Lymphedema After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Who Is at Risk?

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the accepted approach to stage the clinically negative axilla. The incidence of lymphedema (LE) after SLNB is about 5%. We hypothesize that patients undergoing axillary excision of >5 lymph nodes (LNs) are at increased risk of developing LE. Methods and Results: A single institution prospective breast cancer database was retrospectively reviewed from January 2013 to December 2017, to identify patients who underwent SLNB and were diagnosed with LE. Inclusion criteria was (1) de novo breast cancer, (2) SLNB in clinically node negative patients, and (3) no preoperative diagnosis LE of an extremity. Exclusion criteria was history of axillary lymph node dissection. Age, body mass index, tumor-node-metastasis status, surgery type, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy were analyzed. Of the 3325 patients identified, 2940 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Median follow-up time was 24 months. Forty-seven (2%) patients were diagnosed with LE, and nine patients (19%) had >5 LNs excised. LE was diagnosed in 3.7% of patients who had >5 LNs excised versus 1.4% of patients with ≤5 LNs excised. Incidence of LE was higher in patients with >5 LNs excision (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Our study showed that patients have a higher likelihood of developing LE when >5 LNs are excised.

Disaster Preparedness and Response for the Burn Mass Casualty Incident in the Twenty-first Century.

The effective and efficient coordination of emergent patient care at the point of injury followed by the systematic resource-based triage of casualties are the most critical factors that influence patient outcomes after mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The effectiveness and appropriateness of implemented actions are largely determined by the extent and efficacy of the planning and preparation that occur before the MCI. The goal of this work was to define the essential efforts related to planning, preparation, and execution of acute and subacute medical care for disaster burn casualties. This type of MCI is frequently referred to as a burn MCI."

Injury and fatality risks in aeromedical transport: focus on prevention.

BACKGROUND: Aeromedical transport (AMT) is a reliable and well-established life-saving option for rapid patient transfers to health care delivery hubs. However, owing to the very nature of AMT, fatal and nonfatal events may occur. This study reviews aeromedical incidents reported since the publication of the last definitive review in 2003, aiming to provide additional insight into a wide range of factors potentially associated with fatal and nonfatal AMT incidents (AMTIs). We hypothesized that weather and/or visual conditions, postcrash fire, aircraft make and/or type, and time of day all correlate with the risk of AMTI with injury or fatality. METHODS: Specialty databases were queried for AMTI between January 1, 2003 and July 31, 2015. Additional Internet-based resources were also used to find any additional AMTI (including non-US occurrences) to augment the event sample size available for analysis. Univariate analyses of the collected sample were then performed for association between "fatal crash or injury" (FCOI) and weather/visual conditions, aircraft type and/or make, pilot error, equipment failure, post-incident fire, time of day (6 am-7 pm versus 7 pm-6 am), weekend (Friday-Sunday) versus weekday (Monday-Thursday), season of the year, and presence of patient on board. Variables reaching significance level of P < 0.20 were included in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 59 AMTIs were identified. Helicopters were involved in 52 of 59 AMTIs, with 7 of 59 fixed-wing incidents. Comparing pre-2003 data with post-2003 data, we noted a significant decrease in AMTIs per month (0.70 versus 0.39, respectively, P = 0.048), whereas the number of fatalities per year increased slightly (7.20 versus 8.26, p = n/s). In univariate analyses, abnormal weather conditions, impaired visibility, time of incident (7 pm-6 am), aircraft model/make, and post-incident fire all reached statistical significance sufficient for inclusion in multivariate analysis (P < 0.20). Factors independently associated with FCOI included post-incident fire (odds ratio, 19.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-255.5) and time of incident between 7 pm and 6 am (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-97.2). Weather conditions, impaired visibility, and aircraft model/make were not independently associated with FCOI. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports previous observation that post-crash fire is independently associated with FCOI. However, our data do not support previous observations that weather conditions, impaired visibility, or aircraft model/make are independently predictive of fatal AMTI. In addition, this report demonstrates that flights between the hours of 7 pm-6 am may be associated with greater odds of FCOI. Efforts directed at identification, remediation, and active prevention of factors associated with AMTI and FCOI are warranted given the global increase in aeromedical transport.

Traditional autopsy versus computed tomography imaging autopsy in trauma: A case of "synergistic disagreement".

BACKGROUND: Decreases in the rates of traditional autopsy (TA) negatively impact traumatology, especially in the areas of quality improvement and medical education. To help enhance the understanding of trauma-related mortality, a number of initiatives in imaging autopsy (IA) were conceived, including the postmortem computed tomography ("CATopsy") project at our institution. Though IA is a promising concept, few studies directly correlate TA and IA findings quantitatively. Here, we set out to increase our understanding of the similarities and differences between key findings on TA and IA in a prospective fashion with blinding of pathologist and radiologist evaluations. METHODS: A prospective study of TA versus IA was conducted at an Academic Level I Trauma Center (June 2001-May 2010). All decedents underwent a postmortem, whole-body, noncontrast computed tomography that was interpreted by an independent, blinded, board-certified radiologist. A blinded, board-certified pathologist then performed a TA. Autopsy results were grouped into predefined categories of pathologic findings. Categorized findings from TA and IA were compared by determining the degree of agreement (kappa). The χ(2) test was used to detect quantitative differences in "potentially fatal" findings (eg, aortic trauma, splenic injury, intracranial bleeding, etc) between TA and IA. RESULTS: Twenty-five trauma victims (19 blunt; 9 female; median age 33 years) had a total of 435 unique findings on either IA or TA grouped into 34 categories. The agreement between IA and TA was worse than what chance would predict (kappa = -0.58). The greatest agreement was seen in injuries involving axial skeleton and intracranial/cranio-facial trauma. Most discrepancies were seen in soft tissue, ectopic air, and "incidental" categories. Findings determined to be "potentially fatal" were seen on both TA/IA in 48/435 (11%) instances with 79 (18%) on TA only and 53 (12%) on IA only. TA identified more "potentially fatal" solid organ and heart/great vessel injuries, while IA revealed more spine injuries, "potentially fatal" procedure-related findings, and the presence of ectopic air/fluid. CONCLUSION: This limited study does not support substitution of noncontrast, computed tomography-based IA for TA. Our quantitative analyses suggest that TA and IA evaluations may be complementary and synergistic when performed concurrently. There are potential benefits to using IA in trauma process/quality improvement and in educational settings. Further research should focus on the value (and limitations) of the information provided by IA in the absence of TA.