Immune checkpoint inhibitors as subsequent treatment in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastases.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the mainstay treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is a lack of studies assessing ICIs as subsequent treatment in older adults with NSCLC and brain metastasis (BM). This retrospective cohort study compared the real-world survival of older patients with NSCLC and BM at diagnosis [synchronous BM (SBM)] previously treated with chemotherapy receiving ICI versus chemotherapy as subsequent treatment. Methods: Patients with NSCLC and SBM ≥65 years previously treated with chemotherapy were identified using the SEER-Medicare database (2010-2019). Patients receiving new chemotherapy and/or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ICIs as second/third-line treatment were included, excluding those ever-receiving targeted therapies. Each ICI patient was matched to one chemotherapy patient by time to subsequent treatment (within ±30 days) from diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) time was measured from the start of subsequent treatment to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare Part A/B, enrollment in Part C, or end of study (December 31, 2019), whichever came first. OS curves were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Matched cohorts included 546 patients [273 in each group; median age 71 (range, 65-87) years]. ICI patients were older, more likely non-Hispanic, with squamous cell carcinoma, and liver metastasis compared to chemotherapy. KM estimated better survival in ICI than chemotherapy {median survival: 209 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 160-275] vs. 155 days (95% CI: 135-187); log-rank P<0.001}. ICI was associated with a lower adjusted hazard of death [HR =0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.75; P<0.001] compared to subsequent chemotherapy treatment. Conclusions: In this population-based study of older patients with NSCLC and SBM previously treated with chemotherapy, subsequent treatment with ICI was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy.

Stem Cell Origin of Cancer: Clinical Implications beyond Immunotherapy for Drug versus Therapy Development in Cancer Care.

Although immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer care, there is still an urgent need to enhance its efficacy and ensure its safety. A correct cancer theory and proper scientific method empower pertinent cancer research and enable effective and efficient drug versus therapy development for patient care. In this perspective, we revisit the concept of immune privilege in a cancer cell versus normal cell, as well as in a cancer stem cell versus normal stem cell. We re-examine whether effective immunotherapies are efficacious due to their anti-cancer and/or immune modulatory mechanisms. We reassess why checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are not equal. We reconsider whether one can attribute the utility of immunotherapy to specific cancer subtypes and its futility to certain tumor/immune compartments, components, and microenvironments. We propose ways and means to advance immunotherapy beyond CPIs by combining anti-PD1/L1 with various other treatment modalities according to an appropriate scientific theory, e.g., stem cell origin of cancer, and based on available clinical evidence, e.g., randomized clinical trials. We predict that a stem cell theory of cancer will facilitate the design of better and safer immunotherapy with improved selection of its use for the right patient with the right cancer type at the right time to optimize clinical benefits and minimize potential toxic effects and complications.