Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 345: 14-19, 2021 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34699868

RESUMO

AIMS: Mechanical complications (MC) (i.e., free wall rupture (FWR), papillary muscle rupture (PMR) and ventricular septal rupture (VSR)) are rare complications of ST- elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Incidence of MC according to pre-hospital delay remains unknown. We aimed to determine the rates of MC according to pre-hospital delay. METHODS: Analysis was conducted on the MODIF registry data. Patients were allocated to four groups according to pre-hospital delay: 0 to 12 h, 12 to 24 h, 24 to 36 h and 36 to 48 h. RESULTS: 6185 patients with complete data were analyzed. Mean age was 64.1 years old and 75.7% of patients were males. Eighty-three patients (1.34%) presented with MC: 44 (0.71%) experienced a FWR, 17 (0.27%) a PMR, and 22 (0.36%) a VSR. Global rates of MC were 0.82%, 1.43%, 1.24% and 5.07% in the four groups of pre-hospital delays - 0 to 12 h, 12 to 24 h, 24 to 36 h and 36 to 48 h - respectively (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rates were high: 44.2%, 47.1% and 54.6% for FWR, PMR and VSR, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors independently related to the occurrence of MC were older age, female sex, simultaneous COVID-19 infection, absence of dyslipidemia, initial TIMI flow 0 or 1 in the culprit artery, 36 to 48 h-pre-hospital delay and absence of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. CONCLUSION: The probability of MC in STEMI increases with pre-hospital delay. Mechanical complications of STEMI remain associated with a very poor prognosis.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(5): 340-351, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Systems of care have been challenged to control progression of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether this has been associated with delayed reperfusion and worse outcomes in French patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. AIM: To compare the rate of STEMI admissions, treatment delays, and outcomes between the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France and the equivalent period in 2019. METHODS: In this nationwide French survey, data from consecutive STEMI patients from 65 centres referred for urgent revascularization between 1 March and 31 May 2020, and between 1 March and 31 May 2019, were analysed. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death or non-fatal mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A total of 6306 patients were included. During the pandemic peak, a 13.9±6.6% (P=0.003) decrease in STEMI admissions per week was observed. Delays between symptom onset and percutaneous coronary intervention were longer in 2020 versus 2019 (270 [interquartile range 150-705] vs 245 [140-646]min; P=0.013), driven by the increase in time from symptom onset to first medical contact (121 [60-360] vs 150 [62-420]min; P=0.002). During 2020, a greater number of mechanical complications was observed (0.9% vs 1.7%; P=0.029) leading to a significant difference in the primary outcome (112 patients [5.6%] in 2019 vs 129 [7.6%] in 2020; P=0.018). No significant difference was observed in rates of orotracheal intubation, in-hospital cardiac arrest, ventricular arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS: During the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, there was a decrease in STEMI admissions, associated with longer ischaemic time, exclusively driven by an increase in patient-related delays and an increase in mechanical complications. These findings suggest the need to encourage the population to seek medical help in case of symptoms.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Ruptura Cardíaca Pós-Infarto/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Stents , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 110(10): 508-516, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28647466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the number of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures is constantly increasing, it is important to consider common complications, such as pacemaker (PM) implantation, and their specific risk factors. AIMS: Echocardiographic, computed tomography and electrocardiographic data were analysed to determine the predicting factors, if any, associated with PM implantation. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients referred to Nancy University Hospital for a TAVI procedure from January 2013 to December 2015. Both Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards SAPIEN valves were implanted. Patients with preprocedurally implanted PMs and/or referred from another institution were excluded. RESULTS: Of 208 TAVI patients, 23 had a pre-existing PM and were excluded. A new PM was required in 38 patients (20.5%). Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB), the use of the Medtronic CoreValve and large prostheses were identified as predictors of PM implantation (P=0.0361, P=0.0004 and P=0.0019, respectively). Using logistic regression, predictors of PM implantation included first-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.1; P=0.0054) and large aortic annulus diameter in echocardiography (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1-1.4; P=0.0447), with a threshold of 24.1mm. For the combination of preTAVI PR duration >220ms and QRS duration >120ms, the positive predictive value for PM implantation reached 80%. CONCLUSION: Use of the Medtronic CoreValve, RBBB and first-degree atrioventricular block are major risk factors for post-TAVI PM implantation. In addition, large aortic annulus and large valvular prosthesis are independent risk factors for PM implantation. The combination of preTAVI prolonged PR interval and increased QRS duration could be used as a marker for periprocedural PM implantation.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial , Marca-Passo Artificial , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Ecocardiografia , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA