Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 149(3): 554-559, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29661495

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are mechanisms for achieving value-based improvements in surgery. This report provides a detailed analysis of the impact of an ERAS program on patient outcomes as well as quality and safety measures during implementation on a gynecologic oncology service at a major academic medical center. METHODS: A retrospective review of gynecologic oncology patients undergoing elective laparotomy during the implementation phase of an ERAS program (January 2016 through December 2016) was performed. Patient demographics, surgical variables, postoperative outcomes, and adherence to core safety measures, including antimicrobial and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, were compared to a historical patient cohort (January 2015 through December 2015). Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and Chi squared tests. RESULTS: The inaugural 109 ERAS program participants were compared to a historical patient cohort (n=158). There was no difference in BMI, race, malignancy, or complexity of procedure between cohorts. ERAS patients required less narcotics (70.7 vs 127.4, p=0.007, oral morphine equivalents) and PCA use (32.1% vs. 50.6%, p=0.002). Despite this substantial reduction in narcotics, ERAS patients did not report more pain and in fact reported significantly less pain by postoperative day 3. There were no differences in length of stay (5days), complication rates (13.8% vs. 20.3%, p=0.17) or 30-day readmission rates (9.5 vs 11.9%, p=0.54) between ERAS and historical patients, respectively. Compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis was 97.2%. However, 33.9% of ERAS patients received substandard preoperative VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS program implementation resulted in reductions in narcotic requirements and PCA use without changes in length of stay or readmission rates. Compliance should be diligently audited during the implementation phase of ERAS programs, with special attention to adherence to pre-existing core safety measures.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/reabilitação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Padrão de Cuidado
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(4): 756-764, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885412

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for surgical site infection and to define rates associated with cytoreductive surgery before and after implementation of an infection prevention bundle. METHODS: We conducted a prospective quality improvement study. Patients who underwent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer cytoreductive surgery at an academic tertiary care center from April 2014 to April 2016 were prospectively enrolled. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and surgical site infection rates were compared with a historical cohort after introduction of a 5-point infection prevention bundle, including: 1) preoperative and intraoperative skin preparation with 4% chlorhexidine and intraoperative vaginal preparation with 4% chlorhexidine; 2) preoperative use of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation; 3) appropriate timing of intraoperative antibiotics; 4) adoption of enhanced sterile surgical techniques for colon procedures and incisional closure; and 5) perioperative incision management. RESULTS: During the study period, 219 women underwent surgery: 91 prebundle and 128 treated in the postbundle period. Stage, body mass index, proportion of patients undergoing colon or upper abdominal surgery, and estimated blood loss were not different between the cohorts. Overall, the surgical site infection rate prebundle was 18 (20%); this was reduced to four (3%) postbundle (odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.037-0.53; P<.001). Patients who underwent a colon resection prebundle had an infection rate of 14 (33%) compared with three (7%) in the postbundle group (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.037-0.53; P<.001). Additionally, rates of surgical site infection-related hospital readmission were also lower in the postbundle (4/128 [3%]) compared with the prebundle group (12/91 [13%]; P=.005). CONCLUSION: Infection is common after ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery. Implementation of a 5-point surgical site infection prevention bundle in women undergoing ovarian cancer operations was associated with dramatically decreased infection rates and lower hospital readmission rates.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Abdome/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/normas , Neoplasias das Tubas Uterinas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Readmissão do Paciente , Neoplasias Peritoneais/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Ultrasound Med ; 33(8): 1353-64, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25063400

RESUMO

The objectives of this systematic review were to examine the reproducibility of sonographic estimates of amniotic fluid volume (AFV) in twin pregnancies, compare the association of sonographic estimates of AFV with dye-determined AFV, and correlate AFV with antepartum, intrapartum, and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. Studies were included if they were adequately powered and investigated antepartum, intrapartum, and/or perinatal adverse outcome parameters in twin gestations. Studies with comparable populations and exclusion criteria were merged into forest plots. Data comparing the accuracy of AFV assessment, correlation of AFV with gestational age, and adverse outcomes were tabulated. Five of the 6 studies investigating AFV by the amniotic fluid index as a function of gestational age reported data fitting a quadratic equation, with fluid volumes peaking at mid gestation and then declining. This trend was less pronounced when AFV was assessed by the single deepest pocket (2 of 4 studies reporting a quadratic fit). Polyhydramnios was associated with prematurity in 2 of 4 studies (1 amniotic fluid index and 1 single deepest pocket), and oligohydramnios was associated with prematurity in 1 single deepest pocket study. Stillbirth was the only intrapartum outcome reported in more than 1 study. Perinatal outcomes associated with polyhydramnios included neonatal death (P < .05 in 1 of 2 studies), low Apgar scores (1 of 2 studies), neonatal intensive care unit admission (1 of 2 studies), and low birth weight (2 of 3 studies).


Assuntos
Líquido Amniótico/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez de Gêmeos , Gêmeos , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Oligo-Hidrâmnio/diagnóstico por imagem , Poli-Hidrâmnios/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA