Understanding the Complexity of Microbiology Method Validation to Meet State Specific Requirements for Cannabis.

BACKGROUND: Federal legislation still prohibits the cultivation, sale and consumption of cultivars of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol cannabis (>0.3%), however, as of November 2022, 39 states have legalized these products for medicinal consumption and 21 states have legalized for adult-use consumption. This state-by-state approach has produced a patch work of regulations that multi-state operators (MSO) must learn to navigate. Furthermore cannabis laboratories often lack the space and skill needed to perform method validations adding another layer of complexity. While these barriers exist, it is paramount for MSOs to demonstrate the fitness of purpose of their methods. OBJECTIVE: This review presents the complexity that a MSOs navigated in developing microbiology method validation study designs for two proprietary Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) assays to meet four state (California, Florida, Michigan and Oklahoma) testing requirements. The testing in each state was conducted in addition to certification of the assays through the AOAC Performance Tested Method  SM (PTM) program. METHODS: Matrix studies were conducted targeting three analytes (Aspergillus spp., Salmonella spp., and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli) as directed by the state regulatory authorities. For California, inclusivity and exclusivity studies were performed. The number of contamination levels, test portion replicates, and total target organisms evaluated varied by state. Culture confirmation was not performed outside of the AOAC PTM studies. RESULTS: Data from each study was collected, summarized, and provided to the state regulatory agencies. Review of the data consisted of identifying discrepant results and verification of controls. After review, each assay was certified for use in the respective state. CONCLUSION: Requirements from each of the states demonstrate the complexities MSO face and emphasize the need for a more standardized approach to streamline acceptance of alternative methods. HIGHLIGHTS: While varying state regulations can be complex, validation studies performed for the candidate methods have led to adoption across 31 states.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP® EHEC Detection Method for the Detection of Enterohemorrhagic E. coli in Select Foods: Collaborative Study: First Action Method 2020.06.

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP® EHEC assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121806) is a real-time PCR molecular detection method that utilizes fluorescence resonance energy transfer proprietary hybridization probes for the rapid detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) in select foods. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance and submit the results to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as a First Action Official Method of AnalysisSM for the detection of EHEC in select foods. METHOD: The GENE-UP method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the MicroVal VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw ground beef (85% lean). Collaborators evaluated the candidate method using either an automated or manual lysis procedure. The candidate method was compared to the ISO/TS 13136:2012 method. Data from 17 participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union were evaluated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low contamination level (∼1 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from the study were analyzed according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. RESULTS: The difference in laboratory probability of detection (dLPODC) values with 95% confidence interval between the candidate and reference method results were -0.01 (-0.04, 0.02), 0.23 (0.07, 0.39), and 0.06 (0.01, 0.12) for the non-inoculated, low, and high contamination levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For the candidate method, values obtained for repeatability and reproducibility were similar to the reference method and indicated minimal variation between samples or between laboratories. No discrepant results (false positive or false negative) were observed for each contamination. A statistical difference was calculated between the candidate and reference method at the low and high inoculation levels, with the candidate method detecting a higher number of positive samples indicating a higher sensitivity than the reference method. No differences in the recovery of the target analyte were observed between the manual and automated lysis procedures. HIGHLIGHTS: The GENE-UP EHEC Detection Method provides end users a rapid, easy-to-use workflow for the detection of EHEC in food matrixes.

Comparison of the Modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019-Novel Coronavirus Real-Time RT-PCR Method for Detection of Infectious and Heat-Inactivated Virus on Stainless Steel.

BACKGROUND: Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was used in the validation of methods for detection of SARS-CoV-2 on stainless-steel surfaces in the AOAC Research Institute Emergency Response Validation project. Handling infectious virus requires Biosafety Level (BSL)-3 facilities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the recovery and detection of infectious and heat-inactivated (HI; 65°C for 30 min) SARS-CoV-2 from stainless steel by the modified US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Diagnostic Panel. METHOD: Viral stocks were diluted in viral transport medium (VTM) and deposited onto stainless-steel test areas at 2 × 103 and 2 × 104 genomic copies for low and high, respectively. Test areas were sampled and aliquots of the resulting test solutions analyzed by RT-qPCR according to the CDC method. Results were analyzed by probability of detection (POD) statistics. RESULTS: The low level, where fractional positive results (25-75%) are expected, yielded PODI = 0.80 (0.58, 0.92) for the infectious virus and PODHI = 0.15 (0.05, 0.36) for the HI virus. The bias, dPODHI = -0.65 (-0.80, -0.35), demonstrated a statistical difference between infectious and HI virus detection. No difference was observed at the high inoculation level. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the statistical difference observed, the use of the HI virus is a viable alternative for matrix extension studies using a method comparison study design. Highlights: The use of HI SARS-CoV-2 can mitigate the need for a BSL-3 facility for matrix extension validation of alternative methods in SARS-CoV-2 studies. HIGHLIGHTS: The use of HI SARS-CoV-2 can mitigate the need for a BSL-3 facility for matrix extension validation of alternative methods in SARS-CoV-2 studies.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP®Salmonella Method for the Detection of Salmonella Species in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2020.02.

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP®Salmonella assay (Performance Tested MethodSM [PTM] 121802) is a PCR detection method that utilizes fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) hybridization probes for the rapid detection of Salmonella species in foods and on environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance for submission to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official Method of AnalysisSM. METHOD: The GENE-UP method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw ground beef (80% lean). The candidate method was compared to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food Safety Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) 4.10 reference method. An alternative confirmation procedure, using ASAP™ and CHROMID®Salmonella chromogenic agars, was included in the validation study. Fifteen collaborators from 14 laboratories participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low contamination level (∼0.7 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼2 CFU/test portion). Data were analyzed using the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. RESULTS: The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval for the GENE-UP Salmonella method, with either alternative or traditional confirmation, were: 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03), -0.02 (-0.15, 0.12), and 0.02 (-0.03, 0.09) for the non-inoculated, low, and high contamination levels respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. HIGHLIGHTS: The GENE-UP Salmonella method, with ASAP and CHROMID Salmonella, provides industry with a simplified, rapid, and accurate workflow for the detection of Salmonella in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP® Listeria monocytogenes Method for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a Variety of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2019.11.

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP®  Listeria monocytogenes 2 (LMO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121804) uses real-time PCR technology and a proprietary detection platform, the GENE-UP Thermocycler, to detect Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and select environmental surfaces. METHOD: The GENE-UP method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the AFNOR NF VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, full-cream goat milk cottage cheese (8.4% fat). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 11290-1/Amd.1:2004 reference method. Sixteen participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (∼2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from the study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. RESULTS: The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval for each comparison were; -0.02 (-0.07, 0.03), -0.08 (-0.31, 0.16), and 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03) for the non-inoculated, low, and high contamination levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. HIGHLIGHTS: The GENE-UP LMO method demonstrated accuracy and precision in detecting and discerning L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP® Listeria spp. Method for the Detection of Listeria Species in a Variety of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2019.10.

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP®  Listeria spp. 2 (LIS 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121803) is a real-time PCR molecular detection method for the rapid detection of Listeria species (Listeria monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, and L. welshimeri) in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance and submit the results to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of Listeria species in a variety of foods and select environmental surfaces. METHOD: The GENE-UP method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the AFNOR NF VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, full-cream goat milk cottage cheese (8.4% fat). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 11290-1/Amd.1 reference method. Sixteen participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low contamination level (∼2 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from that study were analyzed according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. RESULTS: The dLPODC values with 95% confidence intervals between the candidate and reference method results were -0.02 (-0.07, 0.03), -0.08 (-0.31, 0.16), and 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03) for the non-inoculated, low, and high contamination levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. HIGHLIGHTS: Data from a singular collaborative study was used to achieve adoption as an AOAC First Action Official Method for the detection of Listeria species in a variety of foods and select environmental surfaces.

Evaluation of the 3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid E. coli/Coliform Count Plate for the Enumeration of E. coli and Coliforms: Collaborative Study, First Action: 2018.13.

BACKGROUND: The 3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid E. coli/Coliform Count Plate is a selective and differential sample-ready-culture medium designed for the rapid enumeration of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and coliforms in the food and beverage industries. OBJECTIVE: The 3M Petrifilm Rapid E. coli/Coliform Count Plate was compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 4 Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria, the International Organization of Standards (ISO) 4832:2006 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Horizontal method for the enumeration of coliforms-Colony-count technique, and ISO 16649-2:2017 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-Horizontal method for the enumeration of beta-glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli-Part 2 Colony-count technique at 44 degrees C using bromo-4-chloro-3- indolyl beta-D-glucuronide methods for the enumeration of E. coli and coliforms in dry dog kibble. METHOD: The candidate method was evaluated using two diluents, Butterfield's phosphate buffered diluent and peptone salt solution, in a paired study design with each reference method in a multi-laboratory collaborative study following the current AOAC Validation Guidelines. Three target contamination levels and an uninoculated control level were evaluated. RESULTS: The candidate and reference methods were not statistically different at each contamination level. Reproducibility values obtained during the collaborative study were similar between the candidate and reference methods. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the candidate method is equivalent to the reference methods. HIGHLIGHT: 3M Petrifilm Rapid E. coli/Coliform Count Plate was recommended for Official First Action status for enumeration of E. coli and coliforms in a broad range of foods and environmental surfaces.

Evaluation of the CERTUS Environmental Listeria Species Detection Kit for the Detection of Listeria Species on Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 101802.

BACKGROUND: CERTUS Environmental Listeria species Detection Kit (CERTUS EL Detection Kit) is a real-time, bio-contained assay designed to accurately detect Listeria species (L. grayi, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. marthii, L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri, and L. welshimeri) from environmental surface matrixes using an antibody-coupled magnetic microparticle with a Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) nanoparticle technology test system paired with proprietary CERTUS EL Selective Growth Media and CERTUS Detection Unit. OBJECTIVE: The method was evaluated for AOAC®Performance Tested MethodSM certification. METHODS: Inclusivity and exclusivity, matrix studies, product consistency and stability were conducted to evaluate the CERTUS EL Detection Kit. RESULTS: In the matrix studies, stainless steel, ceramic tile, plastic (polystyrene) and sealed concrete environmental surfaces (4 × 4" test areas) were tested. No statistically significant differences were found by Probability of Detection analysis (POD) in any of the matrixes when results were compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration cultural microbiology reference method for Listeria. The CERTUS EL Detection Kit correctly identified all 50 target Listeria isolates and correctly excluded all 30 non-target strains that were analyzed. Probability of Detection analysis of CERTUS EL Detection Kit robustness, product consistency (lot-to-lot) and stability studies demonstrated no statistically significant differences, and no variation was observed between instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The data collected in these studies demonstrate that the CERTUS EL Detection Kit is a reliable method for the rapid and specific detection of Listeria from stainless steel, ceramic tile, plastic (polystyrene) and sealed concrete environmental surfaces.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP ®E. coli O157:H7 Method for the Detection of E. coli O157:H7 in Select Foods: Collaborative Study, 2019.03.

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP®E. coli O157:H7 2 (ECO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121805) incorporates Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer hybridization probes into its proprietary PCR technology for the rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7 in select foods. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in select foods. METHOD: The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the MicroVal validation process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw milk cheese (Comté, 34% fat, 0.8% salt). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 16654:2001 reference method. Fourteen participants from 13 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 colony-forming units (CFU)/test portion), a low contamination level (∼5 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from that study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. The difference in laboratory POD (dLPODC) values with 95% confidence interval across collaborators was calculated for each level between the candidate and reference method results, and between the candidate presumptive and confirmed results. RESULTS: The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval were; 0.00 (-0.04, 0.04), 0.27 (0.04, 0.49), and 0.17 (0.01, 0.33) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dLPODC results indicate a significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method for both the low and high contamination levels, with the candidate method producing higher recovery of the target organism at both levels. HIGHLIGHTS: The GENE-UP E. coli O157:H7 assay provides industry with a rapid, accurate detection method for E. coli O157:H7 in a broad range of foods.

AOAC-OMA/MicroVal Harmonized Validation of Peel PlateTM EB (Enterobacteriaceae Bacteria), First Action 2018.05.

