryngoscope to successful intubation was 60 seconds (15 seconds to 20 minutes). In 18 cases, the first attempt was by a trainee with no previous successful intubation experience, 10 of whom intubated within two attempts. Muscle relaxation occurred at a mean (SD) of 94 (51) seconds, and mean (range) time to return of spontaneous movements was 937 seconds (480-1800). Intubation conditions were scored as excellent using a validated intubation scale. CONCLUSION: Effective analgesia can be administered and intubation performed with some brief desaturations, even when junior personnel are being taught their first intubation. In this first report of mivacurium for intubation in the newborn, effective bag and mask ventilation was easily achieved during muscle relaxation and was associated with excellent intubation conditions, permitting a high success rate for inexperienced personnel.