Breastfeeding Following Spinal Cord Injury: Consumer Guide for Mothers.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants be breastfed exclusively for the first 6 months of age. However, there are few resources available on the effects a spinal cord injury (SCI) can have for breastfeeding mothers. It is difficult to find information to address the unique challenges women with SCI experience when planning or trying to breastfeed. Our international team, including women with SCI, health care providers, and SCI researchers, aims to address the information gap through the creation of this consumer guide. The purpose of this consumer guide is to share the most common issues women with SCI experience during breastfeeding and provide information, practical suggestions, recommendations, and key resources in lay language. General information about breastfeeding is available on the internet, in books, or from friends and health care providers. We do not intend to repeat nor replace general breastfeeding information or medical advice. Breastfeeding for mothers with SCI is complex and requires a team of health care providers with complementary expertise. Such a team may include family physician, obstetrician, physiatrist, neurologist, occupational and physical therapist, lactation consultant, midwife, and psychologist. We hope this consumer guide can serve as a quick reference guide for mothers with SCI planning of trying to breastfeed. This guide will also be helpful to health care providers as an educational tool.

Motherhood after Spinal Cord Injury: Breastfeeding, Autonomic Dysreflexia, and Psychosocial Health: Clinical Practice Guidelines.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that children be breastfed exclusively for the first 6 months of age. This recommendation may prove challenging for women with spinal cord injury (SCI) who face unique challenges and barriers to breastfeeding due to the impact of SCI on mobility and physiology. Tailored provision of care from health care professionals (HCPs) is important in helping women navigate these potential barriers. Yet, HCPs often lack the confidence and SCI-specific knowledge to meet the needs of mothers with SCI. An international panel of clinicians, researchers, consultants, and women with lived experience was formed to create an accessible resource that can address this gap. A comprehensive survey on breastfeeding complications, challenges, resources, and quality of life of mothers with SCI was conducted, along with an environmental scan to evaluate existing postpartum guidelines and assess their relevance and usability as recommendations for breastfeeding after SCI. Building on this work, this article provides evidence-based recommendations for HCPs, including but not limited to general practitioners, obstetricians, pediatricians, physiatrists, lactation consultants, nurses, midwives, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists who work with prospective and current mothers with SCI.

Guideline No. 431: Postpartum Hemorrhage and Hemorrhagic Shock.

OBJECTIVE: This guideline aims to provide evidence for prevention, recognition, and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage including severe hemorrhage leading to hemorrhagic shock. TARGET POPULATION: All pregnant patients. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Appropriate recognition and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage can prevent serious morbidity while reducing costs to the health care system by minimizing more costly interventions and length of hospital stays. EVIDENCE: Medical literature, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Database, and grey literature were searched for articles, published between 2012 and 2021, on postpartum hemorrhage, uterotonics, obstetrical hemorrhage, and massive hemorrhage protocols. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All members of the health care team who care for labouring or postpartum women, including, but not restricted to, nurses, midwives, family physicians, obstetricians, and anesthesiologists.

Guideline No. 416: Labour, Delivery, and Postpartum Care for People with Physical Disabilities.

OBJECTIVE: To describe evidence-based practice for managing the labour, delivery, and postpartum care of people with physical disabilities in Canada. TARGET POPULATION: This guideline addresses the needs of people with physical disabilities, with a focus on conditions that affect strength and mobility, as well as those that affect neurological or musculoskeletal function or structure. Although aspects of this guideline may apply to people with solely intellectual, developmental, or sensory disabilities (e.g., hearing and vision loss), the needs of this population are beyond the scope of this guideline. OUTCOMES: Safe and compassionate care for people with physical disabilities who are giving birth. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Implementation of this guideline will improve health care provider awareness of specific complications people with physical disabilities may experience during labour, delivery, and the postpartum period and therefore increase the likelihood of a safe birth. EVIDENCE: A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (474), Embase (36), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 28) databases. The results have been filtered for English language, publication date of 2013 to present, observational studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and guidelines and references in these publications were also reviewed. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Maternal-fetal medicine specialists, obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, neurologists, physiatrists, and those who care for people with physical disabilities.

Limitations and opportunities of whole blood bilirubin measurements by GEM premier 4000®.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia has traditionally been screened by either total serum bilirubin or transcutaneous bilirubin. Whole blood bilirubin (TwB) by the GEM Premier 4000® blood gas analyzer (GEM) is a relatively new technology and it provides fast bilirubin results with a small sample volume and can measure co-oximetry and other analytes. Our clinical study was to evaluate the reliability of TwB measured by the GEM and identify analytical and clinical factors that may contribute to possible bias. METHODS: 440 consecutive healthy newborn samples that had plasma bilirubin ordered for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia screening were included. TwB was first measured using the GEM, after which the remainder of the blood was spun and plasma neonatal bilirubin was measured using the VITROS 5600® (VITROS). RESULTS: 62 samples (14%) were excluded from analysis due to failure in obtaining GEM results. Passing-Bablok regression suggested that the GEM results were negatively biased at low concentrations of bilirubin and positively biased at higher concentrations relative to the VITROS results (y = 1.43x-61.13). Bland-Altman plots showed an overall negative bias of the GEM bilirubin with a wide range of differences compared to VITROS. Both hemoglobin concentration and hemolysis affected the accuracy of the GEM results. Clinically, male infants had higher mean bilirubin levels, and infants delivered by caesarean section had lower hemoglobin levels. When comparing the number of results below the 40th percentile and above the 95th percentile cut-offs in the Bhutani nomogram which would trigger discharge or treatment, GEM bilirubin exhibited poor sensitivity and poor specificity in contrast to VITROS bilirubin. CONCLUSIONS: An imperfect correlation was observed between whole blood bilirubin measured on the GEM4000® and plasma bilirubin on the VITROS 5600®. The contributors to the observed differences between the two instruments were specimen hemolysis and the accuracy of hemoglobin measurements, the latter of which affects the calculation of plasma-equivalent bilirubin. Additionally, the lack of standardization of total bilirubin calibration particularly in newborn specimens, may also account for some of the disagreement in results.

Perinatal Care for Women with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Collaborative Workshop for Consensus on Care in Canada.

Background: In North America, there are currently no clearly defined standards of care for women with spinal cord injury (SCI) during the perinatal periods of preconception, pregnancy, labour/delivery, and postpartum. Women with SCI and their partners say resources specific to their needs are hard to find. Little evidence-informed research exists to guide clinicians in the care of women with SCI during pregnancy. Objectives: To further explore these gaps in knowledge and practices for perinatal care for women with SCI, a 1-day workshop was held in Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), Canada in November 2013. Methods: Twenty-nine attendees included women with SCI, SCI-community service providers, researchers, and health care providers from maternal/fetal medicine, rehabilitation, anesthesiology, and psychiatry. A pre-meeting online survey of stakeholders elucidated 3 themes: lack of knowledge for both consumers and care providers, gaps in access to services and information, and a need for collaboration throughout the perinatal journey. The workshop addressed issues of care providers' lack of knowledge of nonmedical issues during the perinatal period, physical and attitudinal barriers to access to care for women with SCI, and the need for better collaboration and communication between care providers, the latter potentially initiated by providing information to care providers through the women with SCI themselves. Results: Content experts attending the workshop collectively made recommendations for knowledge generation and research priorities, clinical application priorities, and the need for policy and guideline development in this field. Conclusion: Two information sources for women have since been developed and are available online.

Diabetes in Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: This guideline reviews the evidence relating to the diagnosis and obstetrical management of diabetes in pregnancy. OUTCOMES: The outcomes evaluated were short- and long-term maternal outcomes, including preeclampsia, Caesarean section, future diabetes, and other cardiovascular complications, and fetal outcomes, including congenital anomalies, stillbirth, macrosomia, birth trauma, hypoglycemia, and long-term effects. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary (MeSH terms "diabetes" and "pregnancy"). Where appropriate, results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English or French language materials. VALUES: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). SUMMARY STATEMENTS: Recommendations It is recognized that the use of different diagnostic thresholds for the "preferred" and "alternative" strategies could cause confusion in certain settings. Despite this, the committee has identified the importance of remaining aligned with the current Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 guidelines as being a priority. It is thus recommended that each care centre strategically align with 1 of the 2 strategies and implement protocols to ensure consistent and uniform reporting of test results.

Le diabète pendant la grossesse.