BACKGROUND: Peel PlateTM  Enterobacteriaceae Bacteria (EB) is dried selective media on a 47 mm plastic plate that produces enzyme substrate colored colonies on rehydration and incubation for 24 h and up to 48 h at 37 ± 1°C. PURPOSE: The method validation compared quantification of EB to reference methods ISO 21528:2017 Parts 1 and 2. METHODS: Matrixes compared were whole milk, skim powdered milk, vanilla ice cream, butter, infant formulas (soy- and dairy-based), infant cereals ± probiotic, environmental sponge swab of stainless steel surface, and poultry carcass rinse with two different peptone buffers. RESULTS: In inclusivity and exclusivity studies, the method detected 54 of 54 EB strains and did not detect 30 of 30 non-EB strains. In matrix studies, the claimed foods were tested at three contamination levels using paired analysis between the reference and Peel Plate EB methods. Colony-forming units per gram or mL [CFU/g (mL)] were log10 transformed for statistical analysis. The candidate method and reference method were shown to be equivalent by the performance requirement of all 95% confidence intervals on mean difference falling between -0.5 and +0.5 log10 CFU/g (mL). An international collaborative study with dried infant formula spiked with Cronobacter sakazakii at log10 CFU/g (mL) 1.05, 2.31, and 3.21 levels, produced method differences -0.16, 0.15, and 0.18 log10 CFU/g (mL) with repeatabilities (r) = 0.33, 0.20, and 0.12 log10 CFU/g (mL) and reproducibilities (R) = 0.45, 0.26, and 0.18 log10 CFU/g (mL). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these evaluations, the candidate method is considered equivalent to the reference methods at both the 24 h and 48 h incubation periods at 37 ± 1°C. HIGHLIGHTS: Ready to use Enterobacteriaceae method equivalent to ISO-21528:2017 Parts 1 and 2; EB test colored colonies at 37°C for 24 h are equivalent at 48 h incubation; Singlet determined CFU/mL are statistically the same as duplicate average results; EB test validated for infant formula and dairy products including with probiotics; EB test for environmental surfaces and poultry carcass rinses using peptone buffers.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP®Cronobacter Method for the Detection of Cronobacter Species in Select Foods and Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2019.01.

BACKGROUND: The GENE-UP®Cronobacter assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 081801) is a real-time PCR technology for the rapid detection of Cronobacter species in select foods and environmental surfaces. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method's interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as a First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of Cronobacter species in select foods and environmental surfaces. METHOD: The GENE-UP method was evaluated in a multilaboratory study as part of the AFNOR NF VALIDATION certification process (NF102) following ISO 16140-2:2016 using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, reconstituted infant formula containing probiotics. The candidate method was compared to the ISO 22964:2017 reference method. Sixteen participants from fifteen laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a noninoculated control level (0 CFU/target test portion), a low contamination level (approximately 2 CFU/target test portion), and a high contamination level (approximately 10 CFU/target test portion). Data from that study were analyzed according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. The difference in laboratory POD (dLPODC) values with 95% confidence intervals across collaborators was calculated for each level between the candidate and reference method results and between the candidate presumptive and confirmed results. RESULTS: The dLPODC values with 95% confidence intervals were 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03), -0.08 (-0.19, 0.02), and 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03) for the noninoculated, low, and high contamination levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dLPODC results indicate no significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method or between presumptive and confirmed results for all three levels of contamination. HIGHLIGHTS: The GENE-UP Cronobacter assay provides industry with a rapid, easy to use method for the rapid detection of Cronobacter in a wide range of products and environmental samples.

Optimization of Salmonella detection in garlic, onion, cinnamon, red chili pepper powders and green tea.

Salmonella is the causative agent of many outbreaks related to spice consumption. However, because of the antimicrobial properties of various spices which hinders recovery and detection, Salmonella detection in spices remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to optimize an enrichment broth for Salmonella growth in different spices and tea, in order to maintain an adequate pH and decrease the antimicrobial effects of spices during Salmonella enrichment and subsequent detection. Salmonella contaminated spice and tea dried samples were prepared and the detection of Salmonella was assessed using the developed broth and automated DNA extraction and RT-PCR. Double strength Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) was used to maintain pH, and L-cysteine and DL-serine were added to the broth to reduce the effects of antimicrobial compounds in spices. The modified enrichment broth allowed the growth of Salmonella from each spice sample. Sample to broth ratios varied from 1:9 (garlic powder, chili peppers and tea), to 1:20 (cinnamon). The pH value of each enrichment varied but remained above 4.8. The addition of L-cysteine (30 mmol/L) allowed Salmonella recovery and growth in garlic and onion samples and the addition of DL-serine (11.23 mmol/L) allowed the recovery and growth in cinnamon. The results indicated that Salmonella detection was achieved in <24 h in the modified (BPW + L-cysteine and DL-serine) enrichment broth followed by detection by RT-PCR. This protocol could allow for a more rapid, robust, and sensitive enrichment method for Salmonella in spices.

Confirmation and Identification of Salmonella spp., Cronobacter spp., and Other Gram-Negative Organisms by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper Method: Collaborative Study Method Extension to Include Campylobacter Species, Revised First Action 2017.09.

Background: The Bruker MALDI Biotyper® method utilizes matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight MS for the rapid and accurate identification and confirmation of Gram-negative bacteria from select media types. The alternative method was evaluated in a method extension study of AOAC INTERNATIONAL First Action Official MethodSM 2017.09 using nonselective and selective agars to identify Cronobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., and select Gram-negative bacteria. Results obtained by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper were compared to the traditional biochemical methods as prescribed in the appropriate reference methods. Methods: Two collaborative studies were organized, one in the United States focusing on Cronobacter spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria and one in Europe focusing on Salmonella spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria. Fourteen collaborators from seven laboratories located within the United States participated in the first collaborative study for Cronobacter spp. Fifteen collaborators from 15 service laboratories located within Europe participated in the second collaborative study for Salmonella spp. For each target organism (either Salmonella spp. or Cronobacter spp.), a total of 24 blind-coded isolates were evaluated. In each set of 24 organisms, there were 16 inclusivity organisms (Cronobacter spp. or Salmonella spp.) and 8 exclusivity organisms (non-Cronobacter spp. and non-Salmonella spp. closely related Gram-negative organisms). For the Campylobacter spp. method extension, 17 collaborators from eight laboratories located within the United States (seven laboratories) and Canada (one laboratory) participated in the collaborative study. A total of 24 blind-coded isolates were evaluated. In each set of 24 organisms, there were 16 inclusivity organisms (Campylobacter spp.) and 8 exclusivity organisms (non-Campylobacter spp. closely related Gram-negative organisms). Results: After testing was completed, the total percentage of correct identifications from each agar type for each strain was determined at a percentage of 100.0% to the genus level for the Cronobacter study and a percentage of 100.0% to the genus level for the Salmonella study. For the Campylobacter method extension, a correct identification and confirmation rate of 100.0% was obtained for the Campylobacter organisms at the species level. For non-Cronobacter, non-Salmonella, and non-Campylobacter organisms, 100.0% were correctly identified. Conclusions: The results indicated that the alternative method produced equivalent results when compared to the confirmatory procedures specified by each reference method. Highlights: The method extension can be modified to include the identification and confirmation of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter lari.

Validation of Solus One Salmonella from Select Food Matrixes and Stainless-Steel and Plastic Environmental Surfaces.

Background: Solus One Salmonella is designed to accurately detect Salmonella species (Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica, salamae, arizonae, diarizonae, houtenae, indica, and Salmonella bongori) from select food matrixes and stainless-steel and plastic environmental surfaces. Solus One Salmonella uses an antibody-based technology test system that is paired with media and our proprietary media supplement, the Solus One Salmonella supplement combined with a manual or automated sample preparation method. Objective: Solus One Salmonella was evaluated for inclusivity and exclusivity, and a matrix comparison study was done for six food matrixes (raw beef trim, pasteurized liquid egg, raw salmon, cheddar cheese, Romaine lettuce, nonfat dry milk) and two environmental surfaces (stainless steel and polystyrene). Methods: Solus One Salmonella was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 5: Salmonella (July 2018) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Manual, 4.09 (January 2017) in the matrix study. Both the manual and automated sample preparation methods were performed for cheddar cheese and stainless-steel environmental surfaces. Results: For the inclusivity and exclusivity evaluation, Solus One Salmonella correctly detected all 108 target organism isolates and correctly excluded all 35 nontarget strains that were analyzed. Conclusions: In the method comparison study, both Solus One Salmonella manual and automated sample preparation methods demonstrated no significant differences based on probability of detection (POD) statistical analysis between presumptive and confirmed results or between candidate and reference method results for the six food matrixes after 20-22 h and two environmental surfaces after 16-20 h of enrichment time. POD analysis of Solus One Salmonella method robustness, product consistency, and stability studies using the automated sample preparation method demonstrated no statistically significant differences.

Evaluation of the MC-Media PadTM Yeast and Mold Device for the Enumeration of Yeast and Mold: Collaborative Study, First Action 2018.02.

Background: The MC-Media Pad™ Yeast and Mold (YM) is a ready-to use culture device that combines a test pad coated with medium and water-absorption polymers that is designed for the rapid quantification of yeast and mold in food products. Objective: The MC-Media Pad YM was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) for the enumeration of yeast and mold in frozen orange juice concentrate. Methods: The candidate method was evaluated using a paired study design in a multilaboratory collaborative study following the current AOAC Validation Guidelines. Three target contamination levels (low, 10-100 CFU/g; medium, 100-1000 CFU/g; and high 1000-10 000 CFU/g) and an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/g) were evaluated. MC-Media Pad YM devices were enumerated after 48 and 72 h of incubation. Results: Plate count obtained by both methods were log-transformed and the difference of means (including 95% confidence intervals), repeatability SD, and SD were determined for each contamination level. Conclusions: No statistical difference was observed between the MC-Media Pad YM (for both 48 and 72 h) and the FDA BAM for each contamination level. Highlights: The new method offers a convenient alternative to the reference method (FDA BAM) for detection of yeast and mold contamination in food products, yielding reliable and comparable results in 48 h compared to 5 days for the reference method.

Independent Validation for the Polyskope 1.0 Multiplex Pathogen Detection Assay for the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Non-O157 STEC, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella Species.

BACKGROUND: The Polyskope 1.0 Multiplex Assay is a novel test to simultaneously detect Escherichia coli O157, non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC), Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella species in a single enrichment using real-time PCR. OBJECTIVE: A Performance Tested MethodSM study was conducted to validate Polyskope 1.0 for inclusivity and exclusivity as well as a matrix comparison study. METHOD: This assay was evaluated in an unpaired independent validation study compared with reference methods according to AOAC INTERNATIONAL validation guidelines. Polyskope 1.0 evaluated raw ground beef (25 g), deli turkey (25 g), baby spinach (25 g), and stainless-steel environmental surface sponges (4 × 4 in. test area) after inoculation with a suspension of the three target microorganisms. All matrices were compared with appropriate reference methods from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook, or International Organization for Standardization standards. RESULTS: Polyskope 1.0 demonstrated no statistically significant differences between candidate and reference method results or between presumptive and confirmed results for three food matrices and one environmental surface. Results from inclusivity and exclusivity evaluations indicated the test method can accurately detect the target analytes and excluded all nontarget organisms. No differences were observed with the stability or lot-to-lot evaluations. Polyskope 1.0 demonstrated robustness by remaining unaffected by small variations in method parameters, which had no statistically significant effect on the results for all eight variations. Conclusions and Highlights: Polyskope 1.0 was shown to be a specific, highly accurate, and robust method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella species, non-O157 STECs, and E. coli O157 across four matrices.

Matrix Extension Study: Listeria Right Now™ Test for Detection of Listeria spp. from Selected Environmental Surfaces Without Enrichment: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 081802.

BACKGROUND: Listeria Right Now™ is a novel, enrichment-free test for the detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples taken from environmental surfaces. Results are available in less than 1 h. In a previous Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) study, the test was validated for swab samples from stainless-steel and sealed concrete surfaces. OBJECTIVE: A PTM matrix extension study was conducted to validate the method for the detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples from ceramic tile, plastic, and rubber surfaces. METHODS: Performance of the Listeria Right Now method was compared to that of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference culture procedure for the detection of Listeria spp. in swab samples taken from inoculated ceramic tile, plastic, and rubber surfaces. Data were analyzed using a probability of detection model. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in performance between the Listeria Right Now and reference culture methods for any of the three surfaces tested, as determined by probability of detection analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Listeria Right Now method is an effective procedure for the detection of Listeria spp. from a variety of environmental surfaces. HIGHLIGHTS: Listeria Right Now provides accurate results, without enrichment, in real time. This enables food industry personnel to react swiftly to suspected Listeria contamination incidents.

The Validation of the VereBeef™ Detection Kit.

