Optimal Quantification of Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison of Volumetric and Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Methods to Predict Outcome.

Background Effective orifice area (EOA) ≥0.2 cm2 or regurgitant volume (Rvol) ≥30 mL predicts prognostic significance in functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Both volumetric and proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) methods enable calculation of these metrics. To determine their clinical value, we compared EOA and Rvol derived by volumetric and PISA quantitation upon outcome of patients with FMR. Methods and Results We examined the outcome of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and moderate to severe FMR. All had a complete echocardiogram including EOA and Rvol by both standard PISA and volumetric quantitation using total stroke volume calculated by left ventricular end-diastolic volume×left ventricular ejection fraction and forward flow by Doppler method: EOA=Rvol/mitral regurgitation velocity time integral. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. We examined 177 patients: mean left ventricular ejection fraction 25.2% and 34.5% with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Echo measurements were greater by PISA than volumetric quantitation: EOA (0.18 versus 0.11 cm2), Rvol (24.7 versus 16.9 mL), and regurgitant fraction (61 versus 37 %) respectively (all P value <0.001). During 3.6±2.3 years' follow-up, patients with EOA ≥0.2 cm2 or Rvol ≥30 mL had a worse outcome than those with EOA <0.2 cm2 or Rvol <30 mL only by volumetric (log rank P=0.003 and 0.004) but not PISA quantitation (log rank P=0.984 and 0.544), respectively. Conclusions Volumetric and PISA methods yield different measurements of EOA and Rvol in FMR; volumetric values exhibit greater prognostic significance. The echo method of quantifying FMR may affect the management of this disorder.

Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors of Reduced Survival in Patient with Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with a poor outcome in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two recent studies of percutaneous mitral valvular repair therapy reported disparate results, likely due in part to variable risk among FMR patients. The aim of this study is to define echocardiographic factors of prognostic significance in FMR patients, and particularly to compare ischemic and nonischemic FMR. We followed three hundred sixteen consecutive patients (age 60 ± 14 years, men 70%) with FMR and LVEF ≤ 35% between January 2010 and December 2015 (mean follow-up 3.7 years). Patients were categorized into ischemic (39.6%) and nonischemic (60.4%). MR was graded according to the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Although echo findings were similar between ischemic and nonischemic patient, the incidence of death, heart transplantation (HT), or LVAD implantation was higher in ischemic than in nonischemic patients (Log rank p = 0.001). In age and gender adjusted multivariate (11 variables) Cox regression analysis, left atrium volume index (LAVI) was associated with death, HT, or LVAD with hazard ratio of 2.1 for patients with FMR (p = 0.003). LAVI greater than 48.7 mL/m2 predicts adverse outcome in both nonischemic and ischemic FMR (AUC 0.62, p < 0.001). Combined ischemic FMR with LAVI ≥ 48.7 mL/m2 had the highest incident rate of all groups. In conclusion, despite similar LV function and MR severity, ischemic FMR patients had higher mortality than nonischemic patients. Of all echocardiographic parameters, an LAVI ≥ 48.7 mL/m2 predicted adverse clinical outcome.

Evaluation of Routine Coronary Angiography Before Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: At the University of California, San Diego, routine coronary angiography has generally been performed in men 40 years of age and older and women 45 years of age and older before pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in this population has not been evaluated, however, and the optimal screening strategy has not been established. This study sought to evaluate whether the current approach may be better optimized on the basis of cardiac risk factors. METHODS: This study included 462 consecutive patients with CTEPH who were undergoing preoperative coronary angiography for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Baseline demographic and medical information was recorded. Major cardiac risk factors included: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, body mass index 25 kg/m2 or greater, tobacco use, and family history of CAD. Charts were then reviewed for presence of significant CAD and revascularization. RESULTS: Significant CAD was found in 13.4% of patients who underwent routine preoperative coronary angiography; it was present in only 5% of patients younger than 50 years of age, compared with 16% of patients 50 years old and older. No patient younger than 50 years of age without cardiac risk factors was found to have significant CAD. Furthermore, in patients younger than 50 years of age, significant CAD was found only among those with 3 or more major risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In patients younger than 50 years of age with CTEPH, the prevalence of significant CAD was low. Omitting preoperative coronary angiography in this subset of patients is reasonable when no coronary risk factors are present. Preoperative coronary angiography is warranted in individuals 50 years of age and older, as well as in those younger than 50 years who have significant risk factors for CAD.

