Corneal thickness differences between type 2 diabetes and non-diabetes subjects during preoperative laser surgery examination.

AIMS: To evaluate the differences in corneal thickness between type 2 diabetes subjects with HbA1c under 7.0% and non-diabetes subjects during their preoperative laser surgery examinations. METHODS: The mean of five consecutive corneal thickness measurements at the central and mid-peripheral cornea was obtained by means of noncontact scanning-slit corneal topography (Orbscan Topography System II; Orbscan, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA) in 35 myopic non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetes subjects (17 males and 18 females) and 48 healthy myopic controls (23 males and 25 females). RESULTS: The corneal thickness values at the central and mid-peripheral cornea were significantly higher in the diabetic group (p<.001). The diabetic subjects presented the highest thickness value in the superior cornea (n=22; 62.9%) followed by the nasal (n=9; 25.7%) and the temporal (n=4; 11.4%) cornea, but never in the inferior cornea. The control subjects presented the highest thickness value in the superior cornea (n=19; 39.6%) followed by the nasal (n=18; 37.5%), the inferior (n=6; 12.5%), and the temporal (n=3; 6.3%) cornea. The central corneal thickness (CCT) of the diabetes patients was not statistically correlated with their HbA1c (r2=.078; p=.104), body mass index (r2=.007; p=.633), and time from diagnosis of diabetes (r2=.025; p=.363), but it was correlated with their corneal endothelial cell density values (r2=.543; p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes subjects with HbA1c under 7.0% who are candidates for laser refractive surgery present thicker corneas than their age-matched control subjects. In these patients, there is a correlation between their CCT values and their corneal endothelial cell density values, so when higher CCT values were found, lower corneal endothelial cell density values were observed.

Effect of Decentration on the Optical Quality of Two Intraocular Lenses.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of decentration on the optical quality of two diffractive-refractive intraocular lenses, a bifocal and a trifocal, when displaced laterally (horizontal direction) from the center. METHODS: The AT LISA 809M IOL (+3.75 D add) with two main foci and the AT LISA tri 839MP intraocular lens with three main foci (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) were analyzed. The optical quality of the intraocular lenses was measured with the PMTF (power and modulation transfer function [MTF] measurement for refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses) optical bench (Lambda-X, Nivelles, Belgium). The optical quality of the lenses was evaluated by the MTF at different object vergences, the average modulation in the range of frequencies from 0 to 100 cycles/mm, and the through-focus MTF curves. All measures were recorded when the intraocular lenses were centered and decentered for 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The Strehl ratio and the percentage of energy allocated at each focus at the centered position were also obtained. RESULTS: Our results showed a lower optical quality with increasing decentration. The MTFs for the diffractive-refractive intraocular lenses decreased when the intraocular lenses were decentered. Also, the relative percentages of light energy allocated at each object vergence, for both intraocular lenses, agreed well with theoretical specifications and were consistent with the overall design of each lens. CONCLUSIONS: The optical quality of these diffractive-refractive multifocal intraocular lenses was slightly reduced when the induced decentration was less than 0.4 mm. For a decentration of 0.4 mm, the maximum difference in average modulation values was about 18% compared to the centered position.

Visual function after implantation of a diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near vision after bilateral implantation of a diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: This study enrolled 204 eyes of 102 patients who had bilateral implantation of the AT LISA tri 839MP IOL. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (4 meters), monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) (30, 40 centimeters), binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) (50, 60, 70 centimeters), the defocus curve, and binocular photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare were evaluated over 6 months. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in visual acuity outcomes between follow-up visits were found at any distance evaluated (p>0.05). Six months postoperatively, the mean monocular UDVA and UNVA were comparable to preoperative CDVA and DCNVA, respectively. All patients achieved a binocular CDVA of 20/25 or better. The mean binocular DCIVA ranged from 0.11 ± 0.11 (70 cm) to 0.07 ± 0.11 logMAR (50 cm). The mean binocular DCNVA was 20/25 or better in nearly 87% of patients. The defocus curve showed a wide range of useful vision, with no statistically significant differences in visual acuity at intermediate distances (p = 0.151). Mesopic contrast sensitivity was lower than under photopic conditions, particularly at medium and high spatial frequencies (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral implantation of this trifocal IOL provides good visual outcomes at far, intermediate, and near distances, being an effective solution to reduce spectacle dependence after lensectomy.

Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole to correct myopia: One-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictability, stability, efficacy, and safety of a newly developed posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) (model V4c Visian Implantable Collamer Lens) to correct moderate to high myopia. SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: This study evaluated eyes that had implantation of the new pIOL model with a central hole for myopia correction. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density, pIOL vault, and adverse events were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS: The study comprised 147 eyes of 80 patients. Preoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -8.80 diopters (D) ± 2.60 (SD). At 12 months, the mean SE was -0.14 ± 0.26 D, with 93.9% of eyes within ±0.50 D of the target and 100% of eyes within ±1.00 D. The mean UDVA and CDVA were 0.028 ± 0.055 logMAR and 0.003 ± 0.013 logMAR, respectively. The efficacy and safety indices were 1.00 and 1.04, respectively. All eyes had unchanged CDVA or gained 1 or more lines during the follow-up. The IOP remained stable over time; no eye developed anterior subcapsular cataract. Twelve months postoperatively, the mean vault was 405.5 ± 184.7 µm (range 100 to 980 µm), and the mean endothelial cell loss was 1.7%. CONCLUSION: The good refractive and visual acuity outcomes and the highly stable IOP values obtained over 12 months support the use of the new pIOL model with a central hole for the correction of moderate to high myopia. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Objective analysis of contact lens fit.

PURPOSE: To assess the validity and repeatability of objective compared to subjective contact lens fit analysis. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects (aged 22.0±3.0 years) wore two different soft contact lens designs. Four lens fit variables: centration, horizontal lag, post-blink movement in up-gaze and push-up recovery speed were assessed subjectively (four observers) and objectively from slit-lamp biomicroscopy captured images and video. The analysis was repeated a week later. RESULTS: The average of the four experienced observers was compared to objective measures, but centration, movement on blink, lag and push-up recovery speed all varied significantly between them (p<0.001). Horizontal lens centration was on average close to central as assessed both objectively and subjectively (p>0.05). The 95% confidence interval of subjective repeatability was better than objective assessment (±0.128 mm versus ±0.168 mm, p=0.417), but utilised only 78% of the objective range. Vertical centration assessed objectively showed a slight inferior decentration (0.371±0.381 mm) with good inter- and intrasession repeatability (p>0.05). Movement-on-blink was lower estimated subjectively than measured objectively (0.269±0.179 mm versus 0.352±0.355 mm; p=0.035), but had better repeatability (±0.124 mm versus ±0.314 mm 95% confidence interval) unless correcting for the smaller range (47%). Horizontal lag was lower estimated subjectively (0.562±0.259 mm) than measured objectively (0.708±0.374 mm, p<0.001), had poorer repeatability (±0.132 mm versus ±0.089 mm 95% confidence interval) and had a smaller range (63%). Subjective categorisation of push-up speed of recovery showed reasonable differentiation relative to objective measurement (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The objective image analysis allows an accurate, reliable and repeatable assessment of soft contact lens fit characteristics, being a useful tool for research and optimisation of lens fit in clinical practice.

Optical and visual simulation of standard and modified spherical aberration implantable Collamer lens post myopic LASIK surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual quality achieved in patients undergoing standard or modified implantable Collamer lens (ICL) to correct residual myopic error after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. METHODS: The adaptive optics visual simulator was used to simulate LASIK surgery of moderate and high myopia with a myopic regression corrected by a standard and modified ICL. Visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) were measured in 14 subjects at 3- and 4.5-mm pupil. Point spread function and simulated retinal images were calculated. RESULTS: Comparing LASIK plus standard ICL and LASIK plus modified ICL simulations, for moderate myopia, VA improvement was less than 1 line in all VA contrasts and both pupils evaluated. No statistically significant differences were found in CS between the simulations at any spatial frequency evaluated and for 3-mm pupil (p>0.05), but differences were significant at 4.5-mm pupil (p<0.05). For high myopia, the VA improvement was less than 1 line at 3-mm pupil, although it increased 2 or more lines at 4.5-mm pupil. Statistically significant differences were found in CS between the simulations for all spatial frequencies and both pupils evaluated (p<0.05), except for low and medium spatial frequencies at 3-mm pupil (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes suggest that an ICL is a good option to correct the myopic residual error after myopic LASIK. When the ICL's spherical aberration is modified, the post-LASIK eyes of high myopia are the most benefited, as these eyes are more aberrated than after moderate myopic LASIK.

In vitro power profiles of multifocal simultaneous vision contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the power profile of multifocal contact lenses (CLs) using a new technology based on quantitative deflectometry. METHODS: The Nimo TR1504 was used to analyze the power distribution of multifocal CLs. The CLs under study were: Air Optix Aqua Multifocal Low, Medium and High Addition and Focus Progressives. Three lenses of each model were considered. RESULTS: All multifocal CLs showed a power profile characterized by a change toward more positive power values when aperture sizes become smaller. The near refractive addition of the lenses under study was +2.61 D, +1.44 D, +1.30 D and +0.30 D for the Focus Progressives, the Air Optix Aqua Multifocal High, Medium Add and Low Add, respectively. The refractive power of the Focus Progressives did not reach the value of the nominal distance power until a radial distance of 0.9 mm from the center of the lens. For the Air Optix Aqua Multifocal Low Add the distance nominal power was reached at a radial distance of 1.5mm from the center of the lens, whereas this occurred at a distance of 1.8mm for the Air Optix Aqua Multifocal Medium and High Add. CONCLUSION: The relation between the pupil diameter of the patients and the power profile of these CLs has a crucial implication on the final distance correction and near addition that these lenses provide to patients. Practitioners should know the power profile of these CLs and measure the pupil diameter of each patient in different situations in order to carry out a customized fitting.

Intra-eye visual function comparison with and without a central hole contact lens-based system: potential applications to ICL design.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a central hole contact lens-based design on visual performance and to compare it with the standard version of that same contact lens without the hole (non-hole scenario). METHODS: The visual performance of 10 myopic patients wearing either a central hole myopic contact lens or its corresponding standard version (non-hole contact lens) was assessed on the same eye. Monocular corrected distance visual acuity was measured under photopic conditions and monocular contrast sensitivity was measured under both photopic and mesopic conditions and higher-order ocular aberrations using Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. An in vitro optical analysis of both contact lenses was performed and a symptoms questionnaire was administered to the participants. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in terms of corrected distance visual acuity were found: -0.091 and -0.098 logMAR for the hole and non-hole contact lenses, respectively (P > .05). Contrast sensitivity was comparable between lenses and no differences were found for specific spatial frequencies or a particular luminance level (P > .05). The hole contact lenses provided excellent outcomes, essentially equivalent to those of non-hole contact lenses, even in terms of subjective symptoms such as glare or halo. In vivo and in vitro optical quality analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the hole and the non-hole contact lenses for either pupil size (P > .1). CONCLUSION: A contact lens having a central hole provides good visual and optical quality outcomes comparable to those yielded by the same lens without a hole. The results suggest that the impact of a central hole may be clinically negligible.

Collagen copolymer posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia correction: three-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability of the Visian V3 Implantable Collamer Lens posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (PC pIOL) for moderate to high hyperopia. SETTING: Private clinic, Oviedo, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study. METHODS: The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, manifest refraction, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure (IOP), central vault, and adverse events were evaluated for 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The study comprised 73 eyes of 44 patients. The mean spherical equivalent decreased from +4.84 diopters (D) ± 1.6 (SD) (range +1.00 to +7.75 D) preoperatively to -0.13 ± 0.39 D 3 years postoperatively; 61 eyes (83.6%) were within ±0.50 D of the target refraction and all eyes were within ±1.00 D. The mean postoperative Snellen decimal UDVA and CDVA was 0.86 ± 0.17 and 0.91 ± 0.16, respectively. Most eyes (91.8%) had no change from the preoperative CDVA or gained 1 or more lines. One eye (1.4%) lost 2 lines, and no eye lost more than 2 lines. Three years postoperatively, the efficacy index was 1.02 and the safety index was 1.08. The IOP remained stable over time, with no significant increase postoperatively. The mean endothelial cell loss was 4.7%, remaining unchanged over time. No postoperative complications or adverse events, including pupillary block or secondary cataract, occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the PC pIOL was safe and effective in correcting hyperopic refractive errors, with stable visual and refractive outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Diurnal variations in visual performance for disposable contact lenses.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the visual performance provided by different daily disposable contact lenses and to analyze its variation over time. METHODS: Visual performance was evaluated in terms of visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) in 15 myopic subjects (-0.50 to -4.00 diopters) who had been previously fitted with each one of the following seven types of soft contact lenses: DAILIES TOTAL1 (Alcon, Forth Worth, TX), DAILIES AquaComfort Plus (Alcon), 1-DAY ACUVUE TruEye (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, FL), 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care), SofLens daily disposable (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY), Proclear 1 Day (CooperVision, Fairport, NY), and Clariti 1-Day (Sauflon, Twickenham, United Kingdom). We measured VA at three contrast levels (10%, 50%, and 100%) and CS for three spatial frequencies (10, 20, and 25 cycles/degree). These measurements were performed at 2-hr intervals during a 12-hr period of continuous wearing. Measurements were also performed with ophthalmic lenses before contact lens fitting. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) results revealed significant differences across the lens types and over time for low-contrast VA only. For high- and medium-contrast VA, ophthalmic lens performed better than the contact lenses after 12 hr of use (without statistical differences among the contact lenses). Contrast sensitivity values also showed differences across lenses for the three spatial frequencies under analysis. For each particular lens type, no CS variations were observed with wearing time. Although some of the differences were not statistically significant, we found that, for many of the VA and CS measures, ophthalmic lens and DAILIES TOTAL1 yielded better values than the 1-DAY ACUVUE TruEye and Clariti 1-Day. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing VA at different contrasts and CS measurements allowed us to perform a visual function evaluation. Contact lens characteristics such as material and water content, among others, may be the cause of the differences in visual performance that emerged from this study. Our findings provide useful information for contact lens practitioners.

Clinical outcomes after implantation of a posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for myopic correction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability of a new-model posterior chamber Implantable Collamer Lens phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) (V4c Visian) to correct myopia. SETTING: Private practice, Oviedo, Spain. DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: This study enrolled patients who had implantation of a new pIOL design with a central hole for more natural aqueous flow, eliminating the need for neodymium:YAG iridotomy or peripheral iridectomy. The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell count, central vault, and adverse events were evaluated 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The study enrolled 138 eyes (70 patients). The mean spherical equivalent decreased from -8.73 diopters (D) ± 2.54 (SD) preoperatively to -0.03 ± 0.19 D 6 months postoperatively; 98.5% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 100% of eyes were within ±1.00 D. The mean UDVA and CDVA were 20/20 or better in 92.1% and 95.0% of eyes, respectively, at 6 months. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.01 and 1.00, respectively. Postoperatively, the IOP remained stable over time. No significant rises in IOP (including pupillary block) and no secondary cataract were found. After 6 months, the mean vault was 482.7 ± 210.5 µm (range 90 to 970 µm) and the mean endothelial cell loss was 8.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the pIOL was effective, predictable, safe, and stable for the correction of moderate to high myopic errors. This design, which avoids iridotomy or iridectomy, provided good IOP outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the distribution of refractive power within the optic zone of different soft contact lenses and to investigate the effect of lens decentration on the power profiles. METHODS: The Nimo TR1504 instrument was used to measure the optical power across different aperture diameters (from 1.5mm to 5.5mm in steps of 0.5mm) of four daily disposable contact lenses: DAILIES TOTAL1, Proclear 1-Day, SofLens daily disposable and 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST. Measurements were performed using a wet cell. Power data were evaluated when contact lenses were in its centered position and after inducing different amounts of lens decentration (from 0.2mm to 1.0mm in steps of 0.2mm). RESULTS: All contact lenses showed an increase - more negative - in lens power with distance from the lens center. The amount of change varied depending on the lens. It was about 10% of lens power for DAILIES TOTAL1 (-0.29diopters (D)), SofLens daily disposable (-0.36D), and Proclear 1-Day (-0.32D) whereas 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST showed a percentage variation of 3.3% (-0.10D). After inducing a lens decentration up to 1mm, the power curves were shifted in the negative direction. However, the change obtained in lens power compared with well-centered position was always lower than a quarter of diopter both for all the lenses and aperture diameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a variation of the refractive power from the lens center, becoming more negative toward the periphery, with a negligible effect of the decentration for all disposable contact lenses studied.

