Alteration of circadian sleep-wake rhythm and salivary melatonin secretion in idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder: Preliminary evidence.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is widely regarded as an early sign of neurodegeneration leading to synucleinopathies. While circadian rhythm alterations in iRBD have been preliminarily demonstrated, evidence on melatonin secretion patterns in this clinical condition is limited. To address this knowledge gap, this exploratory study aimed to integrate salivary melatonin measurement with actigraphic monitoring in individuals with iRBD and age-matched healthy controls (HC) under real-life conditions. METHODS: Participants diagnosed with iRBD and HC underwent clinical evaluation and wore an actigraph for seven days and nights. Salivary melatonin concentrations were measured at five time points during the last night of recording. Comparative analyses were conducted on clinical data, actigraphic parameters, and melatonin levels between the two groups. RESULTS: iRBD participants (n = 18) showed greater motor (p < 0.01) and non-motor symptoms (p < 0.001), alongside disruptions in circadian sleep-wake rhythm compared to HC (n = 10). Specifically, actigraphy revealed a delayed central phase measurement (p < 0.05), reduced activity during the most active hours (p < 0.001), and decreased relative amplitude (p < 0.05). Total salivary melatonin concentration was significantly lower in iRBD (p < 0.05), with a slight but non-significant phase delay in dim light melatonin onset. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study highlights a dysregulation of circadian sleep-wake rhythm coupled with reduced melatonin secretion in iRBD. Future research could add to these preliminary findings to evaluate novel treatment approaches to regulate the sleep-wake cycle and elucidate the implications of circadian dysregulation in the conversion from iRBD to neurodegeneration.

Sensitivity and specificity of in vivo COVID-19 screening by detection dogs: Results of the C19-Screendog multicenter study.

Trained dogs can recognize the volatile organic compounds contained in biological samples of patients with COVID-19 infection. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo SARS-CoV-2 screening by trained dogs. We recruited five dog-handler dyads. In the operant conditioning phase, the dogs were taught to distinguish between positive and negative sweat samples collected from volunteers' underarms in polymeric tubes. The conditioning was validated by tests involving 16 positive and 48 negative samples held or worn in such a way that the samples were invisible to the dog and handler. In the screening phase the dogs were led by their handlers to a drive-through facility for in vivo screening of volunteers who had just received a nasopharyngeal swab from nursing staff. Each volunteer who had already swabbed was subsequently tested by two dogs, whose responses were recorded as positive, negative, or inconclusive. The dogs' behavior was constantly monitored for attentiveness and wellbeing. All the dogs passed the conditioning phase, their responses showing a sensitivity of 83-100% and a specificity of 94-100%. The in vivo screening phase involved 1251 subjects, of whom 205 had a COVID-19 positive swab and two dogs per each subject to be screened. Screening sensitivity and specificity were respectively 91.6-97.6% and 96.3-100% when only one dog was involved, whereas combined screening by two dogs provided a higher sensitivity. Dog wellbeing was also analyzed: monitoring of stress and fatigue suggested that the screening activity did not adversely impact the dogs' wellbeing. This work, by screening a large number of subjects, strengthen recent findings that trained dogs can discriminate between COVID-19 infected and healthy human subjects and introduce two novel research aspects: i) assessement of signs of fatigue and stress in dogs during training and testing, and ii) combining screening by two dogs to improve detection sensitivity and specificity. Using some precautions to reduce the risk of infection and spillover, in vivo COVID-19 screening by a dog-handler dyad can be suitable to quickly screen large numbers of people: it is rapid, non-invasive and economical, since it does not involve actual sampling, lab resources or waste management, and is suitable to screen large numbers of people.