Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Learn Disabil ; 42(5): 392-402, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19542350

RESUMO

Several national reports have suggested the usefulness of systematic, explicit, synthetic phonics instruction based on English word structure along with wide reading of quality literature for supporting development in early reading instruction. Other studies have indicated, however, that many in-service teachers are not knowledgeable in the basic concepts of the English language. They may be well versed in children's literature but not know how to address the basic building blocks of language and reading. The authors hypothesized that one of the reasons for this situation is that many instructors responsible for training future elementary teachers are not familiar with the concepts of the linguistic features of English language. This hypothesis was tested by administering a survey of language concepts to 78 instructors. The results showed that even though teacher educators were familiar with syllabic knowledge, they performed poorly on concepts relating to morphemes and phonemes. In a second study, 40 instructors were interviewed about best practices in teaching components and subskills of reading. Eighty percent of instructors defined phonological awareness as letter-sound correspondence. They also did not mention synthetic phonics as a desirable method to use for beginning reading instruction, particularly for students at risk for reading difficulties. In conclusion, providing professional development experiences related to language concepts to instructors could provide them the necessary knowledge of language concepts related to early literacy instruction, which they could then integrate into their preservice reading courses.


Assuntos
Linguística/educação , Competência Profissional/normas , Leitura , Ensino/normas , Criança , Currículo/normas , Coleta de Dados , Educação , Educação Profissionalizante/normas , Escolaridade , Humanos , Fonética , Padrões de Referência , Estados Unidos
2.
J Learn Disabil ; 42(5): 458-63, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19531632

RESUMO

Two reasons may be responsible for the poor grasp of the linguistic concepts related to literacy acquisition by preservice and in-service teachers: a lack of attention given to such concepts by teacher educators (college faculty members) and a lack of relevant information provided in the textbooks used in college courses. In an earlier study, the authors found that many teacher educators involved in the training of preservice and in-service teachers were not well acquainted with these concepts. In this study, the authors examined the extent to which textbooks used in reading education courses contain the information about the five components of literacy instruction (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and text comprehension) recommended by the National Reading Panel. Such scrutiny shows that many textbooks do not adequately cover these five components and the related instructional procedures for teaching them. In addition to the paucity of information about teaching the five components, some textbooks present inaccurate information.


Assuntos
Educação Profissionalizante/normas , Linguística/educação , Leitura , Ensino/normas , Livros de Texto como Assunto/normas , Universidades , Criança , Compreensão , Currículo/normas , Humanos , Fonética , Padrões de Referência , Vocabulário
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA