Attenuation of opioid tolerance by ETA receptor antagonist, BQ123, administered intravenously in mice.

OBJECTIVES: Intracerebroventricular injection of endothelin-A receptor antagonist BQ123 potentiates opioid analgesia and reverses analgesic tolerance. This study explores whether these effects can be replicated by injecting BQ123 intravenously. METHODS: Male Swiss-Webster mice were used. Morphine tolerance was induced using 3- or 7-day dosing. Intravenous BQ123 (8 mg/kg) was injected only once on Day 1, 2, 3 or 4 (3-day studies), and on Day 4, 6 or 8 (7-day studies). On Day 4 or 8, respectively, tail-flick and hot-plate latencies were measured following a morphine challenge dose. KEY FINDINGS: Intravenous BQ123 increased the potency and duration of morphine antinociceptive responses. In the 3-day study, the antinociceptive response was unaffected by BQ123 given on Days 1 or 2. BQ123 treatment on Day 3 or 4 (Day 4, BQ123 given 15-min before morphine) significantly potentiated antinociceptive response versus vehicle-treated tolerant mice. In 7-day studies, the antinociceptive response was unaffected by BQ123 given on Day 4. BQ123 given on Day 6 or 8 (Day 8, BQ123 given 15-min before morphine) produced a >100% increase in antinociceptive response versus vehicle-treated tolerant mice for at least 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous administration of BQ123 is effective in potentiating morphine analgesia and restoring antinociceptive response in morphine-tolerant mice.

Attenuation of opioid tolerance by ETB receptor agonist, IRL-1620, is independent of an accompanied decrease in nerve growth factor in mice.

AIM: ETA receptor antagonists reverse opioid tolerance but the involvement of ETB receptors is unknown. In morphine or oxycodone tolerant mice we investigated (1) the effect of ETB receptor agonist, IRL-1620, on analgesic tolerance; (2) changes in expression of the brain ETA and ETB receptors; and (3) alterations in the brain VEGF, NGF, PI3K and notch-1 expression. MAIN METHODS: Body weight, body temperature, and tail-flick latency were assessed before and after a challenge dose of morphine or oxycodone in vehicle or IRL-1620 treated mice. Expression studies were carried out using Western blots. KEY FINDINGS: Tail flick latency to a challenge dose of opioid was significantly increased by IRL-1620 from 39% to 100% in morphine tolerant and from 8% to 83% in oxycodone tolerant mice. Morphine or oxycodone did not alter ETA or ETB receptor expression. IRL-1620 had no effect on ETA however it increased (61%) expression of ETB receptors. IRL-1620-induced increase in ETB receptor expression was attenuated by morphine (39.8%) and oxycodone (51.8%). VEGF expression was not affected by morphine or oxycodone and was unaltered by IRL-1620. However, NGF and PI3K expression was decreased (P < 0.001) by morphine and oxycodone and was unaffected by IRL-1620. Notch-1 expression was not altered by morphine, oxycodone or IRL-1620. SIGNIFICANCE: ETB receptor agonist, IRL-1620, restored analgesic tolerance to morphine and oxycodone, but it did not affect morphine and oxycodone induced decrease in NGF/PI3K expression. It is concluded that IRL-1620 attenuates opioid tolerance without the involvement of NGF/PI3K pathway.

Neurobiology of opioid withdrawal: Role of the endothelin system.

Morphine and oxycodone are potent opioid analgesics most commonly used for the management of moderate to severe acute and chronic pain. Their clinical utility is limited by undesired side effects like analgesic tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal. We have previously demonstrated that endothelin-A (ETA) receptor antagonists potentiate opioid analgesia and eliminate analgesic tolerance. Mechanistically, G proteins and regulatory proteins such as ß-arrestins have shown to play an important role in mediating opioid tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal. Recently, the involvement of central ET mechanisms in opioid withdrawal was investigated. ETA receptor antagonist was shown to block majority of the signs and symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal. This review focuses on ET as one of the potential novel strategies to manage the challenge of opioid withdrawal. An overview of additional players in this process (G proteins and ß-arrestin2), and the possible therapeutic implications of these findings are presented.

Endothelin ETA receptor antagonist reverses naloxone-precipitated opioid withdrawal in mice.

Long-term use of opioids for pain management results in rapid development of tolerance and dependence leading to severe withdrawal symptoms. We have previously demonstrated that endothelin-A (ETA) receptor antagonists potentiate opioid analgesia and eliminate analgesic tolerance. This study was designed to investigate the involvement of central ET mechanisms in opioid withdrawal. The effect of intracerebroventricular administration of ETA receptor antagonist BQ123 on morphine and oxycodone withdrawal was determined in male Swiss Webster mice. Opioid tolerance was induced and withdrawal was precipitated by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Expression of ETA and ETB receptors, nerve growth factor (NGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor was determined in the brain using Western blotting. BQ123 pretreatment reversed hypothermia and weight loss during withdrawal. BQ123 also reduced wet shakes, rearing behavior, and jumping behavior. No changes in expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, ETA receptors, and ETB receptors were observed during withdrawal. NGF expression was unaffected in morphine withdrawal but significantly decreased during oxycodone withdrawal. A decrease in NGF expression in oxycodone- but not in morphine-treated mice could be due to mechanistic differences in oxycodone and morphine. It is concluded that ETA receptor antagonists attenuate opioid-induced withdrawal symptoms.

Centhaquin antinociception in mice is mediated by α2A- and α2B- but not α2C-adrenoceptors.

The use of clonidine as a primary and adjuvant analgesic is well-documented. It is known that imidazoline and α2-adrenoceptors are involved in clonidine antinociception. Clonidine also produces antihypertensive actions mediated through the central nervous system. We have reported that centhaquin, a centrally-acting anti-hypertensive drug produces its hypotensive effect through a mechanism of action similar to clonidine. Centhaquin has also been shown to possess significant antinociceptive activity. Centhaquin antinociception is partially blocked by yohimbine, idazoxan, and naloxone; however, the involvement of specific adrenoceptor subtypes (α2A, α2B, or α2C) in centhaquin antinociception is unknown. The present study was conducted to determine antinociceptive properties of centhaquin citrate, a water soluble salt of centhaquin, and involvement of α2A-, α2B-, or α2C-adrenoceptors in centhaquin citrate antinociception in mice. BRL-44408 (α2A-adrenoceptor antagonist), imiloxan (α2B-adrenoceptor antagonist) and JP-1302 (α2C-adrenoceptor antagonist) were used to determine the involvement of α2A-, α2B-, or α2C-adrenoceptors, respectively. Antinociceptive (tail-flick and hot-plate) latencies were determined in male Swiss-Webster mice treated with centhaquin citrate alone and in combination with BRL-44408, imiloxan, or JP-1302. Centhaquin citrate produced significant antinociception in mice (P<0.05) which was unaffected by JP-1302 (P>0.05) but blocked by BRL-44408 (tail-flick test: 49.75% decrease, P<0.05; hot-plate test: 49.12% decrease, P<0.05) and imiloxan (tail-flick test: 46.98% decrease, P<0.05; hot-plate test: 46.42% decrease, P<0.05). This is the first report demonstrating centhaquin citrate antinociception and its blockade by BRL-44408 and imiloxan. We conclude that α2A and α2B but not α2C adrenoceptors are involved in centhaquin antinociception in mice.

Involvement of α2-adrenoceptors, imidazoline, and endothelin-A receptors in the effect of agmatine on morphine and oxycodone-induced hypothermia in mice.

