Predictors and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Osteosarcoma in Diverse Socioeconomic Backgrounds in Southeast Asia: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric osteosarcoma outcomes among developed and developing countries have not been previously compared. Countries in Southeast Asia (SEA) have a wide variety of socioeconomic statuses. A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to determine the prognostic factors and outcomes for pediatric osteosarcoma in SEA. METHODS: Pediatric patients with osteosarcoma treated between 1998 and 2017 in 4 SEA pediatric oncology centers were studied. Countries were classified using the World Bank Atlas method. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's Proportion Hazard Model were applied to estimate survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: In all, 149 patients with osteosarcoma with a mean age of 12.48±3.66 years were enrolled. The localized to metastatic disease ratio was 1.5:1. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 53.8% and 42%, respectively. Prognostic factors associated with outcomes were country, stage of disease, MTX-containing regimens, and surgery type (p-value <0.05). In patients with localized disease, EFS was superior with limb-salvage surgery (62%) than amputation or rotationplasty (40%) (p-value 0.009). MTX-containing chemotherapies provided higher OS (45.3%) and EFS (37.9%) than non-MTX regimens (12.3% and 10.7%, respectively) among metastatic patients (p-value 0.004 and 0.005, respectively). Metastatic disease was an independent prognostic factor for death but not relapse outcome.  Conclusion: The disease outcomes in SEA were acceptable compared to developed countries. The stage of disease was the only independent prognostic factor. MTX-containing regimens and limb-salvage surgery should be considered where possible.

Impact of treatment refusal and abandonment on survival outcomes in pediatric osteosarcoma in Southeast Asia: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment refusal and abandonment (TxRA) are major barriers to improving outcomes among children with sarcomas of the extremities as curative treatment options bearing on amputation or disfiguring surgery, particularly in countries with limited resources. A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to determine the predictive factors for TxRA among patients with osteosarcoma associated with survival outcomes across Southeast Asia (SEA). METHODS: Pediatric patients with osteosarcoma treated between January 1998 and December 2017 in four SEA pediatric oncology centers from three countries were studied. Nelson-Aalen estimates, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's proportion hazard model were applied to address the cumulative incidence, survival outcomes, and to identify prognostic factors associated with TxRA. RESULTS: From a total of 208 patients with osteosarcoma enrolled; 18 (8.7%) patients refused and 41 (19.7%) patients abandoned treatment. Income classification of countries, age at diagnosis, tumor size, disease extent, chemotherapy protocols, and types of surgery were associated with TxRA. Tumor size more than 15 cm was an independent risk factor associated with TxRA. The 5-year overall and relapse-free survivals were 49.4% and 50.4%, respectively. However, these rates declined further to 37.9% and 35.8%, respectively, when TxRA were considered as events. Tumor size larger than 15 cm and metastatic disease were independent risk factors associated with TxRA-sensitive outcomes. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of TxRA was high in SEA, particularly in lower middle-income countries. Factors associated with TxRA related to tumor burden. Treatment outcomes could be substantially improved by lowering the refusal and abandonment rates.

Pediatric Solid Tumor Care and Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Southeast Asia.

PURPOSE: Pediatric solid tumors require coordinated multidisciplinary specialist care. However, expertise and resources to conduct multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) are lacking in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to profile the landscape of pediatric solid tumor care and practices and perceptions on MDTBs among pediatric solid tumor units (PSTUs) in Southeast Asian LMICs. METHODS: Using online surveys, availability of specialty manpower and MDTBs among PSTUs was first determined. From the subset of PSTUs with MDTBs, one pediatric surgeon and one pediatric oncologist from each center were queried using 5-point Likert scale questions adapted from published questionnaires. RESULTS: In 37 (80.4%) of 46 identified PSTUs, availability of pediatric-trained specialists was as follows: oncologists, 94.6%; surgeons, 91.9%; radiologists, 54.1%; pathologists, 40.5%; radiation oncologists, 29.7%; nuclear medicine physicians, 13.5%; and nurses, 81.1%. Availability of pediatric-trained surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists was significantly associated with the existence of MDTBs (P = .037, .005, and .022, respectively). Among 43 (89.6%) of 48 respondents from 24 PSTUs with MDTBs, 90.5% of oncologists reported > 50% oncology-dedicated workload versus 22.7% of surgeons. Views on benefits and barriers did not significantly differ between oncologists and surgeons. The majority agreed that MDTBs helped to improve accuracy of treatment recommendations and team competence. Complex cases, insufficient radiology and pathology preparation, and need for supplementary investigations were the top barriers. CONCLUSION: This first known profile of pediatric solid tumor care in Southeast Asia found that availability of pediatric-trained subspecialists was a significant prerequisite for pediatric MDTBs in this region. Most PSTUs lacked pediatric-trained pathologists and radiologists. Correspondingly, gaps in radiographic and pathologic diagnoses were the most common limitations for MDTBs. Greater emphasis on holistic multidisciplinary subspecialty development is needed to advance pediatric solid tumor care in Southeast Asia.