Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 82(1): 63-7, 1999 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10192487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a case-control study to analyze risk factors for urogenital prolapse requiring surgery. METHODS: Cases were 108 women with a diagnosis of II or III degree uterovaginal prolapse and/or third degree cystocele. Controls were 100 women admitted to the same hospitals as the cases, for acute, non-gynecological, non-neoplastic conditions. RESULTS: Occupation showed an association with urogenital prolapse: in comparison with professional/managerial women, housewives had an odds ratios (OR) of urogenital prolapse of 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-8.8). Compared with nulliparae, parous women tended to have a higher risk of genital prolapse (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.8). In comparison with women reporting no vaginal delivery, the ORs were 3.0 for women reporting one vaginal delivery (95% CI 1.0-9.5), and 4.5 (95% CI 1.6-13.1) for women with two or more vaginal deliveries. Forceps delivery and birthweight were not associated with risk of prolapse after taking into account the effect of number of vaginal deliveries. The risk of urogenital prolapse was higher in women with mother or sisters reporting the condition: the ORs were, respectively, 3.2 (95% CI 1.1-7.6) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.0-5.6) in comparison with women whose mother or sisters reported no prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the clinical suggestion that parous women are at a higher risk of prolapse and the risk increases with number of vaginal deliveries. First-degree family history of prolapse seems to increase the risk of prolapse.


Assuntos
Forceps Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Prolapso Uterino/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Peso ao Nascer , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Intervalos de Confiança , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios , Família , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Razão de Chances , Paridade , História Reprodutiva , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Classe Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Prolapso Uterino/etiologia , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia
2.
Hum Reprod ; 9(7): 1333-6, 1994 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7962443

RESUMO

The reproductive prognosis of 115 women desiring pregnancy who underwent surgery for ectopic pregnancy between 1985 and 1990 at the Clinica Luigi Mangiagalli, was analysed after a median follow-up period of 26 months (range 2-83). Probability of reproductive events was assessed by a product-limit model. Women who underwent surgery for ectopic pregnancy had a 54% probability of becoming pregnant (cumulative pregnancy rate, CPR), and a 36% probability of giving birth to a child (cumulative livebirth rate, CLB) during the 3 years after surgery. These percentages dropped with history of previous ectopic pregnancy (respectively 33%, P = 0.07, and 7%, P < 0.05). Increasing age at surgery and presence of adhesions in the contra-lateral tube seemed to be associated with poor reproductive prognosis (CPR = 40% and CLB = 12% for women aged > or = 35 years and CPR = 37% and CLB = 20% in women with adhesions in the contralateral tube), but these findings were not statistically significant. No association emerged between fertility and parity or type of surgery. The recurrence rate of ectopic pregnancy was 20%. No significant association emerged between recurrence of ectopic pregnancy and age, history of previous pregnancy, history of previous ectopic pregnancy, non-intact contra-lateral tube and salpingotomy.


Assuntos
Gravidez Ectópica/cirurgia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Doenças das Tubas Uterinas/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez Ectópica/complicações , Prognóstico , Recidiva , Aderências Teciduais/complicações
3.
Riv Filos Neo Scolast ; 60(2-3): 191-210, 1968.
Artigo em Indefinido | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21213899
4.
Riv Filos Neo Scolast ; 58(5-6): 564-83, 1966.
Artigo em Indefinido | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21213898
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA