Time to Move Beyond a Binary Criterion for Gestational Diabetes?

Over the years, several international guidelines have been developed by specialist organizations for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, these guidelines vary and lack consensus on what level of glycemia defines GDM and worryingly, there is now evidence of over- or- under-diagnosis of women with GDM by current criteria. Towards this end, the National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) funded a program of research aimed at elucidating the problem with GDM diagnosis. It was determined, on completion of the project, that the solution required diagnosis of graded levels of dysglycemia in pregnancy and not just a diagnosis of presence or absence of GDM. A new diagnostic criterion (called the NPRP criterion) was created based on a single numerical summary of the three readings from the oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) that diagnosed women in pregnancy into four levels: normal, impaired, GDM and high risk GDM. This paper now examines existing GDM criteria vis-à-vis the NPRP criterion. It is noted that no significant change has happened over the years for existing criteria except for a gradual reduction in the threshold values of individual time-points or the number of time points, bringing us towards over-diagnosis of GDM in pregnancy. The new criterion unifies all readings from the GTT into one numerical value and, because it results in four levels of glycemia, represents a new way forwards for GDM diagnosis and can potentially reduce the rates of under diagnosis and over diagnosis of GDM.

The Prevalence of Thyroid Autoimmunity in Pregnancy and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes at a Secondary Care Hospital in the Middle East.

Background and objective Among the common endocrinological disorders of pregnancy, thyroid disorders rank second after diabetes. Thyroid autoimmunity is linked to sub-fertility, miscarriages, preterm birth, gestational diabetes, and adverse neurodevelopmental sequelae in children. Peroxidase and thyroglobulin autoantibodies may be associated with enhanced global autoimmune state, which may have adverse effects on the fetal or placental development. It is the main cause of hypothyroidism in reproductive-age women and is associated with poor obstetric outcomes. In Gulf countries, a higher prevalence of thyroid antibodies during pregnancy was reported. However, there is paucity of data in the literature in the Gulf countries in this regard. Our study was conducted to assess the effects of thyroid antibodies on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancy in a multiethnic population of Qatar. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of thyroid antibodies in pregnant hypothyroid women and their impact on adverse fetal outcomes in pregnancy. Design A Retrospective study of patients' notes (retrospective chart review) was conducted at a secondary hospital in Qatar. Records of the women who delivered from January 2017 to June 2018 were evaluated. A total of 384 women were included after applying exclusion criteria. Neonatal outcomes were compared in hypothyroid women with (group A1) and without thyroid antibodies (group A2) and were compared with euthyroid women (group B). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 27.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Results A total of 7978 women delivered during the study period and the prevalence of hypothyroidism in our sample was 3.47%; 33.33% had thyroid antibodies. Women with more than one miscarriage were 30% (odds ratio {OR}: 2.06, 95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.112-3.811, p<0.05), 21.24% (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.676-2.115, p>0.05), and 17% in group A1, A2, and B, respectively. The incidence of preterm births was 10% (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 0.760-6.495, p>0.05), 4.23% (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.308-2.876, p>0.05), and 4.5% in groups A1, A2, and B, respectively. Small for gestational age infants were 10% (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.036-10.71, p<0.05), 5.93% (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 0.640-6.023, p>0.05), and 3% in groups A1, A2, and B, respectively. The study revealed an association between thyroid antibodies and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancy. Conclusion Thyroid autoimmunity is associated with poor fetal outcomes. In Gulf countries with higher prevalence of endocrinological disorders (obesity and diabetes), thyroid disorders need attention. As fewer studies were reported from these areas with limited results in literature, this study gives an insight into the prevalence of thyroid disorders, thyroid antibodies, and their association with pregnancy outcomes.

Unifying the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Introducing the NPRP criteria.

