RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is the most frequent global abdominal surgical emergency. An ageing population, who often exhibit atypical symptoms and delayed presentations, challenge conventional diagnostic and treatment paradigms. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to delineate disparities in presentation, management, and outcomes between elderly patients and younger adults suffering from acute appendicitis. METHODS: This subgroup analysis forms part of ESTES SnapAppy, a time-bound multi-center prospective, observational cohort study. It includes patients aged 15 years and above who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during a defined 90-day observational period across multiple centers. Statistical comparisons were performed using appropriate tests with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 521 elderly patients (≥65 years) and 4,092 younger adults (18-64 years). Elderly patients presented later (mean duration of symptoms: 7.88 vs. 3.56 days; p < 0.001) and frequently required computed tomography (CT) scans for diagnosis (86.1% vs. 54.0%; p < 0.001). The incidence of complicated appendicitis was higher in the elderly (46.7% vs. 20.7%; p < 0.001). Delays in surgical intervention were notable in the elderly (85.0% operated within 24 h vs. 88.7%; p = 0.018), with longer operative times (71.1 vs. 60.3 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the elderly (27.9% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.001), including severe complications (6.9% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stays (7.9 vs. 3.6 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight significant differences in the clinical course and outcomes of acute appendicitis in the elderly compared to younger patients, suggesting a need for age-adapted diagnostic pathways and treatment strategies to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: European training pathways for surgeons dedicated to treating severely injured and critically ill surgical patients lack a standardized approach and are significantly influenced by diverse organizational and cultural backgrounds. This variation extends into the realm of mentorship, a vital component for the holistic development of surgeons beyond mere technical proficiency. Currently, a comprehensive understanding of the mentorship landscape within the European trauma care (visceral or skeletal) and emergency general surgery (EGS) communities is lacking. This study aims to identify within the current mentorship environment prevalent practices, discern existing gaps, and propose structured interventions to enhance mentorship quality and accessibility led by the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES). METHODS: Utilizing a structured survey conceived and promoted by the Young section of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (yESTES), we collected and analyzed responses from 123 ESTES members (both surgeons in practice and in training) across 20 European countries. The survey focused on mentorship experiences, challenges faced by early-career and female surgeons, the integration of non-technical skills (NTS) in mentorship, and the perceived role of surgical societies in facilitating mentorship. RESULTS: Findings highlighted a substantial mentorship experience gap, with 74% of respondents engaging in mostly informal mentorship, predominantly centered on surgical training. Notably, mentorship among early-career surgeons and trainees was less reported, uncovering a significant early-career gap. Female surgeons, representing a minority within respondents, reported a disproportionately poorer access to mentorship. Moreover, while respondents recognized the importance of NTS, these were inadequately addressed in current mentorship practices. The current mentorship input of surgical societies, like ESTES, is viewed as insufficient, with a call for structured programs and initiatives such as traveling fellowships and remote mentoring. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey underscores critical gaps in the current mentorship landscape for trauma and EGS in Europe, particularly for early-career and female surgeons. A clear need exists for more formalized, inclusive mentorship programs that adequately cover both technical and non-technical skills. ESTES could play a pivotal role in addressing these gaps through structured interventions, fostering a more supportive, inclusive, and well-rounded surgical community.
RESUMO
In hemodynamically stable adults sustaining a splenic trauma, non-operative management (NOM) represents the standard approach even in high-severity injuries. However, knowledge, structural, and logistic limitations still reduce its wider diffusion. This study aims to identify such issues to promote the safe and effective management of these injuries.A survey was developed using the SurveyMonkey® software and spread nationally in Italy. The survey was structured into: (1) Knowledge of classification systems; (2) Availability to refer patients; (3) Patients monitoring and follow-up; (4) Center-related.The survey was filled in by 327 surgeons, with a completeness rate of 63%. Three responders out of four are used to manage trauma patients. Despite most responders knowing the existing classifications, their use is still limited in daily practice. If a patient needs to be centralized, the concern about possible clinical deterioration represent the main obstacle to achieving a NOM. The lack of protocols does not allow standardization of patient surveillance according to the degree of injury. The imaging follow-up is not standardized as well, varying between computed tomography, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.The classification systems need to be spread to all the trauma-dedicated physicians, to speak a common language. A more rational centralization of patients should be promoted, ideally through agreements between peripheral and reference centers, both at regional and local level. Standardized protocols need to be shared nationally, as well as the clinical and imaging follow-up criteria should be adapted to the local features.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Baço/diagnóstico por imagem , Baço/lesões , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CEACT) is still considered the criterion standard for the assessment of suspected acute diverticulitis, in recent years, the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been spreading more and more in this setting. The aim of this study was to compare CEACT to POCUS for the diagnosis and staging of suspected acute diverticulitis. METHODS: This is a prospective study conducted on 55 patients admitted to the emergency department of two Italian Hospitals with a clinical suspicion of acute diverticulitis between January 2014 and December 2017. All the patients included underwent POCUS first and CEACT immediately afterward, with the diagnosis and the staging reported according to the Hinchey (H) classification modified by Wasvary et al. [Wasvary H, Turfah F, Kadro O, Beauregard W. Same hospitalization resection for acute diverticulitis. Am Surg. 1999;65:632-635.] Three surgeons performed all the POCUS, and the same two radiologists retrospectively analyzed all the CEACT images. The radiologists were informed of the clinical suspicion but unaware of the POCUS findings. The CEACT was used as the criterion standard for the comparison. RESULTS: The final cohort included 30 females (55%) and 25 males (45%). The median age was 62 years (range, 24-88 years), and the median body mass index was 26 kg/m2 (range, 19-42 kg/m2). Forty-six of 55 patients had a confirmed diagnosis of acute diverticulitis on both POCUS and CEACT, whereas, in 7 patients, the diagnosis was not confirmed by both methods. Point-of-care ultrasound sensitivity and specificity were 98% and 88%, respectively. Point-of-care ultrasound positive and negative predictive values were 98% and 88%, respectively. Point-of-care ultrasound accuracy was 96%. Point-of-care ultrasound classified 33 H1a, 11 H1b, 1 H2, and 1 H3 acute diverticulitis. This staging was confirmed in all patients but three (93%) by CEACT. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasound appeared a reliable technique for the diagnosis and the staging of clinically suspected H1 and H2 acute diverticulitis. It could contribute in saving time and resources and in avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure to most patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level III.
Assuntos
Diverticulite/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Cirurgiões , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Divertículo/diagnóstico por imagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast intraoperative electron radiation therapy (B-IOERT) can be used in clinical practice both as elective irradiation (partial breast irradiation - APBI) in low risk breast cancer patients, and as an anticipated boost. The procedure generally includes the use of a shielding disk between the residual breast and the pectoralis fascia for the protection of the tissues underneath the target volume. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in improving the quality of B-IOERT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: B-IOERT was introduced in Trieste in 2012 and its technique was improved in 2014 with IOUS. Both, needle and IOUS were used to measure target thickness and the latter was used even to check the correct position of the shielding disk. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the effectiveness of IOUS in reducing the risk of a disk misalignment related to B-IOERT and the secondary endpoint was the analysis of acute and late toxicity, by comparing two groups of patients treated with IOERT as a boost, either measured with IOUS and needle (Group 1) or with needle alone (Group 2). Acute and late toxicity were evaluated by validated scoring systems. RESULTS: From the institutional patients who were treated between June 2012 and October 2019, 109 were eligible for this study (corresponding to 110 cases, as one patients underwent bilateral conservative surgery and bilateral B-IOERT). Of these, 38 were allocated to group 1 and 72 to group 2. The target thickness measured with the IOUS probe and with the needle were similar (mean difference of 0.1 mm, p = 0.38). The percentage of patients in which the shield was perfectly aligned after IOUS introduction increased from 23% to more than 70%. Moreover, patients treated after IOUS guidance had less acute toxicity (36.8% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.33) from radiation therapy, which reached no statistical significance. Late toxicity turned out to be similar regardless of the use of IOUS guidance: 39.5% vs. 37.5% (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: IOUS showed to be accurate in measuring the target depth and decrease the misalignment between collimator and disk. Furthermore there was an absolute decrease in acute toxicity, even though not statistically significant, in the group of women who underwent B-IOERT with IOUS guidance.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Proteção Radiológica/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Elétrons/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Dosimetria Fotográfica/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/instrumentação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In early 2020, the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) spread rapidly throughout the whole world, causing a massive response in terms of health resource disposal. Moreover, lockdowns were imposed in entire countries. This study aims to assess whether there was a downward trend in emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures accomplished throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and to determine patients' and diseases' characteristics. METHODS: This is a multicentric retrospective observational cohort analysis conducted on patients who underwent EGS procedures during the lockdown and the same period of the previous year in the three Third Level Hospitals of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy. RESULTS: During the study period, 138 patients underwent EGS procedures versus the 197 patients operated on in 2019, meaning a 30.0% decrease in the number of surgeries performed. The incidence rate for EGS procedures was 2.5 surgeries per day during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 3.5 surgeries per day in 2019 (P<0.001). The characteristics of patients operated on in 2020 were comparable to those of patients who underwent EGS in 2019, except for the higher prevalence of male patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (76.8 vs. 55.8; P<0.001). No difference was recorded in disease severity between the two study periods. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant reduction in EGS procedures carried out was recorded. However, no clear explanation can be given to elucidate this fact.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Small bowel diverticula are a rare condition occurring mainly in the elderly. They can be isolated or multiple and can involve the duodenum, jejunum and ileum. Acute complications are extremely rare, with an aspecific pattern of symptoms. The aim of the study is to report the different patterns of presentation of patients with complicated jejunoileal diverticula. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study on a consecutive series of patients admitted for complicated jejunoileal diverticula in four Italian surgical departments between 2012 and 2019. Complications included acute diverticulitis, bleeding, perforation and intestinal obstruction. Patients presenting with complicated duodenal or Meckel's diverticula were not included. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. The median age was 77 (46-94) years. Abdominal pain, fever and nausea/vomiting were the most frequent symptoms at presentation. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was diagnostic in 35% of patients. Ten (38%) patients had bowel perforation, nine (35%) acute diverticulitis, five (19%) bowel obstruction and two (8%) had intestinal bleeding. Twenty-one (81%) patients underwent surgery, two (8%) were managed by CT-guided drainage of collections and three (11%) were treated with antibiotics. One patient died post-operatively. The median hospital stay was 9 (5-62) days. CONCLUSION: Acutely complicated jejunoileal diverticula are infrequent, but a strong suspect should be raised whenever elderly patients are admitted for unspecific abdominal pain with a non-diagnostic CT scan. Conservative management may be offered in very selected cases if a diagnosis is obtained, but in most instances, surgery is both diagnostic and therapeutic.
Assuntos
Diverticulite , Divertículo , Divertículo Ileal , Idoso , Diverticulite/diagnóstico , Diverticulite/diagnóstico por imagem , Divertículo/diagnóstico , Divertículo/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Jejuno , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for treating slow-transit constipation (STC). METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of the efficacy of SNS in treating patients affected by STC, who previously failed to respond to conservative therapies. Only patients free of concomitant diseases were enrolled in our study. A temporary stimulation lead was initially implanted; patients with a > 50% symptom reduction were eventually deemed eligible for a permanent implant. RESULTS: This study enrolled 25 patients who underwent a SNS test stimulation; 21 patients (13 women; median age 32 years) eventually got a permanent implant. The median preoperative Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) was 21 (16-25). Preoperative colorectal transit time recorded a median of 10 markers (7-19) retained in the colorectal tract. At 6-month postoperative follow-up, the total number of markers retained in the colorectal tract decreased to 3 (0-4). The CCCS score improved during the first postoperative year (P < 0.001), but progressively worsened over the longer term. The SF-36 questionnaire showed an improvement in all 8 scales measuring physical and psycho-emotional states; all parameters recorded into the bowel diary also improved. Overall, at 60-month follow up, the overall neuromodulator removal rate was 48%. CONCLUSIONS: The SNS is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that we tested for treating STC. The short-term outcome was promisingly after 6 months; however, there was a declining trend beyond this interval. Thus, the long-term efficacy of SNS needs to be further assessed.
Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/fisiopatologia , Constipação Intestinal/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Trânsito Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Sacro/inervação , Adulto , Constipação Intestinal/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Background. Incisional hernias (IHs) can develop in up to 15% of patients who underwent an abdominal surgical procedure. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the best examination to evaluate these patients before surgical repair. The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of the abdominal CT scan during Valsalva's maneuver in patients who are candidates for surgery. Methods. A retrospective cohort analysis conducted on prospectively recorded data was performed on 26 consecutive patients affected by IHs who underwent a preoperative abdominal CT scan both at rest and during Valsalva's maneuver between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Results. Five patients (19%) had IH classified as M1-M2, 10 (39%) as M3, and 11 (42%) as M4-M5. Both the median IH orifice area (IHOA) and the median volume of the IH increased during straining (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). The percentage of the difference in volume ratios increased as the localization of the IH moved caudally. At the binary logistic regression analysis M3 IH, body mass index >28, IHOA > 156 cm2 at rest, and IHOA > 138 cm2 during Valsalva's maneuver were risk factors for posterior component separation. Conclusions. The preoperative CT scan both at rest and during Valsalva's maneuver seemed useful to estimate the risk of difficult IH repairs. Moreover, it could allow surgeons to decide if the patient should be addressed to more specialized centers.
Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Manobra de Valsalva , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pré-Operatório , Radiografia Abdominal , Descanso , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy for locally advanced colorectal cancer is not standardized yet and its potential risks and benefits in elderly patients are still under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and oncologic results of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 lesions in both old and young people. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2015, 115 patients aged <70 years and 112 patients aged ≥70 years underwent elective laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer presenting without distant metastasis at the Department of General Surgery, Trieste. Characteristics of the study populations, including demographic, operative and tumor features, were prospectively collected and short-term and long-term clinical, pathologic and oncologic outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: No difference was found in terms of tumor features, type and duration of surgery, and quality of resection. Old patients were found to have significantly higher rates of conversion (P=0.02) and postoperative mortality(P=0.03), whereas postoperative complications and reintervention rates - although higher in the elderly - did not differ on statistical analysis (P=0.13 and P=0.19, respectively). Local and distant recurrence rates were not statistically different between the two groups (P=0.64 and P=0.34, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently offered to young people (P<0.001), who were considered significantly healthier than old ones (P<0.001). Overall survival was significantly lower among the elderly (P=0.001), but 5-year disease-free survival did not differ between the two groups (P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced lesions is feasible, but old patients present an increased risk of conversion and postoperative morbidity and mortality, which may alter long-term outcomes determining an apparent decrease in survival.
Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Permacol paste injection is a novel treatment approach for complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of treatment with Permacol paste for complex cryptoglandular fistulas. METHODS: Patients with primary or recurrent complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas treated with Permacol paste from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (median age, 41.3 years; 21 female) underwent Permacol paste injection; 20 patients (43%) had previously undergone failed fistula surgery. The patients had experienced anal fistula-related symptoms for a median of 10 weeks (range, 3-50 weeks). All patients had a draining seton in situ for a median of 10 weeks (range, 4-46 weeks). The median follow-up time was 24 months (range, 1-25 months). At the 1-month follow-up, 2 patients had paste extrusion and 2 had anal abscesses. The mean preoperative Continence Grading Scale score was 1.10 ± 1.40, and that at 3 months postoperatively was 1.13 ± 1.39 ( P = .322). There was a significant difference in the preoperative and the 1- and 3-month postoperative pain scores ( P < .001). At the 24-month follow-up, the healing rate was 50% (n = 23). A total of 19 patients (41%) with a recurrent fistula after failed Permacol paste injection required additional operative procedures. The satisfaction rate at the 2-year follow-up was 65%. CONCLUSION: Permacol paste injection is minimally invasive and technically easy to perform. It can be considered as a viable and reasonable option for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas in patients with fecal continence disorders.
Assuntos
Colágeno/uso terapêutico , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Fístula Retal/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Colágeno/administração & dosagem , Incontinência Fecal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rectal advancement flap is the standard surgical treatment for complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas, while Permacol™ collagen paste is considered an innovative treatment option for anorectal fistulas. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with complex cryptoglandular fistulas treated by endorectal advancement flap versus Permacol™ paste. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients with complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas. Thirty-one patients were treated with the rectal advancement flap (RAF group), while 21 were treated with Permacol™ paste injection (PP group). In PP group, the approach consisted of loose seton positioning followed several weeks later by closure internal opening with a resorbable sutures associated with paste injection into the fistula track. Clinical outcomes were assessed in terms of healing rate, faecal continence and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Seton drainage was done in all patients in both groups for a median duration of 8 weeks (range 4-18 weeks) before the final surgery (p = 0.719). No patient had faecal incontinence (CGS ≥ 5) preoperatively. Five patients (16%) in the RAF group and one (5%) in the PP group experienced faecal incontinence postoperatively. The 2-year disease-free survival was 65% in the RAF group and 52% in the PP group (p = 0.659). The median satisfaction scores were 5 (range 1-10) in the RAF group and 7 (range 2-10) in the PP group (p = 0.299). CONCLUSION: The RAF appeared superior to PP in terms of fistula healing, although this result was not statistically significant. On the contrary, PP has a potential advantage in terms of continence disorders. Permacol™ paste can be considered as the initial treatment option for complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas in patients with faecal continence disorders.
Assuntos
Colágeno/administração & dosagem , Colágeno/farmacologia , Injeções , Fístula Retal/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/patologia , Adulto , Animais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Fístula Retal/complicações , Suínos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of stapled hemorrhoidopexy reported in the literature in terms of postoperative pain, hospital stay, and duration of convalescence, it was described to have a higher recurrence rate compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after stapled hemorrhoidopexy at 10-year follow-up. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted on prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Eighty-six consecutive patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse between January and December 2006 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients satisfaction and recurrence rates were measured. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (45 men and 41 women; median age, 49 y (range, 31-74 y)) underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Eight patients had urinary retention during the immediate postoperative period, and 2 patients required a reoperation for suture line bleeding. The median hospital stay was 12 hours (range, 12-96 h). No suture line dehiscence, rectovaginal fistula, pelvic sepsis, anal abscess, or anal stenosis was recorded during the follow-up. Seventy-seven patients (90%) completed the expected follow-up, with a median duration of 119.0 months (range 115.4-121.8 mo). Among them, 30 patients (39%) experienced a recurrent hemorrhoidal prolapse, 8 of whom needed a reoperation. Thirty-four patients (44%) reported urge to defecate with a median visual analog scale of 1 (range, 1-7). Six patients (8%) reported gas leakage at the last follow-up visit, whereas no liquid or solid stool leakage was recorded. Satisfaction rate at 10-year follow-up was 68%. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its small sample size and lack of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: The high recurrence rate and low patient satisfaction rate showed that stapled hemorrhoidopexy reduces its efficacy in the long-term. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A510.
Assuntos
Hemorroidectomia/métodos , Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Grampeamento Cirúrgico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The management of rectal cancer has considerably changed over the last decades and complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is becoming a common clinical entity. There is still no consensus on the definition of complete response to neoadjuvant treatment prior to surgery. Treatment programs are mostly heterogeneous and non-randomized. In addition, techniques to diagnose complete response are still unclear and there is no uniformity in surveillance modality of those patients managed without operative intervention. We review the most recent evidences reported in literature.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Previsões , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Indução de Remissão , Terapia de Salvação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer (CRC) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open procedures for pT3/pT4 CRC in elderly patients. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2015, 225 patients aged ≥70 years underwent elective colorectal surgery for pT3/pT4 CRC at the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Trieste. Patients' demographics, tumor's characteristics, intraoperative factors, short-term and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 113 patients undergone open surgery and 112 who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Age was found to be statistically different between the two group, with open surgery patients being older than laparoscopic ones (P=0.009). The tumor location differed between the two groups (P=0.004), determining a variation in the incidence of surgical procedures performed (P<0.001). No other statistically significant differences were found in terms of intraoperative, histopathologic and oncologic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is as safe as open surgery for pT3/pT4 CRC and it is often feasible, though in old patients higher conversion rates should be anticipated than in younger ones.