Specialized Care Resources for Diagnosis and Management of Patients Who Have Suffered Falls: Results of a National Survey in Geriatric Units.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical guidelines recommend comprehensive multifactorial assessment and intervention to prevent falls and fractures in older populations. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted by the Falls Study Group of the Spanish Geriatric Medicine Society (SEMEG) to outline which types of healthcare-specific resources were assigned for fall assessment in Spanish geriatric departments. A self-reported seven-item questionnaire was delivered from February 2019 to February 2020. Where geriatric medicine departments were not available, we tried to contact geriatricians working in those areas. RESULTS: Information was obtained regarding 91 participant centers from 15 autonomous communities, 35.1% being from Catalonia and 20.8% from Madrid. A total of 21.6% reported a multidisciplinary falls unit, half of them in geriatric day hospitals. Half of them reported fall assessment as part of a general geriatric assessment in general geriatric outpatient clinics (49.5%) and, in 74.7% of cases, the assessment was based on functional tests. A total of 18.7% reported the use of biomechanical tools, such as posturography, gait-rides or accelerometers, for gait and balance analysis, and 5.5% used dual X-ray absorptiometry. A total of 34% reported research activity focused on falls or related areas. Regarding intervention strategies, 59% reported in-hospital exercise programs focused on gait and balance improvement and 79% were aware of community programs or the pathways to refer patients to these resources. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a necessary starting point for a future deep analysis. Although this study was carried out in Spain, it highlights the need to improve public health in the field of fall prevention, as well as the need, when implementing public health measures, to verify that these measures are implemented homogeneously throughout the territory. Therefore, although this analysis was at the local level, it could be useful for other countries to reproduce the model.

Appropriateness of medication prescribing in nursing homes: A collaboration project between pharmacy and geriatric departments.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriateness of medication prescribing and to analyze interventions carried out in polymedicated elderly patients in nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: Prospective study of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in polymedicated older adults living in NHs, implemented via a collaborative project between NHs and the geriatric and pharmacy departments of a university hospital. The pharmacist reviewed patients' active medical prescriptions and prepared an individualized report with proposals aimed at therapeutic optimization that was sent for evaluation to the geriatrician in charge of the NH. The drug-related problems (DRPs) were classified according to the Third Consensus of Granada and the potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) were identified by explicit criteria (STOPP/START, BEERS, LESS-CHRON), implicit criteria (MAI) and CheckTheMeds® software. It was measured the degree of acceptance of the interventions carried out, and the economic impact was calculated from the direct costs of the discontinued drugs. RESULTS: Of the 210 patients reviewed by the pharmacy department, 105 patients from 10 NHs were analyzed. A total of 510 prescriptions with possible DRPs were identified (38.5% of all prescribed drugs). According to STOPP/START/BEERS or LESS-CHRON criteria, 41.2% were PIPs. The main DRPs identified were: unfavorable risk-benefit ratio, inappropriate dose/regimen, inappropriate treatment duration, probability of adverse events, medication not indicated, and duplicate therapy. Interventions were proposed for 81.5% of the DRPs detected, of which 73.3% were accepted. This resulted in a 23.1% reduction in the number of drugs prescribed per patient and an economic saving of €16,218 per 6-month period. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of medication prescribing in polymedicated older adults living in NHs by the pharmacist has made it possible to reduce DRPs and PIPs and to save costs thanks to the high degree of acceptance by geriatricians.

Effect of a multicomponent exercise program and cognitive stimulation (VIVIFRAIL-COGN) on falls in frail community older persons with high risk of falls: study protocol for a randomized multicenter control trial.

BACKGROUND: Falls represent important drivers of intrinsic capacity losses, functional limitations and reduced quality of life in the growing older adult's population, especially among those presenting with frailty. Despite exercise- and cognitive training-based interventions have shown effectiveness for reducing fall rates, evidence around their putative cumulative effects on falls and fall-related complications (such as fractures, reduced quality of life and functional limitations) in frail individuals remains scarce. The main aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness program combining an individualized exercise program and an executive function-based cognitive training (VIVIFRAIL-COGN) compared to usual care in the prevention of falls and fall-related outcomes over a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This study is designed as a four-center randomized clinical trial with a 12-week intervention period and an additional 1-year follow-up. Three hundred twenty frail or pre-frail (≥ 1 criteria of the Frailty Phenotype) older adults (≥ 75 years) with high risk of falling (defined by fall history and gait performance) will be recruited in the Falls Units of the participating centers. They will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). The IG will participate in a home-based intervention combining the individualized Vivifrail multicomponent (aerobic, resistance, gait and balance and flexibility) exercise program and a personalized executive function-based cognitive training (VIVIFRAIL-COGN). The CG group will receive usual care delivered in the Falls Units, including the Otago Exercise Program. Primary outcome will be the incidence of falls (event rate/year) and will be ascertained by self-report during three visits (at baseline, and 6 and 12 weeks) and telephone-based contacts at 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization. Secondarily, effects on measures of physical and cognitive function, quality of life, nutritional, muscle quality and psychological status will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide new evidence about the effectiveness of an individualized multidomain intervention by studying the effect of additive effects of cognitive training and physical exercise to prevent falls in older frail persons with high risk of falling. Compared to usual care, the combined intervention is expected to show additive effects in the reduction of the incidence of falls and associated adverse outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04911179 02/06/2021.

[An opportunity to identify and prevent frailty through falls intervention.] / Oportunidad para la detección y manejo precoz de la fragilidad a través del abordaje de las caídas.

Falls are one of the classic giant geriatric syndromes with a multifactorial etiopathogenesis and closely related to frailty, being this relationship bidirectional. The Consensus Document on the Prevention of Frailty and Falls approved by the Interterritorial Council of the National Health System in 2014 provides recommendations for the screening of frailty and falls in all older adults in order to develop a management plan in high risk older adults so to prevent disability. This review describes the intrinsic relationship between frailty and falls, falls assessment and screening instruments to use and detect frailty and finally gives evidence-based recommendations to reduce falls impact.

Las caídas son uno de los grandes síndromes geriátricos, con una etiopatogenia multifactorial y con una estrecha relación con la fragilidad, siendo esta relación bidireccional. El Documento de Consenso sobre Prevención de Fragilidad y Caídas aprobado por el Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud en 2014, propone un cribado universal de fragilidad y riesgo de caídas, con el objetivo de intervenir en aquellos ancianos de alto riesgo y por tanto prevenir discapacidad. Esta revisión evalúa la relación intrínseca entre caídas y fragilidad, describe las herramientas de valoración del paciente que presenta caídas, incidiendo en aquellos aspectos que detectan fragilidad y finalmente propone intervenciones que han demostrado reducir su impacto.

Results of an anaemia treatment protocol complementary to blood transfusion in elderly patients with hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is a very common condition in elderly patients with hip fracture. The side effects of blood transfusions are well known, and further research on potential alternative therapies is needed. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: A non-controlled descriptive study, conducted on 138 patients admitted for hip fracture, aimed at analysing the effects of an anaemia treatment protocol adjunctive to transfusion, based on the use of supra-physiological doses of intravenous iron and erythropoietin (IS/EPOS). The variables collected were, medical history, physical and cognitive status prior to fracture, as well as the need of blood products, medical complications during admission and their functional outcome at three and six months after the fracture were evaluated. Transfusion rates were compared with a historical control group when the only treatment for acute anaemia was transfusion (2011). RESULTS: Almost half (63, 48%) of the patients received blood transfusion, with (91,70%) IS/EPOD. Intravenous iron did not reduce the percentage of transfused patients (56% vs. 44%), but it did reduce the number of blood units required (0.7 units less in IS/EPO group). Patients who required transfusion had a longer hospital stay, (1.7 days; 13.2 vs. 11.5; p<0.005). Patients who received IS had better functional recovery assessed with Barthel index and the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC scale) at 3 and 6 months after the fracture. Patients with malnutrition or subtrochanteric fracture needed more tabletransfusions (p<0.005). Functional recovery at 3 and 6 months after fracture was better in patients who received intravenous iron. Neither blood transfusions nor intravenous iron were associated with infectious complications or increased mortality. The patient series of this study was compared with a group of patients with hip fracture and similar characteristics seen in 2011, before intravenous iron was available, revealing a 17% reduction in blood transfusion needs (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The use of intravenous iron in elderly patients with hip fracture may help to reduce the number of blood units needed for the treatment of anaemia, although a causal relationship cannot be established due to not having a control group. Transfusions were associated with longer hospital stay in elderly patients with hip fracture.