Histidine transport is essential for the growth of Staphylococcus aureus at low pH.

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen capable of causing many different human diseases. During colonization and infection, S. aureus will encounter a range of hostile environments, including acidic conditions such as those found on the skin and within macrophages. However, little is known about the mechanisms that S. aureus uses to detect and respond to low pH. Here, we employed a transposon sequencing approach to determine on a genome-wide level the genes required or detrimental for growth at low pH. We identified 31 genes that were essential for the growth of S. aureus at pH 4.5 and confirmed the importance of many of them through follow up experiments using mutant strains inactivated for individual genes. Most of the genes identified code for proteins with functions in cell wall assembly and maintenance. These data suggest that the cell wall has a more important role than previously appreciated in promoting bacterial survival when under acid stress. We also identified several novel processes previously not linked to the acid stress response in S. aureus. These include aerobic respiration and histidine transport, the latter by showing that one of the most important genes, SAUSA300_0846, codes for a previously uncharacterized histidine transporter. We further show that under acid stress, the expression of the histidine transporter gene is increased in WT S. aureus. In a S. aureus SAUSA300_0846 mutant strain expression of the histidine biosynthesis genes is induced under acid stress conditions allowing the bacteria to maintain cytosolic histidine levels. This strain is, however, unable to maintain its cytosolic pH to the same extent as a WT strain, revealing an important function specifically for histidine transport in the acid stress response of S. aureus.

The vulnerable versatility of Salmonella antibiotic persisters during infection.

Tolerance and persistence are superficially similar phenomena by which bacteria survive bactericidal antibiotics. It is assumed that the same physiology underlies survival of individual tolerant and persistent bacteria. However, by comparing tolerance and persistence during Salmonella Typhimurium infection, we reveal that these two phenomena are underpinned by different bacterial physiologies. Multidrug-tolerant mutant Salmonella enter a near-dormant state protected from immune-mediated genotoxic damages. However, the numerous tolerant cells, optimized for survival, lack the capabilities necessary to initiate infection relapse following antibiotic withdrawal. In contrast, persisters retain an active state. This leaves them vulnerable to accumulation of macrophage-induced dsDNA breaks but concurrently confers the versatility to initiate infection relapse if protected by RecA-mediated DNA repair. Accordingly, recurrent, invasive, non-typhoidal Salmonella clinical isolates display hallmarks of persistence rather than tolerance during antibiotic treatment. Our study highlights the complex trade-off that antibiotic-recalcitrant Salmonella balance to act as a reservoir for infection relapse.