On-eye optical quality of daily disposable contact lenses for different wearing times.

PURPOSE: To quantify the optical quality of various daily disposable contact lenses in vivo and to ascertain its variation in terms of wearing time by means of objective non-invasive determination of wavefront patterns. METHODS: The crx1 adaptive-optics system was used to measure the wavefront aberrations in 15 myopic eyes before and at 2-h intervals after contact lens fitting, over a 12-h wearing period. Seven types of contact lenses having different material, water content and lens design were evaluated in this study: Dailies Total1, Dailies AquaComfort Plus, Proclear 1 Day, 1-Day Acuvue TruEye, 1-Day Acuvue moist, SofLens daily disposable and Clariti 1-Day. The aberration data were analysed by fitting Zernike polynomials up to the 5th-order for 3 and 5-mm pupils. The optical quality under each condition and at each point in time was described by means of the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) value of wavefront aberration, Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), Point Spread Function and cut-off spatial frequency. RESULTS: A RMS increase was observed after contact lens fitting as well as over time, both for a 3-mm and a 5-mm pupil. Each type of lens induced a different amount of wavefront aberrations, which vary over time also in a different manner. Dailies Total1 showed the lowest RMS values both at baseline and at the end of the day. In addition, Dailies Total1 provided the best MTF out of all the contact lenses that were assessed. These observations were reflected in higher cut-off spatial frequencies and visual resolution both at baseline and after 12 h of wearing time. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrometry makes it possible to analyse accurately and in vivo the optical quality of contact lenses and to assess how lenses having different characteristics - such as material or water content - behave for different wearing times. These variations across contact lenses may result in differences in visual performance.

Refractive lens exchange with a multifocal diffractive aspheric intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and predictability after refractive lens exchange with multifocal diffractive aspheric intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Sixty eyes of 30 patients underwent bilateral implantation with AcrySof(®) ReSTOR(®) SN6AD3 intraocular lens with +4.00 D near addition. Patients were divided into myopic and hyperopic groups. Monocular best corrected visual acuity at distance and near and monocular uncorrected visual acuity at distance and near were measured before and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: After surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 0.08 ± 0.15 and 0.11 ± 0.14 logMAR for the myopic and hyperopic groups, respectively (50% and 46.67% of patients had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in the myopic and hyperopic groups, respectively). The safety and efficacy indexes were 1.05 and 0.88 for the myopic and 1.01 and 0.86 for the hyperopic groups at distance vision. Within the myopic group, 20 eyes remained unchanged after the surgery, and 3 gained >2 lines of best corrected visual acuity. For the hyperopic group, 2 eyes lost 2 lines of best corrected visual acuity, 21 did not change, and 3 eyes gained 2 lines. At near vision, the safety and efficacy indexes were 1.23 and 1.17 for the myopic and 1.16 and 1.13 for the hyperopic groups. Best corrected near visual acuity improved after surgery in both groups (from 0.10 logMAR to 0.01 logMAR in the myopic group, and from 0.10 logMAR to 0.04 logMAR in the hyperopic group). CONCLUSIONS: The ReSTOR(®) SN6AD3 intraocular lens in refractive lens exchange demonstrated good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting high ametropia and presbyopia.

Refractive lens exchange with a multifocal diffractive aspheric intraocular lens / Cirurgia de cristalino transparente com lente intraocular multifocal asférica difrativa

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and predictability after refractive lens exchange with multifocal diffractive aspheric intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Sixty eyes of 30 patients underwent bilateral implantation with AcrySof® ReSTOR® SN6AD3 intraocular lens with +4.00 D near addition. Patients were divided into myopic and hyperopic groups. Monocular best corrected visual acuity at distance and near and monocular uncorrected visual acuity at distance and near were measured before and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: After surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 0.08 ± 0.15 and 0.11 ± 0.14 logMAR for the myopic and hyperopic groups, respectively (50% and 46.67% of patients had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in the myopic and hyperopic groups, respectively). The safety and efficacy indexes were 1.05 and 0.88 for the myopic and 1.01 and 0.86 for the hyperopic groups at distance vision. Within the myopic group, 20 eyes remained unchanged after the surgery, and 3 gained >2 lines of best corrected visual acuity. For the hyperopic group, 2 eyes lost 2 lines of best corrected visual acuity, 21 did not change, and 3 eyes gained 2 lines. At near vision, the safety and efficacy indexes were 1.23 and 1.17 for the myopic and 1.16 and 1.13 for the hyperopic groups. Best corrected near visual acuity improved after surgery in both groups (from 0.10 logMAR to 0.01 logMAR in the myopic group, and from 0.10 logMAR to 0.04 logMAR in the hyperopic group). CONCLUSIONS: The ReSTOR® SN6AD3 intraocular lens in refractive lens exchange demonstrated good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting high ametropia and presbyopia.

