Assessing Functional Outcomes of Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for T1b-T2 Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-institutional Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Deterioration of renal function is associated with increased all-cause mortality. In renal masses larger than 4 cm, whether partial versus radical nephrectomy (PN vs. RN) might affect long-term functional outcomes is unknown. This study tested the association between PN versus RN and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), recovery of at least 90% of the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year, upstaging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) one stage or more at 1 year, and eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less at 1 year. METHODS: Data from 23 high-volume institutions were used. The study included only surgically treated patients with single, unilateral, localized, clinical T1b-2 renal masses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 968 PN patients and 325 RN patients were identified. The rate of AKI was lower in the PN versus the RN patients (17% vs. 58%; p < 0.001). At 1 year after surgery, for the PN versus the RN patients, the rate for recovery of at least 90% of baseline eGFR was 51% versus 16%, the rate of CKD progression of ≥ 1 stage was 38% versus 65%, and the rate of eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less was 10% versus 23% (all p < 0.001). Radical nephrectomy independently predicted AKI (odds ratio [OR], 7.61), 1-year ≥ 90% eGFR recovery (OR, 0.30), 1-year CKD upstaging (OR, 1.78), and 1-year eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less (OR, 2.36) (all p ≤ 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For cT1b-2 masses, RN portends worse immediate and 1-year functional outcomes. When technically feasible and oncologically safe, efforts should be made to spare the kidney in case of large renal masses to avoid the hazard of glomerular function loss-related mortality.

Thermal Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Mass in a Solitary Kidney: A Matched Cohort Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing approaches are preferred for renal mass in a solitary kidney (RMSK), with partial nephrectomy (PN) generally prioritized. Thermal ablation (TA) also is an option for small renal masses in this setting; however, comparative functional/survival outcomes are not well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective study of 504 patients (1975-2022) with cT1 RMSK managed with PN (n = 409)/TA (n = 95) with necessary data for analysis was performed. Propensity score was used for matching patients, including age, preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), tumor diameter, R.E.N.A.L. ((R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor, and (L)ocation relative to polar lines), and comorbidities. Functional outcomes were compared, and Kaplan-Meier was used to analyze survival. RESULTS: The matched cohort included 132 patients (TA = 66/PN = 66), with median tumor diameter of 2.4 cm, R.E.N.A.L. of 6, and preoperative GFR of 52 ml/min/1.73 m2. Acute kidney injury occurred in 11%/61% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). After recovery, median GFR preserved was 89%/83% for TA/PN, respectively (p = 0.02), and 5-year dialysis-free survival was 96% in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 53 months. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 62%/86% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year local recurrence (LR)-free survival was 74%/95% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 96%/98% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p = 0.7). Local recurrence was observed in nine of 36 (25%) and five of 30 (17%) patients managed with laparoscopic versus percutaneous TA, respectively. For TA with LR (n = 14), nine patients presented with multifocality and/or cT1b tumors. Twelve LR were managed with salvage TA, and seven remained cancer-free, while five developed systemic recurrence, three with concomitant LR. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes for TA for RMSK were improved compared with PN. Local recurrence was more common after TA and often was associated with the laparoscopic approach, multifocality, and large tumor size. Improved patient selection and greater experience with TA should improve outcomes. Salvage of LR was not always possible. Partial nephrectomy remains the reference standard for RMSK.

Partial versus radical nephrectomy for complex renal mass: multicenter comparative analysis of functional outcomes (Rosula collaborative group).

