Validity and Reliability of a Novel Multimodal Questionnaire for the Assessment of Abdominal Symptoms in People with Cystic Fibrosis (CFAbd-Score).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For people with cystic fibrosis, validated patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of the complex abdominal involvement are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine whether the CFAbd-Score, a novel questionnaire consisting of 28 items, meets the essential requirements (validity and reliability) for a patient-reported outcome measure according to US Food and Drug Administration recommendations. METHODS: Content validity was assessed by recording the frequencies and severity of symptoms that occurred during the prior 2 weeks in patients with cystic fibrosis (n = 116; aged ≥ 6 years). Comparing the CFAbd-Score results obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis and healthy controls (n = 88), we determined known-groups validity. To explore the structure of the patient-reported outcome measure, a factor analysis was conducted. Internal consistency of the five extracted score domains was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. For test-retest reliability, a subgroup of patients (n = 43) was reevaluated and intra-class correlation coefficients were determined. RESULTS: The CFAbd-Score differentiated patients with cystic fibrosis from healthy controls with a large effect size (17.3 ± 1.1 vs. 8.0 ± 0.7 points; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.85). Items, domains, and scores reflected the relevance to patients with cystic fibrosis and allowed a differentiation between subgroups of patients with cystic fibrosis (e.g., patients with and without abdominal pain, pancreatic sufficiency, and age groups). High item-domain loadings as well as good to excellent internal consistency and reproducibility (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.92; intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.932, 95% confidence interval 0.874-0.963) indicated construct validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The CFAbd-Score has successfully passed through key steps of the iterative process of patient-reported outcome measure development. Prospectively, the CFAbd-Score is proposed as a patient-centered instrument for monitoring abdominal symptoms and, most interestingly, for evaluating changes in symptoms with novel treatments such as cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator modulators. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03052283.

Dynamics of soluble and cellular inflammatory markers in nasal lavage obtained from cystic fibrosis patients during intravenous antibiotic treatment.

BACKGROUND: In cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, the upper airways display the same ion channel defect as evident in the lungs, resulting in chronic inflammation and infection. Recognition of the sinonasal area as a site of first and persistent infection with pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, reinforces the "one-airway" hypothesis. Therefore, we assessed the effect of systemic antibiotics against pulmonary pathogens on sinonasal inflammation. METHODS: Nasal lavage fluid (NLF) from 17 CF patients was longitudinally collected prior to and during elective intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic treatment to reduce pathogen burden and resulting inflammation (median treatment time at time of analysis: 6 days). Samples were assessed microbiologically and cytologically. Cytokine and chemokine expression was measured by Cytometric Bead Array and ELISA (interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, MPO, MMP9, RANTES and NE). Findings were compared with inflammatory markers from NLF obtained from 52 healthy controls. RESULTS: Initially, the total cell count of the NLF was significantly higher in CF patients than in controls. However after i.v. antibiotic treatment it decreased to a normal level. Compared with controls, detection frequencies and absolute concentrations of MPO, IL-8, IL-6 and IL-1ß were also significantly higher in CF patients. The detection frequency of TNF was also higher. Furthermore, during i.v. therapy sinonasal concentrations of IL-6 decreased significantly (P = 0.0059), while RANTES and MMP9 levels decreased 10-fold and two-fold, respectively. PMN-Elastase, assessed for the first time in NFL, did not change during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of NLF inflammatory markers revealed considerable differences between controls and CF patients, with significant changes during systemic i.v. AB treatment within just 6 days. Thus, our data support further investigation into the collection of samples from the epithelial surface of the upper airways by nasal lavage as a potential diagnostic and research tool.

Soluble inflammation markers in nasal lavage from CF patients and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: CF sinonasal and bronchial mucosa reveal identical ion channel defects. Nasal Lavage (NL) allows non-invasive repeated sampling of airway surface liquid. We compared inflammatory mediators in NL from CF-patients and healthy controls, and in CF in relation to sinonasal pathogen colonization. METHODS: From 40 CF-patients (mean age 21.8yrs, SD 11.8yrs.) and 52 healthy controls (mean age 31.9yrs., SD 13.7yrs.) NL-fluid (10ml/nostril) concentrations of MPO, IL-8, IL-17A, sICAM-1, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10 and IL-5 were determined using cytometric bead arrays for flow cytometry. RESULTS: CF-patients showed significantly higher MPO-concentrations in NL-fluid and higher IL-8-levels (n.s.) than controls. MPO, IL-8, IL-17A, sICAM-1, IL-1ß and IL-6 were significantly more often detectable in CF-patients than in controls. CF-patients with S. aureus colonization in both upper and lower airways had significantly elevated MPO and IL-8 levels in NL-fluid compared to S. aureus negatives. CONCLUSION: NL-fluid differed substantially between CF-patients and healthy controls with most promising results for IL-8 and MPO, a primarily in CF-NL assessed mediator. Further studies are required to assess effects of sample collection and processing on concentrations of inflammatory markers and to evaluate potentials of NL analysis in research and clinical routine.