RESUMO
Clinical capacity for sustainability, or the clinical resources needed to sustain an evidence-based practice, represent proximal determinants that contribute to intervention sustainment. We examine the relationship between clinical capacity for sustainability and sustainment of PEWS, an evidence-based intervention to improve outcomes for pediatric oncology patients in resource-variable hospitals. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among Latin American pediatric oncology centers participating in Proyecto Escala de Valoración de Alerta Temprana (EVAT), an improvement collaborative to implement Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS). Hospitals were eligible if they had completed PEWS implementation. Clinicians were eligible to participate if they were involved in PEWS implementation or used PEWS in clinical work. The Spanish language survey consisted of 56 close and open-ended questions about the respondent, hospital, participants' assessment of clinical capacity to sustain PEWS using the clinical sustainability assessment tool (CSAT), and perceptions about PEWS and its use as an intervention. Results were analyzed using a multi-level modeling approach to examine the relationship between individual, hospital, intervention, and clinical capacity determinants to PEWS sustainment. A total of 797 responses from 37 centers in 13 countries were included in the analysis. Eighty-seven percent of participants reported PEWS sustainment. After controlling for individual, hospital, and intervention factors, clinical capacity was significantly associated with PEWS sustainment (OR 3.27, p < .01). Marginal effects from the final model indicate that an increasing capacity score has a positive influence (11% for every additional CSAT point) of predicting PEWS sustainment. PEWS is a sustainable intervention and clinical capacity to sustain PEWS contributes meaningfully to PEWS sustainment.
RESUMO
Introducción: La pseudotrombocitopenia dependiente del ácido etilendiaminotetraacético (PTCP-EDTA) es un fenómeno de laboratorio con una prevalencia estimada del 0,1-2% entre los pacientes hospitalizados y entre el 15-17% en los pacientes ambulatorios evaluados por trombocitopenia aislada. Se produce por cambios conformacionales a nivel de las glicoproteínas de la superficie plaquetaria que inducen la agregación de plaquetas tras la exposición al EDTA. Esta agregación da lugar a una falsa disminución del conteo de unidades totales de plaquetas al utilizar analizadores automatizados. Presentación del caso: Presentamos el caso de un paciente de 5 años que presentaba niveles bajos de plaquetas sin signos de hemorragia activa. El paciente fue ingresado en el hospital mientras se estudiaba la causa de su bajo conteo plaquetario. Para el diagnóstico de PTCP-EDTA, se realizó un frotis de sangre periférica y se compararon los niveles plaquetarios utilizando el tubo con anticoagulante de citrato. Conclusión: La PTCP-EDTA suele ser un diagnóstico que se pasa por alto y que puede dar lugar a procedimientos innecesarios y gastos adicionales para los pacientes que presentan este fenómeno in vitro. (provisto por Infomedic International)
Introduction: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia (PTCP-EDTA) is a laboratory phenomenon with an estimated prevalence of 0.1-2% among hospitalized patients and between 15-17% in outpatients evaluated for isolated thrombocytopenia. It is caused by conformational changes at the level of platelet surface glycoproteins that induce platelet aggregation following EDTA exposure. This aggregation results in a false decrease in total platelet unit count when using automated analyzers. Case presentation: We present the case of a 5-year-old patient who presented with low platelet levels without signs of active bleeding. The patient was admitted to the hospital while the cause of his low platelet count was being studied. For the diagnosis of PTCP-EDTA, a peripheral blood smear was performed and platelet levels were compared using the tube with citrate anticoagulant. Conclusion: PTCP-EDTA is often an overlooked diagnosis that may result in unnecessary procedures and additional expense for patients presenting with this phenomenon in vitro. (provided by Infomedic International)