Gender-Related Differences in Atrial Substrate in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Gender-related differences have been reported in patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Atrial substrate plays a role in the outcomes after ablation but gender-related differences in atrial substrate have never been described in detail. We sought to analyze gender-related differences in atrial remodeling (spontaneous low-voltage zones [LVZs]) and their clinical relevance after PVI. We conducted a prospective multicenter study, including consecutive patients who underwent first PVI-only atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. LVZs were analyzed on high-density electroanatomical maps collected with multipolar catheter, before PVI. In total, 262 patients (61 ± 11 years, 31% female, 50% persistent AF) were followed for 28 months. In women, LVZs were larger (10% vs 4% of left atrial surface [p <0.001]) and female gender was independently associated with fourfold higher risk of having advanced (LVZ > 15%) atrial remodeling (odds ratio 4.56, p <0.001). AF recurrence-free survival was not different between men and women (log-rank p = 0.2). Although LVZs were independently associated higher AF recurrences at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2, p = 0.038), female gender was not (HR 1.4, p = 0.211). Specifically, the LVZ cutoff to predict outcomes was different in men and women: >5% in men (HR 3.0, p <0.001), >15% in women (HR 2.7, p = 0.02). In conclusion, women have more widespread LVZ in all left atrial regions. Despite more extensive atrial remodeling, the AF recurrence rate is similar in men and women, and LVZs become prognostic in women only at high burden (>15%). LVZs seem to have a different prognostic role in men and women.

Clinical and Hemodynamic Effects of Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in Atrial Versus Ventricular Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

The present study aims to assess the clinical and hemodynamic impact of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with MitraClip in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (A-FMR) compared with ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (V-FMR). Mitral regurgitation (MR) grade, functional status (New York Heart Association class), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure) were evaluated in 52 patients with A-FMR and in 307 patients with V-FMR. In 56 patients, hemodynamic assessment during exercise echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after intervention. MR reduction after MitraClip implantation was noninferior in A-FMR compared with V-FMR (MR grade ≤2 at 6 months in 94% vs 82%, respectively, p <0.001 for noninferiority) and was associated with improvement of functional status (New York Heart Association class ≤2 at 6 months in 90% vs 80%, respectively, p = 0.2). Hemodynamic assessment revealed that cardiac output at 6 months was higher in A-FMR at rest (5.1 ± 1.5 L/min vs 3.8 ± 1.5 L/min, p = 0.002) and during peak exercise (7.9 ± 2.4 L/min vs 6.1 ± 2.1 L/min, p = 0.02). In addition, the reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure at rest was more pronounced in A-FMR: Δ SPAP -13.1 ± 15.1 mm Hg versus -2.2 ± 13.3 mm Hg (p = 0.03). MACE rate at follow-up was significantly lower in A-FMR versus V-FMR, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.46 (95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.88), which was caused by a reduction in hospitalization for heart failure. In conclusion, percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with MitraClip is at least as effective in A-FMR as in V-FMR in reducing MR. However, the hemodynamic improvement and reduction of MACE were significantly better in A-FMR.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal carcinoma.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is estimated that 50% of all patients with CRC develop metastases, most commonly in the liver and the lung. Lung metastases are seen in approximately 10-15% of all patients with CRC. A large number of these patients with metastatic CRC can only receive palliative treatment due to invasion of other organs and disseminated disease. However, a subset of these patients present with potentially resectable metastases. Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered to be a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with resectable metastatic CRC. Current data suggest that patients that undergo pulmonary metastasectomy have 5-year survival rates of approximately 40%. However, the majority of data published regarding lung metastasectomy is based on small, retrospective case series. Due to this lack of prospective data, it is still unclear which subset of patients will benefit most from curative-intent surgery. Furthermore, there is also controversy regarding which prognostic and genetic factors are related to survival outcomes and whether there is a difference between open and thoracoscopic approaches in terms of overall and disease-free survival. In this review, we aim to summarize the latest data on prognostic factors and survival outcomes after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with metastatic CRC.