Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(4): 102469, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369207

RESUMO

First-degree atrioventricular block (1-AVB), characterized by a PR interval exceeding 200 milliseconds, has traditionally been perceived as a benign cardiac condition. Recently, this perception has been challenged by investigations that indicate a potential association between PR prolongation and an elevated risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). To consolidate these findings, we performed a comprehensive review to assess the available evidence indicating a relationship between these two conditions. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases as well as manually searched references of retrieved articles. We selected 18 cohort studies/meta-analyses involving general and special populations. Consistent findings across expansive cohort studies reveal that incremental increases in the PR interval may serve as an independent risk factor for AF. However, our analyses underscore the need for further research into the association between 1-AVB, defined by a specified PR interval cutoff, and the risk of AF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Cardiopatias , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
Cureus ; 15(5): e39529, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378178

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection caused by the SARS-Cov-2 virus may result in severe acute respiratory failure and require respiratory support in the ICU. OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to evaluate the role of the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index in the assessment of the adequacy of non-invasive respiratory support the COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure and observe its outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted between October 2020 and September 2021 in the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care Medicine of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 44 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure were enrolled in this study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed written consent was taken from the patient/patient's guardian. Each patient underwent detailed history taking through physical examination and relevant investigations. All necessary information were recorded in a separate case record form. All the patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) were assessed at two hours, six hours, and 12 hours for variables of the ROX Index. The team of respective physicians was applied responsibly for determining HFNC failure to discontinue or deescalate respiratory support as a part of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation success. Each selected patient was observed for the duration of different types of respiratory support. CPAP failure or success, progression to mechanical ventilation, and data were collected from individual medical records. The patients who were successfully weaned from CPAP were recorded. The diagnostic accuracy of the ROX index was determined. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65±8.80 years with a majority in the age group 61-70 years (36.4%). A male predominance was observed with 79.5% male and 20.5% female. Of all, HFNC failure was observed in 29.5% of patients. Oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and ROX index were statistically worse at the sixth and 12th hour of initiation of HFNC (P<0.05). At a cut-off value of 3.90, the ROC curve showed 90.3% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity in predicting HFNC success (the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.909). Similarly, 46.2% of patients had CPAP failure. SpO2, RR, and ROX index were found statistically worse among those patients at the sixth and 12th hour of CPAP therapy (P<0.05). The ROC curve showed 85.7% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity at a cut-off value of 2.64 in predicting CPAP success (the AUC was 0.881). CONCLUSION: The ROX index's clinical score form, which does not require lab findings or sophisticated computation techniques, is its key benefit. The study findings recommend the use of the ROX index to predict the outcome of respiratory support in acute respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA