Remote transmission monitoring for postoperative perineural analgesia after major orthopedic surgery: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: After surgery, patients reported the delay in receiving help as the primary factor for poorly controlled pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of patient management through two communication modalities: remote transmission (RT) versus bedside control (BC). We hypothesized that using remote technology for pump programming may provide the best postoperative infusion regimen for the patient's self-assessment of pain and adverse events. DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial. SETTING: Anesthesiology department and orthopedic surgery ward at three university hospitals. PATIENTS: Eighty patients undergoing orthopedic surgery with postoperative perineural patient-controlled analgesia were included. INTERVENTIONS: Two groups (n = 40 for each group) were formed by randomization. In the postoperative period, perineural analgesia was followed up via an RT system or BC for 72 h. MEASUREMENTS: A nurse assessed daily pain, sensory and motor blocks and adverse events. Patients completed a questionnaire three times a day and alerted for any problem according to the group (RT system or nurses' follow-up). On the third postoperative day, the nurse removed the catheter, completed the final assessment, and collected the historical data from the pump. A physician's shorter response time to change the patient control analgesia (PCA) program was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 71 were analyzed (34 were randomized to the RT group and 37 to the BC group). Fifty-eight pump setting changes were noted. Analysis of repeated evaluations shows that mean time (SD) to change the PCA pump settings was significantly lower in the RT group (20 min (22.3 min)) than in the BC group (55.9 min (71.1 min)); mean difference [95% CI], -35.9 min [-74.3 to 2.4]); ß estimation [95% CI], -34 [-63 to -6], p = 0.011). Pain relief, sensory and motor blocks did not differ between the groups: ß estimation [95% CI], 0.1 [-0.4 to 0.6], p = 0.753; 0.5 [-0.4 to 1.4], p = 0.255; 0.9 [-0.04 to 1.8], p = 0.687, respectively. ß = -34 [-63 to -6], p = 0.011). The consumption of ropivacaine, nurse workload and the cost of the analgesia regimen decreased in the RT group. No differences were noted in satisfaction scores or complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: The response time for the physician to change the PCA program when necessary was shorter for patients using RT and alerts to the physician were more frequent compared with spot checks by nurses. RT helps to decrease nurses' workload, ropivacaine consumption, and costs but did not affect postoperative pain relief, complication rate, or patient-reported satisfaction score. IRB CONTACT INFORMATION: Comité de Protection des Personnes, Sud Méditerranée III, Montpellier-Nîmes, France, registration number EudraCT A01698-35. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02018068 PROTOCOL: The full trial protocol can be accessed at Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical Research and Statistics Unit, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Avenue Doten G Giraud, Montpellier, France. s-bringuierbranchereau@chu-montpellier.fr.

Impact of multiple nerves blocks anaesthesia on intraoperative hypotension and mortality in hip fracture surgery intermediate-risk elderly patients: A propensity score-matched comparison with spinal and general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: A Hip fracture in the intermediate-risk elderly patient is common and associated with a high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal anaesthetic technique but there is a clear association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the haemodynamic stability of three anaesthesia techniques: general anaesthesia (GA), continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA), and multiple nerve blocks (MNB). METHODS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension defined by a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hypotension under 50 mmHg of MAP, time spent below MAP 50 mmHg, use of vasopressors, in-hospital and 30-day mortality. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. RESULTS: After screening and application of the exclusion criteria, 593 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery between the 1st of January 2015 and the 31st of December 2016 were included. The propensity score match analysis selected 43 patients in each group. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in the GA group than in the MNB and CSA groups: 39 (90%), 22 (51%), and 23 (53.5%), respectively; p < 0.0001. The incidence of MAP < 50 mmHg (59.5%, 23.3%, and 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and the use of vasopressors (93%, 39.5%, and 25.6%; p < 0.0001) were increased significantly in the GA group. With the GA group as a reference, odds ratios were reported in the MNB group at 0.08 [0.022-0.30] (p = 0.0002) for hypotension episodes; 0.17 [0.04-0.66] (p = 0.01) for hypotension < 50 mmHg for more than 3 min and 0.049 [0.013-0.018] (p < 0.0001) for use of vasopressors. The duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications, in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: CSA and MNB provide better haemodynamic stability than GA. However, whatever the anaesthesia technique used, the mortality rates do not change even if MNB leads to less hypotension. IRB contact information: CERAR IRB 00010254-2016-118. Clinical Trial Number: ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT03356704.

An uncommon cause of nerve stimulator's malfunction during a dual guidance lumbar plexus block: A technical brief report and an algorithm for prevention of complications.

Posterior Lumbar plexus block (PLPB) combined with an ipsilateral sacral plexus block is a valuable anaesthetic technique in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. PLPB is performed through the acoustic window of the lumbar ultrasound trident and the position of the needle tip, before injection of LA, was confirmed by observing quadriceps femoris muscle contraction to peripheral nerve stimulation (i.e., dual guidance). We report an uncommon cause of nerve stimulator malfunction that might impair block performance and promote complications. We add an algorithm to limit the risk of complications.

Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain management is important for ensuring early mobilization after hip arthroplasty; however, the optimal components remain controversial. Recently, the quadratus lumborum block has been proposed as an analgesic option. The current study tested the hypothesis that the posterior quadratus lumborum block combined with multimodal analgesia decreases morphine consumption after hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Before general anesthesia, 100 participating patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty were randomly allocated to receive a 30-ml injection posterior to the quadratus lumborum muscle with either 0.33% ropivacaine (n = 50) or normal saline (n = 50). For all patients, multimodal analgesia included systematic administration of acetaminophen, ketoprofen, and a morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was total intravenous morphine consumption in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes recorded intraoperative sufentanil consumption; morphine consumption in the postanesthesia care unit; pain scores at extubation and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h; motor blockade; time to first standing and ambulation; hospital length of stay; and adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the 24-h total morphine consumption (ropivacaine group, median [interquartile range], 13 [7 to 21] versus saline group, 16 [9 to 21] mg; median difference, -1.5; 95% CI, -5 to 2; P = 0.337). Pain scores were not different between the groups (ß = -0.4; 95% CI, -0.9 to 0.2; P = 0.199). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in intraoperative sufentanil consumption, morphine consumption in the postanesthesia care unit, motor blockade, times to first standing (median difference, 0.83 h; 95% CI, -1.7 to 3.4; P = 0.690) and ambulation (median difference, -1.85 h; 95% CI, -4.5 to 0.8; P = 0.173), hospital length of stay, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: After elective hip arthroplasty, neither morphine consumption nor pain scores were reduced by the addition of a posterior quadratus lumborum block to a multimodal analgesia regimen.

Preoperative erythropoietin within a patient blood management program decreases both blood transfusion and postoperative anemia: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: In orthopedic surgery, a patient blood management program (PBM) has been proposed to reduce blood transfusion. The aim of this observational study was to assess, within a PBM, the specific efficacy of preoperative erythropoietin (EPO). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a single hospital, 723 patients undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty were prospectively studied. The PBM included EPO if preoperative hemoglobin was lower than 13 g/dL, intraoperative administration of tranexamic acid, use of recommended transfusion thresholds, and postoperative infusion of iron. Blood transfusion and hemoglobin were noted until discharge. Major thromboembolic or cardiovascular events were assessed during admission and 1 month after discharge. RESULTS: Transfusion was noted in 2.5% patients with EPO. Transfusion rate was higher in patient for whom EPO was not indicated (13.6% transfusion rate; odds ratio [OR], 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-66; p = 10-3 ) or if erythropoietin was indicated but not administrated (36.8% transfusion rate; OR, 18.2; 95% CI, 3.9-84.5; p < 10-3 ). Hemoglobin was significantly higher during the postoperative period in patients with erythropoietin. At hospital discharge, 57% of patients were anemic if EPO was used compared to 88% when EPO was not indicated and 87% when EPO was indicated but not administered (p < 10-6 ). There were no significant differences in the odds of major complications between patients with or without EPO. CONCLUSIONS: Within a PBM, preoperative treatment of anemia with EPO decreased both the rate of blood transfusion and postoperative anemia. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Preoperative Epoetin-α with Intravenous or Oral Iron for Major Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Preoperative administration of epoetin-α with iron is commonly used in anemic patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, but the optimal route of iron intake is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effects of erythropoietin in combination with oral or intravenous iron supplementation. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel arm trial. Patients scheduled for elective hip or knee arthroplasty with hemoglobin 10 to 13 g/dl received preoperative injections of erythropoietin with oral ferrous sulfate or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. The primary endpoint was the hemoglobin value the day before surgery. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the analysis. The day before surgery, hemoglobin, increase in hemoglobin, and serum ferritin level were higher in the intravenous group. For the intravenous and oral groups, respectively, hemoglobin was as follows: median, 14.9 g/dl (interquartile range, 14.1 to 15.6) versus 13.9 g/dl (interquartile range, 13.2 to 15.1), group difference, 0.65 g/dl (95% CI, 0.1 to 1.2; P = 0.017); increase in hemoglobin: 2.6 g/dl (interquartile range, 2.1 to 3.2) versus 1.9 g/dl (interquartile range, 1.4 to 2.5), group difference, 0.7 g/dl (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.1; P < 0.001); serum ferritin: 325 µg/l (interquartile range, 217 to 476) versus 64.5 µg/l (interquartile range, 44 to 107), group difference, 257 µg/l (95% CI, 199 to 315; P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with nausea, diarrhea, or constipation was higher in the oral group, 52% versus 2%; group difference, 50% (95% CI, 35 to 64%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: After preoperative administration of erythropoietin, body iron stores and stimulation of the erythropoiesis were greater with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose than with oral ferrous sulfate supplementation.

Effects of pressure support ventilation mode on emergence time and intra-operative ventilatory function: a randomized controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: We tested the hypothesis that pressure-support ventilation (PSV) allows a reduction in emergence time and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) removal time after general anesthesia compared to volume-controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV). Because spontaneous breathing (SB) is often used with LMA under general anesthesia, patients were allocated randomly to three groups (CMV, SB and PSV). Thirty-six consecutive ASA I-II patients scheduled for knee arthroscopic surgery under general anesthesia with a LMA and breathing throughout the ventilator circuit were included. Hemodynamic and ventilatory variables were recorded before and 10-min after general anesthesia-induction, at the surgical incision, at the end of anaesthetic drugs infusion and when the patient was totally awake (which defines emergence time). LMA removal time, drug consumption were recorded at the end of the surgical procedure. Leak fraction around the LMA was also evaluated. LMA removal time was significantly higher in the CMV-group (18 ± 6 min) compared to both SB (8 ± 4 min) and PSV (7 ± 4 min, P < 0.05) groups as well as for emergence time: CMV-group (32 ± 12 min), SB (17 ± 7 min) and PSV (13 ± 6 min, P < 0.05) groups. Total propofol consumption was significantly lower in the PSV-group (610 ± 180 mg) than in both CMV (852 ± 330 mg) and SB (734 ± 246 mg, P < 0.05) groups. Air leaks around the LMA was significantly higher in the CMV-group than in the SB and PSV groups (16% vs 3% and 7%, all P<0.05). In conclusion, in knee arthroscopic surgery, in comparison to CMV, PSV use during general anesthesia in unparalyzed patients decreases LMA removal time, propofol consumption and leaks around LMA while improving ventilatory variables without adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN17382426.

Where should the tip of the needle be located in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Data now exist describing the appropriate positioning of the needle tip and pattern of local anaesthetic spread after injection. The recent literature has been analysed in search of studies on the optimal procedure for common approaches centred on block efficacy, performance time, and safety. RECENT FINDINGS: Large peripheral nerves are surrounded by a gliding layer, the adventitia or paraneurium. Ultrasonically, a circumneural spread corresponds to adventitial extraneural injection. Nerve expansion with fascicular separation matches intraneural injection. Deliberate intraneural injection remains controversial, and is not advisable at the present time. For popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, positioning the needle in the common nerve sheath between the tibial and peroneal components and obtaining a circumneural spread surrounding both divisions predict rapid surgical anaesthesia. Using axillary and infraclavicular approaches, ultrasound-guided perivascular injection aiming at circumferential spread around the artery appears a valuable alternative to individual targeted nerve injections. For single injection interscalene block, an injection into the fascial sheath but far from the plexus proved to be as effective as an injection adjacent to the nerve structures. Fascial plane approaches are appealing alternatives for thin nerves that run between muscles and cannot be regularly visualized with the current resolution of ultrasound systems. SUMMARY: The ultrasound appearance of nerves and target injections are better understood. The specific distributions of local anaesthetic spread that predict success are significantly different from one anatomical site to another. It seems advisable to avoid intraneural injection.

Hemodynamic profile of target-controlled spinal anesthesia compared with 2 target-controlled general anesthesia techniques in elderly patients with cardiac comorbidities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of anesthesia techniques in patients experiencing hip fracture is controversial. This study compares the effects on blood pressure of 3 anesthesia techniques that are considered safe for the elderly. METHODS: Forty-five patients older than 75 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III or IV, with cardiac comorbidities, and undergoing surgery for hip fracture, were randomized to receive continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA), propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI), or sevoflurane (SEVO). In CSA patients, a T10 metameric level target was achieved by titration of 2.5 mg of bupivacaine boluses. In patients on TCI and SEVO, a bispectral value target of around 50 guided the concentration of propofol or sevoflurane. Analgesia in the TCI and SEVO groups was provided with remifentanil. Hypotension was defined as a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure and was treated with an intravenous bolus of ephedrine. RESULTS: The number of hypotension episodes was lower in the CSA group: 0 (range, 0-6) versus 11.5 (range, 1-25) in the TCI group and 10 (range, 1-23) in the SEVO group (P < 0.001). Both TCI and SEVO patients needed more ephedrine compared with CSA patients (30.5 [15.5], 26 [23], and 1.5 [2.5] mg, respectively, P < 0.001). The maximal decrease in mean arterial pressure was lower in the CSA group (26% [17%]) compared with that in the TCI group (47% [8%]) and the SEVO group (46% [12%]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients, spinal anesthesia using titrated doses of bupivacaine provided better blood pressure stability than propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.

The ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for anterior iliac crest bone graft postoperative pain relief: a prospective descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Acute postoperative pain and nerve injuries frequently lead to neuropathic chronic pain after anterior iliac crest (AIC) bone graft. This prospective study evaluated postoperative pain relief after preoperative ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for orthopedic surgery with an AIC bone harvest and the prevalence of pain chronicization at 18 months after surgery. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery with an AIC harvest for autologous bone graft were studied. Preoperative TAP blocks were performed under in-plane needle ultrasound guidance, anterior to the midaxillary line (15 mL ropivacaine 0.33%). The extent of sensory blockade was evaluated at 20 mins with cold and light-touch tests. Pain at the iliac crest graft site was assessed at rest by visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the postanesthetic care unit, and at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hrs after surgery. Time for first request of morphine and total morphine consumption were recorded. Eighteen months after surgery, each patient was interviewed by phone about the importance and localization of pain chronicization. RESULTS: Median VAS score was 0 (range, 0-7) at all periods of assessment. At 20 mins, 62.5% of the patients reported complete anesthesia, and 34% hypoesthesia. The sensory blockade extent ranged from T9 (T7-T11) to L1 (T11-L2) in median (range) values. At 18 months, 80% of patients did not complain about pain or discomfort at the iliac crest site; 20% reported pain chronicization at the iliac crest site (VAS scores 2-4). Five patients (26%) complained about numbness at the iliac crest area. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided TAP block is an appropriate technique for postoperative analgesia after AIC bone harvest in orthopedic surgery.

Ultrasound-guided evaluation of the local anesthetic spread parameters required for a rapid surgical popliteal sciatic nerve block.

BACKGROUND: The ideal spread of local anesthetic (LA) solution around the sciatic nerve during a popliteal block remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that a circumferential spread of LA and/or intraneural injection could lead to rapid surgical block. METHODS: Patients (n = 100) scheduled for foot or ankle surgery underwent popliteal sciatic nerve block using nerve stimulation according to Borgeat's technique and injection of ropivacaine (0.5 mL/kg). Sensory and motor blockades were assessed on the tibial nerve (TN) and common peroneal nerve (CPN) at 5, 15, and 30 mins after completion of the block and in the recovery room. A successful block was defined as a complete sensory block in TN and CPN. Changes in cross-sectional and longitudinal surfaces and diameters and the characteristics of LA spread around the nerve were noted using ultrasound. A suspected intraneural injection was defined as a 15% increase in the surface area or anteroposterior diameter of the nerve. Patients were followed up on days 1 and 7 after surgery. RESULTS: Successful block was noted in 57% of patients at 30 mins and in 88% of patients in the recovery room. A circumferential spread of LA occurred in 47% of patients and 53% had noncircumferential spread. Complete sensory block was significantly higher in the group that had a circumferential spread (73% vs 43%, P = 0.035) only at 30 mins. In the postoperative care unit, there was no difference among the groups. Separated circumferential spreads around TN and CPN were noted in 12% of patients. All of these patients had a complete sensory and motor blockade at 15 mins. Concerning intraneural injection, only the change in the anteroposterior diameter on a 6-cm length of nerve was associated with a higher success and faster onset block at 5 (P = 0.008), 15 (P = 0.02), and 30 (P = 0.05) mins. There were no clinically detectable nerve injuries at follow-up. CONCLUSION: For popliteal sciatic nerve block, circumferential spread of LA, and separation of the nerve into its 2 components are associated with rapid surgical block.

Estimation and pharmacodynamic consequences of the minimum effective anesthetic volumes for median and ulnar nerve blocks: a randomized, double-blind, controlled comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance.

BACKGROUND: Nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance are the most popular techniques for peripheral nerve blocks. However, the minimum effective anesthetic volume (MEAV) in selected nerves for both techniques and the consequences of decreasing the local anesthetic volume on the pharmacodynamic characteristics of nerve block remain unstudied. We designed a randomized, double-blind controlled comparison between neurostimulation and ultrasound guidance to estimate the MEAV of 1.5% mepivacaine and pharmacodynamics in median and ulnar nerve blocks. METHODS: Patients scheduled for carpal tunnel release were randomized to ultrasound guidance (UG) or neurostimulation (NS) groups. A step-up/step-down study model (Dixon method) was used to determine the MEAV with nonprobability sequential dosing based on the outcome of the previous patient. The starting dose of 1.5% mepivacaine was 13 and 11 mL for median and ulnar nerves at the humeral canal. Block success/failure resulted in a decrease/increase of 2 mL. A blinded physician assessed sensory blockade at 2-minute intervals for 20 minutes. Block onset time and duration were noted. RESULTS: The MEAV50 (SD) of the median nerve was lower in the UG group 2 (0.1) mL (95% confidence interval [CI] = [1, 96] to [2, 04]) than in the NS group 4 (3.8) mL (95% CI = [2, 4] to [5, 6]) (P = 0.017). There was no difference for the ulnar nerve between UG group 2 (0.1) mL (95% CI = [1, 96] to [2, 04]) and NS group 2.4 (0.6) mL (95% CI = [2, 1] to [2, 7]). The duration of sensory blockade was significantly correlated to local anesthetic volume, but onset time was not modified. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance selectively provided a 50% reduction in the MEAV of mepivacaine 1.5% for median nerve sensory blockade in comparison with neurostimulation. Decreasing the local anesthetic volume can decrease sensory block duration but not onset time.

Effect of patient-controlled perineural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery: a multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of continuous perineural and patient-controlled ropivacaine infusion at home after orthopedic surgery was compared with patient-controlled intravenous morphine for functional recovery and postoperative analgesia in a multicenter randomized trial. METHODS: Eighty-three patients scheduled to undergo acromioplasty or hallux valgus surgery received an interscalene (n = 40) or popliteal (n = 43) peripheral nerve block with 30 ml ropivacaine, 0.5%. After randomization, patients were discharged home 24 h after surgery with a disposable infusion pump delivering either patient-controlled intravenous morphine (n = 23) or perineural 0.2% ropivacaine infusion, either continuous infusion without bolus (n = 30) or basal infusion plus bolus (n = 30). The patients recorded pain scores on movement and/or walking and were directed to take paracetamol and rescue analgesics if necessary. The time necessary to be able to walk for 10 min; daily activities on days 1, 2, and 3; adverse events; and overall satisfaction scores were noted and graded by the patient. RESULTS: Basal-bolus ropivacaine decreased the time to 10 minutes' walk, optimized daily activities (P < 0.01), and decreased the amount of ropivacaine used. The morphine group had greater pain scores and consumption of morphine and ketoprofen compared with both ropivacaine groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea/vomiting, sleep disturbance, and dizziness increased, and the patient satisfaction score decreased in the morphine group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After ambulatory orthopedic surgery, 0.2% ropivacaine delivered as a perineural infusion using a disposable elastomeric pump with patient-controlled anesthesia bolus doses optimizes functional recovery and pain relief while decreasing the consumption of rescue analgesics and ropivacaine, and the number of adverse events.

Percutaneous electrode guidance using the insulated needle for prelocation of peripheral nerves during axillary plexus blocks.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Short reports have noted that percutaneous prelocation is helpful in determining the anatomic course of a peripheral nerve, and, thereby, may serve as a guide for block needle insertion. We prospectively studied percutaneous electrode guidance to assist axillary brachial plexus blocks. METHODS: In 131 consecutive patients, the tip of an insulated needle emitting 5 mA was placed on the skin above and below the axillary artery to obtain a hand motor response characteristic of the median, ulnar, and radial nerves in succession. The current was reduced until all movement had ceased. The needle was then inserted toward the nerve to be blocked, decreasing the intensity from 2 mA to 0.5 mA, so that the same selected motor response was still obtained. The length of the needle inserted was noted, and 1.5% lidocaine was injected. Pain verbal analogic score (VAS) values were noted during both procedures. Complete sensory blockade was evaluated at 30 min. RESULTS: Rates of successful percutaneous electrode guidance were 94.6% for the median nerve, 89.4% for the radial nerve, 88.5% for the ulnar nerve, and 85.5% for all 3 nerves together. A significant correlation was found between the lowest percutaneous current applied and the depth of the nerve stimulated at 0.5 mA. Pain VAS values were significantly lower during percutaneous stimulation than during needle insertion (P <.05). Sensory block for all 3 nerves was noted in 92% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous electrode guidance using the insulated needle enabled clinicians to locate the terminal branches of the plexus in the axilla and appreciate their depth. This method could, therefore, minimize patient discomfort and perhaps the risk of nerve trauma.

Postoperative analgesia after total-hip arthroplasty: Comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and single injection of femoral nerve or psoas compartment block. a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the analgesic effects and quality of rehabilitation of three analgesic techniques after total-hip arthroplasty in a double-blind, randomized trial. METHODS: Forty-five patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups, patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (PCA), femoral nerve block (FNB), or psoas compartment block (PCB). At the end of the procedure performed under general anesthesia, nerve blocks using 2 mg/kg of 0.375% bupivacaine and 2 microg/kg of clonidine were performed in the FNB (n = 16) and PCB (n = 15) groups. In the recovery room, all 3 groups received initial intravenous morphine titration if their pain score was higher than 30 on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and then a PCA device was initiated. Morphine consumption was the primary end point to assess postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: After extubation (H0), morphine titration was higher in the PCA group (P <.05). During the first 4 postoperative hours (H0 to H4), morphine consumption per hour and VAS pain score were lower in the PCB group (P <.05). After H4, there was no difference in morphine consumption and VAS among groups, either at rest or during mobilization. After H4, morphine consumption remained lower than 0.5 mg/h, and VAS remained lower than 30 mm in the 3 groups. In 4 patients of the PCB group, an epidural diffusion was noted. Hip mobility and length of stay in the rehabilitation center were not different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCA is an efficient and safe analgesia technique. FNB and PCB should not be used routinely after total-hip arthroplasty.

Comparison of continuous 3-in-1 and fascia Iliaca compartment blocks for postoperative analgesia: feasibility, catheter migration, distribution of sensory block, and analgesic efficacy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Efficacy and technical aspects of continuous 3-in-1 and fascia iliaca compartment blocks were compared. METHODS: Forty-four patients scheduled for cruciate ligament repair or femur surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups. After surgery with the patient anesthetized, catheters were placed for continuous 3-in-1 blocks by means of a nerve stimulator (group 1). In group 2, the catheter was inserted for continuous fascia iliaca compartment block without the use of a nerve stimulator. In both groups, a 5-mg/kg bolus of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered followed by continuous infusion of 0.1 mL/kg/h of 0.2% ropivacaine for 48 hours. In the postoperative period, all the patients received parenteral propacetamol (6 g daily) and ketoprofen (200 mg daily) and 0.1 mg/kg of subcutaneous morphine as rescue analgesia if the visual analog scale (VAS) pain values were greater than 30 mm. We evaluated the technical difficulties relative to catheter placement, the location of the catheter, the analgesic efficacy, and the distribution of the sensory block at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 48 hours. RESULTS: Catheter placement was faster in group 2, and the absence of nerve stimulation decreased material costs (P <.05). No significant difference was observed between groups concerning location of the catheter tip under the fascia iliaca. In both groups, the distribution of the sensory block and its course were similar except for those of the obturator nerve (more sensory blocks in group 1, P <.05). No significant difference was noted between the groups regarding median VAS pain values and consumption of morphine during the 48-hour period. No major side effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that a catheter for continuous lumbar plexus block can be placed more quickly and at lesser cost using the fascia iliaca technique than the perivascular technique with equivalent postoperative analgesic efficacy.

Continuous psoas compartment block for postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: new landmarks, technical guidelines, and clinical evaluation.

UNLABELLED: A computed tomographic scan was obtained in 35 patients to measure the depth and the relationship of the branches of the lumbar plexus to the posterior superior iliac spine projection and the vertebral column. In addition, we prospectively studied 80 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty who received a continuous psoas compartment block (CPCB) in the postoperative period. CPCB was performed after surgical procedures by using modified Winnie's landmarks and nerve stimulation. From 5 to 8 cm of catheter was inserted. Radiographs were obtained after injection of 10 mL of contrast medium. An initial loading dose (0.4 mL/kg) of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine for 48 h. The depth of the lumbar plexus and the distance between the lumbar plexus and the L4 transverse process were measured. Visual analog scale values of pain at 1, 12, 24, and 48 h were obtained at rest and during mobilization. Amounts of rescue analgesia were also recorded. Sensory blockade of the principal branches of the lumbosacral plexus was noted at 1 and 24 h, as were adverse events related to the technique. There was a significant difference between men and women in depth of the lumbar plexus (median values, 85 vs 70 mm for men and women, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the body mass index and skin-lumbar plexus distances. In contrast, there was no difference regarding the distance between the transverse process of L4 and the lumbar plexus. The catheter tip lay within the psoas major muscle in 74% of the patients and between the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles in 22%. In three patients, the catheter was improperly positioned. At 1 h, sensory blockade of the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves was successful in, respectively, 95%, 90%, and 85% of patients. At 24 h, these rates were 88%, 88%, and 83%, respectively. During the 48-h study period, median visual analog scale values of pain were approximately 10 mm at rest and from 18 to 25 mm during physiotherapy. Five patients received 5 mg of morphine at 1 h. Five cases of unilateral epidural anesthesia were noted after the bolus injection. We conclude that CPCB with 0.2% ropivacaine allows optimal analgesia after hip arthroplasty, with few side effects and a small failure rate. Before lumbar plexus branch stimulation and catheter insertion, anesthesiologists should be aware of the L4 transverse process location and lumbar plexus depth. IMPLICATIONS: Lumbar plexus depth is correlated with the patient's body mass index and differs between men and women, but this is not true of the lumbar plexus-transverse process distance. Considering new landmarks, a continuous psoas compartment block promotes optimal analgesia after hip arthroplasty, with few side effects.