VereBeef™ Detection Kit, incorporating both multiplex PCR and microarray technologies on a lab-on-chip platform, is intended for qualitative detection and differentiation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, E. coli O26, E. coli O45, E. coli O103, E. coli O111, E. coli O121, E. coli O145, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) virulence factors (stx1A, stx2A, eae), and Salmonella species in one test using raw beef trim samples. This product underwent extensive evaluations, including inclusivity-exclusivity, method comparison, robustness, lot-to-lot variability, and stability studies. The inclusivity/exclusivity study demonstrated that VereBeef Detection Kit specifically detects and identifies target analytes without occurrence of false-positive and false-negative detection. In the method comparison study, the performance of the VereBeef Detection Kit was compared with U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook's methods for target organism detection in raw beef trim using E. coli O157:H7 single inoculation and Salmonella and non-O157 STEC dual inoculation. Data demonstrated equivalence in both methods. The robustness study showed that changes in the test parameters do not impact assay performance. Collectively, VereBeef Detection Kit is able to detect target pathogens in raw beef trim with a minimum enrichment time of 8 h for E. coli O157:H7 detection and 10 h for Salmonella and non-O157 STEC detection.

Validation of Biomode S.A. Probe4CronobacterTM for the Identification of Cronobacter spp.

Background: Probe4Cronobacter test kit is based on the use of a fluorescence-labeled peptide nucleic acid probe (PNA) allied to fluorescence microscopy. A sample is taken after a 24 h enrichment of rehydrated 30 g portions of powdered infant formula (PIF). The method uses ready to use dropper solutions applied directly in the sample. This simple process takes less than 2 h to provide a result. In the presence of Cronobacter species, bright red rod-shaped cells will be visible under a fluorescence microscope. Objective: Probe4Cronobacter validation as a new method for the detection Cronobacter species in Powdered Infant Formula (PIF) under the AOAC Performance Tested MethodsSM (License No. 081702). Methods: The validation study encompassed matrix comparison study, inclusivity and exclusivity testing and robustness studies (stability, kit variation, and ruggedness). Results: The inclusivity and exclusivity testing (50 and 35 strains, respectively) yielded no false negative or false positive results. Probe4Cronobacter was compared to the ISO/TS 22964:2006 in 30 g of PIF samples within method comparison in an unpaired study. A total of 30 samples with both low and high level of inoculation were analyzed by Probe4Cronobacter and compared to the same number of samples screened by ISO/TS 22964:2006. No statistically significant differences between presumptive and confirmed results or between candidate and reference method results were observed. Robustness studies showed a high level of consistency and integrity of the kit when different parameters were varied. The deviation conditions tested did not affect the performance of the kit. Conclusions: Probe4Cronobacter test kit has shown to be a accurate, highly sensitive and robust methods for the detection of Cronobacter spp. in PIF samples.

Evaluation of the Solus One Listeria Method for the Detection of Listeria Species on Environmental Surfaces.

Background: Solus One Listeria is designed to accurately detect Listeria species (Listeria grayi, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. marthii, L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri, and L. welshimeri) from stainless steel and plastic environmental surface matrixes using an antibody-based technology test system paired with proprietary SOLO+ media and combined with manual or automated sample preparation method. Objective: Solus One Listeria was evaluated for inclusivity and exclusivity and a matrix comparison study for two environmental surfaces. Methods: Solus One Listeria was compared with the following reference method for the method comparison study: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 10 from stainless steel and plastic environmental surfaces. Both the manual and automated preparation methods were performed for stainless steel and plastic environmental surfaces. Results: For the inclusivity and exclusivity evaluation, Solus One Listeria correctly identified all 50 target organism isolates and correctly excluded all 30 nontarget strains that were analyzed. In the method comparison study, both Solus One Listeria manual and automated preparation methods demonstrated no significant differences based on probability of detection statistical analysis between presumptive and confirmed results or between candidate and reference method results for two environmental surfaces after 22-30 h of enrichment time. Probability of detection analysis of Solus One Listeria method robustness, product consistency (lot-to-lot), and stability studies using the automated preparation method demonstrated no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: The data from the study support the product claims of Solus One Listeria for the accurate detection of Listeria species, using both the manual and automated methods (using the Dynex DS2 instrument), on both environmental surfaces analyzed.