OBJECTIF: La présente Directive passe en revue les données probantes liées au diagnostic et à la prise en charge obstétricale du diabète durant la grossesse. ISSUES: Les issues évaluées étaient les issues maternelles à court et à long terme, dont la prééclampsie, la césarienne, le diabète éventuel et d'autres complications cardiovasculaires et les issues fœtales, dont les anomalies congénitales, la mortinaissance, la macrosomie, le traumatisme de la naissance, l'hypoglycémie et les effets à long terme. RéSULTATS: La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans PubMed et The Cochrane Library au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé (termes MeSH « diabète ¼ et « grossesse ¼) appropriés. Le cas échéant, les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs et aux études observationnelles. Aucune limite n'a été imposée en matière de date, mais les résultats ont été limités aux articles publiés en anglais ou en français. VALEURS: La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau 1). DéCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Acuity Assessment in Obstetrical Triage.

OBJECTIVE: A five-category Obstetrical Triage Acuity Scale (OTAS) was developed with a comprehensive set of obstetrical determinants. The purposes of this study were: (1) to compare the inter-rater reliability (IRR) in tertiary and community hospital settings and measure the intra-rater reliability (ITR) of OTAS; (2) to establish the validity of OTAS; and (3) to present the first revision of OTAS from the National Obstetrical Triage Working Group. METHODS: To assess IRR, obstetrical triage nurses were randomly selected from London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) (n = 8), Stratford General Hospital (n = 11), and Chatham General Hospital (n= 7) to assign acuity levels to clinical scenarios based on actual patient visits. At LHSC, a group of nurses were retested at nine months to measure ITR. To assess validity, OTAS acuity level was correlated with measures of resource utilization. RESULTS: OTAS has significant and comparable IRR in a tertiary care hospital and in two community hospitals. Repeat assessment in a cohort of nurses demonstrated significant ITR. Acuity level correlated significantly with performance of routine and second order laboratory investigations, point of care ultrasound, nursing work load, and health care provider attendance. A National Obstetrical Triage Working Group was formed and guided the first revision. Four acuity modifiers were added based on hemodynamics, respiratory distress, cervical dilatation, and fetal well-being. CONCLUSION: OTAS is the first obstetrical triage scale with established reliability and validity. OTAS enables standardized assessments of acuity within and across institutions. Further, it facilitates assessment of patient care and flow based on acuity.

Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection: benefits and challenges of a systematic knowledge translation project in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Administration of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) to women with imminent preterm birth at <34 weeks is an evidence-based antenatal neuroprotective strategy to prevent cerebral palsy. Although a Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) national guideline with practice recommendations based on relevant clinical evidence exists, ongoing controversies about aspects of this treatment remain. Given this, we anticipated managed knowledge translation (KT) would be needed to facilitate uptake of the guidelines into practice. As part of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)-funded MAG-CP (MAGnesium sulphate to prevent Cerebral Palsy) project, we aimed to compare three KT methods designed to impact both individual health care providers and the organizational systems in which they work. METHODS: The KT methods undertaken were an interactive online e-learning module available to all SOGC members, and at MAG-CP participating sites, on-site educational rounds and focus group discussions, and circulation of an anonymous 'Barriers and Facilitators' survey for the systematic identification of facilitators and barriers for uptake of practice change. We compared these strategies according to: (i) breadth of respondents reached; (ii) rates and richness of identified barriers, facilitators, and knowledge needed; and (iii) cost. RESULTS: No individual KT method was superior to the others by all criteria, and in combination, they provided richer information than any individual method. The e-learning module reached the most diverse audience of health care providers, the site visits provided opportunity for iterative dialogue, and the survey was the least expensive. Although the site visits provided the most detailed information around individual and organizational barriers, the 'Barriers and Facilitators' survey provided more detail regarding social-level barriers. The facilitators identified varied by KT method. The type of knowledge needed was further defined by the e-learning module and surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a multifaceted approach to KT is optimal for translating national obstetric guidelines into clinical practice. As audit and feedback are essential parts of the process by which evidence to practice gaps are closed, MAG-CP is continuing the iterative KT process described in this paper concurrent with tracking of MgSO4 use for fetal neuroprotection and maternal and child outcomes until September 2015; results are anticipated in 2016.

