[Breast cancer screening in thirteen French departments]. / Dépistage du cancer du sein dans treize départements français.

BACKGROUND: In France, breast cancer screening programme, free of charge for women aged 50-74 years old, coexists with an opportunistic screening and leads to reduction in attendance in the programme. Here, we reported participation in organized and/or opportunistic screening in thirteen French departments. POPULATION AND METHODS: We analyzed screening data (organized and/or opportunistic) of 622,382 women aged 51-74 years old invited to perform an organized mammography screening session from 2010 to 2011 in the thirteen French departments. The type of mammography screening performed has been reported according to women age, their health insurance scheme, the rurality and the socioeconomic level of their area or residence. We also represented the tertiles of deprivation and participation in mammography screening for each department. RESULTS: A total of 390,831 (62.8%) women performed a mammography screening (organized and/or opportunistic) after the invitation. These women were mainly aged from 55-69 years old, insured by the general insurance scheme and lived in urban, semi-urban or affluent areas. CONCLUSION: The participation in mammography screening (organized and opportunistic) in France remains below the target rate of 70% expected by health authorities to reduce breast cancer mortality through screening.

[Bulletin of synthesis 2005. Recommendations for clinical practice. Management of non metastatic prostate cancer]. / Bulletin de synthèse de veille 2005. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Prise en charge thérapeutique du cancer de la prostate non métastatique.

This paper is based on the bulletin of synthesis 2005. Management of non metastatic prostate cancer. Recommendations for clinical practice of the French Urologial Association and the National Federation of Anticancer Centers.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations 2005 for a good practice in enteral nutrition in oncology (summary report.)]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: Standards, Options et Recommandations 2005. Bonnes pratiques pour la prise en charge diététique en cancérologie: la nutrition entérale (rapport abrégé). Validation du rapport original: avril 2005.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To develop good practice guidelines for a good practice of enteral nutrition in oncology, in collaboration with three French learned societies involved in this area. METHOD: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guideline has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The good practices suggested in the document approach seven topics: indications and counter-indications, conditions of the installation of the enteral nutrition, monitoring, prevention of complications, education of the patient, specificities of enteral nutrition in children and at home. In the setting of enteral nutrition, feeding tubes, type of insertion, enteral nutrition products, material and techniques of administration are described as well as the criteria permitting their selection.

[Standards and Options for the use of radiation therapy in the management of patients with osteosarcoma. Update 2004]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: Standards, Options 2004 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints d'ostéosarcome. Mise à jour 2004 du chapitre radiothérapie, validation du rapport initial: mars 1995, 1ère validation de la mise à jour du chapitre radiothérapie: décembre 1998, 2e validation de la mise à jour du chapitre radiothérapie: septembre 2004.

CONTEXT: The A "Standards, Options and Recommendations A" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French regional cancer centres, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVE: To update the SOR recommendations for the use of radiation therapy in the management of patients with osteosarcoma. This work was performed in collaboration with the French society against cancers in children and adolescent (SFCE). METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using MedlineA (from January 1992 to October 2003). In addition several Internet sites were searched in October 2003. RESULTS: The 3 mains standards are: 1) local and exclusive curative irradiation is not indicated as primary treatment for osteosarcoma or for local and operable recurrence, except for lesion in inaccessible sites or if the patient refuses surgery; 2) local and prophylactic adjuvant irradiation is not indicated for the treatment of osteosarcoma after chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) and complete macro or microscopic surgery, except for nonoperable R1 or R2 surgical resection and 3) whole-lung prophylactic irradiation is not indicated in non-metastatic osteosarcoma. Systemic metabolic radiotherapy for pain treatment, using samarium-153 ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonic acid (Sm-153-EDTMP) can be offered to patients with painful metastatic osteosarcoma or in case of recurrent bone sites inaccessible to local therapies (surgery, external irradiation).

[Clinical practice guidelines: Standards, Options and Recommendations for first line medical treatment of patients with ovarian neoplasms (summary report)]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Standards, Options et Recommandations 2003 pour le traitement médical de première ligne des patientes atteintes de tumeurs épithéliales malignes de l'ovaire, mise à jour (rapport abrégé).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To update clinical practice guidelines for first line medical treatment of patients with ovarian neoplasms in collaboration with the French Society for Gynaecologica Oncology. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The CPGs are defined following the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guideline has been developed, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article is a summary version of the full document presenting the clinical practice guidelines with algorithms. After surgery, most patients with ovarian neoplasms need adjuvant medical treatment. These guidelines concern the initial medical treatment (chemotherapy, hormone treatment and immunotherapy) and potential consolidation treatment. To complete the indications, two alternative treatment strategies are taken into account: no treatment and radiotherapy. This updated version concerns the indications and the modalities of chemotherapy. The main modifications are: 1) first-line chemotherapy for ovarian neoplasm can be taxane-platinum or carboplatine alone; 2) poly-chemotherapy is no longer a standard; 3) for early stages, except for stage IA grade I non-clear-cell tumours, adjuvant chemotherapy should be preferred to no treatment; 4) chemotherapy is standard for all stage III tumours, irrespective of the surgical result; 5) for stage IA G2-3 to IIA tumours, complete surgical staging and determination of the histological grade are standards.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations 2004: good practice guidelines for second opinion in anatomic and surgical pathology in oncology (integral report)]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations 2004 pour une bonne pratique de la consultation personnelle et de la relecture en anatomie et cytologie pathologiques en cancérologie (rapport intégral).

CONTEXT: The " Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French Federation of Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To develop good practice guidelines for second opinion in anatomic and surgical pathology in oncology, in collaboration with the French Society for Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. METHOD: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs using the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guideline has been defined, the document is submitted to independent reviewers for review. RESULTS: The working group defined four types of second opinions in anatomic and surgical pathology: personal consultation, inter-institutional consultation, peer review consultation for a scientific survey, intra-departmental consultation in the context of quality control. The main recommendation is that second opinion should respect the patients' rights and the medical ethics code. For each of the four situations defined recommendations have been developed, taking this principle into consideration.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of invasive cervical cancer patients (non metastastic)]. / Standards, Options and Recommandations Cancers invasifs du col utérin stades non métastatiques, version abrégée.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French cancer centers and specialists from French public university and general hospitals and private clinics. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations, clinical practice guidelines for the management of invasive cervical cancer patients. Methods : Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups, then submitted for review to independent reviewers. RESULTS: This is a synthesis of the Standards, Options and Recommendations elaborated by a working group of experts. Pretherapeutic assessment, classification, diagnosis, therapeutic modalities (surgery, radiotherapy, radiochemotherapy, chemotherapy), therapeutic strategies by disease stage and follow-up are covered. Algorithms for the management of patients are also included.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations 2002 for the management of adult patients with intracranial gliomas (summary report)]. / Standards, options et recommandations 2002 pour la prise en charge des patients atteints de gliomes intracrâniens de l'adulte (rapport abrégé).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To define clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult patients with intracranial glioma in collaboration with the Association of French-speaking Neuro-oncologists (Anocef) and the French society of neurosurgeons (SNCLF). These recommendations cover diagnosis, classification, treatment and follow-up of patients with these tumors. METHOD: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article is a summary version of the full document presenting the clinical practice guidelines with algorithms. The main recommendations concern the place of the surgery, radiotherapy, chemiotherapy, imagery and concomitant medical treatments in the specific treatment strategy of grade III and IV glioma, grade II glioma, gliomatosis cerebri, pilocytic astrocytoma, subependymoma, xanthoastrocytoma, intracranial ependymoma and brain stem glioma.

[Clinical practice guidelines: Standards, Options and Recommendations for the diagnosis of carcinomas of unknown primary site]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: Standards, Options et Recommandations 2002 pour le diagnostic des carcinomes de site primitif inconnu.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To define Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the diagnosis of carcinomas of unknown primary site. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGs according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines has been defined, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the diagnosis of carcinomas of unknown primary site are: 1) Diagnostic strategy should aim to identify anatomoclinical entities of carcinomas of unknown primary site for which there is a specific treatment. For other anatomoclinical entities, identification of the primary tumour has no impact on the prognostic or therapeutic consequences, thus a systematic complete assessment is unnecessary. 2) An immunohistochemical investigation for the diagnosis should be performed using an appropriate panel of specific antibodies. This should enable the diagnosis of lymphoma, melanoma, germ cell tumour and sarcoma to be eliminated and the diagnosis of prostate, breast, ovary, thyroid or neuroendocrine tumours to be positively identified. 3) A sample can be frozen to enable typing, cytogenetic and, particularly, molecular biological studies to be performed later. 4) The clinician and pathologist should compare their opinions before and after the pathological diagnosis.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patient with carcinoma of unknown primary site]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations 2002 pur la prise en charge des patients atteints de carcinomes de site primitif inconnu (rapport abrégé).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers, and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUPS) patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline , web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 81 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the management of patients CUPS are presented below: 1) An adapted immunochemistry test using a specific antibody battery should be performed for the anatomopathologic diagnosis. 2) The aim of the diagnosis is to identify specific anatomoclinical forms that can be treated by a specific treatment (standard, level of evidence B2). Except these forms, searching for the primary tumor site have no prognosis or therapeutic interest that can justify a systematic diagnosis assessment (standard, level of evidence B2). 3) The management of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma consists of platin/etoposide based chemotherapy. There is no standard treatment for the differentiated forms. 4) Surgical node excision and adjuvant radiotherapy should be performed in case of epidermoid carcinoma with cervical node metastases. In the event of a non operable tumor, an irradiation should be performed. 5) The management of axillary node metastases in women with adenocarcinoma should be the same as the management of patients with lymph node metastases in breast cancer. If mammary MRI is negative, surgical treatment and mammary irradiation are not recommended and an axillary node excision should be performed. 6) The standard treatment for women with primary papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum is a surgical resection followed by chemotherapy, as recommended for ovarian cancer. 7) CUPS not belonging to any specific anatomoclinical forms can be treated by chemotherapy, symptomatic treatment alone or treatment based on biphosphonates in presence bone metastases.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations 2000: non metastatic endometrial cancer]. / Standards, Options et Recommendations 2000: cancer de l'endomètre, stades non métastatiques (rapport abrégé).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers, and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics, and some specialists learned societies. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The SORs are developed using a methodology based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with carcinoma of the endometrium according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline , web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 63 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the management of carcinoma of the endometrium are: 1) The diagnosis of carcinoma of the endometrium is based on biopsy and histological examination. However, as first intention, the first elements for diagnosis can be obtain from a hysterography, or particularly, a endovaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound allows locoregional metastases to be detected, the CT scan allows the lymph node involvement to be assessed and magnetic resonance imaging allows the myometrium invasion to be evaluated. 2) For the majority of patients, surgery is the initial treatment, both for localised and advanced-stage carcinomas. The excised sample can be used for pathological analysis and tumour staging, using the FIGO (Fédération internationale de gynécologie obstétrique) classification. Surgery for patients with stage I and II carcinomas involves total extrafascial hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy., In patients with stage III and IV carcinomas radical surgery should be performed, when possible. If this is not possible, then surgery should be as complete as possible and be associated with a complementary treatment. In patients with the most advanced carcinomas, tumour reduction by surgery should be performed. 3) Complementary treatment includes external-beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. The decision concerning the extent and type of irradiation should be taken taking into consideration the stage and the prognostic factors present. For patients with stage I and II carcinoma, complementary treatment with brachytherapy can be performed, if the myometrium invasion is not deep, or if the carcinoma is grade 2 or 3. Patients with stage III carcinomas can be treated with pelvic or abdominal-pelvic complementary irradiation. In patients that cannot undergo surgery, exclusive radiotherapy can be performed. 4) In the absence of any symptoms, surveillance should include a general clinical and gynaecological examination. All patients with symptoms should undergo an additional work-up.