Access to psychological treatment for chronic cancer-related pain in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer-related pain (CRP) is among the most frequent collateral effects of cancer, with chronic CRP, lasting at least 3 months, affecting >40% of cancer survivors. Evidence-based treatments, including pain-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), are available, but it appears that cancer patients/survivors are often poorly informed about CRP or the potential benefits of CBT for such pain. This study examined current experience of Swedish cancer patients/survivors in relation to CRP. METHODS: Participants (N = 276; 83% female; mean age = 55.5 years, SD = 11.9) were recruited to an online survey via cancer websites in Sweden, and they provided information about their history of chronic CRP and whether they received information about or treatment for CRP from a healthcare professional. RESULTS: Participants had a history of breast (36%), gynecological (12%), lung (10%), colon (8%), and other forms of cancer (36%). A majority (74%) reported a history of chronic CRP and being prescribed analgesic medications (70%). Less than half (47%) received information from their healthcare provider about the risk of CRP and only 13% with chronic CRP received psychological treatment, and of these, only 33% received CBT. Among those receiving psychological treatment for chronic CRP, satisfaction rates were moderate, reported as an average of 6 on a 0-10 scale (standard deviation 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts are needed to raise awareness among cancer patients/survivors and healthcare providers about the risk of CRP and evidence-based interventions, including CBT, the first-line intervention for chronic pain. These efforts will need to be matched with increases in treatment capacity, particularly pain-focused CBT.

The contribution of psychological flexibility to functioning in people living with cancer-related pain.

BACKGROUND: Studies of individuals with non-cancer-related chronic pain find that higher levels of psychological flexibility (PF) are associated with less distress, better functioning, and a better response to treatment. People diagnosed with cancer are at a significantly increased risk of developing chronic cancer-related pain, the presence of which is associated with poorer health outcomes. Little is known about whether PF is applicable to cancer pain. The current study investigates the relationship between chronic cancer-related pain, distress and functioning, and three theoretical processes proposed by the PF model: pain acceptance, present-moment focus, and committed action. METHODS: Adults (n = 246) with a cancer diagnosis (current or previous), and living in Sweden, completed an online survey involving standardized measures of cancer-related pain (intensity and impairment), depression, fatigue, PF and social stigma. RESULTS: Moderate to strong correlations were found between PF and all variables. In regression analyses, PF, and particularly pain acceptance, accounted for a large and significant proportion of the observed variance in depression, pain-related and overall functioning, after controlling for cancer status, pain intensity and social stigma. CONCLUSION: Consistent with studies of non-cancer-related pain, higher levels of PF were strongly associated with lower levels of distress and better functioning in individuals with cancer-related pain. Further studies are needed to further explore these relationships and to determine whether psychosocial treatments targeting PF may be of benefit to people with chronic cancer-related pain. SIGNIFICANCE: This study explores the relationship between cancer-related pain (intensity and impairment), depression, fatigue, overall functioning, social stigma and PF. The findings suggest that higher levels of PF are associated with lower levels of distress and improved functioning in chronic cancer-related pain, after controlling for cancer status (current, in remission), pain intensity and social stigma.