Impact of Immuno-Nutrition on the Nutritional Status, Inflammatory Response and Clinical Outcome of Clinic-Admitted Mild-Intensity-COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot, Perspective-Concluding Study.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has impacted our lives since early 2020. Both malnutrition and an overweight status significantly correlate with worse patient outcomes and mortality. Immuno-nutrition (IN) has shown promising results in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical course and the extubation time and mortality of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Thus, we wanted to assess the impact of a standardized IN oral formula on COVID-19 patients admitted to our mild-intensity clinic in late 2021. We prospectively enrolled patients admitted to the Internal Medicine COVID-19 Unit of San Benedetto General Hospital. All patients had biochemical, anthropometric, HRCT chest scan, and nutritional assessments at the time of admission and, after oral immuno-nutrition formula administration, at 15 days of the interval follow up. We enrolled 52 consecutive patients (mean age of 60.9 ± 5.4 years, 17 F, and BMI of 23.5 Kg/m2). The main comorbidities were diabetes (20%, type 2: 90%), hyperuricemia (15%), hypertension (38%), chronic ischemic heart disease (12%), COPD (13%), anxiety (10%), and depression (8%). Upon informed consent, 14 patients (mean age of 67.9 ± 5.4 years, 7 F, and BMI of 26.7 Kg/m2) were accepted to be administered IN. A moderate to severe overweight status was present in 59% of the patients; MNA test (4.4 ± 0.7) and phase angle (PA) values, suggestive of malnutrition, were present in 13% of the patients. After 15 days of admission, we recorded three deaths (mean age of 68.9 ± 4.1 years, 3 F, and BMI of 27.5 Kg/m2). An overweight status significantly correlated with the exitus occurrence (r = 0.65). One death was reported among the IN-treated patients. IN administration was followed by a significant decrease in inflammatory markers with a tendency to be higher than those of non-treated patients. IN prevented the worsening of BMI and PA vs. non-treated patients. In this overweight COVID-19 population, immuno-nutrition prevented malnutrition development with a significant decrease in inflammatory markers.

Probiotics and gut health.

Gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem of bacteria, viruses, archea, protozoa and yeasts in our intestine. It has several functions which maintain human body equilibrium. Microbial "dysbiosis" can be responsible for several gastrointestinal diseases. To build a narrative review we performed a Pubmed, Medline, Embase search for English language papers, reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by keywords and their associations. Gut microbiota is altered in several gastrointestinal diseases with very different pathophysiology. They range from multifactorial diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and gastric and colorectal cancers, immune-mediated such as celiac disease, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and antibiotic-related such as clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Microbial dysbiosis remodulation by probiotics is feasible and safe in some of them. Gut microbial dysbiosis is statistically associated with several gastrointestinal diseases, affecting their pathophysiology. Its reverse by probiotics has some promising evidence of efficacy.

From Pre- and Probiotics to Post-Biotics: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: gut microbiota (GM) is a complex ecosystem containing bacteria, viruses, fungi, and yeasts. It has several functions in the human body ranging from immunomodulation to metabolic. GM derangement is called dysbiosis and is involved in several host diseases. Pre-, probiotics, and symbiotics (PRE-PRO-SYMB) have been extensively developed and studied for GM re-modulation. Herein, we review the literature data regarding the new concept of postbiotics, starting from PRE-PRO-SYMB. METHODS: we conducted a search on the main medical databases for original articles, reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and case series using the following keywords and acronyms and their associations: gut microbiota, prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotic, and postbiotics. RESULTS: postbiotics account for PRO components and metabolic products able to beneficially affect host health and GM. The deeper the knowledge about them, the greater their possible uses: the prevention and treatment of atopic, respiratory tract, and inflammatory bowel diseases. CONCLUSIONS: better knowledge about postbiotics can be useful for the prevention and treatment of several human body diseases, alone or as an add-on to PRE-PRO-SYMB.