INTRODUÇÃO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a segurança, eficácia e efetividade da extração de cristalino transparente com implantação de lente intraocular multifocal difrativa. MÉTODOS: Sessenta olhos de 30 pacientes foram submetidos à cirurgia bilateral de retirada de cristalino transparente com colocação de lente intraocular ReSTOR® SN6AD3 com adição de +4,00 D para perto. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: miopia e hipermetropia. Em ambos os grupos foram medidas a acuidade visual monocular de longe e de perto, com e sem a melhor correção, antes e 6 meses após a cirurgia. RESULTADOS: Após a cirurgia, os resultados de acuidade visual não corrigida para longe foram 0,08 ± 0,15 e 0,11 ± 0,14 logMAR para o grupo de míopes e hipermétropes, respectivamente (50% do grupo de míopes e 46,67% do grupo de hipermétropes tiveram uma acuidade visual para longe maior ou igual a 20/20). Os índices de segurança e eficácia foram 1,05 e 0,88 para o grupo de míopes e 1,01 e 0,86 para o grupo de hipermétropes, para a visão de distância. Dentro do grupo de míopes, 20 olhos permaneceram inalterados após a cirurgia, e 3 ganharam mais de 2 linhas da melhor acuidade visual corrigida. Para o grupo de hipermétropes, 2 olhos perderam 2 linhas da melhor acuidade visual corrigida, 21 não se alteraram e 3 ganharam 2 linhas. Na visão de perto, os índices de segurança e eficácia foram 1,23 e 1,17 para o grupo de míopes, e 1,16 e 1,13 para o grupo de hipermétropes, respectivamente. A acuidade visual binocular de perto com a melhor correção melhorou após a cirurgia nos dois grupos, de 0,10 logMAR para 0,01 logMAR no grupo de míopes e de 0,10 logMAR para 0,04 logMAR no grupo de hipermétropes. CONCLUSÕES: Podemos concluir que a lente intraocular ReSTOR® SN6AD3 demonstrou eficácia, segurança e previsibilidade na cirurgia de altas ametropias e presbiopia.

Foldable iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens vs femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia between -6.00 and -9.00 diopters.

PURPOSE: To compare visual, refractive, and clinical outcomes of foldable iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia between -6.00 and -9.00 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty-six myopic patients were randomized to undergo bilateral Artiflex (Ophtec BV) PIOL implantation or bilateral femtosecond laser-assisted conventional LASIK with the VISX S2 (Abbott Medical Optics). Refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, corneal endothelial cell count, rate of retreatment, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, no statistically significant differences were noted in spherical equivalent refraction (P=.19) or UDVA (P=.28), whereas CDVA was better in the PIOL group (P<.001). Spherical equivalent refraction was within ±0.50 D in 42 (91.3%) LASIK eyes and 41 (89.1%) PIOL eyes (P>.99). The percentage of eyes gaining lines of CDVA was significantly higher in the PIOL group (50.0% vs 8.7%; P<.001). Contrast sensitivity was better for PIOL eyes at 1.5 cycles per degree (cpd) (P=.03) and 6 cpd (P=.008). The LASIK eyes showed a mean endothelial cell count increase of 3.7%±2.8%, whereas PIOL eyes showed a mean decrease of 9.1%±2.0% (P<.001). The rate of retreatment was similar (P=.37), and no serious complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The Artiflex PIOL provided better CDVA and contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies than femtosecond laser-assisted conventional LASIK, suggesting that PIOL implantation is a reasonable option for myopia between -6.00 and -9.00 D.

Iris-fixated toric phakic intraocular lens for myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, safety, stability, and complications of the Artiflex toric iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) for myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Private practice surgery centers, Valencia and Terrassa, Spain. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: At 12 months, refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, complications, pIOL misalignment, and endothelial cell count (ECC) were evaluated. Indices of success and misalignment were calculated using vector analysis. RESULTS: The study enrolled 42 eyes in 25 patients aged 21 to 39 years. The mean spherical equivalent decreased from -8.85 diopters (D) ± 2.71 (SD) to -0.37 ± 0.46 D, with 66.7% of the eyes within ± 0.50 D. The mean cylinder power decreased from -2.90 D (range -1.50 to -5.00 D) to -0.39 D (range 0.00 to -1.50 D); refraction was highly stable. All eyes achieved a decimal UDVA of 0.5 or better and a CDVA of 0.8 or better. A gain of 1 line or more of CDVA was found in 69.1% of eyes. The mean clinical pIOL misalignment was 2.6 ± 1.8 degrees; 1 eye (2.4%) required surgical repositioning of the pIOL. The mean ECC decrease was 9.3% ± 1.8%; iris pigment precipitates were observed in 16.7% of eyes. Vector analysis showed excellent mean indices of success for overall (0.94 ± 0.04), spherical (0.96 ± 0.05), and astigmatic (0.95 ± 0.16) corrections; the mean angle of error was 1.8 ± 2.7 degrees. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the toric pIOL was effective, predictable, safe, and stable for the correction of myopic astigmatism. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Contrast sensitivity and color perception with orange and yellow intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and color vision after implantation of either orange or yellow-tinted intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: Fifty-six eyes of 28 cataract patients who had bilateral implantation of orange-tinted (PC440Y Orange, Ophtec), yellow-tinted (AcrySof Natural SN60AT, Alcon), or clear (AcrySof SA60AT, Alcon) IOLs were examined. Six months postoperatively, monocular CSF under photopic and mesopic (with and without glare) conditions were measured using the Functional Visual Analyzer. Color discrimination was determined with the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test. RESULTS: Patients implanted with orange-tinted, yellow-tinted, or clear IOLs displayed similar CSF values, with no statistically significant differences at any spatial frequency (p>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in chromatic discrimination among the 3 groups of patients (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orange or yellow blue-filtering IOL implantation is comparable to a clear IOL in terms of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity or color discrimination.

Comparison of two artificial tear formulations for dry eye through high-resolution optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the efficacy of two artificial eye-drop formulations by analysing the lower tear film meniscus volume through a commercial high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomographer. METHODS: Twenty dry eye patients (12 men, eight women, aged 57.5 ± 8.4 years) with refractive errors from -2.50 to +0.75 D (mean -1.34 ± 1.02 D) and cylinders lower than 1.00 D were examined. Tear meniscus volume was measured before, immediately after and 10, 30 and 60 minutes after instillation using the Copernicus high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomographer (Optopol Tech SA, Zawiercie, Poland). Volume was calculated from the local area obtained from tomograms considering a regular distribution of the tear meniscus across the eyelid. Ten subjects were randomly assigned to first receive either polyethylene glycol (Blink Intensive, Abbot Medical Optics Inc, CA, USA) or hypromellose (Artific, Farma-Lepori SA, Barcelona, Spain) three times daily in both eyes for one month. Measures were then repeated and after a one-week wash-out period they were switched to the other eye-drop for another month. RESULTS: Mean baseline volume was 0.38 ± 0.10 µL, while mean baseline volume after the wash-out period was slightly higher, 0.39 ± 0.10 µL (p = 0.638). Analysis of variance showed significant differences in meniscus volume with time after instillation with both formulations (p < 0.001), mean volume decreasing with time. At 30 and 60 minutes following instillation, values decreased to almost baseline (average difference 0.02 ± 0.03 µL at t(30), p = 0.016 and 0.01 ± 0.01 µL at t(60), p = 0.098). CONCLUSION: An increase in tear film meniscus volume in dry eyes from the use of eye-drops has been shown. High resolution imaging of lower tear film meniscus with clinical optical coherence tomography systems provides useful measures of tear volume. Both formulations assessed in the present study are efficient in increasing tear meniscus volume and reducing dry eye signs and symptoms, although results in terms of increase in meniscus volume were higher with the polyethylene glycol formulation.