Statin use prior to first myocardial infarction in contemporary patients: Inefficient and not gender equitable.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend initiating primary prevention with statins to those at highest cardiovascular risk. We assessed the gender-specific implementation and effectiveness of this risk-guided approach. METHODS: We identified 1399 consecutive patients without known cardiovascular disease or diabetes hospitalized with a first myocardial infarction (MI) in Denmark. Statin use before MI was assessed, and cardiovascular risk was calculated using SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation). RESULTS: Among patients with first MI, 36% were women. Compared with men, they were older (mean 72 vs. 65years) but had a lower estimated risk (median 3.4% vs. 6.7%, SCORE high-risk model in the statin-naïve patients). Statin therapy had been initiated in 12% of women and 10% of men prior to MI. After adding 1.5mmol/L to the total cholesterol concentration of those already on statins, the estimated pre-treatment risk was much lower in women than men (median 3.8% vs. 9.2%, SCORE high-risk model), and only 29% of women would have passed the risk-based treatment threshold defined by the European guidelines (SCORE ≥5%). Estimated risk and statin use correlated directly in men but not in women. Only ~5% of first MI are prevented by the current use of statins in people without diabetes. CONCLUSION: In people destined for a first MI, statin therapy is uncommon and prevents few events. Lower-risk women receive as much statins as higher risk men. This gender disparity and inefficient targeting of statins to those at highest risk indicate that risk scoring is not widely used in routine clinical practice in Denmark.

Traditional SCORE-based health check fails to identify individuals who develop acute myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is caused by well-known risk factors. They constitute important therapeutic targets, but their predictive value is disputed. We evaluated the effectiveness of the risk scoring system (SCORE) and thresholds for pharmacotherapy re-commended in the European guidelines on CVD prevention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of 605 consecutive patients hospitalized for a first AMI were reviewed. Patients with pre-existing CVD, diabetes, or incomplete information on risk factors were excluded. Those not treated with statin before AMI were risk stratified based on risk factors. A SCORE ≥ 5% or ≥ 10% was considered to qualify for preventive medication in young adults (age ≤ 60 years) or elderly (age > 60 years), respectively. RESULTS: Before AMI, 40 (9%) used statin. Among non-statin users, only five of the 109 young adults had a SCORE ≥ 5%, and 23 of the 284 elderly had a SCORE ≥ 10%. Among women, only three elderly qualified for treatment. More than four times more patients would have qualified for treatment with the high-risk country chart used in 2011. The incremental value of the novel high-density lipoprotein adjusted SCORE charts was limited. CONCLUSION: Few patients admitted with a first AMI used statin. Among non-statin users, SCORE and the recommended thresholds for pharmacotherapy identified no women and less than one out of ten men who untreated were destined for an AMI before 61 years of age. The preventive potential of a traditional risk factor-based health check is limited. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.