Systematic Assessment of the Impact of Ultrasound-Enhancing Agents upon Measurements of Cardiac Size and Function by Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography with an ultrasound-enhancing contrast agent (CON) is a powerful tool for identifying the endocardial border. However, the precise relationship of measurements obtained from CON to the reference values of two-dimensional unenhanced echocardiography (BASL) remains undefined, especially regarding wall thickness. The aim of this study was to systematically determine the differences between unenhanced and enhanced images for a broad range of left ventricular (LV) measurements and to define reference values for the relationship between the two methods. METHODS: We examined the echocardiograms of 624 consecutive patients in whom CON was performed for clinical indications. We excluded 192 patients in whom studies were technically difficult for measurement by either or both methods. Echocardiograms were from standard parasternal and apical views according to American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Recordings were measured for wall thickness and chamber dimension in 343 patients and for LV volumes and ejection fraction in 212 patients. RESULTS: LV wall thickness measurements were systematically reduced with a bias of 0.2 cm with limits of agreement (LOA) from -0.5 to 0.16 cm in interventricular septal thickness, and from -0.46 to 0.13 cm in posterior wall thickness in CON. LV dimensions and volumes systematically increased with a bias of 0.2 cm (LOA, -0.19 to 0.58 cm) and 14 to 16 mL (LOA, -11.9 to 42.8 mL), respectively. LV ejection fraction systematically decreased with a bias of 3.4% (LOA, -13.5% to 6.8%) in CON compared to BASL. All differences showed normal distribution in the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. CONCLUSION: CON yields significantly different measurements of cardiac size and function compared to unenhanced imaging. These data define the systematic differences in measurements between CON and BASL images; the range of differences is narrow. These differences may influence management when the measurement value is a borderline.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is a supraventricular arrhythmia that adversely affects cardiac function and increases the risk of stroke. It is the most common arrhythmia and a major source of morbidity and mortality; its prevalence increases with age. Pulse rate is sensitive, but not specific, for diagnosis, and suspected atrial fibrillation should be confirmed with 12-lead electrocardiography. Because normal electrocardiographic findings do not rule out atrial fibrillation, home monitoring is recommended if there is clinical suspicion of arrhythmia despite normal test results. Treatment is based on decisions made regarding when to convert to normal sinus rhythm vs. when to treat with rate control, and, in either case, how to best reduce the risk of stroke. For most patients, rate control is preferred to rhythm control. Ablation therapy is used to destroy abnormal foci responsible for atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulation reduces the risk of stroke while increasing the risk of bleeding. The CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system assesses the risk of stroke, with a score of 2 or greater indicating a need for anticoagulation. The HAS-BLED score estimates the risk of bleeding. Scores of 3 or greater indicate high risk. Warfarin, dabigatran, factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban), and aspirin are options for stroke prevention. Selection of therapy should be individualized based on risks and potential benefits, cost, and patient preference. Left atrial appendage obliteration is an option for reducing stroke risk. Two implantable devices used to occlude the appendage, the Watchman and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug, appear to be as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke, but they are invasive. Another percutaneous approach to occlusion, wherein the left atrium is closed off using the Lariat, is also available, but data on its long-term effectiveness and safety are still limited. Surgical treatments for atrial fibrillation are reserved for patients who are undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons.

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular function is impaired in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) have been shown to help assess right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension. Our goal was to (1) assess TAPSE and RVFAC before and after PTE, and (2) assess correlation of these variables with right heart catheterization data and PVR. METHODS: We evaluated 67 consecutive patients with CTEPH for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). Of these 67 patients, 48 were deemed surgical candidates. Preoperative right heart catheterization was performed within 1.3±1.2 days of the preoperative echocardiogram. All postoperative right heart catheterizations were performed on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: TAPSE dropped from 18±6 to 10±3 mm after PTE (P<.0001). RVFAC remained the same (25%±10% vs 30%±12%). Mean pulmonary artery (mPAP) pressure dropped from 45±12 to 28±6 mm Hg after PTE, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased from 757±406 to 306±147 dyne-s/cm5 (P<.0001 for both). Before PTE, TAPSE correlated inversely with PVR (r=-.57, P<.0001, TAPSE=-5.904×ln[PVR]+56.318). RVFAC did not correlate well with PVR or mean pulmonary artery pressure. After PTE, both TAPSE and RVFAC correlated poorly with PVR (r=-.12 and .01, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with CTEPH, TAPSE paradoxically decreased by 50% early after PTE. TAPSE correlated inversely with PVR prior to PTE, but this correlation was lost completely after PTE. Thus, despite the immediate and marked decrease in afterload postoperatively, TAPSE did not improve; thus, TAPSE cannot be used as an early marker for surgical success.

Intracoronary Gene Transfer of Adenylyl Cyclase 6 in Patients With Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Gene transfer has rarely been tested in randomized clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracoronary delivery of adenovirus 5 encoding adenylyl cyclase 6 (Ad5.hAC6) in heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in US medical centers (randomization occurred from July 19, 2010, to October 30, 2014). Participants 18 to 80 years with symptomatic heart failure (ischemic and nonischemic) and an ejection fraction (EF) of 40% or less were screened; 86 individuals were enrolled, and 56 were randomized. Data analysis was of the intention-to-treat population. Participants underwent exercise testing and measurement of left ventricular EF (echocardiography) and then cardiac catheterization, where left ventricular pressure development (+dP/dt) and decline (-dP/dt) were recorded. Participants were randomized (3:1 ratio) to receive 1 of 5 doses of intracoronary Ad5.hAC6 or placebo. Participants underwent a second catheterization 4 weeks later for measurement of dP/dt. Exercise testing and EF were assessed 4 and 12 weeks after randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Intracoronary administration of Ad5.hAC6 (3.2 × 109 to 1012 virus particles) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points included exercise duration and EF before and 4 and 12 weeks after randomization and peak rates of +dP/dt and -dP/dt before and 4 weeks after randomization. Fourteen placebo participants were compared (intention to treat) with 24 Ad5.hAC6 participants receiving the highest 2 doses (D4 + 5). RESULTS: Fifty-six individuals were randomized and monitored for up to 1 year. Forty-two participants (75%) received Ad5.hAC6 (mean [SE] age, 63 [1] years; EF, 30% [1%]), and 14 individuals (25%) received placebo (age, 62 [1] years; EF, 30% [2%]). Exercise duration showed no significant group differences (4 weeks, P = .27; 12 weeks, P = .47, respectively). The D4 + 5 participants had increased EF at 4 weeks (+6.0 [1.7] EF units; n = 21; P < .004), but not 12 weeks (+3.0 [2.4] EF units; n = 21; P = .16). Placebo participants showed no increase in EF at 4 weeks or 12 weeks. Exercise duration showed no between-group differences (4-week change from baseline: placebo, 27 [36] seconds; D4 + 5, 44 [25] seconds; P = .27; 12-week change from baseline: placebo, 44 [28] seconds; D4 + 5, 58 [29 seconds, P = .47). AC6 gene transfer increased basal left ventricular peak -dP/dt (4-week change from baseline: placebo, +93 [51] mm Hg/s; D4 + 5, -39 [33] mm Hg/s; placebo [n = 21]; P < .03); AC6 did not increase arrhythmias. The admission rate for patients with heart failure was 9.5% (4 of 42) in the AC6 group and 28.6% (4 of 14) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.08-1.36]; P = .10). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: AC6 gene transfer safely increased LV function beyond standard heart failure therapy, attainable with one-time administration. Larger trials are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00787059.

Cardiac Limited Ultrasound Examination Techniques to Augment the Bedside Cardiac Physical Examination.

The current practice of physical diagnosis is dependent on physician skills and biases, inductive reasoning, and time efficiency. Although the clinical utility of echocardiography is well known, few data exist on how to integrate 2-dimensional screening "quick-look" ultrasound applications into a novel, modernized cardiac physical examination. We discuss the evidence basis behind ultrasound "signs" pertinent to the cardiovascular system and elemental in synthesis of bedside diagnoses and propose the application of a brief cardiac limited ultrasound examination based on these signs. An ultrasound-augmented cardiac physical examination can be taught in traditional medical education and has the potential to improve bedside diagnosis and patient care.

Prevalence of coronary artery-pulmonary artery collaterals in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

This study sought to determine the prevalence of coronary artery-pulmonary artery collaterals in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and to correlate their presence with the degree of clot burden. CTEPH is a treatable cause of severe pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure. Bronchopulmonary collateral vessels have been used as a supplementary diagnostic and prognostic tool for this disease. Coronary artery-pulmonary artery collaterals in this population have not been described. The coronary angiograms of 300 consecutive patients with CTEPH evaluated for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) between January 1, 2007, and May 1, 2014, were examined. Of these patients, 259 (50% male; mean age, 58.3 ± 10.6 years) had cineangiographic images deemed adequate to definitively assess for the presence of coronary artery-pulmonary artery collaterals and were included in the final analyses. Pulmonary angiogram reports were reviewed for extent of pulmonary artery obstruction. The coronary angiograms of 259 age- and sex-matched control patients were also examined. Among 259 CTEPH patients with definitive imaging, 34 coronary artery-pulmonary artery collaterals were found in 28 patients (10.8%), versus 1 coronary artery-pulmonary artery collateral among control subjects (0.4%; P < 0.001). Compared with CTEPH patients without collaterals, patients with collaterals had a significantly higher prevalence of total occlusion of their right or left main pulmonary artery (P < 0.001) or lobar arteries (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the prevalence of coronary artery-pulmonary artery collaterals in CTEPH patients undergoing coronary angiography for possible PTE is approximately 11%. These vessels are associated with more severe pulmonary artery occlusion.

Right ventricular strain before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) function is significantly impaired in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Two-dimensional speckle tracking RV strain and strain rate are novel methods to assess regional RV systolic function in CTEPH patients before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). Our goal was to (1) assess baseline longitudinal strain and strain rate of the basal RV free wall in CTEPH and (2) measure early changes in RV strain and strain rate after PTE. METHODS: We performed echocardiography on 30 consecutive patients with CTEPH referred for PTE with adequate pre- and post-PTE strain imaging. Strain and strain rate were assessed 6.4 ± 4.5 days before and 9.1 ± 3.9 after PTE. RESULTS: Basal RV free wall strain and time to peak strain-but not basal RV strain rate and time to peak strain rate-changed significantly after PTE. Unexpectedly, basal RV strain became less negative, from -24.3% to -18.9% after PTE (P = 0.005). Time to peak strain decreased from 356 to 287 msec after PTE (P < 0.001). Preoperatively, RV strain correlated with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) but this relationship was not evident postoperatively. Furthermore, the change in RV strain did not correlate with the change in mPAP or PVR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CTEPH, RV basal strain paradoxically became less negative (i.e., relative systolic shortening decreased) following PTE. This change in RV strain could be due to intraoperative RV ischemia and/or postoperative stunning. Thus, RV basal strain cannot be used as a surrogate marker for surgical success early after PTE.

Assessment of left atrial volume before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Impaired left ventricular diastolic filling is common in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and recent studies support left ventricular underfilling as a cause. To investigate this further, we assessed left atrial volume index (LAVI) in patients with CTEPH before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive CTEPH patients had pre- & post-PTE echocardiograms and right heart catheterizations. Parameters included mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), cardiac index, LAVI, & mitral E/A ratio. Echocardiograms were performed 6 ± 3 days pre-PTE and 10 ± 4 days post-PTE. Regression analyses compared pre- and post-PTE LAVI with other parameters. RESULTS: Pre-op LAVI (mean 19.0 ± 7 mL/m2) correlated significantly with pre-op PVR (R = -0.45, p = 0.001), mPAP (R = -0.28, p = 0.05) and cardiac index (R = 0.38, p = 0.006). Post-PTE, LAVI increased by 18% to 22.4 ± 7 mL/m2 (p = 0.003). This change correlated with change in PVR (765 to 311 dyne-s/cm5, p = 0.01), cardiac index (2.6 to 3.2 L/min/m2, p = 0.02), and E/A (.95 to 1.44, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In CTEPH, smaller LAVI is associated with lower cardiac output, higher mPAP, and higher PVR. LAVI increases by ~20% after PTE, and this change correlates with changes in PVR and mitral E/A. The rapid increase in LAVI supports the concept that left ventricular diastolic impairment and low E/A pre-PTE are due to left heart underfilling rather than inherent left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: utility of right heart Doppler measurements.

