Clinical outcomes and resource utilisation in patients with major burns treated with NovoSorb® BTM.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with major burns can undergo temporary coverage while skin graft donor sites heal, where dermal templates have an emerging role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and resource utilisation in patients with major burns treated with a bilayer biodegradable synthetic matrix (NovoSorb BTM). METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Adult Burn Unit with burns to at least 40 % TBSA who survived their acute admission. Patients treated from July 2017 to June 2022 with BTM were compared with patients with similar injuries treated using cadaveric allograft as temporising full thickness wound coverage between January 2013 and June 2017. Outcomes measures included number of operations, total operative time, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), cadaveric allograft and BTM use, and blood product use. Unadjusted comparisons were made with Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate linear regression was used to adjust for the effect of TBSA on each outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included (78 % male), 22 of whom were treated with BTM. We found no significant differences in age, sex, or TBSA between groups. One patient had half of the BTM removed due to infection and replaced with allograft. Patients treated with BTM had significantly less operative theatre time (median 1361.5 min [BTM] vs 1768 min [no BTM], P = 0.044). Number of operations, allograft use, hospital and ICU LOS, and blood product use were similar between groups. Adjusted models accounting for TBSA supported unadjusted models. CONCLUSION: Resource utilisation and clinical outcomes were similar in patients with at least 40 % TBSA treated with BTM and those who were treated with allograft before the introduction of BTM. Patients treated with BTM had significantly less total operative time and no difference in number of operations, allograft use and ICU LOS.

Intravenous iron therapy to treat burn anaemia: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Intravenous iron is an effective treatment for anaemia in many populations but has not been evaluated in those with burn anaemia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron to manage burn anaemia. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with burns to at least 15% total body surface area (TBSA). Data collected from patient records included demographics, treatment details, and outcomes including length of stay, blood transfusions, and serum haemoglobin concentrations. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to assess the effect of treatment with intravenous iron on haemoglobin over time. RESULTS: Sixty patients met inclusion criteria, with 11 (18%) treated using intravenous iron. Those treated with intravenous iron had higher TBSA burns (median 39% vs 18%, P = 0.0005), more operations (3 vs 1, P = 0.0012), and more blood transfusions (median 8 units vs 0 units, P = 0.0002). One patient (9%) experienced a minor adverse drug reaction from intravenous iron. When examining the change in modelled haemoglobin levels over the first 14 days following the last major operation, the change in the intravenous iron group (11.22 g/L) was 14.56 g/L greater than the change in the group not receiving intravenous iron (-3.34 g/L, P = 0.0282). CONCLUSION: This exploratory study provides preliminary evidence of benefit and safety of intravenous iron treatment on burn anaemia recovery.

Iron status in patients with burn anaemia.

PURPOSE: The iron status of burn patients is poorly understood, limited by difficulty interpreting conventional iron studies in the context of the acute phase response triggered by critical illness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the iron status of patients with burn anaemia using recent post-operative guidelines. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cohort study utilised data collected from records for adult patients admitted to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with burns to at least 15% TBSA. Rates of iron deficiency, defined as ferritin< 100 µg/L or ferritin 100-300 µg/L with transferrin saturation< 20%, and low iron availability, defined as transferrin saturation< 20%, were calculated. RESULTS: Of 60 included patients (90% male), 16 (27%) underwent iron studies. 11 (18%) were treated with intravenous iron. Iron studies showed that five (31%) patients had evidence of iron deficiency, and ten out of 12 (83%) had evidence of reduced iron availability. Two patients (40%) with evidence of iron deficiency were not treated with intravenous iron. CONCLUSION: Application of recent guidelines for interpretation of conventional iron studies in patients with inflammatory states may improve the identification of iron deficiency in burn patients. Iron deficiency may be an under-recognised and under-treated contributor to burn anaemia.