Fostamatinib for the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalization is characterized by robust antibody production, dysregulated immune response, and immunothrombosis. Fostamatinib is a novel spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor that we hypothesize will ameliorate Fc activation and attenuate harmful effects of the anti-COVID-19 immune response. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized adults requiring oxygen with COVID-19 where patients receiving standard of care were randomized to receive fostamatinib or placebo. The primary outcome was serious adverse events by day 29. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients underwent randomization (30 to fostamatinib and 29 to placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in 10.5% of patients in the fostamatinib group compared with 22% in placebo (P = .2). Three deaths occurred by day 29, all receiving placebo. The mean change in ordinal score at day 15 was greater in the fostamatinib group (-3.6 ±â€…0.3 vs -2.6 ±â€…0.4, P = .035) and the median length in the intensive care unit was 3 days in the fostamatinib group vs 7 days in placebo (P = .07). Differences in clinical improvement were most evident in patients with severe or critical disease (median days on oxygen, 10 vs 28, P = .027). There were trends toward more rapid reductions in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and ferritin levels in the fostamatinib group. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, the addition of fostamatinib to standard of care was safe and patients were observed to have improved clinical outcomes compared with placebo. These results warrant further validation in larger confirmatory trials. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04579393.

The influence of alternative instruction on 6-min walk test distance.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) is to enable patients to walk "as far as possible" as a measure of their functional ability. The impact of the specific walk instructions on patient 6MWT performance is unknown. METHODS: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and other forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were recruited to perform four identical 6MWTs with one differing instructional phrase. The standard instruction to walk "as far as possible" was substituted in random order with "as fast as possible," "at your normal pace," or "at a leisurely pace." RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (10 with PAH, eight with IPF, six with other ILD) were enrolled and completed all four 6MWTs. Patients attained the greatest distance with the fast instruction, exceeding the standard instruction distance by a mean of 52.7 m (P < .001). The mean difference between the fast and standard walks was 41.5 m in the PAH group, 66.5 m in the IPF group, and 53 m in the other ILD group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients do not walk as far as they are able with the standard American Thoracic Society instruction for 6MWT. Changing the wording from "far" to "fast" may facilitate a better effort and greater distance during the test. It is possible that this modified 6MWT instruction may result in improved accuracy and reproducibility, thereby enhancing its clinical and research trial usefulness.

Long-term course and prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the new millennium.

The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have been published recently. However, the influence, practical application, and utility of the prior consensus statement for IPF have never been evaluated. Demographics, diagnostic criteria, pulmonary function data, and disposition of patients with IPF evaluated at an interstitial lung disease center between 2000 and 2009 were analyzed. Enrollment in clinical drug trials, lung transplantation, and mortality also were assessed. A total of 521 patients with IPF were evaluated, with pulmonary function testing available in 446. In the 64% of patients without surgical lung biopsy, the most common major criterion not fulfilled was bronchoscopy. Lung transplantation was performed in 16.1% of patients, whereas 27.4% of prescreened patients were enrolled in a prospective drug study. Patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease categorized by FVC % predicted had median survivals of 55.6, 38.7, and 27.4 months, respectively. The attrition rate of patients who survived beyond 5 years was attenuated in subsequent years. IPF remains a deadly disease with a poor prognosis. Bronchoscopy does not appear to be required for an accurate diagnosis. A minority of patients were accommodated within a clinical trial or with transplantation. Categorization by baseline FVC % predicted effectively discriminates groups with different long-term outcomes. Our analysis supports the view that the value of statements also can be realized in the subsequent demonstration of their impact on patient management, which might enable further refinements in a continuous, iterative rediscovery process.