Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 54(4): 471-477, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31271830

RESUMO

In vitro and clinical data were analysed to evaluate the susceptibility profile of itraconazole in light of the new cut-off points. The in vitro activity of itraconazole was compared with that of eight comparators against 119 Candida bloodstream isolates from 2015 to 2018. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured by the colorimetric MICRONAUT-S assay. The content of wells without any color change was sub-cultured to measure killing efficacy. No major differences were found against Candida albicans. Itraconazole, posaconazole and amphotericin B were the most active agents against Candida parapsilosis. Of the 32 isolates of C. parapsilosis that were resistant to fluconazole, 96.9%, 78.1% and 93.8% were susceptible to itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, respectively. The ratio of the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) to the MIC of itraconazole was lower than for the other azoles against C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata. Itraconazole achieved greater inhibition over-time of the growth of C. parapsilosis than fluconazole. Seventy-three critically ill patients who were unresponsive to antibiotics received intravenous empirical treatment with itraconazole (n = 28) or comparators (n = 45). Case-control matching was conducted for severity, comorbidities, risk factors for candidemia, administered antibiotics and days of antifungal treatment. Breakthrough candidemia was found in 3.6% of patients treated with itraconazole and in 32.1% of patients treated with comparators (P: 0.020); breakthrough candidemia by C. parapsilosis was found in 3.6% and 28.6% of patients, respectively. Results indicate that itraconazole retains a valuable susceptibility profile against Candida isolates, particularly C. parapsilosis. This superior profile may explain the clinical efficacy in the occurrence of breakthrough candidemia and warrants further clinical investigation.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidemia/microbiologia , Itraconazol/farmacologia , Itraconazol/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Candida/classificação , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(7): 773-776, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an independent risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which is associated significantly with disease severity. We aimed to determine the rates of CDI among hospitalized IBD patients in major tertiary referral hospitals in Greece. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of stool cultures from hospitalized patients investigated for diarrhea, during 2016, tested for CDI with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B. RESULTS: In total, 6932 patients were tested for CDI; 894 were positive for GDH (12.89%) and 339 were also positive for C. difficile toxin (4.89%). The prevalence of CDI among all hospitalized patients was 1.6/1000 patient-days. Among these, there were 401 IBD patients, and 62 were positive for GDH (15.46%) and 30 were also positive for C. difficile toxin (7.48%). The prevalence of CDI in IBD patients was 2.5/1000 patient-days, significantly higher than in non-IBD hospitalized patients (30/401 vs. 309/6531, P=0.013). Among the 30 IBD patients (ulcerative colitis=18, Crohn's disease=12) with CDI, six were receiving biologics, three were on corticosteroids [one combined with azathioprine (AZA) and one combined with 5-ASA], nine were on AZA monotherapy and 12 were on 5-ASA monotherapy. The prevalence of CDI among patients receiving AZA monotherapy was significantly higher than in patients receiving other medications (9/68 vs. 21/333, P=0.047). Mild CDI (n=28) was treated with metronidazole and/or vancomycin, whereas severe CDI (n=2) was treated with vancomycin. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CDI is higher in hospitalized IBD patients than those without IBD and AZA monotherapy increases the risk of CDI.


Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diarreia , Enterotoxinas/análise , Fezes/química , Feminino , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Grécia/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Mesalamina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA