Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on insulin resistance and ß-cell function in prediabetes: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have suggested an inverse association between low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations and development of type 2 diabetes. High-quality trials are required to test the hypothesis that vitamin D is a direct contributor to type 2 diabetes pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was to investigate the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on insulin resistance (IR) and ß-cell function in people with prediabetes and suboptimal vitamin D status (<50 nmol/L). METHODS: Sixty-six individuals were randomly assigned to receive 3000 IU (75 µg) vitamin D3 or placebo daily for 26 wk. Compliance was monitored by pill count and change in serum 25(OH)D concentration using LC-MS. The primary endpoint was between-group difference in change in IR assessed using a 2-step euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with infusion of tritiated glucose. An oral-glucose-tolerance test was performed pre- and postintervention to calculate indices of ß-cell function. Between-group comparisons were made using ANCOVA. RESULTS: In total, 64 participants completed the study. Baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations in the vitamin D3 and placebo group were 30.7 and 30.0 nmol/L, with status increasing by 70.5 nmol/L and 5.3 nmol/L, respectively (between-group difference in vitamin D: 65.8 nmol/L; 95% CI: 54.2, 77.3 nmol/L; P < 0.01), after supplementation. There was no difference between groups in measures of whole-body, peripheral, or hepatic IR or in any measure of glycemic control or ß-cell function. CONCLUSION: This study employed a robust assessment of IR and ß-cell function and targeted a high-risk population with low 25(OH)D status at baseline and found that vitamin D3 supplementation had no effect on insulin action in people with prediabetes.This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01889810.

Vitamin D and insulin resistance.

Vitamin D is a steroid hormone, which in active form binds to the vitamin D receptor. Expression of the vitamin D receptor in diverse cell types (pancreatic islet cells, myocytes, hepatocytes and adipocytes) raises the suspicion that vitamin D may be involved in multiple cellular processes, including the response to insulin. Insulin resistance is a characteristic feature of type 2 DM, and its attenuation may reduce the incidence of type 2 DM and cardiovascular disease. In observational studies, low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations are associated with an increased risk of type 2 DM. It has been suggested that increasing serum 25-OHD concentrations may have beneficial effects on glucose and insulin homeostasis. However, cross-sectional and interventional studies of vitamin D supplementation provide conflicting results and demonstrate no clear beneficial effect of vitamin D on insulin resistance. These studies are complicated by inclusion of different patient cohorts, different 25-OHD assays and different doses and preparations of vitamin D. Any possible association may be confounded by alterations in PTH, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D or tissue vitamin D concentrations. We identified 39 studies via MEDLINE and PUBMED. We review the evidence from 10 studies (seven observational and three interventional) examining vitamin D and type 2 DM incidence, and 29 studies (one prospective observational, 12 cross-sectional and 16 interventional trials) examining vitamin D and insulin resistance. Based on this data, it is not possible to state that vitamin D supplementation has any effect on type 2 DM incidence or on insulin resistance. Data from the multiple ongoing randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation due to report over the next few years should help to clarify this area.

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist fenofibrate has no effect on insulin sensitivity compared to atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes mellitus; a randomised, double-blind controlled trial.

AIMS: Assess insulin sensitivity after treatment with a selective PPAR-alpha agonist compared to an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor in human subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Thirteen subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were studied in a double-blind crossover design with 4-week placebo run-in and washout and 12-week treatment periods, randomised to micronised fenofibrate 267 mg or atorvastatin 10mg daily followed by the alternate drug in the second period. Insulin resistance was measured using the isoglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp method with isotope dilution. RESULTS: Weight, physical activity and other medications did not change. Total cholesterol (mean +/- standard error) was 4.60+/-0.21 versus 3.9+/-0.22 mmol/L after fenofibrate and atorvastatin respectively, p<0.05. LDL was 2.70+/-0.19 versus 1.95+/-0.23 mmol/L, p<0.05 and triglyceride 1.64+/-0.23 versus 1.84+/-0.26 mmol/L, p<0.05. Insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal (35.4+/-3.1 versus 33.2+/-3.0 µmol/kg/min) and nadir endogenous glucose production (6.2+/-1.4 versus 7.0+/-1.1 µmol/kg/min) revealed no significant differences in effects of the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In human subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus there were characteristic differences in lipid profile changes but no difference in insulin sensitivity after treatment with micronised fenofibrate compared to atorvastatin. This study finds no evidence of increased insulin sensitivity using this selective PPAR-alpha agonist over a commonly used statin at these doses.

Dose-response effect of fruit and vegetables on insulin resistance in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the dose-response effect of fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake on insulin resistance (IR) in people who are overweight and at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 105 participants (mean age 56 years) followed a 4-week washout diet (one to two portions of F&Vs per day). Ninety-two participants completed the washout and were randomized to receive one to two, four, or seven portions of F&Vs per day for 12 weeks. IR was assessed at the start and end of this 12-week period by the two-step euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Compliance was monitored using a combination of 4-day food diaries and plasma biomarkers of F&V intake. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants completed the study. Participants attained self-reported F&V intakes of 1.8, 3.8, and 7.0 portions per day (P < 0.001) per group. There was a significant linear increase in serum lutein status across the groups, indicating good compliance (P < 0.001), and body weight was maintained (P = 0.77). No significant difference was found between groups in terms of a change in measures of whole-body, peripheral, or hepatic IR or adiponectin multimers. CONCLUSIONS: Increased consumption of F&Vs, as advocated in public-health advice, has no effect on IR in overweight individuals who are at high risk of CVD when body weight is maintained. Recent evidence from systematic reviews indicates that particular classes or types of F&Vs may have particular antidiabetic properties; hence, it is possible that benefits may only be observed in response to a more specific fruit or vegetable intervention.

Comparison of 5% versus 15% sucrose intakes as part of a eucaloric diet in overweight and obese subjects: effects on insulin sensitivity, glucose metabolism, vascular compliance, body composition and lipid profile. A randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: The effect of dietary sucrose on insulin resistance and the pathogenesis of diabetes and vascular disease is unclear. We assessed the effect of 5% versus 15% sucrose intakes as part of a weight maintaining, eucaloric diet in overweight/obese subjects. METHODS: Thirteen subjects took part in a randomised controlled crossover study (M:F 9:4, median age 46 years, range 37-56 years, BMI 31.7±0.9 kg/m(2)). Subjects completed two 6 week dietary periods separated by 4 week washout. Diets were designed to have identical macronutrient profile. Insulin action was assessed using a two-step hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp; glucose tolerance, vascular compliance, body composition and lipid profiles were also assessed. RESULTS: There was no change in weight or body composition between diets. There was no difference in peripheral glucose utilization or suppression of endogenous glucose production. Fasting glucose was significantly lower after the 5% diet. There was no demonstrated effect on lipid profiles, blood pressure or vascular compliance. CONCLUSION: A low-sucrose diet had no beneficial effect on insulin resistance as measured by the euglycaemic glucose clamp. However, reductions in fasting glucose, one hour insulin and insulin area under the curve with the low sucrose diet on glucose tolerance testing may indicate a beneficial effect and further work is required to determine if this is the case. Clinical Trial Registration number ISRCTN50808730.

Effects on insulin action of adding low-dose thiazide to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in essential hypertension.

Concern exists regarding adverse metabolic effects of antihypertensive agents. In the United States, diuretics are recommended first-line but additional agents, usually angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, are often required to meet blood pressure targets. We have previously shown that the combination of low-dose diuretic with an ACE inhibitor has detrimental effects on insulin action compared with ACE inhibitor alone in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. Our aim was to establish whether similar effects occur in nondiabetic hypertensive patients using this combination. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design was used. After a 6-week run-in, when regular antihypertensive medications were withdrawn and placebo substituted, patients received captopril 50 mg twice daily with either bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg (CB) or placebo (CP) for 12 weeks with a 6-week wash-out between treatments. Insulin action was assessed by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp after the 6-week run-in and at the end of each treatment period. There were no differences between treatments in fasting glucose or insulin concentrations. Glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycemia were the same with each treatment (CP 22.1±2.2 vs CB 22.2±2.2 µmol/kg per minute). There was no difference in endogenous glucose production in the basal state (CP 8.9±0.5 vs CB 9.5±0.7 µmol/kg per minute; P=0.23) or during hyperinsulinemia (CP 2.2±0.6 vs CB 1.5±0.3 µmol/kg per minute; P=0.30). In contrast to the situation in type 2 diabetes mellitus, ACE inhibitor combined with low-dose thiazide diuretic does not adversely affect insulin action when compared with ACE inhibitor alone in nondiabetic hypertensive patients.

Sex hormone binding globulin and insulin resistance.

Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) is a glycoprotein composed of two 373-amino-acid subunits. The SHBG gene and a promotor region have been identified. The SHBG receptor has yet to be cloned but is known to act through a G-protein-linked second-messenger system following plasma membrane binding. The principal function of SHBG has traditionally been considered to be that of a transport protein for sex steroids, regulating circulating concentrations of free (unbound) hormones and their transport to target tissues. Recent research suggests that SHBG has functions in addition to the binding and transport of sex steroids. Observational studies have associated a low SHBG concentration with an increased incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) independent of sex hormone levels in men and women. Genetic studies using Mendelian randomization analysis linking three single nucleotide polymorphisms of the SHBG gene to risk of developing type 2 DM suggest SHBG may have a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 DM. The correlation between SHBG and insulin resistance that is evident in a number of cross-sectional studies is in keeping with the suggestion that the association between SHBG and incidence of type 2 DM is explained by insulin resistance. Several potential mechanisms may account for this association, including the identification of dietary factors that influence SHBG gene transcription. Further research to characterize the SHBG-receptor and the SHBG second messenger system is required. An interventional study examining the effects on insulin resistance of altering SHBG concentrations may help in determining whether this association is causal.

Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) replacement on insulin action and quality of life in hypopituitary females: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Addition of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) to standard pituitary replacement may improve quality of life and glucose metabolism. Conflicting results from the previous work probably relate to differences in populations studied and assessment techniques used. We examined the effects of DHEAS on insulin action and the quality of life in female patients with hypopituitary hypoadrenalism. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design was used. Patients received either DHEAS 50 mg daily or placebo for 12 weeks. PATIENTS: Fourteen hypopituitary females on stable standard replacement therapy and with low DHEAS were enrolled. MEASUREMENTS: Insulin action by euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp and extensive quality of life parameters were assessed after each treatment. RESULTS: Serum DHEAS (DHEAS 5·4 ± 0·8 vs placebo <0·8 ± 0·0 µm; P < 0·001) and androstenedione (DHEAS 4·1 ± 0·8 vs placebo 1·3 ± 0·2 nm; P < 0·05) rose to within the normal range after DHEAS 50 mg daily. There were no differences between treatments in testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) or IGF-1. Quality of life measures were unchanged after DHEAS. There were no differences between treatments in fasting glucose, serum insulin, HbA1c or in insulin action (glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycaemia; DHEAS 21·9 ± 2·5 vs placebo 24·5 ± 2·1 µmol/kg/min; P = 0·4). Triglyceride concentrations were lower following DHEAS (DHEAS 1·24 ± 0·18 vs placebo 1·41 ± 0·19 mm; P < 0·05) but other lipid parameters remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: There were no differences compared with placebo in quality of life or insulin action after DHEAS replacement therapy for 12 weeks. These results do not provide evidence for the addition of DHEAS to standard hypopituitary replacement therapy.

Addition of metformin to exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 results in increased serum glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations and greater glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone that lowers blood glucose after meals in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The therapeutic potential of GLP-1 in diabetes is limited by rapid inactivation by the enzyme dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4). Metformin has been reported to inhibit DPP-4. Here we investigated the acute effects of metformin and GLP-1 alone or in combination on plasma DPP-4 activity, active GLP-1 concentrations, and glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ten subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (8 male and 2 female; age, 68.7 ± 2.6 years [mean ± SEM]; body mass index, 29.6 ± 1.7 kg/m²; hemoglobin A(1c), 7.0% ± 0.1%) received 1 of 3 combinations after an overnight fast in a randomized crossover design: metformin 1 g orally plus subcutaneous injection saline (Metformin), GLP-1 (1.5 nmol/kg body weight subcutaneously) plus placebo tablet (GLP-1), or metformin 1 g plus GLP-1(Metformin + GLP-1). At 15 minutes, glucose was raised to 15 mmol/L by rapid intravenous infusion of glucose; and responses were assessed over the next 3 hours. This stimulus does not activate the enteroinsular axis and secretion of endogenous GLP-1, enabling the effect of exogenously administered GLP-1 to be examined. Mean area under curve (AUC) (0-180 minutes) plasma glucose responses were lowest after Metformin + GLP-1 (mean ± SEM, 1629 ± 90 mmol/[L min]) compared with GLP-1 (1885 ± 86 mmol/[L min], P < .002) and Metformin (2045 ± 115 mmol/[L min], P < .001). Mean AUC serum insulin responses were similar after either Metformin + GLP-1 (5426 ± 498 mU/[L min]) or GLP-1 (5655 ± 854 mU/[L min]) treatment, and both were higher than Metformin (3521 ± 410 mU/[L min]; P < .001 and P < .05, respectively). Mean AUC for plasma DPP-4 activity was lower after Metformin + GLP-1 (1505 ± 2 µmol/[mL min], P < .001) and Metformin (1508 ± 2 µmol/[mL min], P < .002) compared with GLP-1 (1587 ± 3 µmol/[mL min]). Mean AUC measures for plasma active GLP-1 concentrations were higher after Metformin + GLP-1 (820 x 104 ± 51 x 104 pmol/[L min]) compared with GLP-1 (484 x 104 ± 31 x 104 pmol/[L min], P < .001) and Metformin (419 × 104 ± 34 x 104 pmol/[L min], P < .001), respectively. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, metformin inhibits DPP-4 activity and thus increases active GLP-1 concentrations after subcutaneous injection. In combination with GLP-1, metformin significantly lowers plasma glucose concentrations in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects compared with GLP-1 alone, whereas insulin responses were similar. Metformin enhances serum concentrations of injected active GLP-1(7-36)amide, and the combination results in added glucose-lowering potency.

Insulinotropic actions of nateglinide in type 2 diabetic patients and effects on dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activity and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide degradation.

BACKGROUND: Nateglinide restores early-phase insulin secretion to feeding and reduces postprandial hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated the effects of nateglinide on dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) activity and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) degradation. Research design and methods Blood samples were collected from type 2 diabetic subjects (n=10, fasting glucose 9.36+/-1.2 mmol/l) following administration of oral nateglinide (120 mg) 10 min prior to a 75 g oral glucose load in a randomised crossover design. RESULTS: Plasma glucose reached 18.2+/-1.7 and 16.7+/-1.7 mmol/l at 90 min in control and placebo groups (P<0.001). These effects were accompanied by prompt 32% inhibition of DPP-IV activity after 10 min (19.9+/-1.6 nmol/ml per min, P<0.05), reaching a minimum of 1.9+/-0.1 nmol/ml per min at 120 min (P<0.001) after nateglinide. Insulin and C-peptide levels increased significantly compared with placebo, to peak after 90 min at 637.6+/-163.9 pmol/l (P<0.05) and 11.8+/-1.4 mg/l (P<0.01) respectively. DPP-IV-mediated degradation of GIP was significantly less in patients receiving nateglinide compared with placebo. Inhibition of DPP-IV activity corresponded with a time- and concentration-dependent inhibitory effect of nateglinide on DPP-IV-mediated truncation of GIP(1-42) to GIP(3-42) in vitro. Comparison of in vitro inhibition of DPP-IV by nateglinide and vildagliptin revealed IC(50) values of 17.1 and 2.1 microM respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although considerably less potent than specified DPP-IV inhibitors, the possibility that some of the beneficial actions of nateglinide are indirectly mediated through DPP-IV inhibition and increased bioavailability of GIP and other incretins merits consideration.

Low-fat versus low-carbohydrate weight reduction diets: effects on weight loss, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk: a randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE: Low-fat hypocaloric diets reduce insulin resistance and prevent type 2 diabetes in those at risk. Low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets are advocated as an alternative, but reciprocal increases in dietary fat may have detrimental effects on insulin resistance and offset the benefits of weight reduction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated a low-fat (20% fat, 60% carbohydrate) versus a low-carbohydrate (60% fat, 20% carbohydrate) weight reduction diet in 24 overweight/obese subjects ([mean +/- SD] BMI 33.6 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2), aged 39 +/- 10 years) in an 8-week randomized controlled trial. All food was weighed and distributed, and intake was calculated to produce a 500 kcal/day energy deficit. Insulin action was assessed by the euglycemic clamp and insulin secretion by meal tolerance test. Body composition, adipokine levels, and vascular compliance by pulse-wave analysis were also measured. RESULTS: Significant weight loss occurred in both groups (P < 0.01), with no difference between groups (P = 0.40). Peripheral glucose uptake increased, but there was no difference between groups (P = 0.28), and suppression of endogenous glucose production was also similar between groups. Meal tolerance-related insulin secretion decreased with weight loss with no difference between groups (P = 0.71). The change in overall systemic arterial stiffness was, however, significantly different between diets (P = 0.04); this reflected a significant decrease in augmentation index following the low-fat diet, compared with a nonsignificant increase within the low-carbohydrate group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates comparable effects on insulin resistance of low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets independent of macronutrient content. The difference in augmentation index may imply a negative effect of low-carbohydrate diets on vascular risk.

Decreased dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activity and glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide degradation in type 2 diabetic subjects.

Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-IV) rapidly metabolizes hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide. This study evaluated circulating DPP-IV activity in type 2 diabetic patients in relation to GLP-1 degradation and metabolic control. Blood samples were collected from type 2 diabetic patients in three main categories: good glycaemic control (HbA(1c) <7%, upper limit of non-diabetic range), moderate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) 7-9%) and poor glycaemic control (HbA(1c) >9%). Age- and sex-matched non-diabetic subjects were used as controls. Circulating DPP-IV activity of healthy control subjects was 22.5+/-0.7 nmol/ml/min (n=70). In the combined groups of type 2 diabetic subjects, circulating DPP-IV activity was significantly decreased at 18.1+/-0.7 nmol/ml/min (p<0.001, n=54). DPP-IV activity was negatively correlated with both glucose (p<0.01) and HbA(1c) (p<0.01) in this population. Furthermore, DPP-IV activity was reduced 1.2-fold (p<0.01, n=25), 1.3-fold (p<0.001, n=19) and 1.3-fold (p<0.05, n=10) in good, moderate and poorly controlled diabetic groups, 18.7+/-1.0, 17.4+/-1.4 and 18.0+/-1.5 nmol/ml/min, respectively. Degradation of GLP-1 by in vitro incubation with pooled plasma samples from healthy and type 2 diabetic subjects revealed decreased degradation to the inactive metabolite, GLP-1(9-36), in the diabetic group. These data indicate decreased DPP-IV activity and GLP-1 degradation in type 2 diabetes. DPP-IV enzyme activity appears to be depressed in response to poor glycaemic control.

Effect of eucaloric high- and low-sucrose diets with identical macronutrient profile on insulin resistance and vascular risk: a randomized controlled trial.

The long-term impact of dietary carbohydrate type, in particular sucrose, on insulin resistance and the development of diabetes and atherosclerosis is not established. Current guidelines for the healthy population advise restriction of sucrose intake. We investigated the effect of high- versus low-sucrose diet (25 vs. 10%, respectively, of total energy intake) in 13 healthy subjects aged 33 +/- 3 years (mean +/- SE), BMI 26.6 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2), in a randomized crossover design with sequential 6-week dietary interventions separated by a 4-week washout. Weight maintenance, eucaloric diets with identical macronutrient profiles and fiber content were designed. All food was weighed and distributed. Insulin action was assessed using a two-step euglycemic clamp; glycemic profiles were assessed by the continuous glucose monitoring system and vascular compliance by pulse-wave analysis. There was no change in weight across the study. Peripheral glucose uptake and suppression of endogenous glucose production were similar after each diet. Glycemic profiles and measures of vascular compliance did not change. A rise in total and LDL cholesterol was observed. In this study, a high-sucrose intake as part of an eucaloric, weight-maintaining diet had no detrimental effect on insulin sensitivity, glycemic profiles, or measures of vascular compliance in healthy nondiabetic subjects.

Reduced prevalence of limited joint mobility in type 1 diabetes in a U.K. clinic population over a 20-year period.

OBJECTIVE: Limited joint mobility (LJM), one of the earliest clinically apparent long-term complications of type 1 diabetes, is a risk marker for subsequent microvascular complications. We hypothesize that the prevalence of LJM may have decreased during the past two decades due to improved standards of glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A single observer performed a survey in 204 consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes (106 men and 98 women, age 27 +/- 1 years, HbA(1c) 8.3 +/- 0.1%, duration of diabetes 14.5 +/- 0.8 years, insulin dose 63 +/- 2 units/day). We used the same examination method and criteria for assessment of LJM as used by us in an earlier study in 1981-1982. RESULTS: The prevalence of LJM has fallen from 43 to 23% between the 1980s and 2002 (P < 0.0001). The relative risk for LJM in 2002 compared with the 1981-1982 cohort was 0.53 (0.40 < RR < 0.72, P < 0.0001). The prevalence of LJM was increased with longer duration of diabetes (<10 years, 13%; 10-20 years, 19%; 20-29 years, 30%; >30 years, 65%; P < 0.001). The relative risk for those with a mean HbA(1c) <7% in 2002 was 0.3 (0.1 < RR < 1.2, P = 0.05) when compared with those with mean HbA(1c) >7%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the hypothesis that the prevalence of LJM is lower than 20 years ago and that improved standards of glycemic control and diabetes care may have contributed to this occurrence. Joint limitation in type 1 diabetes is strongly associated with duration of diabetes. The presence of LJM remains a common and important clinical marker for subsequent microvascular disease and can be a useful clinical tool for identification of patients at increased risk.

Low- and standard-dose corticotropin and insulin hypoglycemia testing in the assessment of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function after pituitary surgery.

The optimal means of assessing the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis after pituitary surgery remains controversial. We compared low-dose (1 micro g iv) and standard-dose (250 micro g im) corticotropin tests performed 1 and 4-6 wk after pituitary surgery with an insulin hypoglycemia test performed at 4-6 wk. Forty-one patients (21 male and 20 female; median age, 52 yr; range, 23-73 yr) who had undergone pituitary surgery were studied (Cushing's disease excluded). Twenty-two of the 41 patients had normal cortisol responses to all tests both at 1 and 4-6 wk after surgery. Eight patients had subnormal cortisol responses to all tests. Of the 11 patients with discrepant results, seven had subnormal responses only after the low-dose corticotropin test; the remaining four patients had borderline responses to one or more tests. At 4-6 wk after surgery, subjects with a 30-min serum cortisol after standard-dose corticotropin of less than 350 nmol/liter (12.7 micro g/dl) consistently had a subnormal response to hypoglycemia, and those with a serum cortisol greater than 650 nmol/liter (23.6 micro g/dl) had a normal response to hypoglycemia. Definitive testing of the HPA axis using the standard-dose corticotropin test can be carried out provided it is performed at least 4 wk after pituitary surgery. A 30-min cortisol level greater than 650 nmol/liter (23.6 micro g/dl) indicates adequacy of the HPA axis, and a level of less than 350 nmol/liter (12.7 micro g/dl) indicates ACTH deficiency. No further testing is then required. An intermediate level of 350-650 nmol/liter (12.7-23.6 micro g/dl) warrants further assessment using the insulin hypoglycemia test.

Effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, doxazosin, on endothelial function and insulin action.

Essential hypertension is associated with impairment of both endothelial function and insulin action, and this has provided rationale for the use of antihypertensive agents that are at least neutral, if not beneficial, in these areas. This study examines the effect of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, doxazosin, on endothelial function and insulin action. Sixteen patients with essential hypertension were recruited with 13 (3 men/10 women; median age, 55 years; range, 38 to 65 years) completing the study. A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study design was used. After a 6-week placebo run-in, there were two 12-week treatment periods of either placebo or doxazosin, separated by a 6-week wash out period. Subjects were studied at the end of each treatment period with endothelial function assessed by forearm plethysmography and insulin action by the hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Blood pressure was significantly lowered by doxazosin (doxazosin 144 +/-3/86 +/- 2 mm Hg; placebo 159 +/- 3/96 +/- 1 mm Hg, P <.005 for both systolic and diastolic pressure; mean +/- SEM). Baseline forearm blood flow (FBF) was unchanged (doxazosin 4.9 +/- 0.9; placebo 4.0 +/- 0.7 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1), P >.05), however, FBF responses (area under dose response curve, percentage change in infused:control arm ratio) to acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) were improved by doxazosin (doxazosin 58.6 +/- 11.7 standard units [SU]; placebo 22.1 +/- 7.0 SU, P =.03) with responses to sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation) unchanged (doxazosin 40.3 +/- 5.5 SU; placebo 46.3 +/- 8.1 SU, P >.05). Exogenous glucose infusion rates to maintain euglycemia during hyperinsulinemia were not significantly different (doxazosin 30.4 +/- 0.9; placebo 32.3 +/- 1.0 micromol x kg(-1) min(-1), P >.05). Suppression of postabsorptive endogenous glucose production by insulin was also unchanged by treatment (doxazosin 65.6% +/- 7.5% suppression; placebo 68.3% +/- 11.2% suppression, P >.05). Doxazosin has a neutral effect on both peripheral and hepatic insulin action, but improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation. These results indicate that doxazosin can be used safely in patients with insulin resistance, while its positive effect on endothelial function may lessen the subsequent incidence of atherosclerosis.

Meal-induced 24-hour profile of circulating glycated insulin in type 2 diabetic subjects measured by a novel radioimmunoassay.

Increasing evidence supports a role for glycated insulin in the insulin-resistant state of type 2 diabetes. We measured 24-hour profiles of plasma glycated insulin, using a novel radioimmunoassay (RIA), to evaluate the effects of meal stimulation and intermittent fasting on circulating concentrations of plasma glycated insulin in type 2 diabetes. Patients (n = 6; hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)], 7.2% +/- 0.6%; fasting plasma glucose, 7.4 +/- 0.7 mmol/L; body mass index [BMI], 35.7 +/- 3.5 kg/m(2); age, 56.3 +/- 4.4 years) were admitted for 24 hours and received a standardized meal regimen. Half-hourly venous samples were taken for plasma glycated insulin, glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations between 8 am and midnight and 2-hourly overnight. The mean plasma glycated insulin concentration over 24 hours was 27.8 +/- 1.2 pmol/L with a mean ratio of insulin:glycated insulin of 11:1. Circulating glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glycated insulin followed a basal and meal-related pattern with most prominent increments following breakfast, lunch, and evening meal, respectively. The mean concentrations of glycated insulin during the morning, afternoon, evening, and night-time periods were 24.4 +/- 2.5, 28.7 +/- 2.3, 31.1 +/- 2.1, and 26.2 +/- 1.5 pmol/L, respectively, giving significantly higher molar ratios of insulin:glycated insulin of 18.0:1, 14.2:1, and 12.7:1 compared with 7.0:1 at night (P <.01 to P <.001). These data demonstrate that glycated insulin circulates at relatively high concentrations in type 2 diabetes with a diurnal pattern of basal and meal-stimulated release. A higher proportion of glycated insulin circulates at night suggestive of differences in metabolic clearance compared with native insulin.

Demonstration of glycated insulin in human diabetic plasma and decreased biological activity assessed by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique in humans.

The presence and biological significance of circulating glycated insulin has been evaluated by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), radioimmunoassay (RIA), receptor binding, and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp techniques. ESI-MS analysis of an HPLC-purified plasma pool from four male type 2 diabetic subjects (HbA(1c) 8.1 +/- 0.2%, plasma glucose 8.7 +/- 1.3 mmol/l [means +/- SE]) revealed two major insulin-like peaks with retention times of 14-16 min. After spectral averaging, the peak with retention time of 14.32 min exhibited a prominent triply charged (M+3H)(3+) species at 1,991.1 m/z, representing monoglycated insulin with an intact M(r) of 5,970.3 Da. The second peak (retention time 15.70 min) corresponded to native insulin (M(r) 5,807.6 Da), with the difference between the two peptides (162.7 Da) representing a single glucitol adduct (theoretical 164 Da). Measurement of glycated insulin in plasma of type 2 diabetic subjects by specific RIA gave circulating levels of 10.1 +/- 2.3 pmol/l, corresponding to approximately 9% total insulin. Biological activity of pure synthetic monoglycated insulin (insulin B-chain Phe(1)-glucitol adduct) was evaluated in seven overnight-fasted healthy nonobese male volunteers using two-step euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps (2 h at 16.6 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1), followed by 2 h at 83.0 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1); corresponding to 0.4 and 2.0 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). At the lower dose, the exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycemia during steady state were significantly lower with glycated insulin (P < 0.01) and approximately 70% more glycated insulin was required to induce a similar rate of insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Maximal responses at the higher rates of infusion were similar for glycated and control insulin. Inhibitory effects on endogenous glucose production, insulin secretion, and lipolysis, as indicated by measurements of C-peptide, nonesterified free fatty acids, and glycerol, were also similar. Receptor binding to CHO-T cells transfected with human insulin receptor and in vivo metabolic clearance revealed no differences between glycated and native insulin, suggesting that impaired biological activity is due to a postreceptor effect. The present demonstration of glycated insulin in human plasma and related impairment of physiological insulin-mediated glucose uptake suggests a role for glycated insulin in glucose toxicity and impaired insulin action in type 2 diabetes.