Descriptive analysis of targeted carbapenemase genes and antibiotic susceptibility profiles among carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii tested in the Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network-United States, 2017-2020.

Acinetobacter baumannii is a Gram-negative bacillus that can cause severe and difficult-to-treat healthcare-associated infections. A. baumannii can harbor mobile genetic elements carrying genes that produce carbapenemase enzymes, further limiting therapeutic options for infections. In the United States, the Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) conducts sentinel surveillance of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Participating clinical laboratories sent CRAB isolates to the AR Lab Network for characterization, including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and molecular detection of class A (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase), class B (Active-on-Imipenem, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase, and Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase), and class D (Oxacillinase, blaOXA-23-like, blaOXA-24/40-like, blaOXA-48-like, and blaOXA-58-like) carbapenemase genes. During 2017‒2020, 6,026 CRAB isolates from 45 states were tested for targeted carbapenemase genes; 1% (64 of 5,481) of CRAB tested for targeted class A and class B genes were positive, but 83% (3,351 of 4,041) of CRAB tested for targeted class D genes were positive. The number of CRAB isolates carrying a class A or B gene increased from 2 of 312 (<1%) tested in 2017 to 26 of 1,708 (2%) tested in 2020. Eighty-three percent (2,355 of 2,846) of CRAB with at least one of the targeted carbapenemase genes and 54% (271 of 500) of CRAB without were categorized as extensively drug resistant; 95% (42 of 44) of isolates carrying more than one targeted gene had difficult-to-treat susceptibility profiles. CRAB isolates carrying targeted carbapenemase genes present an emerging public health threat in the United States, and their rapid detection is crucial to improving patient safety.IMPORTANCEThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has classified CRAB as an urgent public health threat. In this paper, we used a collection of >6,000 contemporary clinical isolates to evaluate the phenotypic and genotypic properties of CRAB detected in the United States. We describe the frequency of specific carbapenemase genes detected, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and the distribution of CRAB isolates categorized as multidrug resistant, extensively drug-resistant, or difficult to treat. We further discuss the proportion of isolates showing susceptibility to Food and Drug Administration-approved agents. Of note, 84% of CRAB tested harbored at least one class A, B, or D carbapenemase genes targeted for detection and 83% of these carbapenemase gene-positive CRAB were categorized as extensively drug resistant. Fifty-four percent of CRAB isolates without any of these carbapenemase genes detected were still extensively drug-resistant, indicating that infections caused by CRAB are highly resistant and pose a significant risk to patient safety regardless of the presence of one of these carbapenemase genes.

Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network's multisite evaluation of the ThermoFisher Sensititre GN7F broth microdilution panel for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

In 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network to improve domestic detection of multidrug-resistant organisms. CDC and four laboratories evaluated a commercial broth microdilution panel. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the Sensititre GN7F (ThermoFisher Scientific, Lenexa, KS) was evaluated by testing 100 CDC and Food and Drug Administration AR Isolate Bank isolates [40 Enterobacterales (ENT), 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), and 30 Acinetobacter baumannii (ACB)]. We assessed multiple amounts of transfer volume (TV) between the inoculum and tubed 11-mL cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth: 1 µL [tribe Proteeae (P-tribe) only] and 10, 30, and 50 µL, resulting in respective CFU per milliter of 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 3 × 105, and 5 × 105. Four TV combinations were analyzed: standard (STD) [1 µL (P-tribe) and 10 µL], enhanced standard (E-STD) [1 µL (P-tribe) and 30 µL], 30 µL, and 50 µL. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement, major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were analyzed by organism then TVs. For ENT, the average EA across laboratories was <90% for 7 of 15 ß-lactams using STD and E-STD TVs. As TVs increased, EA increased (>90%), and VMEs decreased. For PSA, EA improved as TVs increased; however, MEs also increased. For ACB, increased TVs provided slight EA improvements; all TVs yielded multiple VMEs and MEs. For ENT and ACB, Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) trended downward using a 1 or 10 µL TV; there were no obvious MIC trends by TV for PSA. The public health and clinical consequences of missing resistance warrant increased TV of 30 µL for the GN7F, particularly for P-tribe, despite being considered "off-label" use.

Deconditioned Knee: The Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Program that Restores Normal Knee Motion to Improve Symptoms and Function.

BACKGROUND: Knee pain can cause a deconditioned knee. Deconditioned is defined as causing one to lose physical fitness. Therefore, a deconditioned knee is defined as a painful syndrome caused by anatomical or functional abnormalities that result in a knee flexion contracture (functional loss of knee extension), decreased strength, and decreased function. To date, no published studies exist examining treatment for a deconditioned knee. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program focused on increasing range of motion for patients with a deconditioned knee. METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age 53.2 years) enrolled in the study. Objective evaluation included radiographs, knee range of motion, and isokinetic strength testing. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective questionnaire was used to measure symptoms and function. Patients were given a rehabilitation program to increase knee extension (including hyperextension) and flexion equal to the normal knee, after which patients were instructed in leg strengthening exercises. RESULTS: Knee extension significantly improved from a mean deficit of 10° to 3° and knee flexion significantly improved from a mean deficit of 19° to 9°. The IKDC survey scores significantly improved from a mean of 34.5 points to 70.5 points 1 year after beginning treatment. The IKDC subjective pain frequency and severity scores were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: A rehabilitation program that improves knee range of motion can relieve pain and improve function for patients with a deconditioned knee.