Comparison of immunogenic potentials of bovine thrombin preparations.

Using a membrane filtration step, bovine crude thrombin was purified into thrombin 4A and 4B preparations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the improved purity of a bovine thrombin preparation can reduce its overall immunogenic potential and lower the risk of development of factor V antibodies. Bovine crude thrombin and its purified versions, thrombin 4A and 4B, were administered to individual groups of rabbits on days 0, 21, 42, 91, 123, and 151 using standard immunologic methods. Blood was drawn from each rabbit on days 30, 50, 105, 137, and 165, and the pooled antisera from individual groups were purified to obtain the Ig Gs using protein G affinity columns. Using Western blotting, the specificity of each immunoglobulin G collected at the first time point (day 30) and last time point (day 165) was determined. The results of Western blotting using the Ig Gs collected on days 30 and 165 were consistent; both demonstrating that thrombin 4B has the least immunogenic potential among the 3 thrombin preparations tested. Compared with the immunoglobulin Gs collected on day 30, the Ig Gs from day 165 did not show obvious difference regarding their ability to detect antigens in bovine thrombin samples. Neither showed cross-reactivity with human coagulation factors nor the recognition of bovine factor Va antigens. These results suggest that despite the presence of a trace amount of bovine factor Va antigen in bovine thrombin preparations, these contaminants failed to elicit the generation of antibodies against factor Va light chain in rabbit.

Reduced immunogenic potential of membrane filtered bovine thrombin preparations for hemostatic application.

There is concern that exposure to bovine thrombin can result in the development of antibodies, usually against factor V/Va, which can lead to hemostatic abnormalities. It is thought that purer preparations of bovine thrombin might be less immunogenic. Utilizing newer methods including a membrane filtration step, bovine crude thrombin is further purified into thrombin 4A and 4B preparations which exhibit a higher specific activity and are devoid of some of the protein contaminants. Bovine crude thrombin and its purified versions were administered intravenously to individual groups of rabbits using standard immunologic protocols. Antiserum was drawn from each rabbit and the pooled antisera were purified to obtain the IgGs using protein G affinity columns. The results suggest that the reported purification process, including filtration, resulted in the removal of most of the antigens found in crude thrombin, and that none of these preparations generated any detectable antibodies against bovine factor V related antigens.

The clinical spectrum of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a disorder characterized by a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Virtually any organ system or tissue may be affected by the consequences of large- or small-vessel thrombosis. There is a broad spectrum of disease among individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Patients may exhibit clinical features suggesting APS but not fulfill the International Criteria for a "definite" diagnosis. Seronegative APS patients demonstrate typical idiopathic thromboses but aPL are not initially detected. Patients defined with definite APS demonstrate nearly identical sites of venous and arterial thrombosis, regardless of the presence or absence of systemic lupus erythematosus. Microangiopathic APS may present with isolated tissue and organ injury or as the overwhelming "thrombotic storm" observed in catastrophic APS.

Laboratory evaluation of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) is among the most common acquired blood protein defects that have been identified as leading to thrombosis. This article describes the laboratory diagnosis of APLS, including the detection of lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies, and subtypes of antiphospholipid antibodies.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy.

During the past 5 years the author and his colleagues have assessed carefully 351 women referred for evaluation of thrombosis and hemostasis after they had suffered recurrent miscarriages. This article describes the flow protocol the author and associates follow to maximize success and keep the costs of evaluation of recurrent miscarriage syndrome/infertility at a minimum while providing the best chances for defining a cause and thus providing optimal therapy for successful term pregnancy outcome. It presents the outcomes of the author's protocol and those of others in treating women who have antiphospholipid syndrome and who have suffered recurrent miscarriages.

Treatment options for patients who have antiphospholipid syndromes.

The antiphospholipid thrombosis syndrome, associated with anticardiolipin (aCL) or subgroup antibodies, can be divided into one of six subgroups (I-VI). There is little overlap (about 10% or less) between these subtypes, and patients usually conveniently fit into only one of these clinical types. Although there appears to be no correlation with the type, or titer, of aCL antibody and type of syndrome, the subclassification of thrombosis and aCL antibody patients into these groups is important from the therapy standpoint. This article also reviews the clinical presentations associated with each of these six subgroups.

Controversies and unresolved issues in antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis and management.

While much is understood concerning the clinical features of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), many issues remain. The proper designation of patients with "definite" APS and the correct categorization of patients by both laboratory and clinical features are matters of ongoing debate. Recent proposals have identified new subsets of patients who have many typical features of APS but either do not fit the criteria for a "definite" diagnosis or have initially negative laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies. Meanwhile, decisions about laboratory tests are based on expert opinion, rather than the results of controlled trials. As for treatment, many guidelines are offered, but few are backed by data from strong clinical trials. This article summarizes the clinical questions remaining to be answered and debates concerning pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

Product individuality of commercially available low-molecular-weight heparins and their generic versions: therapeutic implications.

The currently available brand-name low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the United States include dalteparin (Pfizer), enoxaparin (Aventis), and tinzaparin (Pharmion). Other products available, in Europe, include certoparin (Novartis), reviparin (Abbott), nadroparin (GlaxoSmithkline), and parnaparin (Alpha-Wasserman). Each of these LMWHs has a characteristic molecular weight profile and biological activity in terms of an anti-FXa and anti-FIIa potency. The mean molecular weight of these drugs ranges from 4.0 kDa to 7.0 kDa and the anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio ranges from 1.5 to 3.5. These agents may also be characterized by the presence of specific chemical end groups such as 2-O-sulfo-4-enepyranosuronic acid at the nonreducing terminus (enoxaparin) or 2,5-anhydro-D-mannose at the reducing terminus (dalteparin). Further, the component oligosaccharide chains exhibit product-specific distribution profiles. It is now widely accepted that individual LMWHs are chemically unique agents and cannot be interchanged therapeutically. Each commercial LMWH has been individually developed for specific clinical indications, which are dose and product dependent. Recently, several generic LMWHs have become available in India (Cutenox and Markaparin) and South America (dilutol, clenox, dripanina), and three companies have filed for regulatory approval of a generic version of enoxaparin in the United States. As the primary aim of a generic drug is to reduce cost without compromising patient care, a generic drug is required to be chemically and biologically equivalent to the pioneer drug. Because LMWHs represent complex natural mucopolysaccharide drugs that have undergone chemical and enzymatic modifications, physicochemical and biological information in addition to molecular weight and anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio should be used to determine generic equivalency to the branded drug. We have utilized a previously reported approach to systematically compare three generic versions of enoxaparin obtained from India and Brazil with the branded enoxaparin (Lovenox) available in the United States. Testing included molecular and structural profiling, evaluation in clot-based and amidolytic anti-FXa and anti-FIIa assays, and heparinase-I digestion profiles. While the molecular profiles (4.8 +/- 1.8 kD) and anticoagulant potencies as determined by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were comparable for all four agents, the generic products showed variations in the thrombin time (TT) and Heptest assays. Two generic and the branded enoxaparin were readily digested by heparinase-I, losing most of their anticoagulant activity, but one generic product resisted digestion. This may have been due to a unique structural feature in this product. These studies show that, while generic LMWHs may exhibit acceptable molecular weight and anti-FXa profiles, they can exhibit assay-based differences and digestion profiles. Testing in animal models to determine safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic parameters may be important to verify equivalence. In order to assure that the generic LMWHs are equivalent to branded LMWHs such that equivalent clinical results are obtained, there is a need to develop clear stepwise guidelines that will establish equivalency in terms of physical, chemical, biochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties for these anticoagulant drugs.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: focus on extended therapy with dalteparin.

The increased risk of thrombosis-related morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer remains, even in the face of anticoagulant therapy. Moreover, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates the management of cancer and adversely affects quality of life and survival. Until recently, initial therapy with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by long-term therapy with an oral anticoagulant was the standard of care for the secondary prevention of acute thromboembolism in most patients. However, according to the results of the CLOT trial (Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer), extended LMWH therapy with dalteparin represents an alternative to standard oral anticoagulation. In terms of efficacy, the incidence of recurrent VTE in patients receiving dalteparin was half that of those receiving warfarin (27 of 336 patients vs 53 of 336 patients, respectively), for a 52% relative risk reduction. The incidence of major bleeding in this trial was not significantly different in the two arms. Although this LMWH regimen is supported by the latest practice guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians, the question of whether long-term treatment with LMWH in cancer patients actually affects survival apart from the benefits of thromboprophylaxis remains to be answered.

Recurrent miscarriage syndrome and infertility due to blood coagulation protein/platelet defects: a review and update.

Three-hundred fifty-one women were referred for thrombosis and hemostasis evaluation after suffering recurrent miscarriages. All patients were referred by a high-risk obstetrician or reproductive medicine specialist after anatomic, hormonal or chromosomal defects had been ruled out. These patients were assessed over a three year period. The mean patient age at referral was 34 years and the mean number of miscarriages was 2.9 (2-9). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation for thrombophilia and, when indicated, a hemorrhagic disorder. Of the 351 patients, 29 (8%) had no defect. Of the remaining 322 patients, 7 (2%) had a bleeding disorder: 3 with platelet dysfunction, 1 with Factor XIII deficiency, 3 with von Willebrand's and 3 with Osler-Weber-Rendu. The remainder of the patients had a thrombophilia as follows: 195 (60%) had antiphospholipid syndrome, 64 (20%) had Sticky Platelet Syndrome, 38 (12%) had MTHFR mutation, 23 (7.1%) had PAI-1 polymorphism, 12 (3.7%) had Protein S deficiency, 12 (3.7%) had Factor V Leiden, 3 (1%), had AT deficiency, 3 (1%) had Heparin-Cofactor II deficiency, 3 (1%) had TPA deficiency, and 6 (2%) had Protein C deficiency. There were a total of 364 defects found in the 312 patients harboring thrombophilia; thus, several harbored two and a few harbored three separate defects. All patients with thrombophilia were treated with preconception ASA at 81 mg/day with the immediate post-conception addition of heparin or LMW heparin (Dalteparin). Both ASA and heparin/LMW heparin were used to term. The first 120 patients were treated with unfractionated heparin at 5,000 U every 24 hours, subcutaneously and the last 192 have been treated with Dalteparin at 5,000 U/day subcutaneously. The patients with MTHFR were also treated with folate at 5 mg/day + pyridoxine at 50 mg/day. All patients were carefully monitored with CBC and platelet counts, anti-Xa levels, frequent ultrasounds and physical exams. Only 2 of the thrombophilia patients suffered another miscarriage; all others had a normal term delivery. There were no pregnancy-related thromboses, no delivery complications and no episodes of post-partum thrombosis. The only bleeding consisted of 1-4 cm bruises at injection sites. No episodes of thrombocytopenia (HIT) were noted. In our experience, thrombophilia is a common cause of recurrent miscarriage and all patients with no anatomical, hormonal or chromosomal defect should be evaluated for thrombophilia or a bleeding disorder. The success rate of normal term delivery in these 312 patients was 94% using ASA + heparin or Dalteparin. In addition, side effects of therapy were minimal.