UNLABELLED: The ratio of tricuspid regurgitation velocity divided by the velocity-time integral of right ventricular outflow tract pulsed-wave Doppler tracing (TRV/VTI(RVOT) ) has been used to estimate pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). However, this method has not been validated in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We assessed the utility of TRV/VTI(RVOT) in patients with CTEPH and PVR from 2 to 20 WU. All had right heart catheterization (RHC) within 2 days of echocardiography. TRV/VTI(RVOT) was calculated and RHC-derived pressures, PVR, and cardiac outputs were recorded. Mean pulmonary artery pressure was 47 ± 12 mmHg, cardiac output: 4.2 ± 1.1 L/min, PVR: 9 ± 4 WU, right atrial pressure: 12 ± 6 mmHg. Mean VTI(RVOT) was 13 ± 5 cm; mean TRV was 4.2 ± 0.8 m/s, mean tricuspid regurgitation severity was 2.5 ± 0.8 (1 = trace, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe). Regression analysis demonstrated a correlation between RHC PVR and TRV/VTI(RVOT) : PVR = 19.4 × (TRV/VTI(RVOT) ) + 2.4 (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). However, Bland-Altman analysis found a poor degree of agreement between echo-derived PVR and RHC PVR. We also studied 28 patients with non-CTEPH pulmonary hypertension. Similar analysis revealed a regression equation of PVR = 20.1 × (TRV/VTIR(RVOT) ) + 0.3 (r = 0.57, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: TRV/VTI(RVOT) is only marginally useful for estimating PVR in CTEPH (r = 0.74). Moreover, the regression equation in CTEPH differs significantly from previous studies in pulmonary hypertension. Reasons for this may include the markedly elevated PVR levels in this population and specific effects on VTI(RVOT) from CTEPH.

Diminished aortic excursion in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have found diminished aortic root motion in left ventricular systolic dysfunction, few data exist on aortic root excursion in isolated right ventricular dysfunction due to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to evaluate aortic root excursion in CTEPH. METHODS: We studied 20 consecutive patients with CTEPH, normal left ventricular ejection fraction and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, and 10 normal control subjects. Anterior excursion of the aortic root was measured using M-mode echocardiography as the difference between the maximal and minimal anterior distance of the posterior wall of the aortic root at the level of the aortic valve. RESULTS: Mean aortic excursion for CTEPH patients was approximately half that of normal controls (0.66 ± 0.25 cm vs. 1.16 ± 0.15 cm, P < 0.0001). There was a significant inverse linear correlation between mean pulmonary artery pressure and aortic excursion in the CTEPH group (r = 0.66, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aortic excursion is diminished in the right ventricular pressure overload of CTEPH. This impaired motion of the aortic root may influence systolic expansion of the left atrium, and may contribute to the impaired left atrial diastolic filling patterns often seen in patients with CTEPH.

Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and treatment.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. It impairs cardiac function and increases the risk of stroke. The incidence of atrial fibrillation increases with age. Key treatment issues include deciding when to restore normal sinus rhythm, when to control rate only, and how to prevent thromboembolism. Rate control is the preferred management option in most patients. Rhythm control is an option for patients in whom rate control cannot be achieved or who have persistent symptoms despite rate control. The current recommendation for strict rate control is a resting heart rate of less than 80 beats per minute. However, one study has shown that more lenient rate control of less than 110 beats per minute while at rest was not inferior to strict rate control in preventing cardiac death, heart failure, stroke, and life-threatening arrhythmias. Anticoagulation therapy is needed with rate control and rhythm control to prevent stroke. Warfarin is superior to aspirin and clopidogrel in preventing stroke despite its narrow therapeutic range and increased risk of bleeding. Tools that predict the risk of stroke (e.g., CHADS2) and the risk of bleeding (e.g., Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index) are helpful in making decisions about anticoagulation therapy. Surgical options for atrial fibrillation include disruption of abnormal conduction pathways in the atria, and obliteration of the left atrial appendage. Catheter ablation is an option for restoring normal sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and normal left atrial size. Referral to a cardiologist is warranted in patients who have complex cardiac disease; who are symptomatic on or unable to tolerate pharmacologic rate control; or who may be candidates for ablation or surgical interventions.

