Effects of an Experiential Trauma Bootcamp on PGY 3 Anesthesiology Residents' Knowledge and Confidence Levels.

Background: Bootcamp-style education involves short, intense educational sessions and is a proven educational modality in anesthesia medical education. However, rarely has it been used with senior anesthesiology residents and never in exposing these residents to a curriculum aimed at care of the trauma patient. The purpose of this study was to design and implement an experiential bootcamp to prepare anesthesiology residents to take senior trauma call at a Level 1 trauma center in the Southeastern United States. Methods: Before taking senior trauma call, 21 postgraduate year 3 anesthesiology residents took part in an 8-hour trauma bootcamp that combined flipped classroom-style education with immersive, procedural, and augmented reality simulation facilitated by subject matter experts. Before and after the bootcamp, residents completed 17-item confidence and 20-item knowledge questionnaires developed by the study authors. Results were compared before and after the bootcamp to determine overall change in confidence and knowledge levels pertaining to caring for trauma patients and taking senior trauma call. Additionally, residents completed an evaluation measuring their perceptions of the benefit of the educational offering. Results: Statistically significant increases were seen in 16 out of 17 confidence questions (P < .001) and 12 out of 20 knowledge questions (P < .001). Additionally, respondents indicated that they found the content to be valuable and likely to improve their care delivery within the clinical setting. Conclusions: Following this bootcamp, postcourse surveys demonstrated that residents' knowledge and confidence increased significantly through simulation combined with a flipped-classroom approach in preparation for senior trauma call.

Comparing traditional, immersive simulation with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in postgraduate year 2 anesthesiology residents.

BACKGROUND: Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) is an increasingly popular simulation technique that allows learners to achieve mastery of skills through repetition, feedback, and increasing difficulty. This manuscript describes the implementation and assessment of RCDP in an anesthesia residency curriculum. METHODS: Researchers describe the comparison of RCDP with traditional instructional methods for anesthesiology residents' application of Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) and communication principles in a simulated environment. Residents (n = 21) were randomly assigned to either Traditional or RCDP education groups, with each resident attending 2 days of bootcamp. On their first day, the Traditional group received a lecture, then participated in a group, immersive simulation with reflective debriefing. The RCDP group received education through an RCDP simulation session. On their second bootcamp day, all participants individually engaged in an immersive simulation, then completed the "Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning" survey. Application of ECC and communication principles during the simulation was scored by a blinded reviewer through video review. Participants ended the bootcamp by ranking the experiences they found most valuable. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the different group members' individual performances during the immersive simulation, nor in the experiences they deemed most valuable. However, the Traditional education group reported higher levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning in 5 areas (p = 0.004-0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of RCDP or Traditional education grouping, anesthesia residents demonstrated no difference in ECC skill level or perceived value of interventions. However, members of the Traditional education group reported higher levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in numerous areas. Additional RCDP opportunities in the anesthesia residency program should be considered prior to excluding it as an educational method in our program.

Experience Is the Teacher of All Things: Prior Participation in Anesthesiology OSCEs Enhances Communication of Treatment Options With Simulated High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether previous experiences within an anesthesiology-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessing communication and professionalism skills was associated with improved performance in a subsequent anesthesiology-based OSCE scenario. METHODS: This retrospective multi-center study used the performance data of 44 Post Graduate Year 4 clinical anesthesia residents from 3 US anesthesiology residency programs on an OSCE scenario that assessed the residents' effectiveness of discussing anesthesiology-specific treatment options with a high-risk patient. Residents from 2 of the programs had no prior anesthesiology-based OSCE experience. Residents from the third program had previously participated in 4 separate multi-scenario anesthesiology-based OSCE sessions in the 2 years prior to this study. Participating residents completed the same scenario at their respective institutions' simulation center. Ten performances were randomly selected for double rating to assess the interrater reliability of the assessments. Interrater reliability was good for the scenario (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66, 95% confidence interval = 0.12-0.90). Performance difference between groups with different OSCE experience status were examined using an independent sample t test, with a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Independent sample t test found prior OSCE experience was significantly associated with higher performance scores (t = 2.53, P = .02). The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test result confirmed this finding (z = 3.28, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study provide preliminary evidence that anesthesiology-based OSCE experience is associated with improved performance in an OSCE scenario, specifically regarding discussions of treatment options with high-risk patients.