Magnesium Sulphate for Eclampsia and Fetal Neuroprotection: A Comparative Analysis of Protocols Across Canadian Tertiary Perinatal Centres.

BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) has been recommended for fetal neuroprotection to prevent cerebral palsy, with national societies adopting new guidelines for its use. A knowledge translation project to implement Canadian guidelines is ongoing. Discussion about MgSO4 for fetal neuroprotection could not occur distinct from MgSO4 for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment. Thus, in order to explore standardization of MgSO4 use in Canada, we sought to compare local protocols for eclampsia and fetal neuroprotection across tertiary perinatal centres. METHODS: Twenty-five Canadian tertiary perinatal centres were asked to submit their protocols for use of MgSO4 for eclampsia prophylaxis/treatment and fetal neuroprotection. Information abstracted included date of protocol, definitions of indications for treatment, details of MgSO4 administration, maternal and fetal monitoring, antidote for toxicity, and abnormal signs requiring physician attention. Descriptive analyses were used to compare site protocols with known definitions of preeclampsia. Data from the Canadian Perinatal Network (CPN) were used to verify what was done in clinical practice. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 25 centres submitted protocols for eclampsia prevention/treatment. Eleven of these provided a definition of preeclampsia that warranted treatment; five of the 22 advised treatment of severe preeclampsia only. Criteria for treatment and monitoring procedures varied across centres. Sixteen of the 22 sites with protocols had data from the CPN. Of 635 women with pre-eclampsia, 422 (66.5%) received MgSO4. Twenty of 25 centres provided protocols for fetal neuroprotection. Definitions of indications were consistent across sites, except for gestational age cut-off. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that local protocols are often inconsistent with published evidence. While this may be related to local institutional practices, relevant processes must be put in place to maximize uniformity of practice and improve patient care.

Contexte : L'utilisation de sulfate de magnésium (MgSO4) a été recommandée à des fins de neuroprotection fœtale dans le but de prévenir l'infirmité motrice cérébrale; des sociétés nationales adoptent d'ailleurs de nouvelles lignes directrices quant à son utilisation. Un projet de transfert des connaissances visant la mise en œuvre des lignes directrices canadiennes est en cours. Le rôle du MgSO4 en ce qui concerne la neuroprotection fœtale ne peut être abordé sans que l'on mentionne son utilisation dans le cadre de la prophylaxie et de la prise en charge de l'éclampsie. Ainsi, pour explorer la standardisation de l'utilisation de MgSO4 au Canada, nous avons cherché à comparer les protocoles locaux qui en régissent l'utilisation en matière d'éclampsie et de neuroprotection fœtale dans les centres périnataux tertiaires. Méthodes : Nous avons demandé à 25 centres périnataux tertiaires canadiens de nous soumettre leurs protocoles quant à l'utilisation du MgSO4 aux fins de la neuroprotection fœtale et de la prophylaxie / prise en charge de l'éclampsie. Les renseignements que nous avons tirés de ces protocoles comprenaient la date du protocole, les définitions des indications de traitement, les détails de l'administration du MgSO4, le monitorage maternel et fœtal, l'antidote pour contrer la toxicité et les symptômes anormaux nécessitant l'offre de soins médicaux. Des analyses descriptives ont été utilisées pour comparer les protocoles de ces centres aux définitions connues de la prééclampsie. Des données issues du Réseau périnatal canadien (RPC) ont été utilisées pour vérifier ce qui se faisait dans le cadre de la pratique clinique. Résultats : Vingt-deux des 25 centres nous ont soumis leurs protocoles de prévention / prise en charge de l'éclampsie. Onze de ces centres nous ont fourni une définition de ce qui était considéré comme une prééclampsie justifiant une prise en charge; cinq des 22 centres ne préconisaient que la prise en charge de la prééclampsie grave. Les critères des interventions de traitement et de monitorage variaient d'un centre à l'autre. Seize des 22 sites comptant des protocoles présentaient des données issues du RPC. Au sein d'un groupe de 635 femmes connaissant une prééclampsie, 422 (66,5 %) ont reçu du MgSO4. Vingt des 25 centres nous ont fourni leurs protocoles de neuroprotection fœtale. Les définitions des indications étaient uniformes d'un site à l'autre, sauf en ce qui concerne le seuil en matière d'âge gestationnel. Conclusion : Cette étude avance que les protocoles locaux ne concordent souvent pas avec les données probantes publiées. Bien que cela puisse être attribuable aux pratiques institutionnelles locales, des processus pertinents doivent être mis en place pour maximiser l'uniformité de la pratique et améliorer les soins offerts aux patientes.

Guidelines for the Management of a Pregnant Trauma Patient.

OBJECTIVE: Physical trauma affects 1 in 12 pregnant women and has a major impact on maternal mortality and morbidity and on pregnancy outcome. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted to optimize outcome for both the mother and her fetus. The aim of this document is to provide the obstetric care provider with an evidence-based systematic approach to the pregnant trauma patient. OUTCOMES: Significant health and economic outcomes considered in comparing alternative practices. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library from October 2007 to September 2013 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., pregnancy, Cesarean section, hypotension, domestic violence, shock) and key words (e.g., trauma, perimortem Cesarean, Kleihauer-Betke, supine hypotension, electrical shock). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English between January 1968 and September 2013. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to February 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline is expected to facilitate optimal and uniform care for pregnancies complicated by trauma. Summary Statement Specific traumatic injuries At this time, there is insufficient evidence to support the practice of disabling air bags for pregnant women. (III) Recommendations Primary survey 1. Every female of reproductive age with significant injuries should be considered pregnant until proven otherwise by a definitive pregnancy test or ultrasound scan. (III-C) 2. A nasogastric tube should be inserted in a semiconscious or unconscious injured pregnant woman to prevent aspiration of acidic gastric content. (III-C) 3. Oxygen supplementation should be given to maintain maternal oxygen saturation > 95% to ensure adequate fetal oxygenation. (II-1B) 4. If needed, a thoracostomy tube should be inserted in an injured pregnant woman 1 or 2 intercostal spaces higher than usual. (III-C) 5. Two large bore (14 to 16 gauge) intravenous lines should be placed in a seriously injured pregnant woman. (III-C) 6. Because of their adverse effect on uteroplacental perfusion, vasopressors in pregnant women should be used only for intractable hypotension that is unresponsive to fluid resuscitation. (II-3B) 7. After mid-pregnancy, the gravid uterus should be moved off the inferior vena cava to increase venous return and cardiac output in the acutely injured pregnant woman. This may be achieved by manual displacement of the uterus or left lateral tilt. Care should be taken to secure the spinal cord when using left lateral tilt. (II-1B) 8. To avoid rhesus D (Rh) alloimmunization in Rh-negative mothers, O-negative blood should be transfused when needed until cross-matched blood becomes available. (I-A) 9. The abdominal portion of military anti-shock trousers should not be inflated on a pregnant woman because this may reduce placental perfusion. (II-3B) Transfer to health care facility 10. Transfer or transport to a maternity facility (triage of a labour and delivery unit) is advocated when injuries are neither life- nor limb-threatening and the fetus is viable (≥ 23 weeks), and to the emergency room when the fetus is under 23 weeks' gestational age or considered to be non-viable. When the injury is major, the patient should be transferred or transported to the trauma unit or emergency room, regardless of gestational age. (III-B) 11. When the severity of injury is undetermined or when the gestational age is uncertain, the patient should be evaluated in the trauma unit or emergency room to rule out major injuries. (III-C) Evaluation of a pregnant trauma patient in the emergency