RESUMO
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the destruction of pancreatic ß cells by the immune system, to which both pancreatic ß-cell dysfunction and pathological activation of the immune system contribute. This paper is focused on understanding the modalities of this activation, and the genetic and environmental factors increasing its risk. Innate immunity has a critical role in the loss of self-tolerance and promotion of inflammation either directly using innate effector mechanisms or by providing activation signals to anti-islet adaptive autoimmunity. We provide an overview of various deleterious and protective roles of innate immunity in T1D inside pancreatic islets, regional lymph nodes, and distant locations such as the gut.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of the Mimi Hearing Test (MHT) mobile application in the detection of air conduction (AC) thresholds and in screening for moderate hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Participants with or without a varying degree of hearing loss, aged 18 years and over, without cognitive impairment and without active otorrhea or earwax impaction at the time of the hearing assessment were included. INTERVENTION: Subjects with a ranging severity of hearing loss underwent a conventional in-booth audiogram as well as mobile-based screening with MHT in a quiet room (45.5 dB background noise) on the same day. Both regular over-the-ear and noise-canceling headphones were tested with MHT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of AC thresholds between conventional audiometry and mobile-based audiometry at discrete frequencies and with pure-tone averages (PTA) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 75 adults (mean age: 56.2 yr, 54.7% male) were recruited and 63 used for analysis. Of the thresholds measured with MHT using regular headphones, 44.0% were within 10 dB of the conventional audiogram, compared to 39.3% using noise-canceling headphones. MHT demonstrated best accuracy at high frequencies (4-8 kHz). When screening for moderate hearing loss (PTA >40 dB HL), MHT demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MHT is reliable for identifying moderate hearing loss but lacks precision in detecting thresholds at low frequencies. Noise canceling headphones seem to improve its precision at 4,000 Hz only.