Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast-ovarian families from a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic.

PURPOSE: Data from the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium suggest that the proportion of familial breast and ovarian cancers linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2 may be as high as 98% depending on the characteristics of the families, suggesting that mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 may entirely account for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. We sought to determine what proportion of families with both breast and ovarian cancers seen in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic are accounted for by coding region germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as compared to a linkage study group. We also evaluated what clinical parameters were predictive of mutation status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Affected women from 100 families with at least one case of breast cancer and at least one case of ovarian cancer in the same lineage were screened for germline mutations in the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis, a polymerase chain reaction-based heteroduplex analysis, or direct sequencing. RESULTS: Unequivocal deleterious mutations were found in 55% (55 of 100) of the families studied. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 80% and 20% of the mutations overall, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of detecting a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 in this study group were the presence of a single family member with both breast and ovarian cancer (P <.0009; odds ratio [OR], 5.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04 to 15.76) and a young average age at breast cancer diagnosis in the family (P <.0016; OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.38). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that at least half of breast/ovarian families evaluated in a high-risk cancer evaluation clinic may have germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Whether the remaining families have mutations in noncoding regions in BRCA1, mutations in other, as-yet-unidentified, low-penetrance susceptibility genes, or represent chance clustering remains to be determined.

Modification of BRCA1-associated breast cancer risk by the polymorphic androgen-receptor CAG repeat.

Compared with the general population, women who have inherited a germline mutation in the BRCA1 gene have a greatly increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, there is also substantial interindividual variability in the occurrence of breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers. We hypothesize that other genes, particularly those involved in endocrine signaling, may modify the BRCA1-associated age-specific breast cancer risk. We studied the effect of the CAG repeat-length polymorphism found in exon 1 of the androgen-receptor (AR) gene (AR-CAG). AR alleles containing longer CAG repeat lengths are associated with a decreased ability to activate androgen-responsive genes. Using a sample of women who inherited germline BRCA1 mutations, we compared AR-CAG repeat length in 165 women with and 139 women without breast cancer. We found that women were at significantly increased risk of breast cancer if they carried at least one AR allele with >/=28 CAG repeats. Women who carried an AR-CAG allele of >/=28, >/=29, or >/=30 repeats were given a diagnosis 0.8, 1.8, or 6.3 years earlier than women who did not carry at least one such allele. All 11 women in our sample who carried at least one AR-CAG allele with >/=29 repeats had breast cancer. Our results support the hypothesis that age at breast cancer diagnosis is earlier among BRCA1 mutation carriers who carry very long AR-CAG repeats. These results suggest that pathways involving androgen signaling may affect the risk of BRCA1-associated breast cancer.

BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in an unselected ovarian cancer population: relationship to family history and implications for genetic testing.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in a large, unselected population of ovarian cancer patients and to evaluate the relationship between mutation status and a routinely obtained family history of cancer. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred sixteen consecutive ovarian cancer patients seen for routine clinical care were examined for BRCA1, BRCA2, hMSH2, and hMLH1 gene mutations with use of the polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis, and direct gene sequencing. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate possible associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and specific familial characteristics. RESULTS: Among 116 unselected ovarian cancer patients we identified a total of 13 germline mutations in 12 patients: 10 in BRCA1, one each in hMSH2 and hMLH1, and a single BRCA2 mutation, which occurred in a patient also carrying a BRCA1 mutation. More than half the patients with BRCA1 mutations had family histories that would generally be considered unremarkable. Of 22 family history variables analyzed, only two (maternal family history of breast or ovarian cancer, p=0.037, and maternal family history of any cancer, p=0.020) conferred a significantly increased risk of carrying a BRCA1 mutation compared with ovarian cancer patients without such a history. However, the majority of ovarian cancer patients with these family histories and other suggestive histories tested negative for mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of ovarian cancers occur in association with genetic mutations known to predispose to the disease. A routinely obtained family history is an unreliable way to identify patients who might harbor mutations. The majority of ovarian cancer patients with suggestive family histories test negative for known gene mutations, perhaps suggesting the existence of additional undiscovered genes predisposing to ovarian cancer.

BRCA1 and BRCA2: from molecular genetics to clinical medicine.

Inherited susceptibility to breast cancer has been an area of intense investigation for the past 10 years. Early work focused on identifying modes of transmission, which culminated in the identification of chromosome 17q12-21 as the first human genomic region that harbored an autosomal dominant susceptibility gene for breast cancer (BRCA1) in 1990. BRCA1 was subsequently identified and was followed shortly by the identification of BRCA2. Research in the past 3 years has elucidated much about the mutation spectrum and mutation frequency of these genes in specific populations and is beginning to identify potential functions. Whereas progress in this area has been rapid and much is now known about inherited susceptibility to breast cancer, much more needs to be done to make these discoveries useful in the diagnosis, treatment, and ultimately, the prevention of breast cancer.

BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To define the incidence of BRCA1 mutations among patients seen in clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer, we analyzed DNA samples from women seen in this setting and constructed probability tables to provide estimates of the likelihood of finding a BRCA1 mutation in individual families. METHODS: Clinical information, family histories, and blood for DNA analysis were obtained from 263 women with breast cancer. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing were used to identify BRCA1 mutations. RESULTS: BRCA1 mutations were identified in 16 percent of women with a family history of breast cancer. Only 7 percent of women from families with a history of breast cancer but not ovarian cancer had BRCA1 mutations. The rates were higher among women from families with a history of both breast and ovarian cancer. Among family members, an average age of less than 55 years at the diagnosis of breast cancer, the presence of ovarian cancer, the presence of breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman, and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry were all associated with an increased risk of detecting a BRCA1 mutation. No association was found between the presence of bilateral breast cancer or the number of breast cancers in a family and the detection of a BRCA1 mutation, or between the position of the mutation in the BRCA1 gene and the presence of ovarian cancer in a family. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with breast cancer and a family history of the disease, the percentage with BRCA1 coding-region mutations is less than the 45 percent predicted by genetic-linkage analysis. These results suggest that even in a referral clinic specializing in screening women from high-risk families, the majority of tests for BRCA1 mutations will be negative and therefore uninformative.

Recent advances in breast cancer biology.

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States and is, in fact, the leading cause of death among women aged 30 to 70 years. In addition to being a major public health problem, this disease also provides an excellent model for understanding many aspects of cancer biology and genetics. As molecular and cellular mechanisms are elucidated, it is hoped that these advances can be translated into progress in breast cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. In this review we highlight some of the recent advances in breast cancer biology, with an emphasis on cancer genetics, mechanisms of invasion and metastasis, and drug resistance.

Suppression of mitogenic activity by stable expression of the regulatory domain of PKC beta.

The amino-terminal regulatory domain portion of each protein kinase C (PKC) family member (which in the case of PKC beta 1 includes the pseudosubstrate, C1, V1 and C2 domains) plays an important role in regulating the kinase activity of the carboxyl-terminal catalytic domain. To examine the possibility that this regulatory domain region (designated 'PAT') might have biological functions independent of the catalytic domain, we have developed derivatives of R6 cells which stably express a truncated PKC beta 1 cDNA that encodes the amino-terminal 317 amino acids, including the entire regulatory domain. These R6-plPAT cells express abundant amounts of a 38 kDa protein which binds a labeled phorbol ester, but lacks protein kinase activity. In contrast to the 79 kDa PKC beta 1 holoenzyme which, when overexpressed in R6 cells, is found mostly in the cytosol, the 38 kDa PAT protein is predominantly associated with the particulate subcellular fraction. Furthermore, the PAT protein fails to show down-regulation following treatment of R6-plPAT cells with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Evidence is also presented that TPA-stimulated growth is suppressed in R6-plPAT cells. These findings suggest that the PKC beta 1 regulatory domain could be involved in the suppression of mitogenic signaling.

Molecular epidemiology of lung cancer and the modulation of markers of chronic carcinogen exposure by chemopreventive agents.

Chronic inhalation exposure to environmental carcinogens such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), cigarette smoke, 4-aminobiphenyl (4-ABP), ethylene oxide, and styrene is associated with elevations in biomarkers such as DNA adducts, protein adducts, sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), chromosomal aberrations, gene mutation, and/or oncogene activation. These biomarkers indicate an increased cancer risk for the exposed population, although quantitative estimates cannot be made with certainty. There is convincing epidemiological evidence that the antioxidant and free radical-scavenging vitamins C and E and beta-carotene (beta-C) protect against cancer of the lung and other epithelial tissues, with somewhat weaker evidence for retinol. Experimental studies demonstrate that these micronutrients are capable of blocking or reducing tumor formation caused by diverse carcinogens. A variety of mechanisms appear to be involved, including suppression of carcinogen activation, enhancement of carcinogen detoxification, induction of cellular differentiation, inhibition of mutagenesis, enhancement of immunologic function, and/or reduction of the formation of carcinogen-DNA adducts, SCEs, micronuclei, and other markers of genotoxic damage. Therefore, we have recently investigated the possible modifying effect of serum vitamins C and E, beta-C, and retinol on a number of such biomarkers in a case-control study of lung cancer, and in a cross-sectional study of heavy smokers. Preliminary results indicate an inhibitory effect of certain vitamins on DNA adduct formation. A significant number of human intervention trials are ongoing involving these vitamins. It appears that biomarkers can provide useful intermediate endpoints for assessment of both the mechanisms and the efficacy of chemopreventive agents.