room 12. In cases of major trauma, the assessment, stabilization, and care of the pregnant women is the first priority; then, if the fetus is viable (≥ 23 weeks), fetal heart rate auscultation and fetal monitoring can be initiated and an obstetrical consultation obtained as soon as feasible. (II-3B) 13. In pregnant women with a viable fetus (≥ 23 weeks) and suspected uterine contractions, placental abruption, or traumatic uterine rupture, urgent obstetrical consultation is recommended. (II-3B) 14. In cases of vaginal bleeding at or after 23 weeks, speculum or digital vaginal examination should be deferred until placenta previa is excluded by a prior or current ultrasound scan. (III-C) Adjunctive tests for maternal assessment 15. Radiographic studies indicated for maternal evaluation including abdominal computed tomography should not be deferred or delayed due to concerns regarding fetal exposure to radiation. (II-2B) 16. Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents can be considered when maternal benefit outweighs potential fetal risks. (III-C) 17. In addition to the routine blood tests, a pregnant trauma patient should have a coagulation panel including fibrinogen. (III-C) 18. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma should be considered for detection of intraperitoneal bleeding in pregnant trauma patients. (II-3B) 19. Abdominal computed tomography may be considered as an alternative to diagnostic peritoneal lavage or open lavage when intra-abdominal bleeding is suspected. (III-C) Fetal assessment 20. All pregnant trauma patients with a viable pregnancy (≥ 23 weeks) should undergo electronic fetal monitoring for at least 4 hours. (II-3B) 21. Pregnant trauma patients (≥ 23 weeks) with adverse factors including uterine tenderness, significant abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, sustained contractions (> 1/10 min), rupture of the membranes, atypical or abnormal fetal heart rate pattern, high risk mechanism of injury, or serum fibrinogen < 200 mg/dL should be admitted for observation for 24 hours. (III-B) 22. Anti-D immunoglobulin should be given to all rhesus D-negative pregnant trauma patients. (III-B) 23. In Rh-negative pregnant trauma patients, quantification of maternal-fetal hemorrhage by tests such as Kleihauer-Betke should be done to determine the need for additional doses of anti-D immunoglobulin. (III-B) 24. An urgent obstetrical ultrasound scan should be undertaken when the gestational age is undetermined and need for delivery is anticipated. (III-C) 25. All pregnant trauma patients with a viable pregnancy who are admitted for fetal monitoring for greater than 4 hours should have an obstetrical ultrasound prior to discharge from hospital. (III-C) 26. Fetal well-being should be carefully documented in cases involving violence, especially for legal purposes. (III-C) Obstetrical complications of trauma 27. Management of suspected placental abruption should not be delayed pending confirmation by ultrasonography as ultrasound is not a sensitive tool for its diagnosis. (II-3D) Specific traumatic injuries 28. Tetanus vaccination is safe in pregnancy and should be given when indicated. (II-3B) 29. Every woman who sustains trauma should be questioned specifically about domestic or intimate partner violence. (II-3B) 30. During prenatal visits, the caregiver should emphasize the importance of wearing seatbelts properly at all times. (II-2B) Perimortem Caesarean section 31. A Caesarean section should be performed for viable pregnancies (≥ 23 weeks) no later than 4 minutes (when possible) following maternal cardiac arrest to aid with maternal resuscitation and fetal salvage. (III-B).

Objectif : Une femme enceinte sur 12 en vient à subir des traumatismes physiques et ceux-ci exercent des effets importants sur la mortalité et la morbidité maternelles, ainsi que sur l'issue de la grossesse. La mise en œuvre d'une approche multidisciplinaire s'avère justifiée pour assurer l'optimisation des issues, et ce, tant pour la mère que pour son fœtus. Le présent document a pour but d'offrir, aux fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux, une approche systématique factuelle qu'ils pourront utiliser pour assurer la prise en charge des patientes enceintes ayant subi un traumatisme. Issues : Issues sanitaires et économiques considérables, par comparaison avec les pratiques de rechange. Résultats : La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans Medline, CINAHL et The Cochrane Library entre octobre 2007 et septembre 2013 au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé (« pregnancy ¼, « Cesarean section ¼, « hypotension ¼, « domestic violence ¼, « shock ¼) et de mots clés (« trauma ¼, « perimortem Cesarean ¼, « Kleihauer-Betke ¼, « supine hypotension ¼, « electrical shock ¼) appropriés. Les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux études observationnelles et aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs publiés en anglais entre janvier 1968 et septembre 2013. Les recherches ont été mises à jour de façon régulière et intégrées à la directive clinique jusqu'en février 2014. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été identifiée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. Valeurs : La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau). Avantages, désavantages et coûts : Nous nous attendons à ce que la présente directive clinique facilite l'offre de soins optimaux et uniformes dans les cas de grossesse compliquée par un traumatisme. Déclaration sommaireLésions traumatiques particulières Pour l'instant, nous ne disposons pas de données probantes suffisantes pour soutenir la désactivation des coussins gonflables dans le cas des femmes enceintes. (III) RecommandationsExamen primaire 1. La présence d'une grossesse devrait être présumée chez toutes les femmes en âge de procréer ayant subi des blessures considérables, jusqu'à ce que le contraire ait été prouvé au moyen d'une échographie ou d'un test de grossesse définitif. (III-C) 2. Chez les femmes enceintes blessées inconscientes ou à demi conscientes, une sonde nasogastrique devrait être insérée afin de prévenir l'aspiration de contenu gastrique acide. (III-C) 3. Une oxygénothérapie devrait être mise en œuvre pour garantir le maintien d'une saturation maternelle en oxygène > 95 %, de façon à assurer une oxygénation fœtale adéquate. (II-1B) 4. Chez les femmes enceintes blessées, l'insertion d'une sonde de thoracostomie (à un endroit se situant à un ou deux espaces intercostaux de plus que d'habitude) pourrait être envisagée, au besoin. (III-C) 5. Chez les femmes enceintes gravement blessées, deux lignes intraveineuses de gros calibre (14-16) devraient être mises en place. (III-C) 6. En raison des effets indésirables qu'ils exercent sur la perfusion utéroplacentaire chez les femmes enceintes, les vasopresseurs ne devraient être utilisés qu'en présence d'une hypotension réfractaire qui ne réagit pas à la réanimation liquidienne. (II-3B) 7. Chez les femmes enceintes gravement blessées qui ont passé le cap de la mi-grossesse, l'utérus gravide devrait être repositionné de façon à ce qu'il ne comprime plus la veine cave inférieure, et ce, dans le but d'accroître le retour veineux et le débit cardiaque. Ce repositionnement peut être obtenu en déplaçant l'utérus manuellement ou en plaçant la patiente en position latérale gauche (en s'assurant alors d'immobiliser la moelle épinière de la patiente au préalable). (II-1B) 8. Pour prévenir l'allo-immunisation rhésus D chez les femmes Rh négatives, du sang O négatif devrait être transfusé, au besoin, jusqu'à ce que du sang provenant d'un donneur compatible soit obtenu. (I-A) 9. La partie abdominale du pantalon pneumatique hypotenseur ne devrait pas être gonflée en présence d'une grossesse, car cela pourrait atténuer la perfusion placentaire. (II-3B) Transfert vers un établissement de santé 10. Le transfert vers un service de maternité (service de triage d'une unité de travail et d'accouchement) est recommandé lorsque la patiente en question ne présente pas de blessures potentiellement mortelles ou pouvant mener à la perte d'un membre et lorsque le fœtus est viable (≥ 23 semaines); le transfert vers une salle des urgences est recommandé lorsque le fœtus n'a pas encore atteint l'âge gestationnel de 23 semaines ou lorsqu'il n'est pas considéré comme étant viable. En présence d'un traumatisme majeur, la patiente devrait être transférée ou transportée vers une unité de traumatologie ou une salle des urgences, sans égard à l'âge gestationnel. (III-B) 11. Lorsque la gravité du traumatisme est indéterminée ou lorsque l'âge gestationnel est incertain, la patiente devrait faire l'objet d'une évaluation menée dans une unité de traumatologie ou une salle des urgences en vue d'écarter la présence de blessures majeures. (III-C) Évaluation, au sein d'une salle des urgences, d'une patiente enceinte ayant subi un traumatisme 12. En présence d'un traumatisme majeur, la priorité doit être accordée à l'évaluation, à la stabilisation et à la prise en charge de la femme enceinte; par la suite, lorsque le fœtus est viable (≥ 23 semaines), l'auscultation de la fréquence cardiaque fœtale et un monitorage fœtal peuvent être mis en œuvre. De plus, une consultation en obstétrique devrait être obtenue dès que possible. (II-3B) 13. La tenue d'une consultation d'urgence en obstétrique est recommandée en ce qui concerne les femmes enceintes dont le fœtus est viable (≥ 23 semaines) et chez qui l'on soupçonne la présence de contractions utérines, d'un décollement placentaire ou d'une rupture utérine traumatique. (II-3B) 14. En présence de saignements vaginaux à 23 semaines ou par la suite, la tenue d'un examen vaginal au moyen d'un spéculum ou des doigts devrait être reportée jusqu'à ce que la présence d'un placenta praevia ait été écartée par échographie (préalable ou actuelle). (III-C) Tests d'appoint dans le cadre de l'évaluation maternelle 15. Les études de radiographie nécessaires aux fins de l'évaluation maternelle (dont la tomodensitométrie abdominale) ne devraient pas être retardées ni reportées en raison de préoccupations à l'égard de l'exposition du fœtus à des rayonnements. (II-2B) 16. L'utilisation de produits de contraste à base de gadolinium peut être envisagée lorsque les avantages maternels l'emportent sur les risques fœtaux potentiels. (III-C) 17. En plus des tests sanguins qui sont régulièrement menés dans le cadre de l'évaluation des patientes enceintes ayant subi un traumatisme, un profil de coagulation (comprenant la mesure du taux de fibrinogène) devrait être obtenu. (III-C) 18. Chez les patientes enceintes ayant subi un traumatisme, la tenue d'une échographie abdominale ciblée pour l'identification de traumatismes devrait être envisagée aux fins de la détection des saignements intrapéritonéaux. (II-3B) 19. Lorsque la présence de saignements intra-abdominaux est soupçonnée, la tomodensitométrie abdominale pourrait constituer une solution de rechange au lavage péritonéal diagnostique ou au lavage ouvert. (III-C) Évaluation fœtale 20. Toutes les patientes enceintes ayant subi un traumatisme qui présentent une grossesse viable (≥ 23 semaines) devraient faire l'objet d'un monitorage fœtal électronique pendant au moins 4 heures. (II-3B) 21. Les patientes enceintes ayant subi un traumatisme (≥ 23 semaines) qui présentent des facteurs indésirables (dont la sensibilité utérine, des douleurs abdominales considérables, des saignements vaginaux, des contractions soutenues [> 1/10 min], la rupture des membranes, un profil de fréquence cardiaque fœtale atypique ou anormal, un mécanisme de blessure à risque élevé ou un taux sérique de fibrinogène < 200 mg/dl) devraient être hospitalisées pour une période d'observation de 24 heures. (III-B) 22. De l'immunoglobuline anti-D devrait être administrée à toutes les patientes enceintes Rh négatives ayant subi un traumatisme. (III-B) 23. Chez les patientes enceintes Rh négatives ayant subi un traumatisme, l'hémorragie fœtomaternelle devrait être quantifiée au moyen de mesures telles que le test de Kleihauer-Betke, et ce, dans le but de déterminer la nécessité de procéder à l'administration de doses additionnelles d'immunoglobuline anti-D. (III-B) 24. Une échographie obstétricale devrait être menée d'urgence lorsque l'âge gestationnel est indéterminé et que la nécessité de procéder à l'accouchement est anticipée. (III-C) 25. Toutes les patientes enceintes ayant subi un traumatisme qui présentent une grossesse viable et qui sont hospitalisées aux fins de la tenue d'un monitorage fœtal pendant plus de 4 heures devraient faire l'objet d'une échographie obstétricale avant d'obtenir leur congé de l'hôpital. (III-C) 26. Il est important de disposer, particulièrement à des fins juridiques, d'une documentation rigoureuse du bien-être fœtal dans les cas mettant en cause de la violence. (III-C) Complications obstétricales du traumatisme 27. La prise en charge de la présence soupçonnée d'un décollement placentaire ne devrait pas être différée jusqu'à l'obtention d'une confirmation par échographie; l'échographie ne dispose pas de la sensibilité requise pour l'établissement d'undiagnostic de décollement placentaire. (II-3D) Lésions traumatiques particulières 28. La vaccination antitétanique est sûre pendant la grossesse et devrait être administrée, au besoin. (II-3B) 29. Toutes les femmes qui subissent un traumatisme devraient faire l'objet de questions visant particulièrement la violence familiale ou conjugale. (II-3B) 30. Dans le cadre des consultations prénatales, le fournisseur de soins devrait souligner l'importance du port de la ceinture de sécurité de façon adéquate, en tout temps. (II-2B) Césarienne péri-mortem 31. En présence d'une grossesse viable (≥ 23 semaines), la tenue d'une césarienne est recommandée au plus tard 4 minutes (dans la mesure du possible) à la suite de l'arrêt cardiaque chez la mère, et ce, en vue de faciliter la réanimation maternelle et le sauvetage du fœtus. (III-B).