Effects of atelectatic areas on the surrounding lung tissue during mechanical ventilation in an experimental model of acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide / Efeitos das áreas atelectásicas no tecido pulmonar circundante durante a ventilação mecânica em um modelo experimental de lesão pulmonar aguda induzida por lipopolissacarídeo

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of atelectasis during mechanical ventilation on the periatelectatic and normal lung regions in a model of atelectasis in rats with acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide. Methods: Twenty-four rats were randomized into the following four groups, each with 6 animals: the Saline-Control Group, Lipopolysaccharide Control Group, Saline-Atelectasis Group, and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group. Acute lung injury was induced by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. After 24 hours, atelectasis was induced by bronchial blocking. The animals underwent mechanical ventilation for two hours with protective parameters, and respiratory mechanics were monitored during this period. Thereafter, histologic analyses of two regions of interest, periatelectatic areas and the normally-aerated lung contralateral to the atelectatic areas, were performed. Results: The lung injury score was significantly higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Control Group (0.41 ± 0.13) than in the Saline Control Group (0.15 ± 0.51), p < 0.05. Periatelectatic regions showed higher lung injury scores than normally-aerated regions in both the Saline-Atelectasis (0.44 ± 0.06 x 0.27 ± 0.74 p < 0.05) and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis (0.56 ± 0.09 x 0.35 ± 0.04 p < 0.05) Groups. The lung injury score in the periatelectatic regions was higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group (0.56 ± 0.09) than in the periatelectatic region of the Saline-Atelectasis Group (0.44 ± 0.06), p < 0.05. Conclusion: Atelectasis may cause injury to the surrounding tissue after a period of mechanical ventilation with protective parameters. Its effect was more significant in previously injured lungs.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito da atelectasia durante a ventilação mecânica nas regiões periatelectáticas e pulmonares normais em um modelo de atelectasia em ratos com lesão pulmonar aguda induzida por lipopolissacarídeo. Métodos: Foram distribuídos aleatoriamente 24 ratos em quatro grupos, cada um com 6 animais: Grupo Salina-Controle, Grupo Lipopolissacarídeo-Controle, Grupo Salina-Atelectasia e Grupo Lipopolissacarídeo-Atelectasia. A lesão pulmonar aguda foi induzida por injeção intraperitoneal de lipopolissacarídeo. Após 24 horas, a atelectasia foi induzida por bloqueio brônquico. Os animais foram submetidos à ventilação mecânica por 2 horas com parâmetros ventilatórios protetores, e a mecânica respiratória foi monitorada durante esse período. Em seguida, foram realizadas análises histológicas de duas regiões de interesse: as áreas periatelectásicas e o pulmão normalmente aerado contralateral às áreas atelectásicas. Resultados: O escore de lesão pulmonar foi significativamente maior no Grupo Controle-Lipopolissacarídeo (0,41 ± 0,13) do que no Grupo Controle-Solução Salina (0,15 ± 0,51), com p < 0,05. As regiões periatelectásicas apresentaram escores maiores de lesão pulmonar do que as regiões normalmente aeradas nos Grupos Atelectasia-Solução Salina (0,44 ± 0,06 versus 0,27 ± 0,74, p < 0,05) e Atelectasia-Lipopolissacarídeo (0,56 ± 0,09 versus 0,35 ± 0,04, p < 0,05). O escore de lesão pulmonar nas regiões periatelectásicas foi maior no Grupo Atelectasia-Lipopolissacarídeo (0,56 ± 0,09) do que na região periatelectásica do Grupo Atelectasia-Solução Salina (0,44 ± 0,06), p < 0,05. Conclusão: A atelectasia pode causar lesão no tecido circundante após um período de ventilação mecânica com parâmetros ventilatórios protetores. Seu efeito foi mais significativo em pulmões previamente lesionados.

Effects of atelectatic areas on the surrounding lung tissue during mechanical ventilation in an experimental model of acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of atelectasis during mechanical ventilation on the periatelectatic and normal lung regions in a model of atelectasis in rats with acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were randomized into the following four groups, each with 6 animals: the Saline-Control Group, Lipopolysaccharide Control Group, Saline-Atelectasis Group, and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group. Acute lung injury was induced by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. After 24 hours, atelectasis was induced by bronchial blocking. The animals underwent mechanical ventilation for two hours with protective parameters, and respiratory mechanics were monitored during this period. Thereafter, histologic analyses of two regions of interest, periatelectatic areas and the normally-aerated lung contralateral to the atelectatic areas, were performed. RESULTS: The lung injury score was significantly higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Control Group (0.41 ± 0.13) than in the Saline Control Group (0.15 ± 0.51), p < 0.05. Periatelectatic regions showed higher lung injury scores than normally-aerated regions in both the Saline-Atelectasis (0.44 ± 0.06 x 0.27 ± 0.74 p < 0.05) and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis (0.56 ± 0.09 x 0.35 ± 0.04 p < 0.05) Groups. The lung injury score in the periatelectatic regions was higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group (0.56 ± 0.09) than in the periatelectatic region of the Saline-Atelectasis Group (0.44 ± 0.06), p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Atelectasis may cause injury to the surrounding tissue after a period of mechanical ventilation with protective parameters. Its effect was more significant in previously injured lungs.

Alveolar Tidal recruitment/derecruitment and Overdistension During Four Levels of End-Expiratory Pressure with Protective Tidal Volume During Anesthesia in a Murine Lung-Healthy Model.

PURPOSE: We compared respiratory mechanics between the positive end-expiratory pressure of minimal respiratory system elastance (PEEPminErs) and three levels of PEEP during low-tidal-volume (6 mL/kg) ventilation in rats. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated. Airway pressure (Paw), flow (F), and volume (V) were fitted by a linear single compartment model (LSCM) Paw(t) = Ers × V(t) + Rrs × F(t) + PEEP or a volume- and flow-dependent SCM (VFDSCM) Paw(t) = (E1 + E2 × V(t)) × V(t) + (K1 + K2 × |F(t)|) × F(t) + PEEP, where Ers and Rrs are respiratory system elastance and resistance, respectively; E1 and E2× V are volume-independent and volume-dependent Ers, respectively; and K1 and K2 × F are flow-independent and flow-dependent Rrs, respectively. Animals were ventilated for 1 h at PEEP 0 cmH2O (ZEEP); PEEPminErs; 2 cmH2O above PEEPminErs (PEEPminErs+2); or 4 cmH2O above PEEPminErs (PEEPminErs+4). Alveolar tidal recruitment/derecruitment and overdistension were assessed by the index %E2 = 100 × [(E2 × VT)/(E1 + |E2| × VT)], and alveolar stability by the slope of Ers(t). RESULTS: %E2 varied between 0 and 30% at PEEPminErs in most respiratory cycles. Alveolar Tidal recruitment/derecruitment (%E2 < 0) and overdistension (%E2 > 30) were predominant in the absence of PEEP and in PEEP levels higher than PEEPminErs, respectively. The slope of Ers(t) was different from zero in all groups besides PEEPminErs+4. CONCLUSIONS: PEEPminErs presented the best compromise between alveolar tidal recruitment/derecruitment and overdistension, during 1 h of low-VT mechanical ventilation.

Exercício físico e obesidade: prescrição e benefícios / Physical exercise and obesity: prescription and benefits

A obesidade está associada a várias complicações e maior risco de mortalidade. A mudança no estilo de vida é uma das intervenções fundamentais para melhora do quadro clínico desses pacientes, sendo a prática de exercícios físicos um dos seus componentes. O objetivo do presente estudo foi realizar uma revisão de literatura sobre o exercício físico em adultos e idosos com obesidade, descrevendo os principais programas de exercício, a forma adequada de prescrição e os benefícios da sua prática regular. O exercício aeróbico é a modalidade mais indicada para a perda de peso e está associado com maiores benefícios para esses pacientes. Adicionalmente, tem sido preconizado a realização de exercício resistido como terapia complementar. Para alcançar os benefícios da prática regular de exercício físico, a literatura sugere que sejam realizados exercícios aeróbicos de moderada a alta intensidade por no mínimo 150 minutos por semana e quando possível acrescentar o treinamento resistido, 2 a 3 vezes por semana, com carga de 60-70% de uma repetição máxima. Portanto, a prescrição individualizada de exercício físico para pacientes com obesidade representa uma estratégia eficaz para a redução do peso, tratamento e controle dos fatores de risco cardiovasculares, além de promover benefícios na sintomatologia e em outras complicações.

Obesity is associated with many complications and higher risk of mortality. Changing the lifestyle is one of the fundamental interventions for improvement of the clinical condition in these patients, being the physical exercise one of the components. The objective of this study was to perform a literature review about physical exercise in adults and the elderly with obesity, describing the main exercise programs, the proper form of prescription and the benefits of its regular practice. Aerobic exercise is the most indicated modality for weight loss and is associated with higher benefits for these patients. Additionally, it has been recommended resistance training as a complementary therapy. To achieve the benefits of the regular practice of physical exercise, the literature suggests the performing of aerobic exercises from moderate to high intensity for at least 150 minutes per week and when possible, the implementation of resistance training, 2 to 3 times a week, with a load of 60-70% of one-repetition maximum. Therefore, individualized prescription of physical exercise for the obese patient represents an effective strategy for weight loss, treatment and control of cardiovascular risk factors, in addition to promotes benefits in the symptoms and other complications.

Non-lobar atelectasis generates inflammation and structural alveolar injury in the surrounding healthy tissue during mechanical ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: When alveoli collapse the traction forces exerted on their walls by adjacent expanded units may increase and concentrate. These forces may promote its re-expansion at the expense of potentially injurious stresses at the interface between the collapsed and the expanded units. We developed an experimental model to test the hypothesis that a local non-lobar atelectasis can act as a stress concentrator, contributing to inflammation and structural alveolar injury in the surrounding healthy lung tissue during mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A total of 35 rats were anesthetized, paralyzed and mechanically ventilated. Atelectasis was induced by bronchial blocking: after five minutes of stabilization and pre-oxygenation with FIO2 = 1.0, a silicon cylinder blocker was wedged in the terminal bronchial tree. Afterwards, the animals were randomized between two groups: 1) Tidal volume (VT) = 10 ml/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 3 cmH2O (VT10/PEEP3); and 2) VT = 20 ml/kg and PEEP = 0 cmH2O (VT20/zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP)). The animals were then ventilated during 180 minutes. Three series of experiments were performed: histological (n = 12); tissue cytokines (n = 12); and micro-computed tomography (microCT; n = 2). An additional six, non-ventilated, healthy animals were used as controls. RESULTS: Atelectasis was successfully induced in the basal region of the lung of 26 out of 29 animals. The microCT of two animals revealed that the volume of the atelectasis was 0.12 and 0.21 cm3. There were more alveolar disruption and neutrophilic infiltration in the peri-atelectasis region than the corresponding contralateral lung (control) in both groups. Edema was higher in the peri-atelectasis region than the corresponding contralateral lung (control) in the VT20/ZEEP than VT10/PEEP3 group. The volume-to-surface ratio was higher in the peri-atelectasis region than the corresponding contralateral lung (control) in both groups. We did not find statistical difference in tissue interleukin-1ß and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 between regions. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that a local non-lobar atelectasis acts as a stress concentrator, generating structural alveolar injury and inflammation in the surrounding lung tissue.

Volume-independent elastance: a useful parameter for open-lung positive end-expiratory pressure adjustment.

BACKGROUND: A decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial after full lung recruitment allows for the adjustment of the lowest PEEP that prevents end-expiratory collapse (open-lung PEEP). For a tidal volume (Vt) approaching zero, the PEEP of minimum respiratory system elastance (PEEP(minErs)) is theoretically equal to the pressure at the mathematical inflection point (MIP) of the pressure-volume curve, and seems to correspond to the open-lung PEEP in a decremental PEEP trial. Nevertheless, the PEEP(minErs) is dependent on Vt and decreases as Vt increases. To circumvent this dependency, we proposed the use of a second-order model in which the volume-independent elastance (E1) is used to set open-lung PEEP. METHODS: Pressure-volume curves and a recruitment maneuver followed by decremental PEEP trials, with a Vt of 6 and 12 mL/kg, were performed in 24 Wistar rats with acute lung injury induced by intraperitoneally injected (n = 8) or intratracheally instilled (n = 8) Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. In 8 control animals, the anterior chest wall was surgically removed after PEEP trials, and the protocol was repeated. Airway pressure (Paw) and flow (F) were continuously acquired and fitted by the linear single-compartment model (Paw = Rrs·F + Ers·V + PEEP, where Rrs is the resistance of the respiratory system, and V is volume) and the volume-dependent elastance model (Paw = Rrs·F + E1 + E2·V·V + PEEP, where E2·V is the volume-dependent elastance). From each model, PEEPs of minimum Ers and E1 (PEEP(minE1)) were identified and compared with each respective MIP. The accuracy of PEEPminE1 and PEEPminErs in estimating MIP was assessed by bias and precision plots. Comparisons among groups were performed with the unpaired t test whereas a paired t test was used between the control group before and after chest wall removal and within groups at different Vts. All P values were then corrected for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni procedure. RESULTS: In all experimental groups, PEEPminErs, but not PEEPminE1, tended to decrease as Vt increased. The difference between MIP and PEEPminE1 exhibited a lower bias compared with the difference between MIP and PEEPminErs (P < 0.001). The PEEPminE1 was always significantly higher than the PEEPminErs (7.7 vs 3.8, P < 0.001) and better approached MIP (7.7 vs 7.3 cm H2O with P = 0.04 at low Vt, and 7.8 vs 7.1 cm H2O with P < 0.001 at high Vt). CONCLUSIONS: PEEPminE1 better identifies the open-lung PEEP independently of the adjusted Vt, and may be a practical, more individualized approach for PEEP titration.

Detection of tidal recruitment/overdistension in lung-healthy mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The volume-dependent single compartment model (VDSCM) has been applied for identification of overdistension in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury. In this observational study we evaluated the use of the VDSCM to identify tidal recruitment/overdistension induced by tidal volume (Vt) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in lung-healthy anesthetized subjects. METHODS: Fifteen patients (ASA physical status I-II) undergoing general anesthesia for elective plastic breast reconstruction surgery were mechanically ventilated in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with Vt of 8 mL•kg(-1) and PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O. With these settings, ventilatory mode was randomly adjusted in VCV or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and PEEP was sequentially increased from 0 to 5 and 10 cm H(2)O, 5 min per step. Thereafter, PEEP was decreased to 0 cm H(2)O, Vt increased to 10 mL•kg(-1) and, keeping minute ventilation constant, PEEP was similarly increased to 5 and 10 cm H(2)O. Airway pressure and flow were continuously recorded and fitted to the VDSCM with or without considering flow-dependencies. A "distension index" (%E(2)) derived from the VDSCM was used to assess Vt and PEEP-induced recruitment/overdistension. Positive and negative values of %E(2) suggest tidal overdistension or tidal recruitment, respectively. In addition, the linear respiratory system elastance was calculated. Comparisons among variables at each PEEP value, Vt setting, ventilatory mode, and regression model considering or not considering flow-dependencies were performed with the Wilcoxon-sign rank test for paired samples (P < 0.05). Multiple comparisons were corrected with the Bonferroni method. The relative change in the estimated noisy variance was used as an index of the goodness of fit of the models. RESULTS: VDSCM including the flow-dependent parameter significantly improved estimated noisy variance in almost all experimental conditions (11.2 to 71.4, smallest of the lower and highest of the upper 95% confidence intervals). No differences in %E(2) were observed between VCV and PCV, at comparable Vt and PEEP levels, when flow-dependencies were included in the regression model. The negligence of the flow-dependent parameter systematically led to an underestimation of %E(2) in PCV compared to VCV mode (all P < 0.02). At a given Vt, %E(2) was negative at a PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O and significantly increased with PEEP, being almost 0 at a PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O. At a given level of PEEP, %E(2) significantly increased with Vt. CONCLUSIONS: The distension index %E(2), derived from the VDSCM considering flow-dependencies, seems able to identify tidal recruitment/overdistension induced by Vt and PEEP independent of flow waveform in healthy lung-anesthetized patients.

Correlação entre a distância obtida no teste de caminhada de seis minutos e o pico de consumo de oxigênio em pacientes portadores de doença renal crônica em hemodiálise / Correlation between the distance covered in the six-minute walk test with peak oxygen uptake in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis

Introdução: A doença renal crônica (DRC) cursa com importante redução da capacidade funcional. O teste padrão ouro para avaliação da capacidade funcional é o teste cardiopulmonar que determina o pico de consumo de oxigênio (VO2 pico). Por outro lado, o teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6M) é um teste representativo das atividades da vida diária, é mais barato e de fácil aplicação. No presente estudo, avaliamos a correlação entre a distância obtida no TC6M e o VO2 pico em pacientes portadores de DRC sob tratamento hemodialítico. Métodos: Foram estudados 16 pacientes portadores de DRC em programa de hemodiálise (cinco homens e 11 mulheres), com média de idade de 47,75 ± 12,05 anos. Os pacientes foram submetidos a dois TC6M emuma pista plana de 30m, com intervalo de 30 minutos, sendo considerada para análise a maior distância percorrida. Para determinação do VO2 pico, ospacientes foram submetidos ao teste cardiopulmonar em esteira rolante. Resultados: A distância média obtida no TC6M foi de 516,0 ± 88,79m e o VO2pico foi 20,50 ± 4,92ml/kg/min. Observamos uma correlação positiva e estatisticamente significante entre a distância obtida no TC6M e o VO2 pico (r =0,78). Conclusão: A forte correlação entre a distância obtida no TC6M e o VO2 pico permite sugerir o TC6M como alternativa simples e barata para avaliação da capacidade funcional de pacientes portadores de DRC em tratamento hemodialítico.

Introduction: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) courses with significant reduction in the functional capacity. The gold standard test for evaluation of the functional capacity is the cardiopulmonary test, which provides the determination of the peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak). On the other hand, the six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a representative test of the daily living activities, is inexpensive and easily applicable. In this study we aimed to evaluate the correlation between the distance covered in 6MWT with VO2 peak in ESRD patients on hemodialysis. Methods: Sixteen ESRD patients on hemodialysis (five men and11 women) were studied, with a mean age of 47.75 ± 12.05 years. The patients were submitted to two 6MWT in a 30m corridor, with an interval of 30minutes, being considered for analysis longest walked distance. For determination of VO2 peak, the patients were submitted to the cardiopulmonary test on a treadmill. Results: The distance covered in 6MWT was 516.0 ± 88.79m and VO2 peak was 20.50 ± 4.92ml/kg/min. We observed a positive and significant correlation between the distance covered in 6MWT with VO2 peak (r =0.78). Conclusion: The strong correlation between the distance covered in 6MWT with VO2 peak allows us to suggest the 6MWT as a simple and cheap alternative for evaluation of the functional capacity in ESRD patients on hemodialysis.