The dilated coronary sinus: utility of coronary sinus cross-sectional area and eccentricity index in differentiating right atrial pressure overload from persistent left superior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension and right atrial pressure overload (RAPO) cause dilation of the coronary sinus (CS). Persistent connection of the left superior vena cava (LSVC) to the CS is another cause of CS dilation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of coronary sinus cross-sectional area (CSA) and eccentricity index (EI) in differentiating persistent LSVC from right heart overload and RAPO in patients with dilated CS. METHODS: We identified 15 patients with a dilated CS by echocardiography. Offline analysis was used to measure CS-CSA and CS-EI at end-diastole in the parasternal long axis plane. EI was defined as B/A, where A is the widest diameter and major axis of the CS, and B is the diameter of the minor axis (perpendicular to and bisecting A at its midpoint). Persistent LSVC was confirmed by either computed tomography or injection of agitated saline in the left antecubital vein. RESULTS: CS-CSA was significantly larger in PLSVC group than in group with RAPO. Also, CS-EI was lower in PLSVC than in RAPO group (P = 0.0003). EI was the most sensitive and specific discriminator between patients with persistent LSVC vs. RAPO. CS-EI was <0.8 in all PLSVC patients and >0.8 in all RAPO patients (sensitivity and specificity = 100%). CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent LSVC have a significantly higher CS-CSA than those with elevated RA pressure. When dilated CS is present, a CS-EI <0.8 is 100% sensitive and specific for persistent LSVC. Thus, the CS-EI can be used in cases of dilated CS to diagnose the presence of persistent LSVC with a very high degree of certainty, and can help differentiate this congenital anomaly from RAPO.

Elongated eustachian valve dividing the right atrium.

A 64-year-old man underwent transthoracic echocardiography after a syncopal event. Two-dimensional imaging demonstrated a linear density that appeared to divide the right atrium. Color doppler imaging demonstrated that inflow from the inferior vena cava, but not from the superior vena cava, was obstructed by this density. Injection of agitated saline through an upper extremity vein demonstrated that the linear density did create a functional separation of the right atrium. The contrast material also crossed the interatrial septum within two cardiac cycles. This constellation of findings is consistent with an elongated eustachian valve and a patent foramen ovale.

Left ventricular strain and strain rate by 2D speckle tracking in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular (LV) strain and strain rate (SR) by 2D speckle tracking may be useful tools to assess chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) severity as well as response to successful pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). METHODS: We evaluated 30 patients with CTEPH before and after PTE using 2D speckle tracking measurements of LV radial and circumferential strain and SR in the short axis, and correlated the data with right heart catheterization (RHC). RESULTS: PTE resulted in a decrease in mean PA pressure (44 ± 15 to 29 ± 9 mmHg), decrease in PVR (950 ± 550 to 31 ± 160 [dyne-sec]/cm5), and an increase in cardiac output (3.9 ± 1.0 to 5.0 ± 1.0 L/min, p < 0.001 for all). Circumferential and posterior wall radial strain changed by -11% and +15% respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Circumferential SR and posterior wall radial SR changed by -7% and 6% after PTE. While the increase in posterior wall SR with PTE reached statistical significance (p = 0.04) circumferential SR did not (p = 0.07). In addition, septal radial strain and SR did not change significantly after PTE (p = 0.1 and 0.8 respectively). Linear regression analyses of circumferential and posterior wall radial strain and SR revealed little correlation between strain/SR measurements and PVR, mean PA pressure, or cardiac output. However, change in circumferential strain and change in posterior wall radial strain correlated moderately well with changes in PVR, mean PA pressure and cardiac output (r = 0.69, 0.76, and 0.51 for circumferential strain [p < 0.001 for all] and r = 0.7, 0.7, 0.45 for posterior wall radial strain [p = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.02, respectively]). CONCLUSIONS: LV circumferential and posterior wall radial strain change after relief of pulmonary arterial obstruction in patients with CTEPH, and these improvements occur rapidly. These changes in LV strain may reflect effects from improved LV diastolic filling, and may be useful non-invasive markers of successful PTE.