Potentiation of opioid analgesia by endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, and imidazoline receptor/α2-adrenoceptor agonists such as clonidine and agmatine are well known. It is also known that agmatine blocks morphine hyperthermia in rats. However, the effect of agmatine on morphine or oxycodone hypothermia in mice is unknown. The present study was carried out to study the role of α2-adrenoceptors, imidazoline, and ET(A) receptors in morphine and oxycodone hypothermia in mice. Body temperature was determined over 6 h in male Swiss Webster mice treated with morphine, oxycodone, agmatine, and combination of agmatine with morphine or oxycodone. Yohimbine, idazoxan, and BMS182874 were used to determine involvement of α2-adrenoceptors, imidazoline, and ET(A) receptors, respectively. Morphine and oxycodone produced significant hypothermia that was not affected by α2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine, imidazoline receptor/α2 adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan, or ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874. Agmatine did not produce hypothermia; however, it blocked oxycodone but not morphine-induced hypothermia. Agmatine-induced blockade of oxycodone hypothermia was inhibited by idazoxan and yohimbine. The blockade by idazoxan was more pronounced compared with yohimbine. Combined administration of BMS182874 and agmatine did not produce changes in body temperature in mice. However, when BMS182874 was administered along with agmatine and oxycodone, it blocked agmatine-induced reversal of oxycodone hypothermia. This is the first report demonstrating that agmatine does not affect morphine hypothermia in mice, but reverses oxycodone hypothermia. Imidazoline receptors and α2-adrenoceptors are involved in agmatine-induced reversal of oxycodone hypothermia. Our findings also suggest that ET(A) receptors may be involved in blockade of oxycodone hypothermia by agmatine.

Potentiation of oxycodone antinociception in mice by agmatine and BMS182874 via an imidazoline I2 receptor-mediated mechanism.

The potentiation of oxycodone antinociception by BMS182874 (endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist) and agmatine (imidazoline receptor/α(2)-adrenoceptor agonist) is well-documented. It is also known that imidazoline receptors but not α(2)-adrenoceptors are involved in potentiation of oxycodone antinociception by agmatine and BMS182874 in mice. However, the involvement of specific imidazoline receptor subtypes (I(1), I(2), or both) in this interaction is not clearly understood. The present study was conducted to determine the involvement of imidazoline I(1) and I(2) receptors in agmatine- and BMS182874-induced potentiation of oxycodone antinociception in mice. Antinociceptive (tail flick and hot-plate) latencies were determined in male Swiss Webster mice treated with oxycodone, agmatine, BMS182874, and combined administration of oxycodone with agmatine or BMS182874. Efaroxan (imidazoline I(1) receptor antagonist) and BU224 (imidazoline I(2) receptor antagonist) were used to determine the involvement of I(1) and I(2) imidazoline receptors, respectively. Oxycodone produced significant antinociceptive response in mice which was not affected by efaroxan but was blocked by BU224. Agmatine-induced potentiation of oxycodone antinociception was blocked by BU224 but not by efaroxan. Similarly, BMS182874-induced potentiation of oxycodone antinociception was blocked by BU224 but not by efaroxan. This is the first report demonstrating that BMS182874- or agmatine-induced enhancement of oxycodone antinociception is blocked by BU224 but not by efaroxan. We conclude that imidazoline I(2) receptors but not imidazoline I(1) receptors are involved in BMS182874- and agmatine-induced potentiation of oxycodone antinociception in mice.

Study of adrenergic, imidazoline, and endothelin receptors in clonidine-, morphine-, and oxycodone-induced changes in rat body temperature.

OBJECTIVES: The potentiation of morphine or oxycodone analgesia by endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonists and imidazoline/α(2)-adrenergic agonists is well documented. However, the effect of morphine or oxycodone in combination with an ET(A) receptor antagonist or an imidazoline/α(2) adrenergic agonist on body temperature is not known. The present study was carried out to study the role of ET(A) and imidazoline/α(2) adrenergic receptors in body temperature effects of morphine, oxycodone, and clonidine in rats. METHODS: Body temperature was determined in male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with morphine, oxycodone, or clonidine. Yohimbine, idazoxan, and BMS182874 were used to determine the involvement of α(2)-adrenergic, imidazoline, and ET(A) receptors, respectively. KEY FINDINGS: Morphine and oxycodone produced hyperthermia which was not affected by α(2)-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine, imidazoline/α(2)-adrenergic antagonist idazoxan, or ET(A) receptor antagonist BMS182874. Clonidine alone produced hypothermia that was comparable to the hypothermia observed with clonidine plus morphine or oxycodone. The hypothermic effect of clonidine was blocked by idazoxan and yohimbine. The blockade by idazoxan was more pronounced compared to yohimbine. Clonidine hypothermia was not affected by BMS182874. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report demonstrating that ET(A) receptors do not influence morphine- and oxycodone- induced hyperthermia or clonidine-induced hypothermia. Imidazoline receptors and α(2)-adrenergic receptors are involved in clonidine-induced hypothermia, but not in morphine- and oxycodone-induced hyperthermia.

Determination of α(2)-adrenoceptor and imidazoline receptor involvement in augmentation of morphine and oxycodone analgesia by agmatine and BMS182874.

Studies have demonstrated that clonidine (α(2)-adrenoceptor and imidazoline receptor agonist) and BMS182874 (endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist) potentiate morphine and oxycodone analgesia. Agmatine, an endogenous clonidine-like substance, enhances morphine analgesia. However, its effect on oxycodone analgesia and its interaction with endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists are not known. The present study was performed to determine the effect of agmatine on morphine and oxycodone analgesia and the involvement of α(2)-adrenoceptors, imidazoline receptors, opioid receptors, and endothelin receptors. Antinociception at various time intervals was determined by the tail-flick latency method in mice. Agmatine produced dose-dependent increase in tail-flick latency, while BMS182874 did not produce any change over the 360-min observation period. Agmatine significantly potentiated morphine as well as oxycodone analgesia which was not altered by BMS182874. BMS182874 pretreatment did not increase the analgesic effect produced by agmatine alone. Agmatine-induced potentiation of morphine and oxycodone analgesia was blocked by idazoxan (imidazoline receptor/α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist) and yohimbine (α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist). BMS182874-induced potentiation of morphine or oxycodone analgesia was not affected by yohimbine. However, idazoxan blocked BMS182874-induced potentiation of oxycodone but not morphine analgesia. This is the first report demonstrating that agmatine potentiates not only morphine but also oxycodone analgesia in mice. Potentiation of morphine and oxycodone analgesia by agmatine appears to involve α(2)-adrenoceptors, imidazoline receptors, and opioid receptors. In addition, imidazoline receptors may be involved in BMS182874-induced potentiation of oxycodone but not morphine analgesia. It is concluded that agmatine may be used as an adjuvant in opiate analgesia.

Effect of endothelin-A receptor antagonist on mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor-mediated antinociception in mice.

We have previously shown the involvement of central endothelin (ET) mechanisms in morphine analgesia and tolerance. Here we investigated the interaction of centrally administered endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, with DAMGO (micro opioid receptor agonist), SNC80 (delta opioid receptor agonist), U50,488H (kappa opioid receptor agonist), and oxycodone (micro and kappa opioid receptor agonist) towards antinociception, tolerance to antinociception and body temperature. Antinociception was determined using tail-flick latency method. BMS182874 (50microg, i.c.v.) treatment alone did not produce analgesia or change in body temperature. However, BMS182874 significantly enhanced antinociception response of DAMGO (66.75%), SNC80 (62.40%), U50,488H (55.38%), and oxycodone (61.72%). Chronic treatment with DAMGO, SNC80, U50,488H or oxycodone, induced tolerance to antinociception. Treatment with BMS182874 restored antinociceptive effect in mice that were tolerant to DAMGO, SNC80, U50,488H as well as oxycodone. Antinociceptive response of DAMGO, SNC80, U50,488H, and oxycodone in tolerant mice treated with BMS182874 was significantly higher (44.55%, 37.48%, 43.02%, and 56.08%, respectively) compared to tolerant mice treated with vehicle. Body temperature decreased with DAMGO, SNC80, U50,488H, and oxycodone; tolerance did not develop to hypothermic effect and BMS182874 did not affect DAMGO, SNC80, U50,488H, or oxycodone induced changes in body temperature. Opioid-antagonist naloxone, completely blocked antinociceptive effect of DAMGO, SNC80, U50,488H or oxycodone and potentiation of antinociception by BMS182874. It is concluded that BMS182874 potentiated antinociception and restored antinociceptive effect in mice tolerant to micro, delta and kappa selective, as well as a non-selective opioid receptor agonist. Therefore, endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists could be useful in the restoration of antinociceptive effect during tolerance to opiates.

Determination of adrenergic and imidazoline receptor involvement in augmentation of morphine and oxycodone analgesia by clonidine and BMS182874.

BACKGROUND: Numerous agents have been demonstrated to potentiate morphine analgesia, including clonidine (alpha(2)-adrenergic and I(1)-imidazoline receptor agonist) and BMS182874 (endothelin-A, ET(A,) receptor antagonist). ET has been shown to affect pharmacological actions of clonidine. The present study was conducted to determine whether alpha(2)-adrenergic and/or I(1)-imidazoline receptors are involved in the augmentation of morphine and oxycodone analgesia by clonidine and BMS182874. METHODS: Analgesic tail flick latencies were measured in rats at various time intervals, and were converted to AUC(0)-->(360 min). RESULTS: It was found that clonidine produced mild analgesia, while BMS182874 did not have any analgesic effect. Clonidine (p = 0.015) and BMS182874 (p = 0.009) enhanced the analgesic action of morphine and oxycodone. Clonidine- or BMS182874-induced increases in the analgesic effect of morphine were not inhibited by idazoxan (I(1)-imidazoline receptor antagonist), while increases in the analgesic effect of oxycodone were blocked by idazoxan. Yohimbine (alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist) blocked the clonidine-induced potentiation of analgesic effect of morphine (p = 0.036) and oxycodone (p = 0.0167), while yohimbine did not affect BMS182874-induced potentiation of the analgesic effect of morphine or oxycodone. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report showing that clonidine and BMS182874 augment oxycodone analgesia. Results suggest that alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors are involved in clonidine-induced, but not in the BMS182874-induced, potentiation of the analgesic effects of morphine or oxycodone, and that I(1)-imidazoline receptors are involved in the potentiation of oxycodone analgesia, but not morphine analgesia, by clonidine and BMS182874.

Endothelin ETA receptor blockade potentiates morphine analgesia but does not affect gastrointestinal transit in mice.

Development of analgesic tolerance and constipation remain a major clinical concern during long-term administration of morphine in pain management. Central endothelin mechanisms are involved in morphine analgesia and tolerance. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) and peripheral administration of endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, and endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL1620, on morphine analgesia and changes in gastrointestinal transit in male Swiss Webster mice. Results indicate that morphine (6 mg/kg, s.c.) produced a significant increase in tail flick latency compared to control group. Pretreatment with BMS182874 (50 microg, i.c.v.) significantly enhanced morphine-induced analgesia, while IRL1620 (30 microg, i.c.v.) pretreatment did not affect tail-flick latency values. Changes in gastrointestinal transit were measured by percent of distance traveled by charcoal in the small intestine of gastrointestinal tract. Percent distance traveled in morphine (6 mg/kg, s.c.) treated mice (48.45+/-5.65%) was significantly lower (P<0.05) compared to control group (85.07+/-1.82%). Administration of BMS182874 centrally (50 mug, i.c.v.) or peripherally (10 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect morphine-induced inhibition of gastrointestinal transit. Pretreatment with IRL1620 (30 microg, i.c.v., or 10 mg/kg, i.v.) also did not affect morphine-induced inhibition of gastrointestinal transit. This study demonstrates that endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists delivered to the CNS enhance morphine analgesia without affecting gastrointestinal transit.

Involvement of central endothelin receptors in neonatal morphine withdrawal.

The involvement of central endothelin (ET) receptors in neonatal morphine tolerance has been demonstrated. The present study investigates the role of central ET receptors in morphine withdrawal in neonatal rats. The aim was to determine whether activation of G-proteins coupled to opioid and ET receptors by morphine and various ET receptor modulators is affected during morphine withdrawal in neonatal rats. Pregnant female rats were rendered tolerant to morphine by chronic exposure to morphine pellets during 7 days. On Day 8, pellets were removed and rats were allowed to undergo withdrawal for 24 hrs. Rat pups were delivered by cesarean section. G-protein stimulation induced by morphine; ET-1; the ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874; and the ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL1620, were determined in the brain of neonatal rats undergoing morphine withdrawal by [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay. Morphine produced higher (P < 0.05) maximal stimulation of G-protein in the morphine-withdrawal group (83.60%) compared with the placebo group (66.81%). ET-1-induced G-protein stimulation was also altered, and the median effective concentration (EC50) during morphine withdrawal (170.60 nM) was significantly higher than placebo (62.5 nM; P< 0.05). The maximal stimulation induced by the ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, in the morphine-withdrawal group (86.07%; EC50 = 31.25 nM) was significantly higher than in the placebo group (EC50 > 1000 nM). The ET(B) agonist, IRL1620, induced G-protein stimulation was similar in placebo (73.43%, EC50 = 13.26 nM) and morphine-withdrawal groups (75.08%, EC(50) = 11.70 nM), respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report indicating involvement of central ET(A) receptors in neonatal morphine withdrawal.

Involvement of endothelin in morphine tolerance in neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells.

Long-term use of morphine in pain management leads to adverse effects, such as development of antinociceptive tolerance. We have previously shown the involvement of central endothelin (ET) mechanisms in morphine analgesia and development of tolerance in vivo. The present study was conducted to investigate the in vitro mechanism of interaction of the ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, and morphine during acute and chronic morphine tolerance in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to acute and chronic treatment with vehicle, morphine, ET-1, BMS182874, or morphine plus BMS182874. Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors in SH-SY5Y cells was determined using [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays. Acute morphine treatment produced a concentration-dependent increase in GTP binding. Median effective concentration (EC50) values were significantly decreased after acute morphine treament, suggesting sensitization of opioid receptors. Chronic morphine treatment produced a lower maximal response of GTP binding compared with both control (vehicle treated) and acute morphine treatment, indicating uncoupling of G-proteins. Acute and chronic exposure of cells to ET-1 did not affect changes in ET-1-induced GTP binding. BMS182874 treatment alone (acute or chronic) did not produce G-protein activation. However, in cells chronically cotreated with 10 microM morphine and 1 microM BMS182874, morphine-induced GTP stimulation was significantly higher than control (vehicle treated). The EC50 value after control treatment was 414 nM, and was significantly increased in chronically morphine-treated cells (>1000 nM ). However, the EC50 value in cells receiving a chronic treatment of BMS182874 and 63 nM morphine was significantly reduced compared with control (vehicle treated) and chronic morphine treatment. ET(A) antagonists significantly enhance the coupling of G-protein to opioid receptors. Therefore, we propose that restoration of morphine antinociception by ET(A) antagonists in morphine-tolerant animals is likely via a G-protein mediated mechanism.

Role of endothelin (ETA) receptors in neonatal morphine withdrawal.

We have previously demonstrated role of central endothelin (ET) receptors in neonatal morphine tolerance. The present study was conducted to investigate involvement of central ET receptors in neonatal rat morphine withdrawal. The aim was to determine activation of G-proteins coupled to opioid and ET receptors by morphine and ET ligands in neonatal rat brains during morphine withdrawal. Pregnant female rats were rendered tolerant to morphine by chronic exposure to morphine pellets over 7 days. Withdrawal was induced on day 8 by removal of pellets. Rat pups were delivered by cesarean section 24 h after pellet removal. G-protein stimulation induced by morphine; ET-1; ETA receptor antagonist, BMS182874; and ETB receptor agonist, IRL1620, was determined in the brain of neonatal rats undergoing morphine withdrawal by [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay. Morphine-induced maximal stimulation of G-protein in morphine withdrawal group (83.60%) was significantly higher compared to placebo control group (66.81%). EC50 value for ET-1-induced G-protein stimulation during morphine withdrawal (170.60 nM) was higher than control (62.5 nM). BMS182874, did not stimulate GTP binding in control but significantly increased maximal stimulation of G-proteins in morphine withdrawal (86.07%, EC50 = 31.25 nM). IRL1620-induced stimulation of G-proteins was similar in control and morphine withdrawal. The present findings indicate involvement of central ETA receptors in neonatal morphine withdrawal.

