Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Insects ; 14(10)2023 Sep 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37887799

RESUMO

A critical component of integrated pest management is minimizing disruption of biological control by reducing the use of pesticides with significant non-target effects on natural enemies. Insecticide non-target effects testing for natural enemies has become increasingly common, but research examining the non-target effects of herbicides on natural enemies is scarce, and recommendations regarding herbicide selectivity are non-existent. We used meta-analysis to summarize laboratory bioassays testing non-target effects of herbicides on arthropod natural enemies and identify patterns in taxon susceptibility and active ingredient toxicity. Data were extracted from 78 papers representing 801 total observations. Herbicides increased natural enemy mortality and decreased longevity, reproduction, and predation. Mesostigmatan mites and hemipterans were the most sensitive to herbicides, and spiders, neuropterans, and hymenopterans were the least sensitive. Mortality was higher in juvenile predators versus parasitoids but did not differ between adults; parasitoid juveniles are likely better protected within the host. In terms of acute mortality, metribuzin, glufosinate, and oxyfluorfen were the most harmful herbicides. Only nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, pendimethalin, phenmedipham, atrazine, and urea did not increase natural enemy mortality. The large effect size of glufosinate is particularly concerning, as it is the most likely replacement herbicide for glyphosate in many crops. Many active ingredients remain under-studied. Our analysis indicates that herbicides have a strong potential to disrupt biological control in cropping systems.

2.
Pest Manag Sci ; 79(10): 3451-3458, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37132399

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Historically, integrated mite management in Washington apple orchards has focused on conservation of the predatory mite Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt) to reduce secondary pest mite pressure. However, pesticide use has changed to include more selective products, coinciding with a shift in the predatory mite community composition to include a new major predator, Amblydromella caudiglans (Schuster). There is evidence that A. caudiglans is more pesticide sensitive than G. occidentalis. Therefore, updates to pesticide selectivity recommendations are needed to conserve this 'new' key predator. Using bioassays, we examined the lethal (female mortality) and sublethal effects (fecundity, egg hatch, larval survival) of 4 fungicides and 11 insecticides on A. caudiglans, to determine whether existing conservation recommendations can be applied to this predatory mite. Susceptibility was compared with prior research on G. occidentalis. RESULTS: Mancozeb was the least selective fungicide tested on A. caudiglans; it caused high acute toxicity and sublethal effects. Carbaryl was the least selective insecticide and caused 100% mortality. Captan was the most selective fungicide. Chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole were the most selective insecticides and therefore least likely to disrupt biological control by A. caudiglans. Non-target effects on A. caudiglans and G. occidentalis were similar, but A. caudiglans experienced higher mortality to some broad-spectrum insecticides. CONCLUSIONS: All the products tested had some non-target effects on A. caudiglans. However, A. caudiglans sensitivity to most tested pesticides was similar to that of G. occidentalis. In general, existing spray recommendations for conserving G. occidentalis can be adjusted slightly and applied to A. caudiglans conservation. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.


Assuntos
Fungicidas Industriais , Inseticidas , Ácaros , Praguicidas , Humanos , Animais , Feminino , Praguicidas/farmacologia , Inseticidas/farmacologia , Fungicidas Industriais/farmacologia , Carbaril/farmacologia
3.
J Econ Entomol ; 115(1): 65-73, 2022 02 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850025

RESUMO

Spiders are key predators in many agroecosystems, including orchards. Despite the importance of spiders in biological control, pesticide nontarget effects on this group are poorly described. This is especially true for herbicides, which spiders frequently encounter as they move between the ground cover and tree canopy. We sought to determine the nontarget effects of seven herbicides used in orchards on three species of spiders that are commonly found in Washington state (USA) orchards: Pelegrina aeneola (Curtis) (Araneae: Salticidae), Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer) (Araneae: Philodromidae), and Phanias watonus (Chamberlin & Ivie) (Araneae: Salticidae). Immature spiders were collected from orchards and used in laboratory assays. Single spiders were placed in vials with dried herbicide residues and mortality was evaluated after 1, 2, and 5 d. We also evaluated herbicide impacts on prey consumption rates and on spider movement using motion-tracking software. Only oxyfluorfen caused significant spider mortality. P. cespitum seemed to be less acutely sensitive to oxyfluorfen than the two salticid species. Several herbicide treatments significantly increased locomotion in P. cespitum, whereas rimsulfuron numerically decreased movement of P. aeneola. Sulfonylurea herbicides (rimsulfuron, halosulfuron) decreased prey consumption of P. aeneola. Our work indicates that although spiders may be less acutely sensitive to some pesticides than beneficial insects, they can be affected by sublethal effects of herbicides. Future work should determine if herbicide applications impact spider abundance in the field and reduce biological control services. In general, more work is needed on the impacts of herbicides on natural enemies.


Assuntos
Herbicidas , Praguicidas , Aranhas , Animais , Herbicidas/toxicidade , Washington
4.
Exp Appl Acarol ; 84(2): 407-418, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970407

RESUMO

Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), twospotted spider mite, is a major secondary pest of strawberry and can cause significant yield loss. Tetranychus urticae is typically controlled using miticides, which has led to rapid resistance development. In South Carolina (USA), extension agents and growers have reported field failures of miticides (inadequate pest suppression), but resistance has not been quantitatively determined. In 2018, we determined the level of miticide resistance of six T. urticae populations found on strawberry across South Carolina. We examined efficacy of all miticides registered for use on US strawberry by conducting an initial diagnostic bioassay at 20% of the maximum labeled field rate. Any population × active ingredient combination resulting in < 55% mortality was identified as 'potentially resistant' and concentration-response bioassays were then conducted to calculate LC50 values for an individual population. These values were compared with those of a known-susceptible laboratory population to calculate resistance ratios (RR). Our results indicate that examined South Carolina populations of T. urticae from strawberry were highly resistant to bifenthrin (RR = 100-60,000) and there was reduced susceptibility to fenbutatin-oxide (RR = 25-123). The 'Sardinia' population had decreased abamectin susceptibility (RR = 25). No resistance to hexythiazox, etoxazole, acequinocyl, bifenazate, fenpyroximate, spiromesifen, or cyflumetofen was found. Based on available data, it appears that miticide resistance is not a likely cause of field failures and issues related to application error and coverage should be investigated. Overall, this work supports the need to reduce the use of broad-spectrum pesticides and older products, in favor of newer miticide chemistries due to resistance issues.


Assuntos
Acaricidas , Fragaria , Tetranychidae , Animais , Itália , Controle de Pragas , South Carolina
5.
Pest Manag Sci ; 76(6): 2170-2179, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31955529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biological control in conventional agroecosystems involves the integration of chemical and conservation tactics, requiring knowledge of pesticide non-target effects on key natural enemies. Even for natural enemy groups such as predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae), where pesticide non-target effects have been thoroughly examined, there may be significant differences in species susceptibility to specific active ingredients, including newer selective products. Using bioassays, we examined lethal (female mortality) and sublethal (fecundity, egg hatch, larval survival) effects of ten miticides on a spider mite pest (Tetranychus urticae) and three insectary-purchased predatory mites (Phytoseiulus persimilis, Neoseiulus californicus, and N. fallacis) commonly used for its management. Susceptibility of field-collected and insectary-reared populations of P. persimilis was also compared. Cumulative impacts on production of larvae by treated female spider mites and predators were compared to create a metric that simultaneously accounted for miticide efficacy and selectivity. RESULTS: Bifenthrin was the least selective, as it caused acute toxicity to all predators and had little efficacy against T. urticae. Hexythiazox and cyflumetofen were the most selectively favorable. Phytoseiulus persimilis populations were similar in which miticides they were sensitive to, although the insectary-purchased population was generally more sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: All products, including those considered selective (cyflumetofen, bifenazate, acequinocyl) had non-target effects on at least one species of predator tested. This work emphasizes that there is high variability in selectivity among species, highlighting the need to examine key natural enemies individually when creating management programs. Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.


Assuntos
Acaricidas , Tetranychidae , Animais , Feminino , Controle Biológico de Vetores , Praguicidas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA