Inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association standards.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. AIM: To examine inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) standards. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Results of ASIA motor and sensory examinations performed by two experienced examiners on 45 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) were compared. RESULTS: Total ASIA scores showed very strong correlation between the two examiners, with Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.96, P<0.01 for total motor, light touch and pin prick scores. The agreement for individual muscle testing of the 10 ASIA key muscles showed substantial agreement for majority of muscles, with the weighted Kappa coefficient range 0.649-0.993, P<0.05. The overall agreement in assignment of manual muscle testing grades (0-5) was 82% on the right and 84% on the left, with the strongest agreement for grade '0' and the weakest for grade '3'. The unweighted Kappa coefficient for agreement in motor and sensory levels ranged from 0.68 to 0.78 (P<0.01). There was no difference in ASIA impairment grades derived from the two examiners' results. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results showed very good levels of agreement in ASIA clinical examinations between two experienced examiners. The established degree of variability due to inter-rater differences should be taken into account in study design of clinical trials with more than one assessor..

Perceptual threshold to cutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a quantitative sensory test (QST) that could be used for assessing the level and the density (degree of impairment) of spinal cord injury (SCI) and for monitoring neurological changes in patients with SCI. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. METHODS: Perceptual threshold to 3 Hz cutaneous electrical stimulation was measured in 30 control subjects and in 45 patients with SCI at American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) sensory key points for selected dermatomes between C3 and S2 bilaterally. Electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) was recorded as the lowest ascending stimulus intensity out of three tests at which the subject reported sensation. The level of SCI according to EPT results was established for right and left sides as the most caudal spinal segment at which patient's EPT was within the control range (mean +/- 2 standard deviation (SD)). The level of SCI, according to EPT, was then compared with clinical sensory level derived according to ASIA classification. RESULTS: In the control group, EPT depended on the dermatome tested and was lowest for T1 (1.01 +/- 0.23 mA, mean +/- SD) and highest for L5 (3.32 +/- 1.14 mA). There was strong correlation between corresponding right and left dermatomes and between repeated assessments. In the SCI group, the level of lesion according to EPT and clinical testing was the same in 43 of the 90 tests (48%). In 37 cases (41%), the EPT level was higher than the clinical level, and in 10 cases (11%), it was lower. Below the level of lesion in incomplete SCI and in the zone of partial preservation in complete SCI, the EPT values in most dermatomes were raised compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: EPT is a simple, reproducible QST that can assess both the level and the density of SCI. It seems to add sensitivity and resolution to the standard clinical testing and could be a useful adjunct in longitudinal monitoring of patients with SCI for research purposes during natural recovery and therapeutic interventions. SPONSORSHIP: International Spinal Research Trust (ISRT), UK, Grant CLI001.

Towards improved clinical and physiological assessments of recovery in spinal cord injury: a clinical initiative.

Clinical practice and scientific research may soon lead to treatments designed to repair spinal cord injury. Repair is likely to be partial in the first trials, extending only one or two segments below the original injury. Furthermore, treatments that are becoming available are likely to be applied to the thoracic spinal cord to minimise loss of function resulting from damage to surviving connections. These provisos have prompted research into the improvement of clinical and physiological tests designed (1) to determine the level and density of a spinal cord injury, (2) to provide reliable monitoring of recovery over one or two spinal cord segments, and (3) to provide indices of function provided by thoracic spinal root innervation, presently largely ignored in assessment of spinal cord injury. This article reviews progress of the Clinical Initiative, sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust, to advance the clinical and physiological tests of sensory, motor and autonomic function needed to achieve these aims.

Predicting normal lung function in patients with childhood spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the height and arm span measurements in childhood spinal cord injured (SCI) people and examine the subsequent effect on calculating the predicted lung function using standard formulae and to discuss which of the two measurements is the most appropriate to use in these formulae. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK. METHOD: A total of 12 children had lung function tests performed and at the same time had height and armspan measured. The predicted lung function was calculated twice; once using height and then using arm span and compared. The actual lung function test results were expressed as percentage of the two predicted values, respectively, and compared. RESULTS: The difference between the mean height (1499 mm) and arm span (1649 mm) measurements was significant (P<0.001). In all cases, the arm span measurement was greater than the height. The two predicted lung function values (one calculated using height and the other armspan) were significantly different (P<0.001). When lung function test results were expressed as percentage of the two predicted values they gave a very different interpretation of the results. The actual performance was much lower than the predicted values if arm span, rather than height, was used in prediction equations. CONCLUSION: In childhood SCI, the difference in height and arm span is significant. This affects the predicted lung function values significantly and thus changes the interpretation of the lung function test results. The most appropriate measurement to use in prediction equations (height or arm span) in these subjects is yet to be decided.