When a test is more than just a test: Findings from patient interviews and survey in the trial of a technology to measure antidepressant medication response (the PReDicT Trial).

BACKGROUND: A RCT of a novel intervention to detect antidepressant medication response (the PReDicT Test) took place in five European countries, accompanied by a nested study of its acceptability and implementation presented here. The RCT results indicated no effect of the intervention on depression at 8 weeks (primary outcome), although effects on anxiety at 8 weeks and functioning at 24 weeks were found. METHODS: The nested study used mixed methods. The aim was to explore patient experiences of the Test including acceptability and implementation, to inform its use within care. A bespoke survey was completed by trial participants in five countries (n = 778) at week 8. Semi-structured interviews were carried out in two countries soon after week 8 (UK n = 22, Germany n = 20). Quantitative data was analysed descriptively; for qualitative data, thematic analysis was carried out using a framework approach. Results of the two datasets were interrogated together. OUTCOMES: Survey results showed the intervention was well received, with a majority of participants indicating they would use it again, and it gave them helpful extra information; a small minority indicated the Test made them feel worse. Qualitative data showed the Test had unexpected properties, including: instigating a process of reflection, giving participants feedback on progress and new understanding about their illness, and making participants feel supported and more engaged in treatment. INTERPRETATION: The qualitative and quantitative results are generally consistent. The Test's unexpected properties may explain why the RCT showed little effect, as properties were experienced across both trial arms. Beyond the RCT, the qualitative data sheds light on measurement reactivity, i.e., how measurements of depression can impact patients.

Exploring the incidence of inadequate response to antidepressants in the primary care of depression.

Data from the UK suggests 13-55 % of depression patients experience some level of treatment resistance. However, little is known about how physicians manage inadequate response to antidepressants in primary care. This study aimed to explore the incidence of inadequate response to antidepressants in UK primary care. One-hundred-eighty-four medication-free patients with low mood initiated antidepressant treatment and monitored severity of depression symptoms, using the QIDS-SR16, for 48 weeks. Medication changes, visits to healthcare providers, and health-related quality of life were also recorded. Patients were classified into one of four response types based on their QIDS scores at three study timepoints: persistent inadequate responders (<50 % reduction in baseline QIDS at all timepoints), successful responders (≥50 % reduction in baseline QIDS at all timepoints), slow responders (≥50 % reduction in QIDS at week 48, despite earlier inadequate responses), and relapse (initial ≥50 % reduction in baseline QIDS, but inadequate response by week 48). Forty-eight weeks after initiating treatment 47 % of patients continued to experience symptoms of depression (QIDS >5), and 20 % of patients had a persistent inadequate response. Regardless of treatment response, 96 % (n = 176) of patients did not visit their primary care physician over the 40-week follow-up period. These results suggest that despite receiving treatment, a considerable proportion of patients with low mood remain unwell and fail to recover. Monitoring depression symptoms remotely can enable physicians to identify inadequate responders, allowing patients to be reassessed or referred to secondary services, likely improving patients' quality of life and reducing the socioeconomic impacts of chronic mental illness.

Use of experimental medicine approaches for the development of novel psychiatric treatments based on orexin receptor modulation.

Despite progress in understanding the pathological mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders, translation from animal models into clinical use remains a significant bottleneck. Preclinical studies have implicated the orexin neuropeptide system as a potential target for psychiatric disorders through its role in regulating emotional, cognitive, and behavioral processes. Clinical studies are investigating orexin modulation in addiction and mood disorders. Here we review performance-outcome measures (POMs) arising from experimental medicine research methods which may show promise as markers of efficacy of orexin receptor modulators in humans. POMs provide objective measures of brain function, complementing patient-reported or clinician-observed symptom evaluation, and aid the translation from preclinical to clinical research. Significant challenges include the development, validation, and operationalization of these measures. We suggest that collaborative networks comprising clinical practitioners, academics, individuals working in the pharmaceutical industry, drug regulators, patients, patient advocacy groups, and other relevant stakeholders may provide infrastructure to facilitate validation of experimental medicine approaches in translational research and in the implementation of these approaches in real-world clinical practice.