RESUMO
Despite the great potential, there has been a lack of progress in the development of sharable and scalable tools for digital mental health due to difficulty in reproducibility and clinical application. The LAMP Platform was developed to address this gap by creating a single platform that works for a variety of clinical and research use cases. The study aims to understand how a consortium of clinical and research sites can help onboard, execute, and expand digital health research, software, and use cases. The Division of Digital Psychiatry implemented a formal consortium with goal of expanding the reach of mindLAMP as a digital mental health platform, enabling diverse studies and expanded use cases, and supportint growth of mindLAMP and consortium members' research. The LAMP Consortium has brought together 54 sites from across the world, encouraging collaboration and idea sharing. These sites' locations range from the USA to the Czech Republic to Australia, and apply the many features of LAMP to research, clinical, research and clinical, and industry use. The most popular features were surveys, sharing/viewing data, and GPS passive data collection. A user support network is necessary to encourage research and clinical use of the LAMP Platform. Resources like documentation, an online forum, and newsletters are essential to promote cooperation between many types of sites that is essential to advancing the field of digital mental health.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Utilizing a standard framework that may help clinicians and patients to identify relevant mental health apps, we sought to gain a comprehensive picture of the space by searching for, downloading, and reviewing 278 mental health apps from both the iOS and Android stores. METHODS: 278 mental health apps from the Apple iOS store and Google Play store were downloaded and reviewed in a standardized manner by trained app raters using a validated framework. Apps were evaluated with this framework comprising 105 questions and covering app origin and accessibility, privacy and security, inputs and outputs, clinical foundation, features and engagement style, and interoperability. RESULTS: Our results confirm that app stars and downloads-even for the most popular apps by these metrics-did not correlate with more clinically relevant metrics related to privacy/security, effectiveness, and engagement. Most mental health apps offer similar functionality, with 16.5% offering both mood tracking and journaling and 7% offering psychoeducation, deep breathing, mindfulness, journaling, and mood tracking. Only 36.4% of apps were updated with a 100-day window, and 7.5% of apps had not been updated in four years. CONCLUSION: Current app marketplace metrics commonly used to evaluate apps do not offer an accurate representation of individual apps or a comprehensive overview of the entire space. The majority of apps overlap in terms of features offered, with many domains and other features not well represented. Selecting an appropriate app continues to require personal matching given no clear trends or guidance offered by quantitative metrics alone.