Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Adv Nurs ; 50(6): 613-23, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15926966

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the inter-rater reliability of the PRESSURE Trial pressure ulcer diagnosis (>/=Grade 2) and skin classification for all grades between the clinical research nurse (CRN) team leader and CRNs working across different hospital sites; and CRNs and ward-based nurses. BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom National Health Service Health Technology Assessment Programme has funded a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of alternating pressure mattress overlays and mattress replacements - PRESSURE Trial. Outcome skin assessments were recorded by qualified ward-based nurses daily, and expert CRNs twice weekly. METHOD: Paired assessments were undertaken and skin assessed on seven body sites. The per cent agreement between nurses in the diagnosis of a pressure ulcer was determined and the Kappa statistic and confidence intervals calculated. Per cent agreement between nurses in classifying skin for all grades was also determined. RESULTS: Assessments were undertaken by 378 pairs: 16 paired patient assessments (107 site comparisons) by the CRN team leader and CRNs, and 362 paired patient assessments (2396 site comparisons) between CRNs and ward-based nurses. There was 100% agreement between the CRN team leader and CRNs in the diagnosis of a pressure ulcer, and the Kappa statistics indicated 'very good' agreement. There were only two (1.9%) disagreements in classifying skin for all grades between these nurses. The agreement in the diagnosis of a pressure ulcer between CRNs and ward-based nurses varied by skin site, ranging from 93.6% to 100%, with the Kappa statistics indicating 'good' and 'very good' agreement. However, there were 508 (21.2%) disagreements in classifying skin for all grades. CONCLUSIONS: Overall agreement and Kappa statistics indicated 'very good' and 'good' agreement between expert nurses, and between expert nurses and qualified ward-based staff, respectively. However, the high prevalence of normal skin concealed clinically important disagreements in both the diagnosis of pressure ulcers and skin classification for all grades.


Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão/diagnóstico , Nádegas , Competência Clínica , Calcanhar , Quadril , Humanos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Úlcera por Pressão/classificação , Úlcera por Pressão/patologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sacro
2.
Prof Nurse ; 18(9): 513-6, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12764959

RESUMO

A nurse-led trial is currently collecting data comparing interventions for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. The aim is to provide reliable guidance on the relative merits of alternating-pressure mattresses and overlays for people at moderate to high risk of pressure ulceration. This paper outlines the main objectives, methodology and progress of the study.


Assuntos
Leitos/normas , Pesquisa em Enfermagem Clínica/organização & administração , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Pressão , Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA