Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 52(4): 825-33, 833.e1-2, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20678878

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is superior to ASA alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to determine whether clopidogrel plus ASA conferred benefit on limb outcomes over ASA alone in patients undergoing below-knee bypass grafting. METHODS: Patients undergoing unilateral, below-knee bypass graft for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were enrolled 2 to 4 days after surgery and were randomly assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus ASA 75 to 100 mg/day or placebo plus ASA 75 to 100 mg/day for 6 to 24 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of index-graft occlusion or revascularization, above-ankle amputation of the affected limb, or death. The primary safety endpoint was severe bleeding (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue plasminogen activator for Occluded coronary arteries [GUSTO] classification). RESULTS: In the overall population, the primary endpoint occurred in 149 of 425 patients in the clopidogrel group vs 151 of 426 patients in the placebo (plus ASA) group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.23). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, the primary endpoint was significantly reduced by clopidogrel in prosthetic graft patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.95; P = .025) but not in venous graft patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.94-1.67, not significant [NS]). A significant statistical interaction between treatment effect and graft type was observed (P(interaction) = .008). Although total bleeds were more frequent with clopidogrel, there was no significant difference between the rates of severe bleeding in the clopidogrel and placebo (plus ASA) groups (2.1% vs 1.2%). CONCLUSION: The combination of clopidogrel plus ASA did not improve limb or systemic outcomes in the overall population of PAD patients requiring below-knee bypass grafting. Subgroup analysis suggests that clopidogrel plus ASA confers benefit in patients receiving prosthetic grafts without significantly increasing major bleeding risk.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/cirurgia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Veias/transplante , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Clopidogrel , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/fisiopatologia , Efeito Placebo , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Ticlopidina/efeitos adversos , Ticlopidina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA