RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Only 20% of youth with intellectual and developmental disability (ID/DD) receive health care transition (HCT) preparation from their health care providers (HCPs). To address HCT system gaps, the first-of-its-kind HCT value-based payment (VBP) pilot was conducted for young adults (YA) with ID/DD. METHODS: This feasibility study examined the acceptability, implementation, and potential for expansion of the pilot, which was conducted within a specialty Medicaid managed care organization (HSCSN) in Washington, DC. With local pediatric and adult HCPs, the HCT intervention included a final pediatric visit, medical summary, joint HCT visit, and initial adult visit. The VBP was a mix of fee-for-service and pay-for-performance incentives. Feasibility was assessed via YA feedback surveys and interviews with HSCSN, participating HCPs, and selected state Medicaid officials. RESULTS: Regarding acceptability, HSCSN and HCPs found the HCT intervention represented a more organized approach and addressed an unmet need. YA with ID/DD and caregivers reported high satisfaction. Regarding implementation, nine YA with ID/DD participated. Benefits were reported in patient engagement, exchange of health information, and care management and financial support. Challenges included care management support needs, previous patient gaps in care, and scheduling difficulties. Regarding expansion, HSCSN and HCPs agreed that having streamlined care management support, medical summary preparation, and payment for HCT services are critical. DISCUSSION: This study examined the benefits and challenges of a HCT VBP approach and considerations for future expansion, including payer/HCP collaboration, HCT care management support, and updated system technology and interoperability.
Assuntos
Deficiências do Desenvolvimento , Transição para Assistência do Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Estudos de Viabilidade , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/terapia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Transferência de PacientesRESUMO
The use of corporal punishment in schools is not an effective or ethical method for management of behavior concerns and causes harm to students. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that corporal punishment in all school settings be abolished in all states by law and replaced by alternative forms of student behavior management. Corporal punishment remains legal in many public and private schools in the United States and is disproportionately used among Black students and children with disabilities. The aims of this policy statement are to review the incidence of school-based corporal punishment; the negative physical, psychological, and developmental impact of corporal punishment on students; and the need for continued advocacy by pediatricians, educators, and parents to abolish corporal punishment in all schools.
Assuntos
Punição , Instituições Acadêmicas , Criança , Humanos , Pais , Negro ou Afro-AmericanoRESUMO
Access to services for children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) have typically emphasized coverage, service, timeliness, and capability. Yet families of CYSHCN continue to describe a fragmented health care system with significant unmet needs. For many years, the concept of access to services has focused on the services themselves, rather than starting with the needs of CYSHCN and their families. Meeting these needs should be grounded in health equity, address systemic racism and ableism, and emphasize the life course and journey of those with such needs and their families. In this paper, we start with the simple concept of asking that care is available for CYSHCN regardless of when, where, and how they need it. Access to services is built on relationships instead of a series of transactions. Opportunities for innovation include creating a single point of service entry; determining services based on need instead of diagnosis; and emphasizing service continuity, transition, and a place-based approach. The innovations reimagine access throughout the life course, centering care around a proactive, human-centered system that addresses health and all of its determinants. The landscape of antipoverty investments, cultural humility, workforce changes, technology, and human-centered thought in design have the potential to further transform the conceptual framework to improve access to services for CYSHCN and their families.
Assuntos
Crianças com Deficiência , Adolescente , Criança , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , HumanosAssuntos
COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , Pais , SARS-CoV-2 , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estações do AnoAssuntos
Proteção da Criança , Política de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Liderança , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Marketing Social , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Proteção da Criança , Saúde da Família , Homossexualidade , Casamento , Cônjuges , Adulto , Criança , Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Casamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Política , Política Pública , Cônjuges/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Multiple agencies at the federal and state level provide for children with special health care needs (CSHCN), with variation in eligibility criteria. Epidemiological studies show that 3.8%-32% of children could be classified as children with special health care needs, depending on the definition and method of determination used. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of variation between definitions used and funding by Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title V, and Medicaid for CSHCN. METHODS: Statistics on children receiving SSI and the amount of funding were obtained from the SSI website. This was compared to information on Title V children from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) website and eligibility definitions published by the Institute of Child Health Policy in Gainesville, Florida. Medicaid definitions were obtained through interviews with state Medicaid agencies and confirmed with state regulations. RESULTS: The population enrolled in SSI has varied with alterations in eligibility criteria. The number of children enrolled in SSI and the amount of funding per child in each state correlate with the state poverty rate (r=0.56, p<0.0001; r=0.44, p<0.001). Enrollment in Title V does not correlate with state poverty rates (r=0.16, p=0.25). Title V definitions vary widely among states, but there was no correlation between the number of children served or amount of funding per child and the type of definition used (Z=-0.12, p=0.91; Z=-0.59, p=0.55). State Medicaid agencies rarely define CSHCN. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in definitions used by agencies serving CSHCN. Agencies need to be more explicit with eligibility criteria so the definitions are logical to those making referrals for services.