Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA). DESIGN: This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline. CONCLUSION: In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Executive summary of the expert consensus document from the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery and the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition: clinical recommendations on the perioperative management of pituitary tumors.

Pituitary tumors (PT) account for 15% of intracranial tumors affect 10.7-14.4% of the population although the incidence of clinically relevant PT is 5.1 cases/100,000 inhabitants. Surgical treatment is indicated in PTs with hormone hypersecretion (except for prolactin-producing PTs) and those with local compressive or global neurological symptoms. Multidisciplinary care, is essential for patients with PTs, preferably delivered in a center of excellence and based on a well-defined care protocol. In order to facilitate and standardize the clinical procedures for this type of tumor, this document gathers the positioning of the Neuroendocrinology Knowledge Area of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC) on the management of patients with PTs and their preoperative, surgical and postoperative follow-up.

Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in glioblastoma patients: a pilot study.

Aim: Glioblastoma (GB) is an aggressive tumor type and the detection of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in peripheral blood has been related to angiogenesis. Materials & methods: A prospective single-center pilot study of CEC detection at diagnosis in 22 patients with GB was performed, using the US FDA-approved CellSearch system. Results: A CEC cutoff value was estimated using a receiver operating curve (ROC) and patients were classified into two groups: <40 CEC/4 ml and >40 CEC/4 ml blood. Median overall survival was 25.33 months for group 1 and 8.23 months for group 2 cases (p = 0.02). There was no correlation between CEC and PWI (perfusion-weighted imaging) RM. Conclusion: CEC detection has a prognostic value in GB cases at diagnosis.

Compressive myelopathy secondary to posthemorragic arachnoiditis: Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal arachnoiditis is an arachnoid inflammatory process frequently caused by infection or spinal surgery; there are different degrees of severity, including arachnoid thickening and severe adhesive lesions that can lead to the development of arachnoid cysts. Non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (ntSAH) is a relatively uncommon cause of arachnoiditis; further complication with spinal cord compression (SCC) is even more unusual. METHOD: we describe a 70-year-old female, with SCC caused by arachnoid cysts. Her medical past history was relevant for an episode of ntSAH after rupture of a posterior communicating artery aneurysm, eight months prior to the onset of symptoms. We also present a literature review of previous published cases. RESULTS: we selected 23 articles with 24 case reports. A noticeable female predominance (11:1) was observed. It is more common between the fourth and fifth decades. The majority of cases (58 %) were secondary to aneurysmal SAH due to rupture of a posterior circulation aneurysm. The most common location of the cyst is in the cervicothoracic spine. The average time between the initial bleeding and symptom development is 3-6 months. The most frequently described treatment is laminectomy and marsupialization of the cyst, but reports show a high recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: ntSAH is an uncommon aetiology of arachnoiditis and arachnoid cysts. SCC from arachnoid cysts secondary to ntSAH is exceptional. Treatment through laminectomy has a relatively high recurrence rate (33 %). We present different hypotheses to try to explain how the alteration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics after ntSAH can lead to arachnoid cyst development and SCC. Although the small number of cases included in the present series precludes us to draw definite conclusions, ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement can be considered as an alternative treatment in the management of known ntSAH patients that present recurrent symptomatic arachnoid cysts.

Pituitary tumors: epidemiology and clinical presentation spectrum.

Pituitary tumors (PTs) are a heterogeneous group of lesions of the central nervous system that are usually benign. Most of them occur sporadically, but 5% can do so within family syndromes, usually at a young age. There are differences by sex, age, race, and genetic factors in the prevalence of different tumor cell types and clinical presentation. Functioning-PTs (FPTs) are usually diagnosed earlier than non-functioning PTs (NFPTs). However, this depends on the PT type. Headaches and visual disturbances are the most frequent mass-effect symptoms, but seizures or hydrocephalus may also occur. Pituitary apoplexy is another possible mode of presentation, and it requires special attention because of its potential severity. PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and old age present a series of clinical peculiarities that must be taken into account when evaluating these patients. Ectopic PTs (EPTs) are uncommon and share the same clinical-epidemiological data as eutopic PTs, but, depending on their location, other types of clinical manifestations may appear. Silent PTs are often detected as an incidentaloma or due to neurologic symptoms related to mass-effect. Aggressive PTs and pituitary carcinomas (PCs), which are very rare, are characterized by multiple local recurrences and metastases, respectively. This review addresses the epidemiology and clinical presentation of PTs, from the classical hormonal and mass-effect symptoms to the different rare presentations, such as pituitary apoplexy, hydrocephalus, or diabetes insipidus. Moreover, special situations of the presentation of PTs are discussed, namely, PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and the elderly, EPTs, silent and aggressive PTs, and PCs.

Giant Prolactinoma in Men: Clinical Features and Therapeutic Outcomes.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical features and long-term therapeutic outcome of giant prolactinoma (gPRLoma) in men and to compare them with those of a group of male patients with non-gPRL macroprolactinomas (non-gPRLomas). A retrospective and multicenter study of gPRLomas in men diagnosed in a 20-year period was performed. Clinical data and treatment outcome were registered. The diagnosis of gPRLoma was established when the maximal tumor diameter was ≥40 mm or the tumor had ≥20 mm of suprasellar extension associated to hyperprolactinemia (PRL>1000 ng/ml). Non-gPRLoma was considered when tumor diameter was ≥ 10 mm and<40 mm associated to hyperprolactinemia (PRL≥200 ng/ml). Twenty-three patients with gPRLoma (age 38.3±13.5 years) followed for at least 3 months (follow-up 87.1±60.5 months, range 3-211 months) were evaluated. A group of 42 patients with non-gPRLoma (age 42±16.6 years; NS; follow-up 89±65.9 months, range 3-222 months; NS) served as a control group. More than half (56.5%) of the gPRLoma patients were younger than 40 years at diagnosis. Visual disturbances were significantly more common in gPRLoma than in non-gPRLoma patients (65.2 vs. 25.6%; p=0.004). Prevalence of hypopituitarism was similar in both groups of patients (73.9% vs. 80.9%; gPRLoma vs non-gPRLoma; NS). Serum PRL concentrations were significantly higher in gPRLoma than in non-gPRLoma patients [median (IR), 3978 ng/ml (1179-9012) vs. 907 ng/ml (428-3119); p<0.001]. Maximum tumor diameter in gPRLomas was 4.8±0.8 cm and 2.4±0.7 cm in non-gPRLoma (p<0.001). All patients were treated with dopamine agonists (DA). Twelve (52.2%) gPRLoma patients and 32 (73.8%) non-gPRLoma patients were treated with DA as monotherapy (p=0.045). Surgery was used in 12 (52.2%) gPRLoma patients and in 12 (28.6%) non-gPRLoma patients (p=0.054). Lastly, radiotherapy was used in 5 (21.7%) gPRLoma patients and in 6 (14.2%) non-gPRLoma patients (NS). At last visit, PRL was similar in both groups of patients [16 ng/ml (4-30) vs. 11 ng/ml (4-25); gPRLomas vs. non-gPRLomas; ns] and tumor size decreased significantly (p<0.001) in both groups of patients. Clinical cure (maintained normoprolactinemia without therapy for>1 year and no radiological evidence of pituitary tumor) was achieved in 2 (8.7%) gPRLoma patients and in 2 (4.8%) non-gPRLoma patients (NS). gPRLomas in men are usually diagnosed at a mean age of 40 years, an age similar to that of non-gPRLomas. The only clinical difference with non-gPRLomas is their greater prevalence of visual disturbances. The therapeutic approaches and tumor outcomes were similar to those obtained in patients with non-gPRLomas. Complete cure in gPRLoma is rare, but similar to that achieved in non-gPRLomas, reached in less than 10% of patients.