The paucity of morality in everyday talk.

Given its centrality in scholarly and popular discourse, morality should be expected to figure prominently in everyday talk. We test this expectation by examining the frequency of moral content in three contexts, using three methods: (a) Participants' subjective frequency estimates (N = 581); (b) Human content analysis of unobtrusively recorded in-person interactions (N = 542 participants; n = 50,961 observations); and (c) Computational content analysis of Facebook posts (N = 3822 participants; n = 111,886 observations). In their self-reports, participants estimated that 21.5% of their interactions touched on morality (Study 1), but objectively, only 4.7% of recorded conversational samples (Study 2) and 2.2% of Facebook posts (Study 3) contained moral content. Collectively, these findings suggest that morality may be far less prominent in everyday life than scholarly and popular discourse, and laypeople, presume.

Eating and wheel running across the estrous cycle in rat lines selectively bred on a taste phenotype.

The Occidental Low- and High-Saccharin-Consuming rats (respectively, LoS and HiS) have been selectively bred for decades to study the relationship between taste and behaviors in and beyond the ingestive domain. Whether the saccharin phenotype is associated with behavioral periodicities tied to reproductive status is not known. Here we describe for the first time variation across the estrous cycle in chow intake and wheel running by LoS and HiS rats. This study also shed light on why rats, humans, and some other mammals eat less and become more active as fertility increases. Wheel running increases when eating is reduced through restricted chow access, more so in LoS rats than in HiS rats (Dess et al., 2000). If the decrease in food intake from diestrus through estrus causes the increase in running (Eat Less â†’ Run More hypothesis, ELRM), then the running peak should follow the eating nadir and be greater in LoS rats. Bayesian cyclic regression showed that estrous cycles were shorter in LoS rats than in HiS rats; implications are discussed. Contrary to ELRM, the running peak did not follow the eating nadir, and cycle amplitude did not distinguish LoS rats from HiS rats. These results indirectly support the No Time To Eat hypothesis (Fessler, 2003), according to which the periovulatory eating nadir and running peak reflect fitness-enhancing consequences of shifts away from eating and toward mating as fertility increases.