Correspondence between symptoms and preference-based health status measures in the STOP study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients decrease lung function, increase symptoms and reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated associations between 8 symptom-based questions from the Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptom Diary - Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CFRSD-CRISS) and the 5-level EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5 L) summary score and hypothesized the CFRSD-CRISS would be well-correlated with quality-of-life measures among CF patients with PEx. METHODS: CF patients who had CFRSD-CRISS and EQ-5D-5L measurements on the day of the initial PEx, 7 days later, and at the end of intravenous antibiotic treatment were included. We examined age-stratified (<18 versus ≥18 years old) characteristics, including the percent predicted of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1), CFRSD-CRISS measurements, and domains of the EQ-5D. We also calculated age-stratified Pearson correlation coefficients between the EQ-5D-5L and CFRSD-CRISS items at each of the 3 time points. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were analyzed. Patients reported having problems performing usual activities and with pain/discomfort on the first day of the PEx and these measures improved by the end of treatment. PpFEV1 improved in both age categories by the end of PEx treatment but was not associated with the change in summary EQ-5D-5 L over the time of PEx treatment (r-squared = 0.029). Correlations were weak (generally <0.4) between the elements of the EQ-5D-5 L versus the CFRSD-CRISS. CONCLUSIONS: Value assessment of treatments for CF PEx will require the collection of preference-weighted measures rather than only the symptom-based questions of the CFRSD-CRISS.

Study design considerations for the Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations 2 (STOP2): A trial to compare intravenous antibiotic treatment durations in CF.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and contribute to morbidity and mortality. Duration of IV antibiotic therapy to treat PEx varies widely in the US, and there are few data to guide treatment decisions. METHODS: We combined a survey of CF stakeholders with retrospective analyses of a recent observational study of CF PEx to design a multicenter, randomized, prospective study comparing the efficacy and safety of different durations of IV antibiotics for PEx to meet the needs of people with CF and their caregivers. RESULTS: IV antibiotic duration was cited as the most important PEx research question by responding CF physicians and top concern among surveyed CF patients/caregivers. During PEx, forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1% predicted) and symptom responses at 7-10days of IV antibiotics identified two distinct groups: early robust responders (ERR) who subsequently experienced greater FEV1 improvements compared to non-ERR (NERR). In addition to greater FEV1 and symptom responses, only 14% of ERR patients were treated with IV antibiotics for >15days, compared with 45% of NERR patients. CONCLUSIONS: A divergent trial design that evaluates subjects' interim improvement in FEV1 and symptoms to tailor randomization to IV treatment duration (10 vs. 14days for ERR, 14 vs. 21days for NERR) may alleviate physician and patient concerns about excess or inadequate treatment. Such a study has the potential to provide evidence necessary to standardize IV antibiotic duration in CF PEx care -a first step to conducting PEx research of other treatment features.

Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) study: Observations at the initiation of intravenous antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: The Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) program has the intent of defining best practices in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The objective of this analysis was to describe the clinical presentations of patients admitted for intravenous (IV) antibiotics and enrolled in a prospective observational PEx study as well as to understand physician treatment goals at the start of the intervention. METHODS: We enrolled adolescents and adults admitted to the hospital for a PEx treated with IV antibiotics. We recorded patient and PEx characteristics at the time of enrollment. We surveyed treating physicians on treatment goals as well as their willingness to enroll patients in various study designs. Additional demographic and clinical data were obtained from the CF Foundation Patient Registry. RESULTS: Of 220 patients enrolled, 56% were female, 19% were adolescents, and 71% were infected with P. aeruginosa. The mean (SD) FEV1 at enrollment was 51.1 (21.6)% predicted. Most patients (85%) experienced symptoms for ≥7days before admission, 43% had received IV antibiotics within the previous 6months, and 48% received oral and/or inhaled antibiotics prior to IV antibiotic initiation. Forty percent had ≥10% FEV1 decrease from their best value recorded in the previous 6months, but for 20% of patients, their enrollment FEV1 was their best FEV1 recorded within the previous 6months. Physicians reported that their primary treatment objectives were lung function recovery (53%) and improvement of symptoms (47%) of PEx. Most physicians stated they would enroll patients in studies involving 10-day (72%) or 14-day (87%), but not 7-day (29%), treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, prospective studies are feasible and physician willingness for interventional studies of PEx exists. Results of this observational study will help design future PEx trials.

Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) study: Physician treatment practices and outcomes for individuals with cystic fibrosis with pulmonary Exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Exacerbations (PEx) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in individuals with CF. PEx management practices vary widely, and optimization through interventional trials could potentially improve outcomes. The object of this analysis was to evaluate current physician treatment practices and patient outcomes for PEx. METHODS: The Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations (STOP) observational study enrolled 220 participants ≥12years old admitted to the hospital for PEx at 11 U.S. CF centers. Spirometry and daily symptom scores were collected during the study. Physicians were surveyed on treatment goals and their management practices were observed. Treatment outcomes were compared to stated goals. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of IV antibiotic treatment was 15.9 (6.0) days. Those individuals with more severe lung disease (<50% FEV1) were treated nearly two days longer than those with >50% FEV1. Physician-reported FEV1 improvement goals were 10% (95% CI: 5%, 14%) lower for patients with 6-month baseline FEV1 ≤50% predicted compared with those with 6-month baseline FEV1 >50% predicted. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in symptoms from the start of IV antibiotic treatment to the end of IV antibiotic treatment and 28days after the start of treatment. The mean absolute increase in FEV1 from admission was 9% predicted at end of IV antibiotic treatment, and 7% predicted at day 28. Only 39% fully recovered lost lung function, and only 65% recovered at least 90% of lost lung function. Treatment was deemed successful by 84% of clinicians, although 6-month baseline FEV1 was only recovered in 39% of PEx. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective observational study of PEx, treatment regimens and durations showed substantial variation. A significant proportion of patients did not reach physician's treatment goals, yet treatment was deemed successful.

Microbiological efficacy of early MRSA treatment in cystic fibrosis in a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate microbiological effectiveness, that is, culture negativity of a non-blinded eradication protocol (Rx) compared with observation (Obs) in clinically stable cystic fibrosis participants with newly positive methicillin resistant Staphylococcusaureus (MRSA) cultures. DESIGN: This non-blinded trial randomised participants ages 4-45 years with first or early (≤2 positive cultures within 3 years) MRSA-positive culture without MRSA-active antibiotics within 4 weeks 1:1 to Rx or Obs. The Rx protocol was: oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or if sulfa-allergic, minocycline plus oral rifampin; chlorhexidine mouthwash for 2 weeks; nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine body wipes for 5 days and environmental decontamination for 21 days. The primary end point was MRSA culture status at day 28. RESULTS: Between 1 April 2011 to September 2014, 45 participants (44% female, mean age 11.5 years) were randomised (24 Rx, 21 Obs). At day 28, 82% (n=18/22) of participants in the Rx arm compared with 26% (n=5/19) in the Obs arm were MRSA-negative. Adjusted for interim monitoring, this difference was 52% (95% CI 23% to 80%, p<0.001). Limiting analyses to participants who were MRSA-positive at the screening visit, 67% (8/12) in the Rx arm and 13% (2/15) in the Obs arm were MRSA-negative at day 28, adjusted difference: 49% (95% CI 22% to 71%, p<0.001). Fifty-four per cent in the Rx arm compared with 10% participants in the Obs arm remained MRSA-negative through day 84. Mild gastrointestinal side effects were higher in the Rx arm. CONCLUSIONS: This MRSA eradication protocol for newly acquired MRSA demonstrated microbiological efficacy with a large treatment effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01349192.