AIMS: Disagreement about the appropriate criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) persists. This study examines an alternative approach which combines information from all time-points on the glucose tolerance test (GTT) into a single index and expands the GDM spectrum into four categories using data from three geographically and ethnically distinct populations. METHODS: A retrospective observational study design was used. Data from Wisconsin, USA (723 women) was used in derivation of the criterion and data from Doha, Qatar (1284 women) and Cape Town, South Africa (220 women) for confirmation. Pregnant women without pre-existing diabetes with a GTT done between 23 and 30 weeks gestation were included. A novel index was derived from the GTT termed the weighted average glucose (wAG). This was categorized into four pre-defined groups (henceforth National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) criterion); i) normal gestational glycemia (NGG), ii) impaired gestational glycemia (IGG), iii) GDM and iv) high risk GDM (hGDM). RESULTS: In the Doha cohort, compared to the NGG group, the odds of large for gestational age babies increased 1.33 fold (P = 0.432), 2.86 fold (P < 0.001) and 3.35 fold (P < 0.001) in the IGG, GDM and hGDM groups respectively. The odds of pregnancy induced hypertension increased 2.10 fold (P = 0.024) in GDM & hGDM groups compared to the IGG and NGG groups. In the Cape Town cohort, a third of women in the GDM group and two-thirds in the hGDM group progressed to T2DM at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The NPRP categorization identifies four distinct risk clusters of glycemia in pregnancy which may aid better decision making in routine management, avoid potential over-diagnosis of women at lower risk of complications and assist with diabetes prevention in women at high-risk after an index pregnancy with GDM.

Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed during Admission Adversely Affects Prognosis after Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic effect of newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (NDM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) post myocardial infarction (MI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 768 patients without preexisting diabetes mellitus post-MI at one centre in Yorkshire between November 2005 and October 2008. Patients were categorised as normal glucose tolerance (NGT n = 337), IGT (n = 279) and NDM (n = 152) on pre- discharge oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Primary end-point was the first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, severe heart failure (HF) or non-haemorrhagic stroke. Secondary end-points were all cause mortality and individual components of MACE. RESULTS: Prevalence of NGT, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), IGT and NDM changed from 90%, 6%, 0% and 4% on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to 43%, 1%, 36% and 20% respectively after OGTT. 102 deaths from all causes (79 as first events of which 46 were cardiovascular), 95 non fatal MI, 18 HF and 9 non haemorrhagic strokes occurred during 47.2 ± 9.4 months follow up. Event free survival was lower in IGT and NDM groups. IGT (HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.06-2.24, p = 0.024) and NDM (HR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.42-3.24, p = 0.003) independently predicted MACE free survival. IGT and NDM also independently predicted incidence of MACE. NDM but not IGT increased the risk of secondary end-points. CONCLUSION: Presence of IGT and NDM in patients presenting post-MI, identified using OGTT, is associated with increased incidence of MACE and is associated with adverse outcomes despite adequate secondary prevention.

Development and validation of a patient-centered health-related quality-of-life measure: the chronic heart failure assessment tool.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the importance of health-related quality of life (HRQL) as an outcome measure in chronic heart failure (CHF), instruments currently available have been developed by clinicians or researchers; none have been derived from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a patient-derived, disease-specific HRQL measure. METHODS: The psychometric testing of the Chronic Heart Failure Assessment Tool (CHAT) followed 2 phases: testing the psychometric properties (n = 223) of the 51-item version of the CHAT in a postal survey and validation of the CHAT (n = 68) using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire. RESULTS: The CHAT contains questions measuring 7 themes of HRQL: physical ability, emotional state, self-perception, relationships, coping with symptoms, maintaining social/lifestyle status, and cognitive aspects in respect to CHF. Factor analysis was used to analyze these themes. Four domains emerged: symptoms, activity levels, psychosocial aspects, and emotions. CONCLUSION: The CHAT comprises dimensions of HRQL identified by patients in the study population that may more appropriately reflect the concerns of patients. Further work is recommended to develop this tool for use as an HRQL measure in a CHF population.

Quality-of-life measurement in chronic heart failure: do we take account of the patient perspective?

The modern management of chronic heart failure has led to improved life expectancy, functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQL). HRQL measures the effects of an illness or a treatment from the patient's perspective. It is now recognised that the patient's perspective is as legitimate and valid as the clinician's in monitoring health care outcomes. Although there are a number of quality-of-life measures, which can be separated into two types-generic and disease specific-many have been developed, with little or no account being taken of the patient's perspective. Because most of the widely used measures are not patient centred, they may lack sensitivity and specificity in determining those aspects of HRQL important to individual patients. This paper reviews the use of quality-of-life assessment tools in the evaluation of patients with heart failure.