Racial and Ethnic Composition of Populations Served by Freestanding Children's Hospitals and Disparities in Outcomes of Pediatric Lupus.

OBJECTIVE: Health disparities may be driven by hospital-level factors. We assessed whether racial and ethnic composition of populations hospitals serve explain or modify disparities in hospital outcomes of children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of patients 5 to 26 years old with SLE at 47 children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System (2006-2021), race and ethnicity were assessed at the patient level and hospital level (proportion of total admissions composed of Black or Hispanic patients, respectively). Outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission or adverse renal outcome (end-stage renal disease, dialysis, or transplant) during follow-up. We estimated racial and ethnic disparities, adjusted or stratified by hospital racial or ethnic composition. RESULTS: Of 8,125 patients with SLE, 2,293 (28%) required ICU admission, and 698 (9%) had an adverse renal outcome. Black and non-Hispanic White disparities in ICU admission were observed only at hospitals serving higher proportions of Black patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.04-1.59 vs OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.83-1.38). Larger Black and non-Hispanic White disparities in adverse renal outcomes were observed at hospitals with higher Black racial composition (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8 vs OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.4). Conversely, Hispanic versus non-Hispanic disparities in renal outcomes persisted after adjustment for hospital-reported Hispanic ethnic composition but were observed only at hospitals with lower proportions of Hispanic patients. CONCLUSION: Worse Black and White disparities in SLE outcomes are observed at children's hospitals serving more Black children, whereas distinct patterns are observed for Hispanic and non-Hispanic disparities. Reporting of hospital characteristics related to populations served is needed to identify modifiable drivers of hospital-level variation.

Attitudes towards involving children in decision-making surrounding lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Medical care has shifted from a paternalistic model towards one centered around patient autonomy and shared decision-making (SDM), yet the role of the pediatric patient in decision-making is unclear. Studies suggest that many children with chronic disease are capable of making medical decisions at a young age, yet no standardized approaches have been developed for involving children in these decisions. METHODS: This is a single-center survey study investigating the attitudes of pediatric pulmonologists towards involvement of children in decisions regarding lung transplantation, utilizing a hypothetical case scenario with systematic manipulation of age and maturity level. We evaluated physician belief regarding ultimate decision-making authority, reconciliation of parent-child discordance, and utility of ethics and psychiatry consultation services. RESULTS: The majority of pediatric pulmonologists at this center believe decision-making authority rests with the parents. The effects of age and maturity are unclear. In instances of parent-child disagreement, physicians are more likely to try to convince parents to defer to the child if the child is both older and more mature. Physicians are divided on the utility of ethics and psychiatry consultations. CONCLUSION: Involvement of children with cystic fibrosis in SDM is broadly supported but inconsistently implemented. Despite evidence that children with chronic disease may have decisional capacity at a young age, the majority of physicians still grant decisional authority to parents. There are numerous barriers to involving children in decisions, including legal considerations. The role of age and maturity level in influencing these decisions appears small and warrants further investigation.