Morphine tolerance does not develop in mice treated with endothelin-A receptor antagonists.

Long-term use of morphine leads to development of antinociceptive tolerance. We provide evidence that central endothelin (ET) mechanisms are involved in development of morphine tolerance. In the present study, we investigated the effect of ET(A) receptor antagonists, BQ123 and BMS182874, on morphine antinociception and tolerance in mice. Mechanism of interaction of ET(A) receptor antagonists with morphine was investigated. BQ123 (3 microg, i.c.v.) and BMS182874 (50 microg, i.c.v.) significantly enhanced antinociceptive effect of morphine (P < 0.05), through an opioid-mediated effect. Treatment with a single dose of BQ123 (3 microg, i.c.v.) reversed tolerance to morphine antinociception in morphine-tolerant mice. BQ123 or BMS182874 did not affect naloxone binding in the brain. Therefore, ET(A) receptor antagonists did not bind directly to opioid receptors. [35S]GTPgammaS binding was stimulated by morphine and ET-1 in non-tolerant mice. Morphine- and ET-1-induced GTP stimulation was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in morphine-tolerant group (33% and 42%, respectively) compared to control group. BQ123 and BMS182874 did not activate binding in non-tolerant mice. BQ123 and BMS182874 significantly increased G protein activation in morphine-tolerant mice (96% and 86%, respectively; P < 0.05). These results provide evidence that uncoupling of G protein occurs in morphine-tolerant mice, and ET(A) antagonists promote coupling of G protein to its receptors, thereby restoring antinociceptive effect. These findings indicate that ET(A) receptor antagonists potentiate morphine antinociception and reverse antinociceptive tolerance in mice, through their ability to couple G proteins to opioid receptors.

Disposition of morphine in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid varies during neonatal development in pigs.

The pharmacological effects of morphine are mediated via the central nervous system (CNS) but its clearance from the CNS in neonates has not been investigated. We have proposed that neonatal development of the blood-brain barrier affected CNS clearance mechanisms and CNS exposure to morphine. Male piglets (n = 5) aged one, three and six weeks were given morphine sulfate (0.5 mg kg(-1), i.v.). Serial blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were withdrawn over 360 min after morphine administration. Morphine concentration was measured by radioimmunoassay. A three-compartment model was fitted to individual data. Estimated parameters were reported as median and range. The peak morphine concentrations in plasma were not significantly different in the one-, three- or six-week-old piglets. Plasma clearance at one week (4.5, 3.8-8.6 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) was significantly lower than at three weeks (30.0, 19.1- 39.0 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) and six weeks (37.0, 29.7-82.8 mL min(-1) kg(-1)). The peak morphine concentration in CSF at one week (59.84, 31-67 ng mL(-1)) was higher than at three weeks (18.8, 17.7-25 ng mL(-1)) and six weeks (24.51, 16.5-84 ng mL(-1)), while CSF clearance was lower at one week (1.0, 0.18-9 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) compared with three weeks (6.2, 2.3-9.3 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) and six weeks (3.95, 1.3-85.7 mL min(-1) kg(-1)). Apparent plasma:CSF transfer ratio at one week was greater than at three and six weeks. The reduced plasma and CSF morphine clearance in early infancy resulted in elevated systemic and central morphine exposure in neonatal pigs.

Central endothelin-B receptor stimulation does not affect morphine analgesia in rats.

Several neurotransmitter mechanisms have been proposed to play a role in the actions of morphine. We reported that centrally administered endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonists potentiate morphine analgesia in rats. It has also been reported that ETB agonist, IRL1620, has antinociceptive action mediated through opiate receptors in the periphery. The present study was conducted to determine if central ETB receptors are involved in analgesic actions of morphine. The effect of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ETB receptor agonist, IRL1620, on morphine-induced analgesia and hyperthermia was determined in the rat. Morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) produced a significant increase (84%) in tail-flick latency compared to the control group and the analgesic response lasted for 4 h. IRL1620 (30 microg, i.c.v.) did not produce any increase (16%) in tail-flick latency over the 5-hour observation period in vehicle-treated rats. Pretreatment with IRL1620 (3, 10, and 30 microg, i.c.v.) did not have any significant effect on the intensity and duration of morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced analgesia. Morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) administration produced an increase in body temperature compared to the control group. In vehicle-pretreated rats, IRL1620 (30 microg, i.c.v.) did not produce any change in body temperature. The morphine-induced hyperthermic effect was not altered in IRL1620-pretreated rats. These studies demonstrate that IRL1620, a specific ETB receptor agonist, did not affect the morphine-induced analgesic and hyperthermic effect in rats. It can be concluded that central ETB receptors are not involved in modulation of pharmacological actions of morphine.

Evidence that morphine tolerance may be regulated by endothelin in the neonatal rat.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are widely used in the neonatal intensive care units for analgesia and sedation. Management of tolerance and withdrawal symptoms in neonates remains a major challenge. OBJECTIVES: The present study investigates the involvement of a central endothelin (ET) mechanism in the development of tolerance to morphine in neonatal rats. METHODS: Pregnant female rats were rendered tolerant to morphine and rat pups were delivered at term by cesarean section. The affinity (Kd) and density (Bmax) of ET receptors was determined by [125I]ET-1 binding in the brains of neonatal rats. Changes in G-protein stimulation were determined in placebo and morphine-tolerant neonatal rats by [35S]-guanosine-5'-o-(3-thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS)-binding assay. RESULTS: Morphine tolerance did not affect the characteristics (affinity and density) of the ET receptors in the neonatal rat brains. Morphine as well as ET-1 produced significantly lower (p < 0.05) maximal stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding in morphine-tolerant neonatal rats compared to the placebo group. The ETA receptor antagonist, BMS182874, produced significantly higher stimulation of G proteins in the morphine-tolerant compared to the placebo group. The ETB receptor agonist, IRL1620, produced a similar effect in both placebo and morphine-tolerant rats. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report indicating the involvement of the G-protein-coupled ETA receptor in neonatal morphine tolerance.

Endothelin ETA receptor antagonist did not affect development of tolerance to glyceryl trinitrate in rat.

Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), extensively used for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, is associated with rapid development of tolerance. The exact mechanism responsible for tolerance development to GTN is still not known. Recently, it has been demonstrated that GTN tolerance is associated with increased expression of endothelin (ET). This study was carried out to determine the effect of ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, on the development of tolerance to GTN in urethane-anaesthetized rats. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously recorded in vehicle- and BMS182874 (3 mg kg(-1), i.v.)-treated rats. GTN was infused at the rate of 10 microg min(-1), intravenously for 4 h. Tolerance to GTN was determined using challenge doses of GTN (10, 30 and 90 microg, i.v.). GTN produced a fall in DBP, SBP and an increase in HR. In vehicle-treated rats, the fall in SBP before induction of GTN tolerance was 28 +/- 2, 43 +/- 4 and 52 +/- 4 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. However, following GTN infusion (10 microg min(-1), i.v. for 4 h) a rapid development of tolerance was observed and the fall in SBP was 1 +/- 1, 9 +/- 4 and 15 +/- 4 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. Similarly, in BMS182874-treated rats the fall in SBP in non-tolerant rats was 28 +/- 4, 42 +/- 4 and 48 +/- 5 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. In BMS182874-treated rats following GTN infusion (10 microg min(-1), i.v. for 4 h) a rapid development of tolerance was observed and the fall in SBP was 4 +/- 3, 10 +/- 2 and 13 +/- 4 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. The decrease in DBP and SBP in vehicle- and BMS182874-treated GTN-tolerant rats was statistically similar. These results suggest that ET(A) receptor antagonist BMS182874 did not affect development of tolerance to GTN in rats.