Thirty-day mortality following surgical management of hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a prospective multi-centre UK study.

PURPOSE: Thirty-day mortality of patients with hip fracture is well researched and predictive; validated scoring tools have been developed (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score, NHFS). COVID-19 has significantly greater mortality in the elderly and comorbid patients which includes hip fracture patients. Non-operative treatment is not appropriate due to significantly higher mortality, and therefore, these patients are often exposed to COVID-19 in the peri-operative period. What is unclear is the effect of concomitant COVID-19 infection in these patients. METHODS: A multicentre prospective study across ten sites in the United Kingdom (responsible for 7% of hip fracture patients per annum in the UK). Demographic and background information were collected by independent chart review. Data on surgical factors included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, time to theatre, Nottingham Hip fracture score (NHFS) and classification of fracture were also collected between 1st March 2020 and 30th April 2020 with a matched cohort from the same period in 2019. RESULTS: Actual and expected 30-day mortality was found to be significantly higher than expected for 2020 COVID-19 positive patients (RR 3.00 95% CI 1.57-5.75, p < 0.001), with 30 observed deaths compared against the 10 expected from NHFS risk stratification. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection appears to be an independent risk factor for increased mortality in hip fracture patients. Whilst non-operative management of these fractures is not suggested due to the documented increased risks and mortality, this study provides evidence to the emerging literature of the severity of COVID-19 infection in surgical patients and the potential impact of COVID-19 on elective surgical patients in the peri-operative period.

Correction to: Thirty-day mortality following surgical management of hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a prospective multi-centre UK study.

The published online version contains mistake, as the Fig. 1 legend should read "Kaplan-Meier survival curve for 30-day survival for 2020 cohort COVID-19 positive vs COVID-19 negative" whilst the Fig. 2 legend should read "Kaplan-Meier survival curve for 30-day survival 2020 COVID-19 negative group vs 2019 cohort".

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative cholangiography in detection of common bile duct stones.

Introduction During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is currently regarded as the gold standard in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) is an attractive alternative with several potential advantages. Methods A systematic review was undertaken of the published literature comparing LUS with IOC in the assessment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Results Twenty-one comparative studies were analysed. There were 4,566 patients in the IOC group and 5,044 in the LUS group. The combined sensitivity and specificity of IOC in the detection of CBD stones were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.89) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98-0.98) respectively with a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 and a diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of 260.65 (95% CI: 160.44-423.45). This compares with a sensitivity and specificity for LUS of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99) respectively with a pooled AUC of 0.982 and a diagnostic OR of 765.15 (95% CI: 450.78-1,298.76). LUS appeared to be more successful in terms of coming to a clinical decision regarding CBD stones than IOC (random effects, risk ratio: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98, df=20, z=-3.7, p<0.005). Furthermore, LUS took less time (random effects, standardised mean difference: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98, df=20, z=-3.7, p<0.005). Conclusions LUS is comparable with IOC in the detection of CBD stones. The main advantages of LUS are that it does not involve ionising radiation, is quicker to perform, has a lower failure rate and can be repeated during the procedure as required.

Acute afferent loop syndrome in the early postoperative period following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Afferent loop syndrome (ALS) is a recognised complication of foregut surgery caused by mechanical obstruction at the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis itself or at a point nearby. Acute ALS has only been reported following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) after several years due to recurrence of malignancy at the anastomotic site. We report five cases of acute ALS in the first postoperative week. METHODS: The presentation, clinical findings and successful management of the 5 patients with ALS were obtained from a prospectively collected database of 300 PDs. All five patients with early acute ALS presented with signs and symptoms of a bile leak. Since the fifth patient, the surgical technique has been modified with the creation of a larger window in the transverse mesocolon and a Braun enteroenterostomy. RESULTS: There have been no further incidents of ALS since the adoption of these modifications to the standard technique of PD and there has also been a reduction in postoperative bile leaks (6.4% vs 3.6%, p=0.416). CONCLUSIONS: Acute ALS is a rare but important complication in the immediate postoperative period following PD and causes disruption to adjacent anastomoses, resulting in a bile leak. A prophylactic Braun anastomosis and wide mesocolic window may prevent this complication and subsequent deterioration.

The two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach for minimal access pancreatic necrosectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in surgery and critical care, severe pancreatitis continues to be associated with a high rate of mortality, which is increased significantly in the presence of infected pancreatic necrosis. Controversy persists around the optimal treatment for such cases, with specialist units variously advocating open necrosectomy, simple percutaneous drainage or one of several minimal access approaches. We describe our technique and outcomes with a two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal necrosectomy (2P-LRN). METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients with proven infected pancreatic necrosis were treated by 2P-LRN over a three-year period in the setting of a specialist hepatopancreatobiliary unit. The median patient age was 46 years (range: 28-87 years) and 10 of the patients were male. RESULTS: The median number of procedures required to clear the necrosis was 2 (range: 1-5), with a median time to discharge following the procedure of 44 days (range: 10-135 days). There was no 90-day mortality and the morbidity rate was 38%, consisting of pancreatic fistula (31%) and bleeding (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal necrosectomy has been demonstrated to confer similar or better outcomes to other techniques for necrosectomy. It carries the additional advantages of better visualisation, leading to fewer procedures and the opportunity to deploy simple laparoscopic instruments such as diathermy or haemostatic clips.

Fundus-first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a cholangiogram: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of techniques are emerging in the literature describing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). The advent of a new surgical approach is a reminder of the increase in bile duct injuries in the past when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was first introduced. With this in mind, the authors describe a safe and reproducible approach to SILC. METHODS: Between August 2008 and August 2009, 20 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease underwent SILC using a totally transumbilical fundus-first approach with an intraoperative cholangiogram. Data including pain scores were collected prospectively. RESULTS: In this initial series, the median operative time was 103 min (range, 55-177 min), including the time for two patients undergoing additional procedures at the time of surgery. Intraoperative cholangiograms were completed for 18 of 19 patients. Additional ports were required in four patients for safe completion of the procedure. The mean pain score 12 h postoperatively was 2.5 on a visual analogue scale with a range of 0-10. There was no morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: According to the findings, SILC with an intraoperative cholangiogram can be performed safely using a fundus-first approach. However, for SILC to become the operation of choice for the treatment of gallbladder disease, evidence is required to demonstrate its advantage over laparoscopic cholecystectomy.