BACKGROUND: Utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) for complex renal mass (CRM) is controversial. We determined the impact of surgical modality on postoperative renal functional outcomes for CRM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter registry (ROSULA). CRM was defined as RENAL Score 10-12. The cohort was divided into PN and radical nephrectomy (RN) for analyses. Primary outcome was development of de-novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Secondary outcomes were de-novo eGFR<60 and ΔeGFR between diagnosis and last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards was used to elucidate predictors for de-novo eGFR<60 and <45. Linear regression was utilized to analyze ΔeGFR. Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) was performed to analyze 5-year freedom from de-novo eGFR<60 and <45. RESULTS: We analyzed 969 patients (RN=429/PN=540; median follow-up 24.0 months). RN patients had lower BMI (P<0.001) and larger tumor size (P<0.001). Overall postoperative complication rate was higher for PN (P<0.001), but there was no difference in major complications (Clavien III-IV; P=0.702). MVA demonstrated age (HR=1.05, P<0.001), tumor-size (HR=1.05, P=0.046), RN (HR=2.57, P<0.001), and BMI (HR=1.04, P=0.001) to be associated with risk for de-novo eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age (HR=1.03, P<0.001), BMI (HR=1.06, P<0.001), baseline eGFR (HR=0.99, P=0.002), tumor size (HR=1.07, P=0.007) and RN (HR=2.39, P<0.001) were risk factors for de-novo eGFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2. RN (B=-10.89, P<0.001) was associated with greater ΔeGFR. KMA revealed worse 5-year freedom from de-novo eGFR<60 (71% vs. 33%, P<0.001) and de-novo eGFR<45 (79% vs. 65%, P<0.001) for RN. CONCLUSIONS: PN provides functional benefit in selected patients with CRM without significant increase in major complications compared to RN, and should be considered when technically feasible.

Single Port Robotic Kidney Autotransplantation: Initial Case Series and Description of Technique.

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive kidney autotransplantation (KAT) has demonstrated reduced morbidity, however multiport robotic approach required patient repositioning and multiple sets of incisions. We present our initial series of single-port (SP) robotic KAT, ideal for multi-quadrant surgeries, and aim to evaluate feasibility and safety of the novel approach. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2022, 8 consecutive patients underwent SP KAT using the DaVinci SP platform. Patient clinicopathologic variables and perioperative outcomes were recorded. Indications for KAT include complex or recurrent ureteral stricture, ureteral avulsion, and chronic visceral pain due to multiple etiologies. RESULTS: All SP KATs were successfully performed without repositioning or conversion to open. Operative times ranged from 366 to 701 minutes, warm and cold ischemia times between 4 to 10 minutes and 86 to 209 minutes, respectively. Median hospital length of stay was 3 days. At a median of 13 months follow-up, latest postoperative GFRs were stable, ranging from +23% to -10%. There were no complications. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate our single port, multiquadrant robotic kidney auto transplantation technique performed though a single incision further reducing surgical morbidity. All cases were completed successfully without conversion or loss of graft function. All patients reported resolution of flank pain and no radiological evidence of urinary obstruction on follow up.

Single-port transvesical versus open simple prostatectomy: a perioperative comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the initial perioperative outcomes of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) patients to those of open simple prostatectomy (OSP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Perioperative data from 42 consecutive patients with BPH who underwent SP RASP were prospectively reviewed. Similarly, data from forty-three consecutive patients who underwent the standard OSP, were retrospectively collected. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. OSP was performed according to the standard approach. Demographics, Intra- and perioperative data were analyzed and assessed with a descriptive analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the preoperative median post-void residual volume, which was higher in the OSP group (p = 0.004). The SP RASP group had less intraoperative estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), no need for continuous bladder irrigation (p < 0.001), and less in-hospital opioid use (p < 0.001). Patients in the SP RASP group were discharged on postoperative day zero, compared to a median of 2 days for OSP (p < 0.001). The median Foley catheter duration was 7 days for SP RASP, compared to a median of 10 days for OSP (p < 0.001). SP RASP group had fewer postoperative complications, however, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: SP RASP is an alternative approach in treating surgical BPH. It may offer patients less morbidity in comparison to OSP.

Percutaneous thermal ablation for cT1 renal mass in solitary kidney: A multicenter trifecta comparative analysis versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in solitary kidney (SK) represents a challenging scenario. We sought to compare outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) versus percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) in SK patients with renal tumors cT1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of SK patients treated for RCC. The PTA group included cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation. We collected baseline characteristics, intraoperative, pathological, and post-operative data. We applied an arbitrary composite "trifecta" to assess surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes, only for malignant histology. RFS analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of "trifecta" achievement. RESULTS: We included 198 SK patients (RAPN, n = 50; PTA n = 119). Mean clinical tumor size was not significantly different while R.E.N.A.L. score was higher for RAPN (p < 0.001). No differences in intra and major post-procedural complications. Recurrence rate was higher in PTA group but not statistically significant (p < 0.328). No difference in metastasis rate was found (p = 0.435). RFS was 96.1% in RAPN and 86.8% in PTA cohort (p = 0.003) while no difference in PFS was detected (p = 0.1). Trifecta was achieved in 72.5% of RAPN vs 77.3% of PTA (p = 0.481). Multivariable analysis has not detected predictors for Trifecta achievement. CONCLUSION: PTA offers good outcomes in the management of SK patients with RCC. Compared with RAPN, it might carry a higher risk of recurrence; on the other hand, re-treatment is possible. Overall, PTA can be safely offered to treat SK patients presenting RCC. In general, it should be preferred in more frail patients to minimize the risk of complications.

Microwave versus cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass: a multicenter comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ablative techniques emerged as effective alternative to nephron-sparing surgery for treatment of small renal masses. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRYO) are the two guidelines-recommended techniques. Microwave ablation (MWA) represents a newer technology, less described. The aim of the study was to compare outcomes of MWA to those of CRYO and RFA. METHODS: Retrospective investigation of patients who underwent MWA, CRYO, or RFA from seven high-volume US and European centers was performed. The first group included patients who underwent CRYO or RFA; the second MWA. We collected baseline characteristics, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Oncological data included technical success, local recurrence, and progression to metastasis. Multivariate analysis was performed to find predictors for postoperative complications. A composite outcome of "trifecta" was used to assess surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: 739 patients underwent CRYO or RFA and 50 MWA. CRYO/RFA group had significantly longer operative time (P<0.001), but no difference in LOS, postprocedural Hb mean, intraprocedural complications (P=0.180), overall postprocedural complication rates (P=0.126), and in the 30-day re-admission rate (P=0.853) were detected. No predictive parameter of postprocedural complications was found. Concerning functional outcome, no differences were detected in terms of eGFR at 1 year (P=0.182), ΔeGFR at 1 year (P=0.825) and eGFR at latest follow-up (P=0.070). "Technical success" was achieved in 98.6% of the cases (MWA=100%, CRYO/RFA=98.5%; P=0.775), and there was no significant difference in terms of 2-year recurrence rate (P=0.114) and metastatic progression (P=0.203). Trifecta was achieved in 73.0% of CRYO/RFA vs. 69.6% of MWA cases (P=0.719). CONCLUSIONS: MWA is a safe and effective treatment option for small renal masses. Compared with CRYO/RFA, it seems to offer low complication rates, shorter operation time, and equivalent surgical and functional outcomes.

Percutaneous Ablation vs Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Completely Endophytic Renal Masses: A Multicenter Trifecta Analysis with a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.

Purpose: To compare outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and percutaneous tumor ablation (PTA) for completely endophytic renal masses. Methods: Data of patients who underwent RAPN or PTA for treatment of completely endophytic (three points for "E" domain of R.E.N.A.L. score) were collected from seven high-volume U.S. and European centers. PTA included cryoablation, radiofrequency, or microwave ablation. Baseline characteristics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Trifecta was used as arbitrary combined outcome parameter as proxy for treatment "quality." Multivariable logistic regression model assessed predictors of trifecta failure. Results: One hundred fifty-two patients (RAPN, n = 60; PTA, n = 92) were included in the analysis. RAPN group was younger (p < 0.001), had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.002), and higher baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.001). There was no difference in clinical tumor size, clinical T stage, and tumor complexity scores. PTA had significantly lower rate of overall (p < 0.001) and minor (p < 0.001) complications. ΔeGFR at 1 year was statistically higher for RAPN (-15.5 mL/min vs -3.1 mL/min; p = 0.005), no difference in ΔeGFR at last follow-up (p = 0.22) was observed. No difference in recurrences (RAPN, n = 2; PTA, n = 6) and RFS was found (p = 0.154). Trifecta achievement was higher for RAPN but not statistically different (65.3% vs 58.8%; p = 0.477). R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score resulted predictive of trifecta failure (odds ratio = 1.47; confidence interval = 1.13-1.90; p = 0.004). Conclusions: PTA confirms to be an effective treatment for completely endophytic renal masses, offering low complications and good mid-term functional and oncologic outcomes. These outcomes compare favorably with those of RAPN, which seem to be the preferred option for younger and less comorbid patients.

Long-term comparative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and cryoablation in patients with solitary kidneys: a single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with solitary kidneys are amenable to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after PN. We compared the functional and oncological outcomes of cryoablation (CA) and PN in patients with a solitary kidney and a cT1a renal mass. METHODS: From a single-institution series, we analyzed 74 patients (31 PN, 43 CA) with a solitary kidney who underwent treatment for a cT1a renal mass. The functional outcomes were AKI and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation. Oncological outcomes were recurrence and death. Linear mixed-effects and logistic regression models were used for functional outcomes analysis, whereas oncological outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63.9 months. PN group had lower median age (59 years vs. 68, P<0.001) and larger median tumor size (2.80 cm vs. 2.0, p =0.003). AKI was more common in the PN group on postoperative day 1 (58% vs. 2.8%, P<0.001). However, only one patient in the PN group required temporary dialysis in the perioperative period. eGFR preservation was similar at postoperative 3 months (89% vs. 90%, P=0.083), or 12 months (85% vs. 94%, P=0.2) follow-up. CA group had higher recurrence rate (29% vs. 3.2%, P=0.005), and worse recurrence-free survival (P=0.027). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (P=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: In a solitary kidney setting, CA is associated with a lower risk of AKI at postoperative day 1 compared to PN. Functional outcome is comparable upon longer follow-up. The local recurrence rates are significantly higher in the CA group with no significant difference in OS.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for management of renal mass in patients with a solitary kidney: can we expand the indication to T2 and T3 disease?

BACKGROUND: Management of complex renal masses is challenging in a solitary kidney setting. We retrospectively compared oncological and renal functional outcomes between robotic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with a pT2-pT3 renal mass and a solitary kidney. METHODS: From a multi-institutional series, we identified 20 robotic partial nephrectomies (RPN) and 15 open partial nephrectomies (OPN) patients confirmed to have a pT2 or pT3 renal cancer. Surgeries were performed between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients with familial renal cell carcinoma, prior ipsilateral PN, or multiple ipsilateral synchronous tumors were excluded from the analysis. Baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared using χ2 test, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann-Whitney U Test, and Student's t-test. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Cold ischemia was utilized more in the open group (92.9% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001). OPN group had a longer ischemia time (48.9 min vs. 27.3 min, P<0.001), a higher major complication rate (38.5% vs. 11.1%, P=0.009), and a higher length of stay was (5 vs. 3.5 days, P=0.023). Positive surgical margin rate was comparable (20% OPN vs. 15% RPN; P=1.000). At a mean follow up of 21 months local recurrence rates (1 OPN vs. 2 RPN, P=1.000) were comparable, chronic kidney disease upstaging rate (46.7% OPN vs. 45.0% RPN, P=0.922) and estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation at one year (75.2%% in OPN vs. 79.1% RPN, P=0.707) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In select cases and experienced hands, the robotic approach offers a reasonable alternative to open surgery in patients with pT2 and pT3 tumors and a solitary kidney.

Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Pure single-site robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy (EPP) using a single-port (SP) robotic platform has been shown to be feasible and safe in previous descriptive studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing SP-EPP versus conventional multiport (MP) transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From January 2019 to January 2020, data of 100 consecutive patients who underwent SP-EPP performed by the same surgeon and 110 consecutive patients who underwent MP-RARP by three surgeons from the same institution were prospectively collected. INTERVENTION: All SP-EPPs were performed in a pure single-site fashion without Trendelenburg. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Demographic characteristics as well as intra- and postoperative data of patients in both groups were analyzed. Quantitative data were described in terms of median and quartiles. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After SP-EPP, the rate of patients discharged the same day was nine times higher than that after MP-RARP (p < 0.001), and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter: 4.3 h (interquartile range [IQR] 3.3-17.4) versus 26.1 h (IQR 21.5-44.8). The rate of opioid use in the hospital and after discharge in the SP group was at least half that in the MP group (respectively, 32% vs 64%, p < 0.001, and 35% vs 87%, p < 0.001). The overall positive surgical margin rate as well as continence rate at 12 mo (85% vs 88%, p = 0.97) and the prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (p = 0.09) were statistically comparable between the SP and MP groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pure single-site SP-EPP was associated with a shorter length of stay as well as a decreased need for postoperative pain medication and narcotic administration in comparison with conventional transperitoneal multiport prostatectomy, with comparable postoperative complications and readmission rate. PATIENT SUMMARY: Surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer using a single-port robotic platform allows for a shorter hospital stay, less pain, and less opioid use than conventional robotic surgery without more morbidity. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Pure single-site single-port extraperitoneal prostatectomy was associated with a shorter length of stay as well as a decreased need for postoperative pain medication and narcotic administration in comparison with conventional transperitoneal multiport prostatectomy, with comparable postoperative complication and readmission rate.

Development of a model to predict prostate cancer at the apex (PCAP model) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To develop a model based on preoperative variables to predict apical prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 459 patients who underwent a robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) between January 2016 and September 2017. All patients had a preoperative biopsy and mpMRI of the prostate. Significant apical pathology (SAP) was defined as those patients who had a dominant nodule at the apex with a Gleason score > 6 and/or ECE at the apex. Binary logistic regression analyses were adopted to predict SAP. Variables included in the model were PSA, apical lesions prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and apical biopsy Gleason score. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was computed. RESULTS: A total of 121 (43.2%) patients had SAP. On univariable analysis, all apex-specific variables investigated emerged as predictors of SAP (all p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis PSA and apical PI-RADS score > 3 (all p < 0.05) emerged as significant predictors of SAP. The AUC of the model was 0.722. CONCLUSION: Patients with PI-RADS 3, 4 or 5 lesions at the apex were three times as more likely to have true SAP compared to those who have PI-RADS < 3 or negative mpMRI prior to undergoing RALP.

Clinical implications of prostatic capsular abutment or bulging on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The presence of capsular abutment or bulging can raise concern when planning surgery. In this study we aimed to test the clinical implications of capsular abutment or bulging on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). METHODS: We analyzed the data of 291 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for a cT1-2N0 prostate cancer in a single surgeon series. All patients underwent preoperative staging with mpMRI. PIRADS v2 was used for characterizing lesions. The role of capsular abutment or bulging was tested in a multivariable logistic regression adjusting for prostate-specific antigen and highest ipsilateral biopsy Gleason grade. The presence of focal versus extensive extracapsular extension (ECE) was investigated. RESULTS: Overall, ECE on final pathology was documented in 35 (12%) cases and ECE was focal in 32 (91%) patients. Overall, mpMRI demonstrated capsule bulging or abutment in 12 (24%) cases. After adjusting for confounders, capsule bulging or abutment on mpMRI emerged as predictor for ECE (OR=6.70; 95% CI: 2.97-15.12, P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of capsule abutment or bulging in predicting ECE were 43% and 95%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 36% and 48% respectively to predict focal ECE. CONCLUSIONS: The PIRADS v2 scoring system has a grey zone concerning ECE as defined by capsule abutment or bulging. We found an increased risk of ECE and specifically focal ECE when capsule bulging or abutment on mpMRI are documented.

The Impact of Obesity in Patients Undergoing Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

Introduction: As the prevalence of obesity increases worldwide, an increasing proportion of surgical candidates have an elevated body mass index (BMI), with associated metabolic syndrome. Yet there exists limited evidence regarding the effect of elevated BMI on surgical outcomes in robotic surgeries. We examined whether obese patients had worse perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function after robotic partial nephrectomies (RPNs). Materials and Methods: We performed a multi-institutional analysis of 1770 patients who underwent RPNs between 2008 and 2015, allowing time for the data set to mature. Associations between BMI, as a continuous and categorical variable, and perioperative outcomes, acute kidney injury (AKI, >25% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) at discharge, and change in eGFR per month were analyzed. AKI and eGFR were evaluated using multivariable logistic and linear regression models adjusted for confounders, including age, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor size, and the identity of the surgeon. Results: In total 45.2% (n = 529) of patients were found to be obese, with a greater prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in overweight and obese patients. Obese patients were more likely to have malignant tumors (>77% vs 68%, p < 0.001) and trended toward having larger tumors (3.0 cm vs 2.8 cm; p = 0.061). Heavier patients required longer operative times (166-196 minutes vs 155 minutes; p < 0.001), although equivalent warm ischemia times (p = 0.873). Obesity did not correlate with an increased complication rate (p > 0.05). On multivariable analysis, obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.81; p = 0.031), male sex (OR = 1.54; p = 0.028), and larger tumor size (OR = 1.23; p < 0.001) were associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of AKI at discharge. BMI above normal weight was not associated with greater eGFR decline per month post-RPN. Conclusions: Obesity was associated with equivalent perioperative outcomes and long-term renal function. Further research is warranted into how obesity and metabolic syndrome may foster a more aggressive tumor environment. RPN appears to be an equally safe operative option for patients regardless of obesity status.

Risk factors and prognostic implications for pathologic upstaging to T3a after partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Performing partial nephrectomy (PN) on a cT1 tumor, which postoperatively is upgraded to pT3a can possibly lead to compromise of cancer specific mortality. We therefore aimed to identify risk factors for pathologic T3a upstaging of cT1 tumors and to analyze the association between upstaging, positive surgical margins (PSM) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: The present study included patients who underwent PN for a clinically localized T1 renal mass from two datasets: 1) 1298 patients from a prospectively maintained multi-center database (MCDB); and 2) 7940 patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable logistic regression models within each cohort were used to identify predictors of cT1 to pT3a upstaging and its association with PSM. Cox proportion hazards regression models were used to compare overall survival in the NCDB cohort. RESULTS: The rate of pT3a upstaging was 5.7% (N.=74) in the MCDB and 1.9% (N.=156) in the NCDB cohort. Older age (MCDB OR=1.04, P=0.001; NCDB OR=1.04, P=0.001) and larger tumor size (MCDB OR=1.89, P<0.001; NCDB OR=1.38, P<0.001) increased the likelihood of upstaging. PSM was found to be more likely for pT3a upstaged patients in both cohorts (MCDB 14.9% vs. 3.5%, P<0.001; NCDB 14.8% vs. 8.3%, P=0.006), even when adjusting for tumor size. At short term follow-up (NCDB median follow-up 27.3 months), pT3a upstaging was associated with worse OS in univariable (HR=1.89; 95% CI=1.00, 3.55; P=0.049) but not multivariable analysis (HR=1.63; 95% CI=0.86, 3.08; P=0.131). OS was 93.0% vs. 95.8% at 3 years for those with and without pT3a upstaging, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Larger tumor size and increased age are associated with pathological upstaging to T3a for clinical T1 tumors treated with partial nephrectomy. Steps to improve identification of occult pT3a disease are necessary as its occurrence significantly increased the likelihood of a PSM, both in a high-volume multicenter cohort, as well as, a national data registry.

Can multiphase CT scan distinguish between papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 and type 2?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of multiphase computed tomography (CT) and percutaneous renal mass biopsy (PRMB) in differentiating between papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC)-Type 1 and -Type 2, as emerging data have suggested differential enhancement patterns in different renal tumor histologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 51 patients (23 pRCC-Type 1/28 pRCC-Type 2) who underwent multiphase CT followed by surgery from July 2011 to April 2016 was performed. Data were analyzed between subgroups based on histology. Multiphase CT was analyzed for tumor size, and attenuation [Hounsfield Units (HU)]. Change in HU (ΔHU) was calculated between noncontrast (NC), corticomedullary (CM), nephrographic (N), and delayed (D) phases. Subset analysis was carried out on patients who underwent PRMB prior to surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in median tumor size (pRCC-Type 1 2.8 vs. pRCC-Type 2 2.6 cm, p=0.832). In addition to tumor size being similar between groups, distribution of tumor stages between groups was also similar (p=0.651). Greater proportion of high-grade tumors (III/IV) was noted in pRCC-Type 2 (42.9% vs. 8.7%) (p=0.011). There was no difference in HU values for NC (p=0.961), CM (p=0.118), N (p=0.277), and D (p=0.256) phases, and in ΔHU between CM-NC (p=0.278), N-NC (p=0.316), and D-NC (p=0.103). Thirteen patients underwent percutaneous biopsy, 11 of whom had diagnostic samples. Examination of 10/11 (90.9%) samples accurately predicted correct histology, and of 6/11 (54.5%) samples correctly identified high-vs. low-grade histology. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest substantial overlap of CT findings, despite pRCC-Type 2 having greater proportion of high-grade tumors. Utility of CT is limited in the differentiation between pRCC subtypes. Patients with suggested pRCC on CT imaging being considered for a non-extirpative strategy should undergo PRMB for risk stratification.

Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We compared quality outcomes between transperitoneal (TRPN) and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN). METHODS: Two-center retrospective analysis of TRPN and RRPN from 10/2009 to 10/2015. Perioperative/renal function outcomes were analyzed. Primary endpoint was Pentafecta, a composite measure of quality [negative margin, no 30-day complication, ischemia time ≤25 min, return of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to >90% from baseline at last follow-up, and no chronic kidney disease upstaging]. Multivariable analysis (MVA) for factors associated with lack of optimal outcome was performed. RESULTS: 404 patients (TRPN 263, RRPN 141) were analyzed. Comparing TRPN vs. RRPN, mean tumor size (3.1 vs. 2.9 cm, p = 0.122) and RENAL score (7.4 vs. 7.2, p = 0.503) were similar. Most TRPN were anterior (65.0%) and most RRPN posterior (65.3%, p < 0.001). Operative time (p = 0.001) was less for RRPN. No significant differences between TRPN vs. RRPN were noted for ischemia time (23.1 vs. 22.8 min, p = 0.313), blood loss (p = 0.772), positive margins (p = 0.590), complications (p = 0.537), length of stay (p = 0.296), ΔeGFR (p = 0.246), eGFR recovery to >90% (55.9 vs. 57.4%, p = 0.833), and lack of CKD upstaging (84.0 vs. 87.2%, p = 0.464). Pentafecta rates were not significantly different (TRPN 33.9 vs. RRPN 43.3%, p = 0.526). MVA revealed increasing RENAL score (OR 1.5, p < 0.001) and decreasing baseline eGFR (OR 2.4, p = 0.017) as predictive for lack of Pentafecta. CONCLUSIONS: TRPN and RRPN have similar quality outcomes, though RRPN may offer modest benefit for operative time and have utility in posterior tumors. Association of increasing RENAL score and decreased baseline eGFR with lack of Pentafecta suggests dominant role of non-modifiable factors.

Statin utilization improves oncologic and survival outcomes in patients with dyslipidemia and surgically treated renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the role of statins in patients who underwent surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and who had dyslipidemia, as use of statins has been suggested to improve outcomes in RCC. METHODS: Two-center retrospective study of patients with dyslipidemia who underwent surgery for RCC from 7/1995 to 6/2005. Patients were managed by statins or ezetimibe, fibrate agents, or cholestyramine. Analysis was conducted between patients who received statin therapy versus those that did not. Primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with disease progression. RESULTS: In this study 283 patients were analyzed (180 statin, 103 non-statin, median follow-up 68 months). There were no significant demographic differences. Median duration of antidyslipidemia therapy was similar (statin 31 months vs. non-statin 28 months, P=0.413). Tumor size (statin 5.4 cm vs. non-statin 5.6 cm, P=0.569), stage distribution (P=0.591), histology (P=0.801), and grade (P=0.807) were similar. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated higher 5-yr PFS (91% vs. 70%, P<0.001), CSS (88% vs. 69%, P<0.001), and OS (71% vs. 67%, P=0.025) in statin vs. non-statin patients. Multivariable analysis for factors associated with disease progression found absence of statin therapy (OR 2.41, P<0.001), higher stage (OR 2.01-3.86 P<0.001), and higher grade tumors (OR 2.07, P=0.006) to be predictive. CONCLUSIONS: In RCC patients with dyslipidemia, statin use was associated with improved survival outcomes, and was an independent predictor of PFS. Further investigations are requisite to determine utility of statins in RCC patients.

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and multiport laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T2a renal masses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and multiport laparoscopic (MPL) radical nephrectomy (RN) for clinical T1b/T2a renal masses, as concerns continue regarding suitability and benefit of LESS for larger renal masses. METHODS: Retrospective single-surgeon comparison of LESS- and MPL-RN between 7/2005 and 11/2014. Sixty-three patients underwent LESS-RN (44 cT1b/19 cT2a); 133 underwent MPL (83 cT1b/50 cT2a). All patients were managed with a standardized care pathway. Primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, discharge pain score (visual analog pain, VAP), narcotic requirement (morphine equivalents, MSO4eq). RESULTS: 130/133 MPL and 62/63 LESS were successfully performed. For MPL and LESS groups: mean tumor diameter (cm) for cT1b was 5.3 vs. 5.4 (P=0.689); and for cT2a was 8.2 vs. 8.3 (P=0.728); mean OR time (min) was 126.3 vs. 132.7 (P=0.314); mean EBL (mL) was 139.5 vs.127.8 (P=0.49). No significant differences in complications were noted (P=0.781). LESS was associated with significant reductions in LOS (2.14 vs. 2.45 days, P=0.043), discharge VAP (1.3 vs. 2.2, P<0.001), and narcotic use (5.9 vs. 10.7 MSO4eq, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LESS is comparable to MPL-RN for cT1b and T2a renal tumors in terms of perioperative parameters and may confer benefit with respect to LOS and analgesic requirement.

Gastrointestinal tract access for urological natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

We conducted a literature review of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), focusing on urologic procedures with gastrointestinal tract access, to update on the development of this novel surgical approach. As part of the methods, a comprehensive electronic literature search for NOTES was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library from March 2002 to February 2016 for papers reporting urologic procedures performed utilizing gastrointestinal tract access. A total of 11 peer-reviewed studies examining utility of gastrointestinal access for NOTES urologic procedures were noted, with the first report in 2007. The procedures reported in the studies were total/radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, and prostatectomy. The transgastric approach was identified in five studies examining total/radical nephrectomy (n = 2), partial nephrectomy (n = 1), partial cystectomy (n = 1), and adrenalectomy (n = 1). Six studies evaluated transrectal approach for NOTES, describing total/radical nephrectomy (n = 3), partial nephrectomy (n = 1), robotic nephrectomy with adrenalectomy (n = 1) and prostatectomy (n = 1). Feasibility was reported in all studies. Most studies were preclinical and acute, and limited by concerns regarding restricted instrumentation and infection risk. We concluded that gastrointestinal access for urologic NOTES demonstrates promise as described by outlined feasibility studies in preclinical models. Nonetheless, clinical application awaits further advancements in surgical technology and concerns regarding infectious potential.